Hello, everyone! We're on the Turbo Moon channel. Technological news, Silicon Valley sites around the world.
Don't talk to men in glasses.
A huge number of other ways, such interviews can be deceived.
The U.S. Court has admitted that Google illegally monopolized the online advertising market in the US. OpenAI has no DNA. At the political-politics meeting, Politburo said that independent artificial intelligence was needed, not depend on the United States. And since social media doesn't build, the fried amount of money, it's not being built, unfortunately. I've got a past time on the wall, whether the spider is a fly. That's how a lot of comments were written.
You noticed, Walkek-
- What's the crawl on the wall? To the picture.
Wow!
I said, "How did you know how you-- well, how did you know it was a cockroach? With artificial intelligence?"
ChatGPT.
Yeah, no cockroaches here, no cockroaches here.
Look, I want to start with the case. I think he's very alive, this case. And this direct use of artificial intelligence shows some realisticity. So Colombian, e., Columbia University student, he was expelled from Columbia University, just like his partner because they were disciplined in the proceedings. About what they, uh, used artificial intelligence tools to cheat, uh, interview, right? And why did this news come out? It's clear that a lot of people who use artificial intelligence on job interviewing. In particular, according to the words, a, Lee, it was because of his soft that he was selected for an internship at Amazon. Here. I like the comment, I like the comment, Amazon, I abstained from commenting. Here. But obviously, there's a lot of this used in hiring and working. And again than a fun case? The fact that a week ago their start-up, well, the guys, they made a soft, respectively. It's like the kind that's being launched in the browser, and it allows for dialogue or conversation with other people, it helps, helps communicate, and others don't know it. Yeah? Well, that's a great subject. I-- my favorite case of Case is going on the street in glasses, so you meet a girl and tell you how to talk to her about your pre-determined goal. It's not working. I'm just saying it like a case. Yeah, they're attracted to--
Don't talk to men in glasses.
Yeah, they got five points of $3 million and the first round, the first round. And little they say they already have an alleged future profit, you know, there's a RR, over $3 million.
And the subject is very interesting because this team, they made the Clule project, Clule, I don't know how it's read or Clalie, Clyu--Cluili. The point is, they think Clule's team is... comparing with a calculator or a carpool of technologies that first considered cheating but then became normal. So they have, uh, and they have a prom reading on their date, called feedback from admiration to comparison with the black mirror. That's it, uh... Well, the--there's a skate about how a man wears glasses. What do you think about this? Because what's really going on? On the one hand, using artificial intelligence, like reading, and on the other hand, artificial-- using artificial intelligence is a way of increasing efficiency. It's like, you know, we use books, we use search systems. Where is this line, uh, where is this line, and what happens?
Because, of course, from the point of view of hiring, interviewing, and online and everything, it's unreal. Because a lot of things now have to come and give off-line, like, and now all interviews, a lot of things go online. And logically, people will use it, especially those who know it. What's gonna happen, uh?
I have a little comment that I was preparing for an interview in America, to my first one, I was very worried. Even though I wasn't 100% sure about English, and I did-- ChatGPT, then I didn't think it was. Well, at least that's the way it is. And I just went to Google to beat up a hundred questions that are being asked to interview corporations in America. Anyway, he gave me a hundred questions. I have prepared answers on these 100 questions, and there is no question that, and I have five interviews on this position, there was no question that would not be on the list. I mean, I've already prepared everything, I've had some answers in advance. So it's a reader like, you know, a little bit of a problem.
Let me play for another position a little. Uh, look, from, uh, again, it's just my opinion, yeah. The use, uh, of various tools in the work, if they are more effective, enables the task to be performed faster, more accurately and so on, is precisely good. Well, it's like an accountant not to be banned from using a calculator because he makes less mistakes, he'll read it more quickly and so on. But then, you know, the question is, what does a job interview take? The interview needs, uh, to take the right candidate and to remove the unsuitable candidate. And in this case, that is, in particular, their instrument, and the vast number of other ways, such as these interviews can be deceived, how to be purified in these interviews, as you can, and, uh, solve the very complexities of the interviews. tasks you would never have decided. What's that? And that's the sap, that's the sieto that companies have made, it's not gonna work. We leave behind the brackets, good is sieto or bad is sieto, because there's a lot of thoughts about not having to make the technical interviews do the tricks, because everyone starts them. I'm learning about it. That other interviews should be held, and so on. But it's just, it just leads to this way of interviewing, he just stops working. Just like the universities are out of writing, yes, the students write with a microphone. If you take 15 years, 20 years ago or the reflexes that were down there from all the sites or anything. The only question is that the briefing- interview as an instrument is not working in the current form. And that would either lead to, uh, all of them being taken out of probation or something. Either another option would just come up with another way of interviewing, which would then also be hacked with GPT. But until I guess the most efficient way to get around is to have an offline interview where you're on the board with, uh, checking the markers, yeah, not on the computer, that's exactly what you're saying. So. It must be a hard time for GPT chatting. The rest is with these tools or c--
If someone who didn't come in the glasses.
- Yes, I am. Yeah, I'm sure. That's how the glasses come, and it's gonna be all over it.
Or a built-in chip, built-in chip somewhere in the eye.
Yeah.
Yeah, well, the lenses will start in place, and you won't know what's going
on.
But I think the law that is in the European Union is exactly the same, if I remember not to accept a study, but using artificial intelligence. That's something I remember.
You have no right to decide whether to enlist or not on the basis of artificial intelligence. Well, usually how does that work? There's something, well, maybe it's a little bit of a deal, again, like, uh, it could have been. Artificial intelligence gives you some kind of conclusion, and the final button will be subtle or not, uh, pushing a man, right? I mean, it's his responsibility, like he made that decision. He can always say that, besides, uh, there's a GPT chat, it's still there on the basis of some of his, uh, re-consumptions.
Intuition
I made that decision, yes, intuition or something. But automatic systems, yes, that's something that's breaking rights.
But these cabs, of course, will be very serious, and it will take a lot of time, I think, to diagnose it. It's hard to diagnose now. Remember, the usual sparks have been diagnosed for a long time. I mean, how much, not what was diagnosed, how do you know? People came in, found ways, printed it on a micro printer, and so on. So here's the question, uh, the key, of course, how quickly different systems will be adapted, what they will make decisions. But a lot of things will be very complicated. I just don't understand how they've been worded to the end of these guys, you know, actually, how they've been said, right? Here's the...
They're spraying, Sasha, it was their pier. They showed themselves the videotape they were passing through this interview.
Aah!
Zoom, as I understand.
Oh, they didn't say it first, they showed it all, then they got kicked out.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's because of that.
And they're up there now, five and three tenths of a million dollars. It's just, uh, it's a piercing move.
Why would they do that university when it's all good?
No, well, the university is serious. Yeah, the university is serious.
Yeah. And university is one of the best.
Sasha, what do you think about this? Well, there's a fun start-up now called GPT Zero.
He's GPT Zero. And I'm an investor, so they're somehow making a platform to turn the generative AI text into. I can say, I guess, just that, uh, adoption isn't as fast as I want, but it's a very cool business. There you go. So it's a very good business, like business, right? I mean, there's a marja, there's a prophyto, but it's just not that big.
Well, you mean business, business, business, different softs, which helps to circumvent all kinds of restrictions.
Who helps-
Is this a business?
Which helps to detach if it is written with generative AI.
Ah, it's a little bit of a tactical. Not to be a little bit of a bloke.
It's a little bit of a joke, yeah.
I think the main big money, I think, is the biggest money that's helping to get around.
This is the next investment Sashin project. It's hard to say, I don't know. It's hard to say.
I know a lot of serious projects that make huge money in ordinary business, like marketing, advertising, mobile applications, in, uh, spreading different information on the Internet with different information. use new ways. They just don't sell it like a start-up, they make so much money they don't need a fucking vent. Well, venture capital is not needed. Sign on our channel, support it, it helps us to develop very much.
And the liquor, the liquor, put the liquor on.
New news was recently about the detail of the generated texts. I don't remember, I don't think she was added to the list. ChatGPT, said, started adding inseparable gaps in random ways in different parts of the text. If the text is long enough, there are still inextricable gaps in the room, instead of the usual gaps. They are not visible in the eye, but they can be very easily wrapped up, because there are a lot of texts in some places. Sas, you must be not, yes, but in a raw form, the text can be analysed, well, in the start-up, and try to determine how well it's being generated.
Well, I mean, yeah, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, the, uh, educational establishments, it's super important. Oh, well, many, many corporations don't even have a policy on AI generated output in marketing, do they? That's why this tool is important. I mean, yeah, I just can't, I guess, really, really, really, really, really, really talk about it, just say it's kind of a really cool, that's a pretty good business.
I wonder how, given the development of systems, I've seen different systems that try to determine that something is written with LLM's model, but I just know that LLM models are so much developing themselves, I'm sure they'll be fine with the same systems. I had a nice case right now. The nephew applied to different universities, and there you write the text and send it. And there's a system that tells you how much you used, like GPT systems of different kinds, you know? And he says that the shipment-- full 100 per cent of the total was guaranteed. He sends it, he's got 70 percent of it. You take part of the text, you generate, you send, you're writing, there's no GPT of a generated text. Well, that's what you're getting under some kind of problem. So you might be expected to think you did something wrong because some system has decided. This system was wrong. I remember that. I was told this whole thing the weekend, how a man was denied. A man from India came to the USA and he had a work visa. And on the border, he was supposed to be a programmer, and at the border, he was placed in a separate interrogation room. It was a few weeks ago. And we decided to ask him, check him out, check him out. Border control opened ChatGPT and wrote how to check that a human is a programmer. And he was asked to write an ancient algorithm. Here. He sat there, took a leaf, started doing something, did it completely.
Border control wrote in ChatGPT as to what correct answer.
He received a ChatGPT response. He compared that answer to him and said, "These are different. So we're sending you home." And he sent him home. Here. Well, how could border control compare? And ChatGPT could be wrong, right? Plus, algorithm can be implemented differently, it can be implemented differently. And who said that this man should know this algorithm? If he was hired by a programmer and given a visa, he was fully tested at embassies and everywhere. I think there's gonna be a huge number of these problems. Because I'm personally not-- I don't understand, under all circumstances, how a real or untrue text can be developed and who wrote it. There are so many styles, nuances, features. Plus, everyone used some sort of literature to write. Someone's got a very good memory, someone can, there, synonyms to pick, some words to fix, someone's using some, some, uh, helpers to make words. Well, that's, of course, the most complex, complicated circumstances. Here. Let's see what happens. The detect system works a long time ago.
Remember, Elnar, when we were developing training, for programming, when we looked at CS50 in Harvard, they were on CS50, there's a course in Harvard CS50, that's training, there, IT, programming, everything. They're on this course, youTube's on it, by the way, is it, yeah, you're on YouTube, right? They had an internal system written in which they diagnosed. A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d- The code says unique or has been copied somewhere, right? I'm actually, yes or I'm off. I don't know what to do with it right now. Yeah? Because if you have big corporations saying that programming with a cop-- with a copil or with different systems into it, it's a sc-- it's cool, it's legal, it's right. What will happen if you program with some certain systems?
So, is that how these checks are made? That's the rarest story. Look, let's get to the point. OpenAI you-- you've got these. E-e-e-seater information is sometimes available in different places and, uh, according to the Verge, uh, OpenAI, plans to produce its own social network. What kind of social network is that, what's she gonna look like? And that's just, like, a piercing move about Ilona Mask and his X. Or are they really gonna do a social net? What's the speciality? It says that OpenAI is concerned that he needs data on which to learn that you're in your own contour, right? It's kind of a big deal on the subject, including the rusty of Perplexity, which suggests that he needs to build his own browser and his own infrastructure, uh, to show more ads on which they can be able to make. to learn your system and to see a user-friendly path. What do you think about the OpenAI social network? What are there, or what are the sites? Or what do they say, Sasha, what do you say in the valley, for example? What do the developers say? Or is it just some kind of infa?
Well, Perplexity is. I mean, Perplexity's got a pretty negative attitude, because they've already been working for everyone, right? It's just everybody. A-a-m, and many of this is a... a lot of it that raises questions. I mean, where defensibility is, if it's really the one that's working, what they do, is, everyone already. But if you look at usage, it's still growing. And I-- yeah, I mean, he's still growing up pretty much. Marth is their pick-- And they have, that is, So, 30 percent is a huge increase. They've had so much growth for months. Uh-oh, and so far, the numbers don't say that...
Until the numbers say they have some problems.
So, you think this is the story that OpenAI wants to do his social network, there's Perplexity Browser, they're gonna do it or not? And what, uh, what kind of tools, technologies or different scenarios do you miss in modern systems? What would you like to be in these systems, huh? Well, for example, someone really would like the OpenAI to have a social network. I'm not interested, for example. What else would you want to be? Please write in the comments. I'm very interested in your opinion. And maybe you've seen different applications or someone else testing and doing something. What do you think? What do you think about it, about the way it is to expand it? Well, look, the OpenAI wants to do his social network. It's a different skies, but it's a different system. So they were able to create a unique, unique, totally design, that they were a conditional, a conditional trillion company, a dear company. They, they're a, they're a super expensive company, and...
Super-High company. And they, uh, they, uh, they, uh, they, uh, they didn't have an operating system, whatever they had a search. Ah, they've done it. What they're going to social networking, they can do that?
Oh, look, well, frankly, yes. So, we can, of course, well, there, uh, uh, how much we want to think about what, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, what, they're gonna have new products and new products that are gonna be successful, but, uh, multi-product AI companies, No. It doesn't exist, does it? So all the OpenAI did was release, there, ten models, you know what you're gonna do, right? That's like the one where OpenAI is now. I mean, honestly, there's some, uh, innovations about how to interact with a user or new products, I'd be doing a hundred, to be honest, because, well, that's like what they promise, But there's no way that this is going to happen.
So while Perplexity is a mono-product company, they-- each of these companies, it's mono-productive, but, uh-a-a-a, okay, OpenAI, they've been able to do a lot of successful models, which is really cool.
But the idea is that both of these news, Sasha, I understand it's a plus-minus on both of these news, it's a plus-minus one of the same. So, like, the OpenAI thing? Here we have, uh, a picture generator, a new one that's beautiful, fashionable, has a text that prints and all. And users, the gener, these beautiful pictures, they'll be out there somewhere. It may be, on Twitter, that may be other social networks, but it's working out, and that's all the results that are being performed inside OpenAI, they're out. And they have a wish, as they say on the news, it's all about the incubation. Like why are we helping other social media develop by offering them a huge amount of content? It's a similar Perplexity story, that we kind of accupied some users, but they use other browsers. The conditional, there, Google, Mozilla and other companies collect these data, then sell them, uh, as an ad, make huge money. And they're kind of using our website, our resource, and so on. And here we want them not only to use it, but also inside our browser. Accordingly, all the data we have left, and we could sell more commercials or something. But whatever they can or can't, it's like Sasha's been good at, um, multi-product AI companies on the market yet.
I mean, in principle, yes. I mean, basically, uh-huh, whatever, uh-uh, that's my op-- that's, like, a story of innovation that says that a quick change in the prysing model doesn't work for anyone. I mean, it's like fairy tales, yeah, that a prysing model is changing. So Google still woo-- if you look at Google, they had a big-time model from the beginning, right? I mean, they're enough, I understand, uh, Google, doing a little bit of a bidding-padform move from the beginning. Maybe I'm wrong. If anything, write the commentary. Uh-oh, but as far as I know, it was. So they didn't think to put in a consumer subscription there, like to make people look for them. And I think that, as-- they all have so much consumer revenue, yes, they're already having a big consumer revenue. I think it's all a rash-- it's gonna be very difficult to match. So the same YouTube is probably the only example that's the use of the subscriptions and the kind of ad, yeah, he's good, to combine. Netflix goes that way, but as the first person to do it well, I think, well, in my experience, I think it was YouTube. And it took years, years too.
And there's a super-successful, smartest, data-driven sales managers in the world.
Yeah, that's interesting, of course. Will they break the whole story? In parallel, the U.S. court admitted, well, he's in the skirts while acknowledging, of course, Google has illegally monopolized the online advertising market in the US and has set up a hearing. Now the hearing is, this is the second May hearing, just the release of some of these days, and we'll see when we have the second May now. Yeah, on Friday, Friday, May 2, in a few days, yeah. And the release is just after graduation, yes, there's a hearing. Maybe some new rules will come out, although I don't think there's gonna change anything with Guglom, but still. And they have good performances right now, they feel good there. What happens-- somo-so-- how will they compete with it, yes, how will they compete? I'm not putting a bet on Perplexity, by the way. OpenAI something, um, I believe in GPT chatting, but in the social network, I don't believe in their food team.
I don't believe in the food team.
Yeah. So we have to understand that social media is a different approach, right? I mean, it requires an approach where, uh, you, you, uh, you put a revenue in the head of the corner very much.
Yeah, yeah.
And where you can do-- well, it's like meta. Either you can really focus the team, work very fast like ByDance., and until the OpenAI has seen neither. I mean, like the ByDance, right? They say we do TikTok Shop, it's gonna be the coolest SMB tool for sale in America, right? Here. I mean, for SMB, who didn't sell anything, that's something to go sell, that's what they want to hire influensers, and that's where they sell, right, that's the best, uh, that's the best. By decision. They said they did. I mean, it's still a little bit of a size that China has, but they've done it, right? So they're the only ones who work the labels are fine. A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-create-the-creat-cla-cla-me-me-me-me-b-b-band-like. And that's a real work subject. And as much as the whole e-- well, e-commerce is growing through TikTok now. And, uh, as the OpenAI has neither DNA nor any other DNA, and they have DNA, you know, how to do the most successful AI products for consumers, burning a non-real amount of money. And since social media doesn't build, a fried amount of money, it doesn't work, unfortunately, does it? I mean, I'd try Snapchat, this market cap, that's, that's, that's, like, Snapchat's less than, uh, half a year and a half, less than two years ago, five years ago, when they went to IPO, right? Well, that's a rude word. So, by burning money, you can't build a successful social school. It doesn't work just this category, so I think it's gonna be very hard for them to come.
You can just buy.
Without the users involved, you know, you can just buy. Should we even get into this? Maybe you could have a company that's worth more than a trillion dollars, just in the technology inside, yeah, from the point of view of AI technology. And you don't have to go to social networking. Another point is they're afraid of losing the market in the future, that people with this line are going to leave. Well, I've said on several occasions that if Apple doesn't let a similar working story out, I mean, I'm not moving from GPT now, like Grok, right? Well, I'm not leaving, okay, Perplexity is like a surgeon, I'm not going, there, other, different models, I don't know, there's no way DeepSeek's going, I'm not going to other models. But if Apple gets out, I'm gonna be interested in migrating from the side application to the same infrastructure. They must be their job to tie a man somehow to keep him there. Meta, for example, was not tied up, uh, with her models. So, even though they're in WhatsApp and Facebook, I'm the user of these in Instagram, right? I'm a user of this soft, they're not tied up. I'm not tied to Grok by Elon Musk, I'm in X. So I go to X, use X and everything, right?
Grok has nothing to do with it, how does he have anything to do with it? But let's see what happens to them. Although the estimates are certainly different. The grades are different. And by the way, Ilon Mac is, uh, attracting a $2 billion round. I want to point out again, I, I have been telling a lot of people for the past two weeks, you're gonna pay attention to the amount of money that goes to the United States, you know, China, including that China takes very seriously, and They're flattering, well, the U.S.
number one completely in artificial intelligence. That money will never be lost anywhere. Well, in other countries, there's no such money under any circumstances.
But by the way, China, Ce Jinping at the political political party meeting said that independent artificial intelligence must be made and not depend on the United States. And now new chips are coming out of Huawei, right? They say they say they say that these chips will be cooler than NVIDIA chips. And they actually have a whole line of chips. I think we'll talk about it in the next edition.
There's a lot of people doing and a lot of stuff that's embedded in these chips. And, um, China wants to leave the NVIDIA monopoly, while America now wants to leave China's monopoly. It has been a huge, direct message that Apple is moving, accelerating the transfer of its plants from China to India. And it even said that by the twenty-sixth to twenty-seventh year, the main production would not--
The year of major production will not be in China, but in India, which will increase them now-- even because of that, they have lost a lot of money. But in a long time, it is estimated that it will increase the speed of delivery and make China independent. It's a very interesting story of displacement, uh, such large giants from China. Uh, is that better for the U.S.
or worse? I don't understand. If it's better for China or worse, it's also unclear, yes. That's what's going to happen. Uh, let's go over the subject. We'll make it today. Uh, I think it's so fun. About DeepMind and the union in Britain. Illnar, can you give me some details there?
Yeah, we, uh, have been talking about DeepMind a little bit, and there's a drilling of staff, yeah. I recall we were talking about staff members being involved in such small slavery, including that they can't work anywhere in the year. But we pay you a salary. But the staff complained they're degrading this year without working with advanced technology, then they're hard to catch up on the market. Now, the story is that DeepMind's employees want to join the union and, like, they're making it up to fight a little against their employer., the trigger, I understand, has been that it is planned to remove information from the company ' s website that the results of staff work, you know, from the company, will not be used in military technology. And this is the kind of counter-activity of the people who-
Yes! They said it in the exact same way, didn't they? They specifically said that we wanted trade unions to resist the use of our technologies in Israel, for example, yes? I mean, straight--
In particular.
Yeah, right, yeah, I think it's in Israel, in particular. We don't want to, like, we want to get this agreed with us, yes, they said.
Mm-hmm. And there's DeepMind, it's just like a lab, a lab. There's a lot of scientists working there, and they're doing, uh, there, and we've had a year ago, yeah, there was a chemistry Nobel history, which, in particular, results, uh, that, uh, that, uh, that's, uh, that's, uh, that's a little bit of a year ago. DeepMind, uh, got it, got it, got it to Sir Hassabis and a few more people. And besides this, DeepMind is all about artificial intelligence in different ways, games, chess, somewhere else, yeah. Uh, and those scientists who do science, science and discovery, and like their hob, and their results are sent to the military sphere without agreeing with them. And it's good they can oppose it, at least publicly.
Well, let's see what happens. It's purely British law, right?
It's very unconscious what's going to happen here in the United States. They can turn a trade union like that or not. So, the U.S. is moving, right? And with, uh, that's interesting news. I already told you how the programmer turned up on the border. Uh, GPT developer 4.5 didn't extend the grin card. He's been in the US for 12 years, I think he's been in the US for 12, nine or twelve years. Twelve, yes.
Twelve, yes.
He's from Canada, he's from Canada.
Yeah, and Canada.
And I came to prolong. And he was told, so you're not allowed, and you have to leave. Well, I mean, right away, yeah. And, um, well, I wonder, by the way, why didn't he get his passport that long? Well, I guess I didn't want to get my passport.
And, uh, it says he's moving and working remotely from Airbnb Oofis in Canada, until everything here is in law. And Sam Altman made a statement that in no case could very talent be lost in the United States. And we have the privilege and the good that the world and all the talents of the world are trying to get into the United States and want to get into the United States. And we need to give them the opportunity, not to deny these people. Otherwise the world will change. Well, clearly, given the current, current realities. These are the coolers and the equipment money, of course, now, well, that's a big decision. Let's see, by the way, though, uh, what do you do, what start-ups are gonna be made by different famous people who have left the cool companies. Here, uh, there, and Suzkever and Mira Murati, and the different people who left. Is it really gonna work out if this story plays in terms of the minds, right?
Realizing business, real business through the mind, so the company doesn't just attract a lot of money, and that's a real system of work.
It's time to start a new level at the graduation. What's that? Like once there were young kings, companies that actually attracted a billion, right? Now, a billion people are attracted without a product. The same Sukkever, he literally has a few lines on the website about what they want to do. And he's got billions of company scores. Murati doesn't have the specific products they're planning to create, and the vast amount of money is too high. I don't know what happens when they're taking out a specific product. Either the money's gone or the other way, it's all going to go down there.
But there's a story. The word of the young king is, I think, seriously devalued.
Well, now, actually...
Even the product doesn't have to be tied up.
There's been a lot of information that's been found here in the Valley, and there's a lot of rumors that there are a number of teams that have attracted $100-$200 million to do the agent. You know, we see the market. If we see Murati and the Suzkever that they've attracted a few billion dollars, yes, there's a whole layer of people in the early phases, that's just that we don't even see or know people who don't even know. They're attracting hundreds of millions of dollars. It's not easy. Look, dozens of people who attract billions, dozens more of them, there are still others we don't know all the time, right? There are always those we don't know or see, and we don't understand. And there's a huge layer of investment in 100, 200 million dollars. And the main theme that's a very big subject that's written is the AI agents and the obvious AI agents, it's gonna be, well, it's gonna be super. I guess when they start to create real agents in different topics and when they get some sophths, where it can be easily launched, well, the market will surely go up. The market will be on the way. I mean, while I'm using, I see, like, uh, dozens of people I know, there, business, and I'm connected to a lot of things, nobody's really using anything. It's so simple. When it comes, if there are any serious agents again, they can do before-- how, well, create some scenarios and complex chains. It's gonna be a big move, of course.
Let's see what happens. We've got new episodes through our launch. There were three episodes, and we want to make the AI-agents issue, yes. We want to make a graduation on the use of artificial intelligence in education, and in the education, as professionally as it is used, in the teacher's business, as well as how people can be used to use it. I'm not sure what I'm doing. Very interesting information, different casees. In both Singapore and China, and in European countries, and in Germany, France, Holland, Estonia, the United States, Brazil has very many different casees. We'll have to tell you that. With our weekly graduation in exactly one week, Sunday. Before we meet! Bye, everybody.