And the global launch of ChatGPT Go. He's got the first supercomputer in the world to run a hygat class. Dippheyki. Bandcamp's platform banned the tracks created by artificial intelligence. The hymanoid robot I ordered will be abandoned by the tele-management. OpenAI revealed that its computing workload had reached one and nine gigawats, and they started to show the ad. Britain wants to ban social networks for children under 16. The Z Generation is worried that artificial intelligence will take the job.
OpenAI for Countries initiative. Hello, everybody! We're on ToTheMoon. Technological news, Silicon Valley sites around the world. We're going out every Sunday. Sometimes we have special subjects on Wednesdays, Wednesdays. So, uh, how--
Comments work, right?
The comments are working, yes. So listen, and the interesting part is that you're now, and now you're saying that we were personal intelligence discussing what we did in Gemini. And the point is, I was just looking at him at another angle, because I was just starting to study it, and she's in the beta-money, first of all, for Pro and Ultra's subscribers. And, uh, as I read a little different aspect, he was interested in me right now, so she's gonna connect Gemini to her applications, there, Gmail, pictures, YouTube stories, search requests. And accordingly, Gemini can-- and, well, he connects the juices of the yia, in fact, starts to give you a more personalized answer. It is understandable that the links to the different systems could be made before. But as far as I understand, what difference is that I have to say in a specific request, for example, that you're working with that mail or you're working with YouTube. And here, he's supposed to have it as a memory. She'll work or not, I don't know, because I've been called ChatGPT since morning as a women's floor. I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, uh, got it. "I hope you understand?" - He writes me. And, uh, I'm telling him, I'm, "You've got a man in your building." "All right, I'll know now that you're a man." I think, "You know this afternoon, and tomorrow..."
I wonder what Pauline says to him.
Pauline doesn't know, she's got her own account right now, so...
Oh, well, then, that's all, then my powers are over.
We're scouts, we're scouts, yes, we've been separated for a long time. So, at my insistence. But she said I wasn't interested in the expensive account, and she showed me I didn't bring anything meaningful. I said, "No problem at all." So.
So, mini-drama.
Yeah, mini-drama. Well, she's...
The time of the day. Separating the sharks.
And it's just the beginning.
Yeah, yeah, it's just the beginning. So what's going to happen to the robot? Tanya, what's going to happen to the robot I'm getting, by the way?
I don't know at all. I think Pauline's gonna move in with me, which I'm very happy about. We'll have a robot free house.
Yeah, on the robot, what do I mean? First, according to the company's statements, it's clear that the robots are far away, right? Because when they write that they refused, uh, stories that...
I'll remember. So there's a robot, and it's made by the 1X company. Robot is called NEO. California's company is their main headquarters, although they are in the media as Norwegian, they have a part of the Norway office, respectively. The essence was in this robot. Illar laughed so much about what if the robot doesn't work, he's got a personal assistant from the company. Yeah, well, there were some kind of shit in here. What can you not do? And at some point in time, the personal assistant will be connected. So, uh, you don't have to do this, by the way, with the robot. So, what did they say? They said they were moving to new models. I actually got a sp-para week ago from them, because I still got them for a prediction, I got a story from them. They've been describing what, uh... The topic was very interesting, by the way, I didn't tell you about it. They sent information that, in fact, they are now targeted that when they deliver you a robot, you can teach him any absolutely anything. So it's a direct focus on that now. And they-- and now in the current information, the media also says that they, uh, make robots that, uh... He's got a full autonomy, and you can actually teach him. They showed different examples, like how they taught them to take orelsin there and what to do with it. Or it's a orange, right? Or a specific, specific operation, something to cut in there or open something, which is generally interesting. So you can actually... I have said on several occasions that I'm interested in robots to learn to do some specific, specific things, right? I have a lot of household tasks, a lot of things, right? Big territory, big house, lots of kids, dogs. I'd teach him to watch the dog. So, you know, do a specific, specific action. Watch the kids.
I think he'll be gone for ten years, I think Sasha, to teach him to follow your dog.
I don't know.
You've got a dog that's complicated.
Maybe he's already, like, ending up with a puppy, turning into a reasonable creature.
Well, while the robot comes, yes.
Yeah, while the robot comes, Anya, the dog's gonna get cleaned up.
You just know when you said to cut the orange, I introduced my three-year-old son Lion with a knife in my hands, and I got sick. That's how he learns to cut oranges so he doesn't cut his fingers off, and the robot didn't cut off anyone else's fingers.
I'm scared too.
I'm not gonna give a knife. But I'm saying that, in general, personalized training is what it looks like, more naturally. And if I get a robot that's just gonna be geared to learning him in the process, and there, well, there's some kind of shabby program, not a story like where he takes a regular vacuum cleaner and some kind of a little bit of a stun. It's vacuuming. I laughed and laughed all the time. Yeah. It's like a pretty interesting story, how cool kids are gonna be, how she's gonna work inside this online robot or without the Internet, how often she's gonna be loaded, not. To recharge how he's gonna be stupid, not to fool around how he's gonna talk. We see today that modern models, there's a voice assistant in GPT chat room, he's got a backup, a low-cost model, and so on. What do you want to talk about? They're not really good at it. For example, why I, for example, would not make a story where I speak and the operator says, "This is where your request is now under review. We'll come back to you when he's found. Let's talk about something else. I mean, they're gonna come to this. I understand they might not have that interest inside. We'll see. Here.
But robots are interesting. So, Gemini, it's personal, this intelligence, it's just that, adding to what it is, connecting a lot of different blocks of its own, how he, how far he's gonna study it, see. Because I have a lot of data. I mean, when they say tie mail or photos, I think you'll be able to connect my 60,000 pictures that I have in my place, or you'll tie my letters that I have 15 years. Do you know how much this is? Is that if I have a 15-year-old archive that weighs four or how many gigabytes, how much do I weigh the current mail?
Yeah, there's the idea that Gemini is the model that might, if necessary, put some additional data into the context. Well, you know, then we talked about you forgetting your car number. I asked the model. The Google model ran through your picture, found a picture of you right there, I don't know, standing with your car. I checked the number and this number returned to you. But what's the point? So she can be there, I don't know, tens of thousands of pictures to find the one you're wearing with the car. She needs, well, that's a plus-minus in real time. Indicate all your photos, all your data, there's a mail hygigabites, right? Here are the photos you have. So it's all necessary to indicate, somehow, so that the model in the plus-minus of real time can find the necessary pieces, these pieces add to their context. Well, here's cancer.
And I knew it was, right? I knew, at least I knew the context. That people have a very different kind of guy. That's right, people have a very different kind of guy.
And in this story, I'm the one who's got the most stress.
And the cars are very much photographed.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And in this story, I'm the one most intimidating that, well, she's gonna have to scan and study everything you have. And, in fact, Google knows everything about you, and that's how it's gonna be more about you.
And that's a little embarrassing.
No, he doesn't know about me. I keep telling everyone when they come and tell me that a personalized ad, he knows about me, they don't know anything about me, like a GPT chate, like. Here's GPT chatting to date, which is much more. Yeah, just crazy, just a lot more. But you're absolutely right that if he indicates, he can make very fast comparisons differently. That's another aspect. One thing he knows some phrases there, somewhere, somewhere, saw some search requests, some trash, some kind of post that you're writing in social media. Another case he knows your pattern of behavior. Yeah, I'm not saying later if he's got twenty-four on you. And I'll remember the problem. That's a very serious problem in America. Yeah, we've been discussing it once, that there are data that are confidential at the level that they'll never be brought to trial, nowhere. For example, medical records. I mean, they'll only be suing if they're there.
He'll only be there if there's a final case. Or there's data, a different kind of data, I don't know, there, with lawyers, there, with lawyers. Well, that's a lot of personalized information that can't be disclosed. What's the problem with ChatGPT? That ChatGPT would easily disclose this information in a microdeal. I mean, if you're on the case, they're gonna have to read your correspondence, they're gonna read it. Just like they get access to the computer. And this problem-- that, by the way, raised this issue in OpenAI Health. Yeah? What people will start loading, even though people are already on the line, people will start loading up a lot of their medical records, and it's supposed to be... Well, I don't care, for example, I have nothing to do with it. I'm a personalized information mine, I don't see any health information at all. Yeah? And for many people, it's a problem. For me-- I have other questions I wouldn't want them to be highly indexed, and there my life is so much above, and, uh, it's been recognized.
Oh, until the experts, the commentators are awake. I don't know exactly how to work the subload of content in Gemini. Maybe that's how you know there's a story in the iPhone that there are pictures that are being grouped inside the cell phone. There, this in the restaurant, this is on a trip.
Yeah.
And there are these groups. Perhaps the model will use such kinds of gate and factions that are created to find, and will not be able to do it in the first place, index it, and so on. Maybe. But I still have this story that makes me a little embarrassed. You're starting to think, "I'm gonna take this picture, or should I do it better?" That's, well, that's not the fact that it's gonna be for your use. Yeah? Gemini might use it for something.
I guess.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, that's a very smart search. Yeah? I remember when the story came out when you could find something fast among tens of thousands of pictures. He seems to me to have been the same as he was seven years ago in the iPhone. But I'm with an iPhone amateur. Yeah? But in general, but it was, it was a know-how. I remember when you had the chance to find something super cool fast. They've been trying for two years to make a story where I can combine words differently, but it's working really hard. So, so far, well, it still works very hard, and it doesn't understand. Like, if I'm looking for pictures, uh, I don't know, my wife and looking for her name, I'm telling you, English, for example, and I have it in my Russian book, then he doesn't know who I'm talking about. Look, who's talking about. And you need to know exactly how you call a man in the correspondence. Yeah? And there's all people's names, like, who's recording who. They're still recording differently. There's someone who loves, someone's a cocoa. Yeah? I mean, here. And I got caught up here like a Belarusian, and my wife sent me a riles yesterday. A girl in Belarusian, and she's talking about, uh, how to learn the Belarusian language. And she says, "I've lived here my whole life and realized I don't know a big and necessary word like a poop in Belarusian." And she's been studying a whole story about finding that word in Belarusian. It's a separate subject. The Belarusians can study, see. So we'll move on. Not the subject of our...
Write in the comments.
Yeah, it's very-- it's really, really, really, really, really, really, really, like, you know, like the man born in the Republic of Tatarstan, which means for the unfamiliar, it's the Russian Federation, I mean, that, uh, you-- you, you could be, like, an intellectual man. You'll laugh, and you'll be confused. Yeah? Because the Belarusian language is not entirely understandable for a Russian man.
He's not even clear, I'd say. For the design, a little comment. I was born in Udmurti.
Oh, here, in Udmurti.
It's the Russian Federation, too.
For the Belarusian, Udmurthia, the Republic of Tatarstan is the same.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, right? So we'll go to, uh, the news. I'm out, look. It's a big story, actually.
She may be uninterested on our news, but she's actually important. There's a ChatGPT Go tariff. Last year, he started turning around, I think he started turning up on India last year, and then started, and then turned into a huge number of other countries. It's a tariff that's worth $8 in ChatGPT, not twenty. Now, this tariff is spreading around the world, until it came to the United States, it's worth $8. Well, I mean, first of all, that's a huge plus. And the good thing is, the Openai people don't chase money. We were here with my partners yesterday, there, one business at IT discussed some models. There are people who chase, there, discounts, some gangs do, sell all the pre-exports, annual subscriptions. OpenAI is a good company, as it does, like a real business. Yeah? We told you two weeks ago, Max Grigoriev shared his opinion on what they really did, what they did to the research company. But in fact, they're very stable. I mean, this is the annual tariff, for example, that was proposed and proposed in the xAI Elon Musk for an annual tariff. Annual tariffs, what's the deal? What if you're offered an annual tariff, you should in fact be held responsible for it and not want to have a new annual tariff six months later, you know, a new tariff. Yeah? You're selling people something cheaper in advance. ChatGPT didn't do that. And that they put in even cheaper tariffs and roll out, which means they want to enter every house in the world. And eight dollars is a perfectly affordable price. Well, it's been a lot of countries. Yeah? And even if $20,000, I think people in Eastern Europe, for example, could, well, maybe someplace expensive a month. Eight dollars is a more accessible story and, well, a little. Yeah? I don't know, there's how many of these 20 Belarusian roubles and how many in Russia, there are six hundred and fifty roubles. Yeah? I mean, it's a cheap price. It is clear that it is not available in some countries, particularly in the said, but it is indeed a good topic, a good theme forward. So I remember a large number of people using a free ChatGPT, which is, uh, unbelievable to have a signature. I don't know what colleagues think, but it's unbelievable to have even the simplest signature, because you have extra designs. Only if you're a GPT chat there every month. Here. So I congratulate everyone on the new tariff. Illnar, there was another topic that they had at the beginning of the 20 or 30 countries, I think in Mid-Asian, right, somewhere or something?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Indonesia went there differently. Next, respectively.
South-East Asia.
Go ahead.
Southeast.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
way, OpenAI launched an initiative called the country initiative. And you can see that they're starting to go very seriously. Before we speak of an initiative for the country, I mean, they have announced that their current capacities are currently being developed.
One and nine gugawattts.
They have loaded one and nine hygawatts. By the way, it's 40 per cent of the Republic of Belarus. Here. That's more than Croatia. Yeah. And the current load. And there's a way to figure out what it is. What do you mean? That it's not just you that took this system now, and, in fact, the OpenAI in this report, revealing these data, they're saying it's actually their current, you know, bottled pot, yeah, their business. And when electricity and computing power are rigid, well, severely restricting their development, yes, inside. What they're saying now, and they're clear that they could launch, I think that's what they're doing, even at $8, that story is that they have power, yeah. And perhaps if they had no limit power, they might be free to give more resources.
Let's see what's going on. So they've launched an initiative for countries. It is called OpenAI for countries and this initiative for education worldwide and for public services. And they've run her now with eight partners. There is Estonia, Greece, there is the UAE and Trinidad and Tobago. Well, they were definitely making a sample, right? There's an AEE, Estonia, and, uh, Tobago.
Kazakhstan surprises me most. What is the connection between these countries? Why did they choose them?
Look, I think this story, Tanya, is random partnerships. Kazakhstan. The fact is that Kazakhstan had spoken at a conference several months ago, a chapter responsible for education and public service. The man was speaking to me, Sash Masrabov sent this news from Kazakhstan. And he told Kazakhstan that they were working together with the State on education. And I have repeatedly said that on the spot there would be many States where I would be at the seat of the presidents immediately to launch various initiatives at the state level, with the OpenAI, because you have The opportunity to turn your contours. Remember, they agreed with them not just about a tariff or just about using some kind of microscope there. In fact, they're turning their OpenAI for the OAE, yes. I mean, this is your infrastructure. So there's gonna be contours in there, because, of course, the state can't afford it. Well, some might be a country, but most people can't afford to get in all the information that, on which, I don't know, some su-- some court, right? But I remember that the OpenAI is still dividing the servers, and they, for example, have solved the problem. There are very complex personal data legislation in Europe. They have their servers in Europe, and you can choose where to keep them, if I'm not mistaken, for the rest of the time. They are, first, special in the initiative.
Initiatives. They give, first of all, special access to the version. They have a version of Education, and it's based on ChatGPT 5.2. And, uh, plus they can make different specialized, specialized adaptations inside. Let's see what's going to happen. Is that what they're writing? It says that ChatGPT Education has already been introduced in schools and universities in Estonia, covering 30,000 students and teachers. Of course, on the one hand, it's a country's end. Partly, yes. On the other hand, I don't understand what's going on with business that's in the educational environment. Yeah? So, such topics, they, they, if they're not together, for example, with private companies, they're gonna be private companies straight, well, very hard to crush, yeah. Could this be-- and this might be possible in Estonia. I don't know if it's gonna be in countries where the superpowered public agenda should be pursued, do I? Because we see that models, they have information often, where, in, I don't know, authoritarian regimes, well, obviously, they won't allow the use of such models.
But the subject is very interesting.
I wonder if you've been playing Anthropic. I mean, it was worth it, so we discussed the OpenAI initiative on health. In a few days, Anthropic was annotated and released in beta versions. The OpenAI for Countries initiative has also emerged. Also, respectively, in parallel with the education of Anthropic, the initiative is shown, as well as by which countries they work.
Yes, Teach for All.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, they're straight--
For everyone. And they said that...
Parallel.
For teachers in 60 three countries. And what is meant by this AI Literacy and Creator Collective initiative is that over 100,000 Teach All programme graduate teachers will have access to Lot, there, and training on the introduction of artificial intelligence. Yeah?
I mean, they're doing the same thing. Literally day.
Yeah. And the news came out. In fact, the AI initiative for Countries of Type 21 has been announced. Anthropic of the 21st was announced. And Health, I think so. Yeah, there was something on the health.
It was a few days between them, yeah.
I think it's real. But anyway, we see that OpenAI, Anthropic is definitely going into the field of interaction with everyone. Gemini is definitely gonna see that there, too. It's Google, though. Yeah, Google, they're doing their own thing. And I think Google has one of the biggest pain-- one of the biggest challenges is just to integrate into their own services. I don't know how much they can create new services. I think the OpenAI and Anthropic have a lot more chance of creating new colleges in education than Google.
Google is probably used to working in different countries with its own methods, which concerned their previous services, rather than new initiatives. And it's gonna be a little harder. Oh, it's a little hard to do. By the way, there was some interesting news about lobbing big tech and lobbying, here. And then the news was that in Britain, the number of high-ranking meetings about lobism big tech was eight times more than those high-ranking people's meetings to discuss. crisis, there, uh, children's development. And that's to say that, of course, big tech is today an incredible resource of money and power. And on the one hand, it's cool, on the other hand, well, in fact, they're getting more and more power, power is catastrophic, right? There's even a saying. In 2025, for the first time, there were articles that started to compare that, in fact, the leaders of big tech companies in the United States are beginning to poop-- to absorp such an oli-oli-oligarchal power, right? And from the point of view of power, when power is concentrated in, there, a certain group of people, and by fact, it's actually getting bigger and bigger now, isn't it? Because these people make incredible decisions, they participate in economics, there, not just countries, but the world. I mean, look at how many companies Google costs - four trillion, Apple, NVIDIA, there, four trillion or four, I don't know how much it's worth today, right?
Apple more than three trillions. I mean, Microsoft is more than three trillions. I mean, it's a big money, a very serious money. So, the Hygie started the first in the world of AI-suppeter of the hygatt class. And for the audience, maybe it doesn't mean anything. Just like 1.9 hygawatts we just said before. That's why I compared it to the country. I think that with the country, that's a very clear characteristic. I remember we showed a schedule somehow, maybe this time-- this time, too, today, we'll be able to highlight that China is incredibly growing in power and electricity, and everything. And China is ahead of the world in terms of electricity development. And there is, of course, the question of what will happen because what models they can roll, what data they can learn, especially the country interested in keeping under control, not only is it? to study other people's data, including their country. Yeah. I mean, it's definitely China moving really hard. But, uh, so that's just that-- that player was here. Elon Musk reported on the social media that he had a new computer infrastructure, that he had this Colossus-2 from xAI, that it was operational, and there's a record power of one gigawat. That's why it's important. I remember being told in the Valley that the best power ever existed would be in the xAI. What did I have to ask you, how could it be? It means there's an OpenAI, which, with Oracle, Arm, is being introduced, developing Stargate, right? And they were right about this initiative. But still, Elon Musk, he always says he'll have the highest power. Yeah? And it's very interesting to see what they're wearing.
It's good to compare, but, uh, in the OpenAI article, which you're talking about-- about one and nine gugawatts that you've brought. They're showing a schedule, how they have the computing power, the available growers. I mean, in the twenty-third year, it was literally there two years ago, when this peak, linked to GPT chat, and all that, they had only zeros of two gigawattes. I mean, literally, there's a zero of two dozen. In the twenty-fourth year, literally recently, they had zero of six gigawatts, right? And only in the twenty-fifth, they were able to reach one and nine. So one Colossus-2, which one Gigawatt is genetic, five times more than the OpenAI in the twenty-third.
OpenAI was already an interesting company in the twenty-third.
Illnar, less than five months of Colossus built.
One hundred and twenty-two days. Yeah. And, yes, what's interesting is, Colossus-2 has one gigawattt that's not a ceiling on top. I think a few months later, the gigawatts are planning to bring it.
Spring, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, six, seven, seven, seven, seven, six, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, six, six, six, six, six, seven, seven, six, six, six, six, seven, six, six, six, seven, seven, seven, six, six, six, seven, six, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, six, seven, seven, six, seven, seven, six, six, seven, six, six, seven, seven, six, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven, seven
Yeah. In fact, the computer power is huge. And in the same publication, the OpenAI has an interesting correlation. Literally, one to one addiction. When they had zeros of two gigawatts, they generated two billion profits there when they had zeros of six gigavatts available, they had six billion profits, one and nine, they had up to twenty. billions of them. And they show that it's kind of like, if we're gonna increase our computing power further, we're gonna have a lot more money. Well, now, the xAI is not even comparable, it's going to climb up the relatively computing capacity that it has available, which is being introduced. It means that larger models can learn more people, and they can, uh, unload their services. Not only people, users, that's what we say, yes, there's company, anything can happen. That's why it's a very big achievement for Mask.
Yeah. And I wonder what the team is down there, yes, and the timelines are in place. xAI is in fact a year and there are not such investments. There, if they're attracting $2 billion. And the question I think they didn't sell them for a share, they're inside somehow, I don't know how they've been doing, it's not really important. What's interesting is that what Illnar was talking about power is that they consume more electricity than the peak consumption of San Francisco City, yes, and in the peak. Also, the article states that they are now more than a million equivalent GPU NVIDIA H100. I remember we somehow-- I was doing a special episode on the comparison between the US and Russia with regard to the number of maps and, uh, over a million H100. That's, of course, unreal. Well, that's, that's very serious.
It's really a lot, yeah.
It's really a lot.
It's a lot of inappropriate. Oh, let's go to the dips. So, here, why did I want to raise this subject again today? And it's gonna be interesting, viewers, how you're gonna write back, what's your situation on the dips? They showed me, uh, the Kmatchka and showed up on the snow-blower. Well, the snow has been falling and people are digging up there before the second floor. There were comments everywhere: "One second floor." Well, I was just looking, watching, watching, and then at some point of time, I started seeing videos and pictures of the house and the back of that snow right on the tenth floor, so the side goes in, so it's right on the side. You didn't see, Ilnar, did you? It's coming right in.
The fourth to fifth floor saw something else coming down, but I didn't follow the situation closely.
Yeah, it comes in side, yeah, snow. And then one of the videos I-- it says that this content is generosized, and, uh, artificial intelligence. And then there's nothing wrong with it. And then the media went, uh, the news is that. It's a video that shows and says, "This isn't an artificial intelligence." So, a bunch of videos.
So, a bunch of videos and everything. And I sit down, and I can't understand, where's the artificial intelligence? Because there was artificial intelligence, and people are going to the airport. It says it's an artificial intelligence. And there's a picture of it, where it feels like snowing there on the 20th or the tenth floor, somewhere in the side, it's all buried, and it says it's not artificial intelligence. And you realize at this point that you're actually... Well, I'd like to see what that looks like, right? One thing I got from Minsk's mom sent me that they had an abnormal amount of snow in there, and he said, "Look at how much snow. I said, "You saw the Camchatka?" So you're watching the Camchatka. I'd like to see the real thing, because you're looking at it, and they sent it out of Chicago, that there were some sort of accidents and a lot of snow that fell out there or in New York now. Well, you're kind of... assessing it somehow. And it's getting in the sense of the dypphes. This week, there's interesting things. First, there's a senator who's speeding up the law in the U.S. now, Durbin, yes, Richard Durbin, who wants to enact a separate law to give victims of porn-dippeyes a trial, right? Because porn-dipphei is a whole problem in the world. We told you last time, we briefly touched her. And apart from the general point of view, the senators in the United States now require reports from Big Tech about the dypphes, of course, with the sexy diapers. Because what's the situation when they're being asked to ask for large tech forms to explain their policies or something, the platforms usually, like, well, we didn't know there was anything wrong, something went wrong. They're sort of cleaning the back, right? And it turns out there's a lot of sexual photographs on the Internet, not just a sexual one, when the AIs created and used real people, right? And the fairies are putting on real people. I mean, this is the subject, she, she's brutal.
So we've been discussing a lot of content creation, because there's news that, by the way, there's a very interesting Bandcamp music platform. She banned her track platform, built with artificial intelligence. That's a nice case, by the way. She said very hard that we're not gonna have more artificial intelligence tracks. People will listen to real people. Why? Because last year the world was broken, completely smacked with a single-type, enough content, generosed with artificial intelligence. And I was doing piano last night, and I was a music teacher, and she was inspired by many people who were very famous, you know, about, about, uh, different, right? We talked about her, we were sitting there. I was just driving in the car, listening to the third Rahmanin concert with my son, my younger. And on my way, my son turned on me with a surprise-- well, he couldn't believe it was possible to play. He's just, you know, it's real! I wrote her how much school I need to learn to play this concert? And we're here with her, and Igor, Igor Illnar, was sitting, he just had, he had a shock. Here they are, we were on Kiana, and Damian was in the back, five-year-old, and there's a nine-year-old. And he's just doing piano. And he had him, he, he, he had a real shock. He couldn't figure out how it was possible. It's 15 minutes. It's clear that there's more than piano, and there's more to it, right? And all of Rachm-- this concert is for this. But still. The point is, I was talking to her at this point of time, and I thought, and artificial intelligence could be so generosic? And basically what happens next, huh? What happens next in terms of the music on the Internet that people listen. And that's why Bandcamp banned what I think it's a good policy. I don't know-- I understand that there's a platform that isn't super mass, there could be YouTube, like, prohibiting proliferation or not. Maybe we'll get there, right? Perhaps we all come to see social media, world-wide big ones that will be banned. I mean, now, on the contrary, Instagram is introducing some artificial intelligence chips. TikTok is introducing artificial intelligence chips, all embedded. Maybe it's not just a mark, but maybe a ban. Although X AI Ilon Mac thinks that the entire content will be generated by artificial intelligence, he's got me-- one of his opinions, yes, which I know, well, directly, from him, right?
One of his views is that the entire content will be generated by artificial intelligence, and people will consume a personalized content created by artificial intelligence.
Yeah, I think that I'm getting Mask's position closer, that it's probably gonna be a lot of sgenerated content, and he's gonna be all over it just because it's cheaper, it's easier. Well, on a parole, let's get the same Rahmanin concert, huh? Try playing. There are clearly musicians among our viewers who can do that. Write how hard this is. I mean, it's a conservatory, not a conservatory, but it's still a huge amount of work that--
It's the fourth, fourth year of conservatory-- fourth year of conservatory, saying to play. Well, they teach a lot.
It's not even music school, it's--
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
It's--
It's a top pilot, it's a top pilot.
Yeah. And as for the generosity music or people's writing, you know, again, you're classical music, especially the RACHMANIN, you're not listening every day, you probably not on the background when you work, are you? Still, everyone has a niche. There's only one thing left that's what a man does, that's what he plays right now. Like, you know, there's a melomana out there that I don't know, gold ends at the tecera just to get better at it, the columns are right. People are spending huge fortunes on it just to feel the sound. Someone, I don't know, goes to the conservatory all the time to concerts just to hear it play alive. Not there, not through the columns, but there's a whole lot of noise waves, vibrations, all this. Yeah, that's why everything has a niche. But speaking of the widest possible total consumption, I'm sure the cheap AI's a slob, as it was called, yes, you know, was discussed, too. Just the trash that's generosed with neurosets, he's gonna win. He'll be a lot, he'll be cheap, he'll take his niche. It's gonna be a lot of money.
Here's a teacher who will lead you to the fourth course of the conservatory and then perform the third concert of the Rahmanin.
I think my teacher wants to put me somewhere. Otherwise, I'm always saying where to take time? And by the way, we're going to keep going, yeah. Very-- write. Write what you think about the dyppheics. Well, I'm really curious, it's interesting to start a discussion and start on the canal, see. Because I've been telling a story about some social network going on to what, why not? Yeah? I mean, I'm really in the middle of a Kmchatka. I still don't even know how to find the news in this case. You just realize that even the media are official, they can put a chippy out now, without knowing they're putting out a dyppheik. Yeah? So, or there, ChatGPT can give you a dipphenic without knowing it's a dipphenic. Yeah? Because how do you check it out? And that's a very, very hard story.
The porn of the sippers you were talking about. Now, this problem has come to light because it has just become more accessible. Yeah? Well, what's the problem with that? When you write in a X-ray in the former Twitter Grok, I don't know, there, change a man to a swimsuit or something, he does. It's become public. People just started using it. There was some popularity, but in general, the generation of such content, it's been a long time ago. It's not that hard to do, but it was just a little harder than writing tweets in a X-ray, right? And that's the only reason this thing went up.
Yeah.
And so many, there, virtual models for the relevant resources like Onlifance and similar, they're being generosized. They're not real people.
Yeah.
It's just a whole human story, and it's not very difficult. It's obvious that this isn't done in GPT chat room somewhere, right? And you're just turning your models around, you're gonna get them, you know, they're gonna make them, and so on. You're taking down the filters that are available, but it's working anyway. It just became so public now. And here's our bloke with all those Grok pictures that just brought up this story. Well, I'm very glad she was raised.
The question is, in fact, important. And the pictures and the videos are about to stop trusting.
Last time we talked about Apple, I was like, "Siri's gonna make it," that Apple is partnering with Gemini. They've already done a lot of tests, but I think we're gonna see them right now. Usually there's a March or when there's a release. I think we'll see something. But the point-- the interesting news was that we were talking about Apple choosing Google and not choosing, for example, Anthropic or opting OpenAI. It was reported on the Internet that insiders had reported that OpenAI had refused to become Siri brains and that discussions had been held on whether the OpenAI should be inside Apple. And OpenAI deliberately didn't make this deal. Yeah? And, and the OpenAI focused on its independent absolute infrastructure and on making the system for itself, not going anywhere. Well, I guess first, that's a billion dollars that's a conditionality. And maybe they want to be completely independent, not be under any of them, not to devote any resources to it, yes, to spend all their resources.
Yeah, spending all your resources in terms of all of your systems on your own. Not much, they're still making competition. Well, honestly, their task is not to keep the fifty percent of the people who use Apple's phones, uh, coming with Siri because it's clear that it's easier to start than, uh, to run a backwards. A voice assistant. And to make your voice assistant, and everyone was interested in running the button, not "Hey, Siri" to say, yeah, you got a phone on, and you got to talk--
...Hey, Sam, there, or Hey, ChatGPT. I mean, I have a lot of Alexes at my house, and the kids used to say, "Hey, Alexa." And in the car, for example, I have Google, there's a new sophth where there's no integration. What's that called? I have some in others, but here's the but--
Apple CarPlay or something, I guess.
Yeah, one of the new ones is missing, right in CarPlay, CarPlay there. And there is, there's just Android operatives, and there's Google. Stupid. Well, like Siri is stupid, by the way, huh? If anyone among the adroiters thinks that, "Yeah, Siri is shit, and Google is smart," I can say that I'm a user, including Hey, Google, well, he's totally stupid. So my son's driving in the car when, you know, or the kids when they're driving in the car, they often say, "Hey, Alexa, hey, Alexa," they start screaming, so then, "Oh, right, right, Google." So they change and say, "Hey, Google." I think there's still a missing Hey, Siri, missing Hey, Sam, right? And then you sit, uh, somewhere, and you always pick up, so who's there, right? Who's there?
Yeah, it's very likely that this is where Johnny Eve and he are starting their equipment, and there's a voice assistant. It would be very strange if they were first in Siri and then a year later, for
example, released their equipment, and the same. That makes sense. Good point up.
Yeah. Uh, interesting information was that the generation Z was more concerned that artificial intelligence would take their work away. And it turns out these people, there, uh, generation Z, there's a different time interval that shows when these people were born, there, two thousand to two thousand, ten, there, or... And the average there is...
Young people for a year.
Yeah, the average age of people, there, 20 years. Ia's got a new study that, uh, there, I don't know what amount they were inside, but this is, according to Randstad, about four out of five workers around the world expects artificial intelligence. It'll affect their work. And, accordingly, this is Gen Z, Z pussy, while seeing a lot of risks. I mean, if we, for example, Ilnar, are taking this in our way from the point of view of news or data when people, well, you're very deep in technological IT, yes, you're sitting, and there's a, uh, chapter. Antropic says, "No one's gonna walk in 12 months, right? Here. Well, you smile like that, and I smile-- well, I, for example--
Very embarrassing, Sasha, we're very embarrassed now.
Disgusted?
I'm gonna make a little comment on this story.
I smile, for example, because there's a million sophths in the world, and yet, uh, no Claude, no Claude, no Claude can replicate the site, right? What to say, uh, in complex decisions to come in and build dependency, dependence on the fields in the databases, understand all the essence, hierarchy. Well, it's a really cool code to do, not be a helper, not be an assistant. Because when we say that a deputy comes along, we're just going to the level of a more sophisticated technological solution. And the world requires more technological choices. That's what we're talking about. More cool. But he can't even make the simplest ones, can he? Well, if someone sends me a smash on how to copy a site from one platform to another, I'll pay a lot of money for it. Just a little stiff.
Well, uh, here's to the news you said on the courseora, yeah, there was a proo of agents who could work for weeks, where this architecture is, uh, a conditional manager, too. The agent who's sharing the task for the sub-task. Then the sub-tasks are taken as separate slips by other actors. Then they, uh, do the job, the job checks, and then they're leaving. I mean, this is the move on this side. Uh, we all, there, most of the Aythichians laughed at the words, uh, Adario Amadea, that a huge amount of the code would be written by I-Chem. And generally, until the end of the year, it's not eighty percent of the code, but there are cabs where people show that I haven't written anything here. It's clear that it's not an enterprise code or anything, but even this is starting to come down.
Still in our lives, the programmers have very deep all these assistants.
So we vote, then we vote. Uh, do the programmers disappear or not? I'm for those who won't disappear. Ilinar for those who are on the side.
No, look, let's do this. They're not gonna disappear. We have a huge bottleneck on electricity, we have a huge bottleneck on the chips. The TSMC cannot produce all these chips on all applicants. A lot of them. We've got plenty of years. Remember when you once discussed the horses as many? Twenty years while their cars were pushed. The programmers will have a lot, too, but first of all,
But you, but you're still looking. I just-- let's get the audience so fast, because I'm considering the next story that I don't even see the beginning of the era of Togo, so that the IT developers are gone. I started programming in two thousand years, didn't I? But, uh, there, I've been doing a professional program, okay, two thousand third year, professionally. So it's clear that I stopped programming at some point, but it was a long time ago. I remember this area very clearly. I was there, I don't know, one of the first, there were complex systems, is automating the entire financial system in the transport company. I remember, I was the young programmer, and they let her do everything, right? And you sit and do everything, and the Baek, the front, there, you break it, you make it up, you make it up, you test it yourself, you start it, you print it, you print it, you do it, you do it, you do it, you do it, you do it, you do it, all of you, right? I remember that time, I saw migrating at all, uh, structure, like migraines-- like a development. The funds were always said, everything was coming, and it was complicated. It's so hard to start a studio where you need to develop, you should have hired some programmers who're turning something around, right? Well, that's how it turned out. New professions have come up. There's a DevOps, that's UMoP, I don't know, that's a bunch of stuff, a bunch of stuff, that's all about it, so it's in the interior. So my position is, Ilnara, the position, Illnara, is that, uh, everything will be, the issue of chips.
Well, look, let's do this. Ah, in the past few years, development has been so fast that I wouldn't, I didn't, make the bet that we won't have anything more powerful in three years.
I mean, if the trend continues...
But with this power, look, you see the power of this... I see the next thing, so let's just focus here. I see that-- I see that some people are going to disappear into some professions, something will come up, but from the programming perspective, it's gonna be a little redistribution of what people do. But that doesn't mean that there's gonna be a decrease in the number of personnel needed for technology. That's what I just--
It's just that the other people have to do it, right? Just another one needs to be done.
Well, yeah, for example, okay, that's how I used to, for example, spend a lot of time drawing up the database structure by creating some field. Now, I'd like to use ChatGPT or Claude or something, I would do it much faster in terms of normalization of data, I don't know, for example, yes? Or the description of some kind of technical mission, I would, I would just do more. But now and now, the code needs to be done. Now we're talking about a robot fucking learning that a man can't cut a knife, right?
Yeah.
So again. The number of people-- do you have a decrease in the number of programmers or not?
Look, I think it's not getting any smaller, but the job's changing. Work is changing.
That means yes.
Can we call, there, a programmer, a human who, in five years, I don't know, will be the voice to say what to do? We might, but it's not the same programist. Well, as programmers are now, they're not the same as ten years ago.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Whatever. And the level of tasks that are being handled at a speed.
Yeah, but we're going to go along on this, but the audience needs to answer that, too. But as my--I talked, too, there, with my close comrade and friend, there, in, and in Moscow, and he says that they, uh, there, part of their project, part of the code was written by a man of a promt engineer who isn't even a professional. He understands programming. And then he ran into a problem. The engineers came in and they took the code, they opened it, they said, "What the fuck is written, yes?"
What's this code?
It's impossible to read, it's impossible to watch. And this man, this promt engineer, he didn't even know what he was doing. I mean, he did, yes, he wrote, but he didn't really know what he was. It's the same thing that if I'm gonna get a man to analyze, my wife will be called to analyze financial, uh, financial data in my company in some way, right? And, well, I see she's so...
The mask is on this subject.
Well, I see she can do it. Not much of a good one, she's gonna make me some super-reports, write, but she's not gonna understand anything, is she? If I say, "Look, you've got some weird logic in here, and you're already talking about another business. We don't have wholesale sales, like, or then... she's gonna say, "Yeah, yeah?" Well, that's what the prom engineers smell, right? And...
Engineering, yes. And, and we kind of, on the one hand, sort of, sort of simplify things, and on the other hand, we're actually getting a lot of other episodes that will have to be resolved, too.
I think you see them, these problems, right? With this kind of engineer. There they are, they must be known. Look, do you know what I read? Britain. We didn't talk about Australia for nothing. I recall that in Australia, a new law is not possible for social networks throughout the country until the age of 16 to be fully dissolved. It's a unique theme in the world. The British Government is testing and is considering the possibility of introducing a ban on self-registration in social media for adolescents under 16 years of age. Similar to the law that came into force in Australia. And I don't know, first of all, if they have a total ban on the use or prohibition of registration. There's still a difference, yes, a big one. And, or there's gonna be, like, parenting or whatever they're gonna lead. But again, we live in the world, it's like we talked about whether social networks without artificial intelligence are going to be in place, where we don't even know what's going on. So, perhaps social networks at some point for everyone were probably going to be trending, in ten years when all countries say, there are children under the age of 16, so social networks are not sitting. It's British, but it's serious. And many people know, yeah, that Australia is actually a test site for, for, I think, it sounded like, yes, that this test site is very often, yes, a test site for the United States. So, or, in particular, for Britain. I'll see you in a week. ToTheMoon Canal.