Hello, everyone! ToTheMoon Canal. Technology news and sites from the Silicon Valley all over the world. And we have a magical intelligence, yes.
Sam Altman has shown that they have updated the personalization page. This once again reflects that the market as a whole is different. All shares are worth a lot. Dad, if Google's looking and you have an AI-mode search, that's what this AI-mode eats twenty-six times more, uh, energy.
All people just need to come to this and understand what can be used in a much more productive key.
Look, I'll start with the presentation. Yesterday, Zuckerberg presented new points to the presentation. I'm thinking about points that, uh, smart ones that are with AI, cameras, dynamics, microphones. Something needs to be put on a finger or hand, which helps to do more detail. How convenient is this interface? I think that in the world AI, at least what happened in the last two years, this scenario seems to be not very working, that I should put on a head-on-one thing to, uh, get something from it. additional information. Who's gonna be in town all the time with glasses, except some tests? What do you think of this story? Because sales in the world are very small. Well, if you see the number of people on Earth, if ChatGPT declares-- OpenAI says they have seven hundred, uh, million users of weekly, and the glasses sold there in history are four to six million. The owners, in general, have smart points. And how much people actually use them. How good is this trend, and especially for Meta? I think it's a little bit of a bet on the wrong side. Although Zuckerberg, I'm going to go, I'm very excited about glasses.
Look, it's like any gyak product, yeah, or any tech stuff. The first ones are attracted to giki. So with the ChatGPT, it was the same. It's from every cliff now, every grandmother knows there's some sort of ChatGPT answering questions. And if we take it when three and a half of them came along, well, very few people used it. And then, just if the technology is good, it starts to spread. Same with technological gadget. These are warehouse phones, yes, they've been there once, and now they're more and more frequent with ordinary people. And before, only technological enthusiasm used them. The same thing is with these kinds of glasses. Until they're not very comfortable until they're very functional, they're only used by those who are really interested. You can call them guiki, right? Now, if the technology is convenient and this, uh, threshold for other people, that you need to put something on, the battery in your pocket, and put it on the wire somehow or something like that. The previous Horizon, which is why other people will be slowly stretched. I mean, it looks like almost all the technologies are developing. But I agree that the glasses would be a little faster, of course, because Apple's his Vision Pro when they put it, it's gonna be two years soon, yeah, closer to winter. That's why, as if time was coming, there was no real good use of glasses, but Meta is actually moving this story.
Let's see what happens.
Oh, I think the bet is that it's gonna be next, uh, the motto, the popular Consymerian motto. And Meta wants to dive, wants to dive. But I think that's a standard problem, yes, that is, that Meta has, like they built a machine to coinate content, they've been pumped instagram, and, like, from the 17th to the twenty-first, they're, like, Completely dominated. First they lost, and first, Instagram lost his whole relevance because of TikTok. I mean, Instagram is not exactly where something happens in the world. There's definitely something going on somewhere not in Instagram. Oh, and the next stage, of course, is what they lose. They lost their advantage as, uh, as a company that produces the coolest open source of technology. In the context of the open source of Meta, no one else speaks either in the context of web technologies, but not in the context of AI. And directly in AI consumer experience, that's, they're zero. I mean, no progress has been made on the frontline since the ChatGPT release. How much longer? Three years? Three years, yes. I mean, that's the kind of situation. So they'd like to start investing a long time ago when they were really the leader, and they thought they should open up new horizons, but now they're really behind us.
Even in their core business, they're not number one anymore.
Look, did they get something new from AI? How does the market respond to that? As they're discussed in terms of the team, the new manager is here. Two months ago, and they hired a lot of engineers. Well, someone's gone, he hasn't left. What do they say in the market from the point of view inside of them within the framework of artificial intelligence?
What's going on with artificial intelligence? I guess it's okay. We don't even have any news about this. I mean, I-- I don't have any hidden information. I think that in the public space, there is no specific plan, or results. I mean, I think it's zero. So they license models from other providers, that's the only thing they know.
Well, let's see how they're going to develop.
And Tanya, what do you think about the glasses? How does this gadget apply or want to buy from the perspective of, for example, your environment? I'm not even talking professionally, but in life, because I think they're making a device that should be complete in terms of life. And yet I'm personally waiting for something that won't be on my head now, at least the next such device in front of my nose. Maybe I'm wrong. There's probably something in the future that's gonna close your eyes and be there on the pupil. What do you think about this?
Well, I'm totally in agreement with you. I had scepticism about the previous points, that it seemed so strange when a man walks down the street, almost in a helmet, completely as exploded from the surrounding world. Well, you have to be certain so you can walk around the street like that. Well, there's nowhere else to go. And in other countries, the latitudes are hard to imagine. Well, in general, Sasha, I fully support your thought of not being able to wear yourself, you know, like a bucket on your head and go on with it all. I'm looking for some, uh, future, as sad as you sound, some built-in chips, microchips, I don't know, lens, and stuff. Well, I see it that way. Well, not to that point of massive food.
Well, let's see what they're gonna have.
I don't see any sense. That's what I can give, what I can't give, like, an iPhone. What's the comfort?
This is the moment that's come. What's the comfort? I got a friend here, one of them bought a camera in the hand that shoots. I said, "What's the difference between her and her iPhone?" Yeah. So you're just getting some of the gadgets out of the way, actually. You say, "What's the difference? I have a phone. Why else would I have a separate camera to be and filmed? I said, "Well, like, I'm gonna get it off the phone, too." And you don't understand why you need to. Well, unless it's a specialized camera, like, that's, like, three hundred and sixty degrees, yeah, now it's there.
Okay, these cameras, they have, like, another meaning. Look, I want to go to the next issue from the perspective of OpenAI. OpenAI did, put out a big study of their data, where they were just like that, again, I approved that they had seven hundred million weekly users. It's a number, by the way, but they've, by the way, put it in my article that they've been with yu-- it's since July, right? And we were just saying it in July, June. And they say they have two and a half billion messages on the system a day. And they showed how many people use interest. And that was, by the way, my personal interest in this number of communications, for example, that 10 per cent of the total number of students studying is only two per cent of the emotional conversations.
The conversation is only two percent. And what, how did they show the details in this report? I think maybe we can get a special release, by the way. At least I was planning on this subject too, a little more in the face of this, uh, mass use. The grammar is four per cent in the system, yes. More than emotional conversations, at least as they say inside.
And then you can add after saying that programming four percent, it can be added that the OpenAI has been literally recently failed, and the results of the international programming Olympics. They took gold there. Well, who needs it, huh? There's four percent of the users.
Yeah, but of the 70 million people, four percent is more like even, yes, Elnar, the number of glasses is more than the the glasses can wear. The number is decent, yes, it's 30 million. It's very serious. At least it looks very serious. Here. Tell me, the OpenAI said the code. OpenAI released the code, yes, its inside. And there's a Codex 5, there's a GPT 5 Codex. It's something special, something cool. I saw a lot of Russian-speaking audiences in X, well, Twitter, not all of them take X. In X, he saw a lot of speeches from the "All other systems are dead. Anthropic at the canan, that's where it is. Here. About Codex. But I smiled at it and I don't believe it much.
How cool is this system?
Let's split up a little. There are models, and there's a shell you're working with them. And in this sense, as much as you can do in GPT chat room, you can program, and you can, respectively, in the course, yes. IDE is the place where you write the code, and you can actually add some of your agent, some LLM to connect. The same GPT 5, you can, you can get Anthropic Claude, you can have someone else. I mean, it's a separate environment you can get some model. Aa, Anthropic did differently to keep it from the cadet, Windsurf and other publishers. They made their sunflower utilitus. Claude Code. And, accordingly, you can program in Anthropic, Claude, yes, but not on their website, but on your computer. Consequently, the system has a little more opportunities. She can read the code, uh, edit it on the spot without leaving the cassay. You don't need to copy and put a browser in there on your design environment. In fact, the courser does the same thing, yes. And the emergence of Claude Code is in part just a distance from other developers and, there, the creation of its own utilitate. Codex is the same, only from OpenAI. There's a little to make an adjustment, that's not the same thing, but it's, yeah. So there's some environment in which you can program GPT with a GPT chat. So you don't need to do this, there, imputing, putting it out of the browser, connect it to some IDE, a proxy, yeah, that everyone heard about. And you can use the tidal that the GPT chate has, they've created it. So they're a little distant from another market. Also Anthropic with Claude Code, ChatGPT with Codex. Here. And that's how I see it. Sasha might be a little more detailed, maybe at another angle, but that's what it looks like for me. Well, there's only a way to add, yes. I'm gonna answer the specific question you asked. Uh, will the whole market die after the Codex has been updated? Well, no, like the model is updated. Okay. This model can be used in other ways, but another instrument has become a little better than it was before.
Sasha, what do you say about this? Interesting Elnar.
I mean, I think it's another useless update from OpenAI, which has no effect on the market. I mean, they're teri-- but they're on the other side, well, they don't have a single successful product except GPT. They understand it's hard to make a GPT product, but all the rest is pretty much past, yeah. And I understand that you need to be strong. They're irritating, of course, but for now, I don't think it's used by nobody.
Mm
-hmm.
Sasha already has a chip.
No, I didn't say that. Not pointless, not inconclusive. Here. I mean, there's no results. I'm not saying that.
Unresultative.
I guess that's the right thing to say. I'm sorry if I talked. I mean, just for now, well, that's all they're trying to do, except for the GPT chate, doesn't have a close adoption.
Yeah, it's unresultative.
Yeah, I must have misreaded that. So, unsuperceptive. I think there's still some updates that are totally weird. So Sam Althman has announced that they've updated the staff page. I think it's cool! I was waiting so long, so there's a chance, there's a way to do other personalization. I'll remind the viewers that personalization is when you point out in your designs, you tell me who you are, what preferences you have, how you want the system to work in terms of the information. What she used, like, rules. I'm writing, for example, to tell me, there's a very clear, very professional place. Well, there's some sort of writing about where you live, what you do and so on. And so. And plus, she has a memory that works in absolutely no sense. Remember. The memory you're saying remember. And there is. They're still using your previous chat. And then Sam Altman put it out. I'm opening a page with staff and looking at it. It was the same thing, and it didn't change anything. I'm closed. I'm going to Sam Althman's X, rereading the post, I think I missed something, and he's in the post setting up the exact same virol and he says, "We've done a cool update, so, staff. It's all in one place now." And I realized that their updating was not that they actually learned the user, you know, how I got some kind of information and, uh, in the entrance, yeah, to help me work. They just... the menu's points were moving places, I don't know. Yeah, and they wrote, so it's all in the same place. I actually-- what the-- what's the update of "all in one place"? Here. But you know...
But the info has happened.
Yeah, I guess the info was happening. But to be honest, he's very strange. So why even put it out? I think they have, first, other peddates parallel, there, system capacity, some, uh, resources inside. I can see the system works differently. Well, give us some interesting updates that you're actually doing, especially I don't know, to users, damn professional version. Say something more widely written, tell me. And I love it again, there, OpenAI, ChatGPT, they have a super cool product and a lot of users. It must be another reflection that the market as a whole doesn't really matter, yes, and it's gonna do everything and it's gonna wait. Oh, all shares are worth it. Meta, by the way, was getting more expensive yesterday after her glasses. Why are you like this? Here, she's been getting a little bit more expensive. Sasha says they don't do shit, they didn't do anything. People were fired, there's something else. They're still expensive, right? And 12 bets are in banks now. There's a 12-bed in the bank, uh, buying shares, selling zeros and holding zero. Yeah, that's what everyone's recommending, so they're warning Meta to grow up. I'm not looking at this, and I don't know what a turbulent growth is? Well, it's probably all company growing up. Okay. Well, that's probably the same thing about Apple. They didn't do anything in the update in terms of artificial intelligence, but at least they don't have stocks. That's who didn't grow up, that's Apple. I think Meta can catch them soon or Tesla will soon get them at cost.
They're gonna get something out and X two, X two, maybe they're gonna do it. I want to raise this one, very good, and, uh, it's on the market, it's visible somewhere, somewhere else. YouTube has released a very big update, and I want to explain youTube here. YouTube has released a huge, simple update inside of her, they added more than 30 different chips, and, differently, there, all the stitches, black cars, there, the video for the podcasts, they've completely pulled out a huge amount of stuff. The number of nutcases in terms of duplication, AI and everything. And I wonder if I've noticed the number I've hit. I didn't know that. I don't know, Sasha, did you know or not? Tanya and Elnara, I don't think you knew that youTube's staging now holds position one on the payroll TV. Well, that's when you compare it to Netflix, and he's now overshooting Display, overshooting Disney, and he's, uh, stable there, okay, in top three, he's got 13 percent of the market now, and, uh, Netflix eight points eight, he's got a three-point. Netflix point eight. There's a, uh, Disney, and Disney's got five to nine percent, yeah. And Disney includes, there's a Hulu service in America, right? Well, who's here, everyone knows. There's ESPN and so on. I mean, YouTube, video and-
Video and, uh, they're getting a straight shot, including, uh, like a system, uh, tra-- well, like a system, not a video content we used to. That's what I was gonna say. And there's a share of, uh, TV checks.
I mean, I'm the one who said the data in the framework, uh, U.S.
Sas, about, uh, their updates, that's the first thing with the duplicate, yeah. I had a funny situation. I'm often on YouTube downloading some content, you know, a subcatet of some kind or something, and I'm listening to you in a flight or a gym where there's no Internet or something. And, uh, there was a funny situation when I downloaded the video I wanted to see. Suddenly, I'm on the runway, wearing headphones, and it's in English. I mean, the Russian authors, the entire content was always Russian, but I hear a simple audio trail, and I can't change my tongue because the video is down. And because I have a systemic language in my phone, YouTube decided he's so smart, he's gonna help me now, and he started to download the English track with the duplicate. I mean, they're good, they must have wrapped up this story. But be careful when you're downloading the video, if you have a language that isn't the one you wanted to see this video, you're accidentally, you know, it's not quite an accident that can roll the audio track in another language.
You know, it's interesting, by the way, you probably said something. I don't know how they're gonna do this, this is the question to decide. I had this YouTube duplicate in my test, and I noticed that when I was on the video, I was gonna take this backup, it would work if you were in America, and you walk in, you got this video, because I've got the interface everywhere. In English, you automatically have my videos in English, and the man starts to see them as English rather than Russian. I mean, even the one who watches the video starts to see them as English. And it's a very interesting thing to do here. On the one hand, it's kind of a fun thing, because you can watch around the world, and on the other hand, it's a real problem. Because if people are used to watching a certain audience in their own language, in a country with another language, it's possible if I sit in France, I'm in France in YouTube to open a Russian video, I'll get it in French, and I'll open the video from the States, it'll be in French, too. If I have a region of France, and I don't want to listen in French, I was gonna listen to it, a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-the way I was told in the original language. And you're not even taking it because you and your headline, and they all go straight to English. And you probably sat there through, uh, you walked in, through the system, I don't know, through the VPN or through some system, yeah, rocking, downloading the video, right? And he probably figured out, for example, that you were in another language.
Or maybe you have a region, right, youTube?
No, no, I'm telling you, I have a systemic language worth English.
That's it.
Anyway, I honestly say, I don't understand how they're gonna do it because I've had a lot of discussion right now. They have now released this worldwide, which can now be integrated in local languages across the globe. As a matter of fact, you can in every country in the world turn your content into a local language, it will be duplicated. But I have a question: if the whole world, all people turn on a duplicate content, then it's gonna be a dump, right? And that doesn't mean people get bigger, the time to look more. So the algorithms will be harder to work. And that's me, of course... I don't know what to do with it, how to use it. It's not clear how to move. It's not as clear as algorithms work. It's a very difficult story, you know, from the point of view of the system. Or they'll win mass channels. I mean, if you think about it, there's a big channel that looks at millions of people, and it's gonna be in the sixty languages, so it's gonna be watched. Why watch small producers? Here we are, um, some kind of content. Why would you watch him? And if we turn it on in all languages now, I don't understand how this video will be in other countries, how youTube will choose. We're interested in a Russian-speaking audience, for example, right? But in general, we don't mind being looked, I don't know, in Nigeria, Brazil, Argentina, anywhere. Well, look, I'll imagine, anywhere. We're okay with that. So if there's a volume coming, it'll change YouTube's algorithms in terms of audience perception, and YouTube will think that another audience should be shown. Well, I'm just saying that I'm really-- I don't, I don't know how to solve it. You know, right? I mean, here's...
I think at least they should have some sort of construction, uh, leave the original language or automatically give the duplicate video. This is some first point I'd like to find in my building, not to turn the interface into Russian, so that I don't think about this story. That's the first. And the second one is a problem with the duplicate. Systems can't recognize voices well enough. And if we had one person on the video, you'd have a calibre voice that you sounded like he'd be alone. We'll have the same story, just four people. The system won't be able to find out very well when one of us says if she's just got a tidy video, not a separate one, there's four audio channels. And then it's just gonna be that those who look not in Russian will hear one calibre voice for everyone, right? And it's like it's a Dawnshifting as a kitten. And why does that even matter?
If anyone's important, you can-
There was a translator for all the films before.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Like the Volodanian. We used to watch pirate videos.
Yeah. Well, Eleven Labs, for example, Eleven Labs is doing a good job, but Eleven Labs is a payroll and all video and video relays are expensive. And that's why it's a question, how do they do it? Can you imagine how much capacity it takes to, for example, translate our video into forty languages and do a professional, quality duplicate? Well, that's expensive.
Here, Sasha, I have a question. I haven't really done that for a while, but when I was looking that way, it's really hard to recognize when someone's voice is, right? I mean, like, how Riverside can do a good job, uh, transcribing, the looting we write because everyone has a channel, and she doesn't need to know that's my voice. You're saying there's Sasha Masrabov printing, and Tanya says something, right? He doesn't need to identify those votes in any way.
Sasha Goroha.
Because there are separate channels. Yes. Here. And when all this stuff is salad, it always gets so easily separated from the rest of the bucklegun. And when we're all stained in Sasha, it's easy to separate. And when we're all stuck in one audio flow, we're intermittently. It's a very difficult task, technically, uh, to hang on to every voice of yours. All right, Eleven Labs is generating voices like mine, yours and so on. But the video, when we're in dialogue, we're gonna put our own thing down without mistakes, is, I think, a pretty complex technical task.
Maybe they've made a lot of progress, but I thought it was still unsolved.
Oh, look, aaah, I want to tell you that what's in Eleven Labs is the matter, and, Ilnar, it's a good deal. I have a video I'm in, uh, checking where my dialogue is, and the other man says little, he's still handling it, and Eleven Labs is doing it pretty well. I don't know how they do. Maybe they're still picking up the picture, maybe they're picking up the picture because you're not giving them audio, you gave them the video. And it might be a little more complementary. Oh, but I saw it make mistakes a couple times. I mean, I had a couple of times, it made mistakes when it was a complicated one, and then the man goes into this difficult speech. But in general, recognition is good enough in terms of duplication and overlapping. It's just a matter of resource use. I got a daughter in the tenth grade. She had a report on how, uh, ChatGPT systems eat environmental. So she says to me yesterday, "Dad, you want to tell me the report?" I say-- and she says, "Pap, you know, companies that are doing infrastructure for systems like ChatGPT, they burn, there, the planet. "Tr-l." I said, "Oh, okay, I just bought twenty new companies today." She looked at me like that. I said, "The stock is bought. "So it's just that company." I looked at me like that. I said, "Okay, come on." She says, "Let me tell you that, ChatGPT. She's in there saying, "Pap, if Google's looking and you have an AI-mode search, that's the AI-mode that eats twenty-six times more, uh, energy." And then she says, "Do you know how much one request is worth, like, in-- and how many three seconds the video celebrating the lights that the normal light bulb burns?" I said, "How much?" She says, "All of a year." Here. I said, "Oh! Sasha Mashrabov will come to visit, I say, "Here he eats, Yolanta, you know, lights."
He won't come to visit.
I say, "He eats lights."
Yolanta won't let him in.
They're with Christina, I'm saying, we should be in our guests. He's not the only one who's got a video that's been generated for three seconds, but a lot. He's got millions of users, I'm telling you. You're-- you're-- you're just telling him. No, my daughter's humor. Tanya, you know that. And she's been calmly responding. Well, she's kind of peacefully responding to my stock and electricity jokes. Here, uh, I hope Sasha Mashw's blacklist doesn't put it.
They won't, they won't.
I'm very careful in your guests right now.
Me too, and I'll be in the blacklist with her, too. I'll be in the blacklist, too, because I bought the stock, uh, so, in a row, all the companies that infrastructure makes round and the charges, and so on, they do. But she's got the data, of course. So what do I mean? I mean, how many YouTube, uh, how free a function can be, how they'll all over it, how much they can do on all the video so much to re-evaluate the quality duplicate, otherwise it's not a quality redundancy. - Oh, my God. And if the duplicate is inaccurate, then, uh, people won't use it.
Yeah, that's not gonna be very interesting. Let's see how they're gonna decide anyway.
And since the kids were talking, the OpenAI had news that they were planning to add a client's age forecast based on a relationship with him. And it was a funny story. I'm gonna beat the situation a little bit. I've been watching the "Sloan Dangerous Game" movie recently. Miss Slown is in English, if you've ever seen it. But not the point. So there was this conversation between two people who work in the office. And one complained about having a coffee machine, and when you get coffee, you have to put your age in there, and then this age is being sold to advertising companies that use it further. And he was all upset that his personal information was then sold, somewhere else. And the other one was joking, and I said I lied just and everything. And in any situation where it was necessary to indicate the age, and now it's a age, and there's no need for some ID to show, show a passport or something, you can always lie. Now, if we're talking about ChatGPT, it's gonna be a lot harder to do when they're rolling this story. Because the conditional, the Zumeras don't communicate like the millenillars, and so on. Yeah, and you can always get a little bit of a message, on the request that a man does. If it's his personal account and he's his only user, not whispering, I don't know, with his parent, with his sister, with someone else and so on, you can bend his behavior around the age of the man, And on that basis, limit it to some kind of thing, I don't know, the functions that are in the system, and something. And it's pretty busy that I'm just always filling out these systems, you're gonna get your age in there, and you think that's how old am I today? And you choose how much you want to be years because no one will ever check it out. Well, there's a way to be circumstantial, but somehow, right? And in this sense, ChatGPT has gone a little further, and they will predict the age of the user, based on, there, the requests he makes, based on, there, the grammatical errors that a man has made or something. Something like that. So, from a set of signs that they will not, of course, reveal, it will be possible to know how many users it will be.
I don't know how this system will work, especially with mistakes. I think it's interesting to see.
I'd rather have them ask me how old I am, you know? I wish they had asked me how old I was. I'm saying, before you predict, you'd better take it and let it be filled.
I'd love to fill out the data on myself.
Well, you're the one who's willing to fill it. And the kids won't be filled, Sasha. They'll say they're 40 years old.
Ten years from above, yes.
Yes! But the kids don't use it.
So that you can't watch anything.
It's a question-- look, it's a question further. Look, kids are a separate question, yes, that's the question of parents. How they give tools, how they buy, they don't buy signatures, how they give access to anyone, and so on. That's the next question, a separate story. But the basics would be better for them to learn first from a man rather than try it in some way, so guess. They'd be, at least, Ilnar, I think they'd be better off building a model. Well, I mean, if they had known age from 100 million people and had two and a half billion messages a day. That's 100 million people coming, I don't know, there's three hundred million messages a day, so they'd better for these three hundred million messages, build a model and know exactly who's asking for ages. Because a lot of people will indicate normal age. Well, for example, my daughter that she told you, she's gonna be guaranteed to show a real age. She's not lying to anyone. She's got a way of life. Someone, I agree. Well, there are adults who will say something wrong.
Most of it, I'd say.
Okay, look, that's an interesting aspect. Ilnar and I are the ones who lived with Ilnar in a big questionnaire, like in the systems. Everyone thinks people lie in response to the information.
Yeah, it's a customer development. Why don't they do it, I wonder.
Well, look. Look. Well, look, I'm here, I'm getting an analysis today. I've passed a test for mi-- different minerals. You know, you give your hair, and you get your analysis, you know, the amount of mercury, the number of heavy metals, and so on. But why? I'm an idiot to point out in ChatGPT that I'm 20 years old if I want to get a conclusion from him, an analysis, well, to take this analysis seriously. But I need real recommendations. And, accordingly, if ChatGPT says you're using, use this system.
By the beginning, where we started today. What is ChatGPT used primarily as Google? So far, it is not even used for other things by most users. So what you're saying is not so relevant. And how, when you're looking through Google and when you're a teenager, you need more than a year, the
better.
Well, maybe. Maybe. But I think if they did check and check the users, the main, the bulk of people with a normal explanation, why would they need to, would have provided normal data. The question is always a normal explanation for why and who you want to hide, what's the point? What's the point you want to hide? I see if you're incognito's free version of the story, and you need to bail. It's when you need to lie down, confirm the postal you've already got Google, you know, you got, like, a lot of stuff, right?
It's part of the, yes, parenting. They had problems with what they did, yeah, yeah. You don't have to give the whole thing to the kids. There were tragic stories about children, and that's just one part. Yeah, just if you put a cap on, tell me you've been there for over eighteen years, and the baby's been pushing, but it's like there might be some kind of liability with the company. But, yes, the child can be deceived. And in this case, they're just trying, yes, so they're gonna solve the problem and try to say no, no, no. You're still not old enough.
Yeah. And there's a grown man saying the same thing. Yeah?
It could be. What's the compliment, Sasha?
You want to get the data, you don't.
My husband came to America when I thought he was six years old. That's something. And he writes in Russian. I don't know. Paulina and I, Sasha's wife, laughed very much because he makes the same mistakes in Russian as Igor, who's nine years old. Yeah? How much Igor? Nine, right? I mean, my husband Steve, who's thirty-six or thirty-seven, I don't remember anymore. In Russian, make the same mistakes as Igor, who is nine years old. And how would that ChatGPT be torn apart if it was purely grammar? Well, it's kind of a little bit of a bet.
Well, he doesn't talk.
It's gonna be.
It's like, yes, English too. I'm probably in English, maybe worse than Iolant, like, in the tenth grade. Well, that's the kind of thing that's relative.
How old is that, huh? But actually, this use report, that, Tanya, you said that the bulk of people use routine search requests. It's a dentist. Yeah, people are using and taking systems for now. There was a very good interview, I forgot the name of this man from one of the venture capitalists. He said you don't understand that in the world, very few people in general are still using artificial intelligence. And a lot of people, there's a lot of people who tried, and they didn't like it at all. And they don't understand what it is. But the subject will come. So the subject will come before people start to analyze. I had an interesting story. My mom was in my guests late last year. I said, "Mam, let me put you a ChatGPT." "Oh, no, no, no." I said, "Okay." So she can hear more, which means who uses what she's using. Then she told me there was hallucinations that he was lying, you know, in some YouTube skates about it. I think bloggers are all talking about that, right? So, hallucinations, some kind of deception everywhere, the complexities, the problems, some emotional stress, and everything. They don't see the positive side of this. And I've come to her for a few times, and I've been there, I've been analysing, I've come to me, so something from the garden, hop, has been analyzed from somewhere else. I was in this one, I was even talking about it here. So she says to me a few days ago, "Sash, listen, can you set me up a system?" I'm sorry I didn't put it in there. I say, "Well, I'll get it." She's like that.
I made her. I say, "Open it." She opens up, she opens up. I said, "Well, you might need a VPN. I'm not gonna put anything on you right now. Next time you come, I'll put it." Yeah, and, uh, n-- I said something else might work for you. There must be something else in Minsk. I don't know what system is open. Maybe Perplexity is open, maybe, uh, DeepSeek. I don't know if I can buy it, but I saw it, something that was paid, because you still had restrictions on free, you wouldn't feel this daily job. So you want what? I'll have to make a purchase, yeah, to be in it. By the way, how many people are among our viewers? Let's go vote, see who's on the payroll, who's on the free. I mean, a lot of people on free. ChatGPT shows, of course, that there are still a large number of people who use it free of charge, and people think it's the same thing. Well, I mean, I talked to my friend yesterday. He, uh, says that, uh, well, he uses free Perplexity with GPT chat, and he's got the same perception. Well, as he says, "We don't need to, we're good enough. We've got a search there." Anyway, everything is all totally enough. And, indeed, people don't see the whole thing, but they're gonna come to them. Uh, people, well, at some point in time, they're aware of it. That I'm the one with the hair report that's been dropped, there's an interesting topic before--
That's what this study says.
Yeah. But, but also fun, it's funny that this report was never possible before without a doctor.
This, uh, report says that, uh, they seem to be disconnecting people, analysing information that those people who are older and with some professional education, uh, and even more, I think, What they said about social level, above social level, they're using, uh, job requests more than just some, uh, search-and-a-a-ga-gle. Uh, but these people are basically less in the world, right? So there are fewer cases, respectively. Well, then, uh, you're right, and it's gonna be a little bit more evolved. People just need to come to this and understand that they can be used in much more productive, uh, key, uh, ChatGPT and other such systems. And there's a growing up, even as you call it-- call emotional conversations.
More time.
The numbers are also on the rise.
Since June, it's been a percentage increase. People just gradually understand.
I wonder if it's all the absolute recommendations that are made by the coolest people in the, there, business and artificial intelligence that it's a question of how to use it properly and understand how to use it. different casees, right? And that's what you need to use. I mean, if you don't run a constant test, test, check, you won't understand. I didn't give you a good example again, because this test, in fact, could only be interpreted with a doctor. And my friend who advised him, he said, "I have an interpreter, a doctor. I thought, well, I probably don't need a doctor at the beginning. And a very complicated report came. There are reports you understand, and they're easy. And the report came here, it's complicated. I opened it and I don't understand anything at all. It's just zero. And I've got him in the system. She just gave me a "swill sound" to give me all the details, all the recommendations, all the trends, uh, different world practice, councils, no exception, right? And then I can work with that information and make a decision: I'm gonna consult with the real person alive or not. But I wouldn't know what that could do if I didn't use the system all the time. I thought, well, if they say that you need someone to interpret, we'll probably buy this man. I mean, I don't recommend why I pay more tris or $400 to decipher these tests by humans if I have a system that's obviously much better than any person decoding for. $300. Well, unless I have something special, I need some personal, individual person's opinion. Again, I have the opportunity to use it further, to use it. But it's a question of the real boxes, understanding these briefcases. Here, let's see what happens to this. It's very interesting to have your opinion on this subject again. Oh, what do you think you think that-- because we're still looking at a wide audience, and it's always good to see other side-by-sided views, right? It's not a question of ChatGPT again, but the question of totally any AI systems. And I'll see you in a week. Bye, everybody.