Hello, everybody! We're on ToTheMoon and this is our special release on Wednesdays. I'll remind you, we're going out every week, Sunday. Four people have been leading us for over a year. So today, our podcast is very interesting. I think it's the most important thing that concerns all people in terms of artificial intelligence. What professions will exist in the future, what will disappear and what is the point of making a contribution now? Go on and do what. Not just that next year, two or three get the right wage, the right thing, make good business, open up new business, make decisions at your current place of work, but, you know, For decades, to be in the trend and in motion, including you, your friends around and your children. I, I-- this is an important subject, and she's been asked by a lot of people. In the comments, describe how much the topic really is concerned and many have been waiting for it. And you can support our sub-camp on this. Ah, the profession, the future profession. I'll try to give you today, tell you, uh, my mind about the profession and the look of people, the minds of the world, yes, who are engaged in artificial intelligence and are in the United States, China, Europe, totally different. countries. I'm in and I'm living in the Silicon Valley, in the US, California. However, of course, in constant communication with people from totally different countries and in different business areas. It's gonna be different, different dynamics here. So, the very important idea I want to start with is that there's a lot of research on this subject, by the way. We'll talk about this research today, too. And one of the great research of the last one that came out is the PricewaterhouseCoopers study. We'll see about that today. That's why I want to start that, um, artificial intelligence is not a threat to a man now, but an opportunity.
And I'm gonna make this meeting today, and I'm gonna make it a first-hand opportunity for a man, right? We can, of course, discuss the threat and address the critical aspects of the availability of artificial intelligence, especially what is seen in the development of his two past years. At the same time, you can be seen and you can be, and how am I supposed to make decisions? And in general, ToTheMoon, our channel, we've done more than 50 episodes. They're dedicated to learning more about technological worlds, learning more about artificial intelligence and understanding how it is naturally used in your life every day, all the time, every time. Day. We've had this vote in a roller skate a few days ago. How much money are you willing to spend on artificial intelligence and chatting? It's a very interesting thing, because I'm sure this subject will change very much. It's been a year, I think we'll see the changes in terms of the cost. You're gonna spend your money on that, right? They didn't look, they didn't. It's very interesting to be in this dynamic and to see it. So there's a plasthetic of reasoning, and a lot of people say that simple professions, starters will disappear. It's a very standard reason that junior programmers will disappear, that simple copyrights, simple designers, simple salesmen will disappear. I mean, it's gonna disappear, it's gonna wipe out a whole layer of ordinary people. And then everyone goes and tells us that there won't be any assistants, no secretaries, and no people who do easy work. What's so weird, huh? Because if all the ordinary people disappear, everyone should be super smart or what? On the other hand, what people do now without any serious education, what they used to demand higher education or some very strong training, now makes many things much easier. Yeah, it's a lot easier now, I say, before artificial intelligence becomes available, to create some sort of text, to design, to make websites, to program, including to sell, it's all a lot easier. A huge number of different tools. However, the number of junior staff has not decreased. I'd say the number of these people has increased, right? Because when the basic simple things are easier to do, competition is very huge and very many new products are being created. On the other hand, there is a point, it sounds like, even if artificial intelligence helps first, business will start to optimize costs over time. And where the car's running at 90%, the man's gonna be taken away. And there's a good point, a big point. We'll look at it today, including with you, in the example of different professions. My challenge again is to make you, after the meeting, understand, feel and understand, and what do you do in terms of artificial intelligence, what professions will be further developed, what is there? The point of investing in what you don't have to invest is to expand your mind.
This is a cluster that should be given at the outset, that the number of vacancies associated with artificial intelligence is increasing much faster than the overall vacancy rate. Yeah, that's what you've seen for the past two years. I've been in touch today, and I have a software business, and my partner says, "there's a lot of people saying that the market is getting worse, and the obvious amount of money that is currently in technology, They're bigger. Well, that's a fact. And the number of vacancies that, together with artificial intelligence, has become more. But, but, they're not just more than that, according to some reports, the latest data at the end of June of the twenty-fifth year, the demand for artificial intelligence specialists is growing three and a half times. faster than average job growth, huh? And the number of vacancies in artificial intelligence with knowledge of artificial intelligence has grown more than seven times. The fundamental thing, I think, is the example of a lot of people racing two years ago in designing and making different designs. I told everyone, "Look, the engineers are very expensive. How do you do that?" They say, "We have engineers in the arts. And why am I surprised? Because in the Silicon Valley, people who are inside are two years ago, intra-intelligent, modeling, paying more than a million dollars a year. Then we rolled, ran a story saying people pay five, ten million dollars a year. The last thing that's interesting is that Meta, it's Facebook, yes, offered an officer of OpenAI to go to the start-up bonus for $100 million. When you see that number, you realize the market is completely different. It's not a question of bubble, it's not a question of some reassessment, it's a question of what we are now in a situation where there may be a big change. They may not happen, they may be. These changes, if they do, they will have a strong influence on every person. Well, a lot of people. I like the speech, not that it's close to me, I'd pay attention to it. Chapter Anthropic recently stated that in 10 years in the world, the world will be governed by artificial intelligence, and that artificial intelligence will be owned by either the US or China. I would like to be very careful to draw attention to this statement, it's important. There are positions like, for example, we're going to move in detail now. But I want to start. That's the position of marketing, sales specialist. These roles would seem to depend on human communication, and artificial intelligence helps to analyse customer behaviour, optimize sales crusts, there, staff proposals. But what's on the market now, huh? This is the beginning of our discussion today, that the Marquetologists who have learned the AI-Analytic have conducted more precise campaigns, and that is, they have made a more precise result for the company. Sales managers use forecast models to work with clients. And now there's a very good report that shows that in the US, sales managers with artificial intelligence skills receive about 40% plus bonus and salary.
And the indicator, that's the indicator, he, he's very cool, right? I mean, if you're on your job today, using these skills, there's someone who's gonna say I can't use them. If people write, it's for you, it's great in California, I'm sitting there eating bananas, and I'm not doing anything. But if you're not working, you're locked up in the room, of course it won't help you. Oh, but if you do something, it's a man-made intellectual, it's moving forward. I don't even want to bring it. I have a very good issue, I think I'm a special prom, and I released it Wednesday a few weeks ago about where I use artificial intelligence in a normal life. Look at him. The wheel is very cool, and the reference will be in the description, too. But I'm not talking about how much it helps me in business. I mean, my effectiveness, my acceleration is cardinal. I'll give you examples from the perspective of staff members and professional staff again today. Who would I hire? I think these people want to fire them. It says that eighty-three percent of the business owners and directors general want to fire these people. I'll tell you who I would hire. This is a pay report I told you that sales managers are more than 40 percent of the people who know artificial intelligence. What does that mean? It means that people call a client have the opportunity to open some kind of chat-bot model, I don't know, ChatGPT, like Gemini, or DeepSeek.
Like, or there's Gemini or DeepSeek. And fast for this client, to be more focused, to know more information, yes, or to get some further analysis or to get an analysis on this industry, or to help process an objection, yes. I'll do it quickly.
I mean, they're the ones that are self-oriented in how to do it. They're getting these awards. I want you to just lead a little bit of an example, which is now visible to people who know artificial intelligence. Yeah, it's a labour market demand. Of course, the highest awards were observed in highly skilled and knowledgeable roles. Yeah. And a lot of, of course, American analysts. I'll give you analyst of the United States because it's hard to watch, for example, analyst of other countries in terms of artificial intelligence. China's on the front. As for the market, for example, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, the Russians, the Russian language understands that we are the only ones who look at each other from every country. It is important to understand that the market in the third, fourth, fifth, is in the process of developing artificial intelligence. It's a little far away, and many things will catch up much later. This does not mean that, for example, the Russian Federation does not have a technological market. He's developed. But to date Russia has no access to a range of the most powerful models and will not be available in the near future. He's not likely to be here in the coming years. And there's no access to equipment. It's very important that there's no access to equipment. I'm not saying that there's no access to such money, yes, in terms of the opportunities that are present. Well, a lot of sophthing is blocked. So, for example, lawyers, lawyers, salary is 40 to 9 per cent higher if artificial intelligence is expected to be used. I mean, look, it's very important, yeah. Someone thinks you-- you're firing or kicking out, yeah. This is definitely not happening right now. The question is that, to date, only a few per cent of the world ' s lawyers are using real models and are well aware of them. So there's a lot of precedents for that. There is a precedent in Britain where lawyers began to fine for using incorrect references. We were talking about this a couple of episodes ago on Sunday. Well, forty-nine percent higher. Sales and marketing managers -- 40 3 per cent, financial analysts -- 30 3 per cent, programmers -- 20.4, 30 per cent higher, accountant -- plus 18 per cent. Look, accounting is a plus, yes, plus people who know artificial intelligence. Here I'll notice that this is a higher award in the company.
In fact, if you work as a lawyer today, for example, on a contract, you can do a job, maybe ten times more, but three to five times more guaranteed. Qualitative. Look, it doesn't mean you're doing work, and you don't check it out. I'm talking about quality, yeah, speed of information processing, getting information. I had some interesting cases today, of course I'm just once again... This is a tremendous saving of time. This car goes to service, one of the machines, and I needed to know more details. What do people do? And that's the quality of the search that's recommended for so much, but people on the Internet write in a forum that makes sense, like, this, like, doing it better or not, bringing their material or not, the prices are. or such. That, well, that's unreal, yeah, that's really cool. So you don't think it's anything you think the system says it's better to buy the creams from the dealer and do his service, or you'll save ten to fifteen percent there, but you won't get the guarantee, yes. I mean, with a full price count, with a full price count, it's very important. Of course, that's great. So, uh, it's worth noting that not for each particular post, of course, the artificial intelligence bonus, it's the same and guaranteed. And what was the record that, for example, British artificial accountants only get a little more collolegs, for example, yes. And in the US, for example, almost 20 percent, 18 percent was. So, historical experience in industrial revolutions shows that technology creates new jobs and whole industries to compensate for the disappearance of old ones, yes. I mean, the base is a technological revolution, new industries are emerging, some sort of disappear, but new industries are. And there is a economic and economical nature of David Otter, and according to this economist, 60 per cent of the workers are currently engaged in occupations that were not available in 1940. In this way, the lion ' s share of employment growth in the past eighty-year period has been created by new activities. And that's the fundamental criterion to watch again, we're now, you know, the emergence of artificial intelligence is like the emergence of computers or the emergence of the Internet, something completely different. And there are things that we just don't understand and foresee, because we don't understand what kind of use scenario is going to happen at all, and that we're really gonna work, and how it works.
There are things that are unrecognizable. I use 100 or two different boxes on the day, using different systems, c-- if I take them too many, more, well, more. I understand that in many areas of my work and life, I do not understand how to work, yes. And there's a very interesting PricewaterhouseCoopers report. And according to the last one, they built a barometer of occupations. And they said what? They said that... I'm gonna give you another different opinion today. It's very important. Your opinion, the opinion of others. A particularly, Bill Gates ' opinion, which is sufficiently critical to the emergence of artificial intelligence. Here. There's a lot of skeptos in the eyes of who's gonna stay, who's gonna make money. So PricewaterhouseCoopers says that the income of the staff member is three times faster than the rest of the companies. So companies that use artificial intelligence means that investment in artificial intelligence is being paid. The company receives more profits for each employee and wages in the most digitized sectors are increased by about twice as fast as in low-skilled sectors. Even in posts that theoretically can be automated. This is an interesting, interesting myth, a thing that refutes the myth of depreciation of human labour from machines. Because they show? They show that if a person has low qualifications and artificial intelligence, he becomes strong enough. And I can tell you that my wife is technically untouched, she's been using the most expensive last-- most expensive last model every year, always the maximum, there's a ChatGPT tariff. And I see how much she's been doing in many places, uh, very fast, very cool. I mean, she used to be, she was a little more likely to be mistaken because she was either the one who found a solution or she was in Google, and finding him in Google, and, or there in Yandex, it's, well, Jandex isn't gonna help find it. All right, yeah. It's a-- it used to be a very good slogan, so he's going back to the back, yeah. Especially search systems, they help money, uh, make a commercial for these companies, but they don't help people look. It's a very old, outdated system. And if you use new models, especially search models, especially the reasoning model, that LRM, yes, Large Reasoning Modules. These models, of course, they do just huge things, crazy interesting things, help compare the portraits of different people between themselves, search for data, and then on data, and they're still searching, Still searching, still searching.
Automatically, initially, based on your one request. Here PricewaterhouseCoopers has this opinion: there is a positive effect, so there are experts from the World Economic Forum. They predict that in the next five years, a quarter of the existing jobs will be ravaged by changes. They say that the sixty-nine million new vacancies will come, well, new jobs will come from technology and eighty-three million jobs will be reduced or lost. I mean, they say that it's worth 14 million jobs. Accordingly, it is two per cent of the world labour market. So you'll have problems. I know, of course, when I see all these reports at all, I know that nobody knows anything, yeah, everybody sees things differently. All people call different numbers, different data. And since I'm very strong in the artificial intelligence market and listening to people for two years, from a very big guru to some investment funds, different starttaps, people still change their minds, yes, constantly. plans change. Some absurd. Goldman Sachs notes that the emergence of a genetic artificial intelligence can affect up to 300 million jobs worldwide. This is about 18 per cent of all the labour-seaters can be automated. So what do you say? Everyone thinks they do. It's important to take into account, uh, the important criterion that is, and you should be very careful about it. There's a national difference, yes. For example, the PricewaterhouseCoopers report, for example, for China, shows that the influence of artificial intelligence can be positive in the long term. No, positive. What does that mean? Which, on the contrary, will be a vacancy. They are said to automate some 20 per cent of existing jobs in China in 20 years of artificial intelligence and related technologies, but by increasing productivity and new ones. The industry will create more new jobs, approximately 38 per cent of additional jobs. As a result, by the thirty-seventh year-
As a result, by the thirty-seventh year, twelve years from here, can be up to 12 per cent of total employment, right? It's about a new ninety million jobs in China. Note that the numbers are very different. It's a factor that should be approached as follows: that I am a human being, it's personal now important to get from it, and, benefit, from everything, to get a good one from it, not to argue that artificially artificially, Intellect, first of all, nobody needs, it's not gonna work.
And on the other hand, say, "All of us, we're all completely gone and we're gonna be completely haunted." So what kind of professions are under threat of extinction? What should we draw attention to? Again, again, I'm giving you information today as a reflection and a little to look forward to it. No way is this information that is guaranteed by the boo-- will work in your case, for you personally, as a person in your country where you live, in your city where you live. Well, because it's a crazy big difference, right? You're in the technology applications and you're a sales manager at the Silicon Valley, I don't know, in the technology market. Or you live in Indonesia in Bali, and you sell coffee. Well, I mean, a little different things. First is the production and storage workers, right? Conway work, prefabricated operations, sorting, packing in warehouses. The base is expected to be in the process of carrying out 60 per cent of all retail and manufacturing operations by the end of the twenty-fifth year. I can tell you personally, I've been seeing robots in a very different year. Well, first of all, robot doesn't exist well. We're talking about this a lot, but I'm honest with you, I'm waiting for Tesla to release Optimus. I think that's-- they're the first to release something serious, big. Maybe no, someone else will let me buy another one. They say he'll be worth $3,000. I'll buy it right away. I was walking around, I was in a guest, uh, my friend, and he said, "Look, you don't have to buy the first version." I'll buy the first version. Why would I buy it? Because and-- I feel that this is a completely different opportunity from the point of view of the whole house assistance, from the point of view of cleaning, uh, garden, territory. I have a lot of territory. From the point of view, uh, home inside, from a security point of view, well, and something extra we don't even know, we don't even know. But if there's a cool model inside, and I'll notice that, uh, Tesla owner, one of Tesla's owners, at least the creator, Ilona Mask, company xAI, is the last, there are rounds. They're talking about $200 billion. The company is very serious, and the model in the HIAI is very serious, and it's gonna be in-- anyway, there's a x--- xAI, and it's gonna be something, that's a full robot. There's a problem there, yes, with robots. Robot has a problem. It's, uh, to stand correctly and perform any foot surgery so that you can take any object and distinguish it, distinguish the banana from the human head and the metal box, and so on. There are many different nuances, but if they learn it, they do it, it's gonna be really cool. And I think it's here again, everyone should watch a movie, I think it's called "two-hundred-and-a-a-man." That movie made me pretty much arrogant in terms of how it looks, right? What you're saying about the production of warehouse workers to you, even if you're not connected to this, so you're at all aware of what's going on. That's the leader to date on this automation, right? South Korea holds the first place in the world by the density of industrial robots. More than 1,000 robots per 10,000 employees. Look, a thousand robots for 10,000 employees. I first got into a factory with a lot of robots, where robots probably aren't, and robots were guaranteed more than humans, uh, Taiwan, uh, Taiwan Island. Two thousand six, I think I ran a single-equipment project. There were clean rooms inside. And where there was a huge amount of robots, like the floor, on the ceiling. We've set up robots, but it's, uh, just a purely industrial robot. There were a lot of them. That's what made me look like a great impression, right? That was then, it was 20 years ago. In Singapore, this figure is 700,770,100, and in Japan, it's 4,990. And in Europe, the leader of Germany is four hundred twenty-nine. The average world level is 100,660 units per 10,000 employees, right? In the US, two hundred and ninety-five. So South Korea is a thousand, USA is two hundred and ninety-five. Very interesting figures. I mean, you know, it's very serious, right? Eastern Europe, by the way, the robot report very strongly states that Eastern Europe may face even higher levels of exclusion due to labour-intensive production, right? The PricewaterhouseCoopers study for Slovakia and Slovenia shows potential automation rates of forty-two, forty-four per cent of jobs. That's a very interesting thing, too.
Uh, look, Eastern Europe as a whole will certainly suffer very much, because all the cool robots that are now in Korea, Japan, the US, China, well, East Korea, Europe is not very present.
The second area that's a big risk is transport and logistics. The development of unmanned transport is radically likely to change drivers, operators, all autonomous cranes, autonomous cars, all loaders, dispatchers, different and so on, right? Especially when, uh, it's replaced, including the courier service, right? I mean, when the chain ends. I mean, if we can now see-- uh, San Francisco, in one of the most difficult cities in terms of driving, at least in the U.S., or-- just an incredible number of drones, just incredibly unbelievable. Number. I've been driving them a lot, uh, where you go without a driver. They're going very qualitatively and so high that it looks even a little borazo, because, well, it looks like a borazo. What does Borazo mean? Sure. That's a certain idea when you're rebuilt. Drivers know what a certain driver is. When you're easy, you're rebuilt, you know, you have a place for this. That's interesting. I was telling you in one of the videos on Sundays that I was driving out of the car park and I see Waymo, a drone. I turned the left turn and I went without waiting for her to stop, because I realized there was no driver's car and a robot would stop 100 percent. What if a normal driver, there, maybe he's only been driving for a month, you have to be extremely critical, then, uh, he's in here, he's very safe, yeah. There are different cases, but it's very safe. I wonder what this is about, in transport and logistics, there's a story, uh, of course, that's being held back by a lot of countries. And on the one hand, that's very good. They don't, for example, push out there, taxi, couriers, etc. On the other hand, it is both bad and both because these countries may face the fact that some other countries will fly away in these chips and in these aspects simply go far ahead. Let's see what's going on here. Uh, but it's obvious that from the point of delivery, uh, delivery of different modes of transport, by the way, this is a drone shipment, a lot of which is being tested. But I was told by a very hot-- strong NVIDIA engineer that one of the main problems there is a protocol of their interaction between themselves in the air. And as soon as this whole story is well-balanced from the point of view of the protocols, it'll all live a completely different life. Just like a smart house. Now, I think the problem is a smart house, at least what I'm seeing and seeing is the problem of the different protocols and communications of these devices. Yeah, if those devices were all connected and working together, aaah, we'd have a huge breakthrough. But the next, I think, the evolution of smart houses, it's only possible with artificial intelligence. Because, of course, smart houses, they're not smart, they're wooden, they're stuck somewhere. The next such profession undergoing disappearance is a routine office and administrative role, yes. Data entry, processing, basic accounting, reporting and so on, yes. In addition, there are banking operators, insurance derriers, administrative assistants, many of these positions can be reduced as they are implemented, yes, these are self-service systems. But I'm here to see that I've told you from the beginning that I would hire anyone. I want to point out that by the way, you're gonna finish writing it up while you're playing, as you think, the professions are gonna be definitely gone, which I didn't say. I want to see one interesting thing that I was preparing for this video, and I told myself that everyone was saying that the assistants wanted to fire. I would personally hire myself, and I would have put in a personal assistant if he had been able to deal with models, artificial intelligence, like me, in a way that would be literate in terms of the different ways of doing different things. I was prepared to study, because this man would help my life incredibly strong ways, especially now. What's the problem? I have a... how much? I'll tell you, not 20, 18 years old, there are assistants, yes.
I've been working with assistants and stains for 18 years.
With the assistants and, uh, fifteen years ago, very tight, very serious, very tight. C-S-S-Assistant states. And I'm talking about personal assistants. What's the problem? That these people, in fact, have no access to my data often and could not analyse them. So, no matter how many meetings they've written, uh, no matter how much they've been in meetings, it's a big problem. Not enough, they had to be in some kind of meeting with themselves. It is now possible, and especially in the world of a large number of online meetings, to record meetings online, to give them the text, to pass it automatically, to run through, to get through. Models, making incredible help to managers, just crazy help. And I see how I'm in this, uh, I've made a lot of progress in terms of analysis. I can only imagine what a man could do if he had access to my data. Usually there are assistants, and, well, that's the other level. I mean, on the contrary, it's now a good job to hire an assistant, and then it was a bad job to hire him, yes. I was better at booking the ticket myself and buying it, filling out many forms myself, making some choice. Otherwise I'll explain more or I'll have a problem, a mistake, yes, or I'll be worth it very expensive. So, aaa, the World Economic Forum predicts that by the twenty-seventh year, the need for cassars, bank clerks, accountants will be reduced by tens of per cent, yes. They're forecasting. Of course, in many ways, it will happen, yes, it will, we will see it. And I guess I have personal managers in banks, like some banks. I guess I don't need them. And if there's an automatic system that has algorithms where it serves me like, like, I don't know how VIP client is or how a normal client is, it doesn't matter, yeah. There are algorithms, and they work well for two four for seven. Why would I want this personal person if there's an assistant who's doing a really cool job? The next big area is model customer services and sales. Yeah. I've said that before. All sales, customer service. I told you, the example was that the wages were just rising. I want to show you the risk profile here. Threats, guys, again, it's a threat, yeah. So, a, a, a, a, a, a, sales manager, telemarketers and, in general, people who provide customer services, including, for example, rehearsers, including a number of teachers. It's a very complicated question: which teachers will remain, what teachers will disappear? I want to give you an example of where everyone says it's gonna be replaced. There are restaurants, and I was with a friend in Hawaii last week, and we got a waitress at the restaurant and got a waitress up and a truck came from the kitchen and brought a robot to-- food. So she took this food, put it to us, said, "Please, please." So, very often in America, food is delivered by bus boy, yes, or, well, another person, not an official. Or even if it's a waiter, it means we're here. And there's a time like this, and there's no waiter in many places. And some of them have restaurants where there are self-services, you come, you take it. Or there's a desk here for you, like, an automatic table bringing your food, like, to the right table. But there are places where I don't go to that restaurant and I don't want to. I want a man to come, a man to serve me, and a man brought me. Is that super-priority? Not a fact. And there's a very big question. Look, one thing I-- I need a man now. Another thing is, I'm so used to it, I'm just so comfortable to see that man is not needed. There's a service in-- here in America, when you go in cards, you find some restaurant, and if this restaurant doesn't fit in the reservation system, like Gogla, and you found this restaurant on Google cards, You're pushing the button. This service itself is called-- it's called to a restaurant, it's called periodically, it's called to a restaurant and it's booking you a table. What's the subject interesting? What, uh, he doesn't talk about it in a great way, he's just, uh, a stupid crypt that talks on the phone. Oh, that's enough. So restaurants are used to calling a robot who's booking for a man's place. We-- for us now, if the bank and I don't call the manager or we have someone else calling us when we get called, there's a bean on some questions that's hard. On some episodes, we're used to it, and on some episodes, we're used to it as notices, for example, some kind of stuff. And on some episodes, we are hard to take this information. But if we're to that information, we're gonna get used to it, it doesn't mean that robot has to say super-quality. Doesn't mean he's got to be some genius. Doesn't mean he's got to have a speech like a cool man. The question is, we're used to this kind of communication. This type of communication is either our task or not. So if we need a serious waiter in the restaurant, why not? Yeah, I like it when high-level waiters come in restaurants, and, uh, who understand you, they know how to service you, what you do. I mean, they know you. I like it. I'm very easy at a lot of restaurants buying self-services, yes, if there's a restaurant like that. So, just like rehearsal, there are places where it's like a man doesn't need a man. Like, I have a dog. I'll take a dog for example. It may not be rehearsal, but in any case, there's a cinema. I'm online asking a lot of questions. And on the one hand, of course, to date, the latest GPT tea model will find me much more information about my Russian beast than any movie of the world. On the other hand, a living man, he gives you some extra clues. Or it's a lively communication that I'm personally interested in, yes, and I-I'm here to leave a man and listen to his opinion. Although I could have asked ChatGPT again for an opinion, I am doing so, people who own Russian braze in Russia, in different regions, own Europe, own America. According to my profile. Which one of you, who uses the tools like ChatGPT, checked, and what does ChatGPT know about you? Now, in a free version, including that he knows about you. That's very fun. I was just showing my buddy that ChatGPT did what portrait he did about me, what he knew. That's very interesting and very cool. Oh, I want to add a study to you on the subject of model sales clients. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas noted that one of the most vulnerable to language careers was telemarketers and some teachers. Instructors are referred to on-line courses. Look, I mean, an instructor on online courses where artificial intelligence can replace the role of a lecturer. But it's a fact. Yeah, I certainly know that's a great thing, and I know that it's a fact. But that doesn't mean teachers are missing. Yeah. The system is changing, the system changes. Next thing? It's a zone you should be alerted to. There will be many places where the initial positions will be sharply subtracted in highly skilled industries. That's what we said, for example, by a highly skilled industry, like, jurisdiction or analysts, or programmers. There's a starting point, they'll be pushed out because they were needed to do some kind of reservoir. Well, for example, to prepare me the material today. I'd have asked people to do a full analysis before. It would take weeks to gather information to me. Well, you know, I give you some information that is Chinese, for example, in Asian resources or in forums, yes, or in the voices of different people. I learned Chinese, but I can't read any of this information, of course, and especially find it that way, yes. And give me something fresh, you need to be here and now. I'm getting ready for graduation. I didn't use any man to at least prepare. It took an hour. Yeah, I have a big spectrum of knowledge. I'm in artificial intelligence directly. I mean, I don't need the original layer of people. But I'll remind you, if you're friends or relatives now, parents, children, brothers, sisters in the primary industry, with the addition of their artificial intelligence, they're coming out of this zone, they're, uh, they're in the middle of something. They're getting cool. Yeah, that's very important to remember. And the world won't make 100 percent. Marketing, content, of course, also changes. Neurosetti, there's a simple text, a lot of stuff. And I think it's gonna change quality again. It's just that the Marquetologists couldn't do the masses of what they do now. Fifteen years ago, there weren't all the Marquetologists, not all, and most of the Marquetologists didn't know what a leed was, they didn't know about conversions. And in fact, we come to an era where there is a possibility if you have brains, if you are a man who wants to develop and want to develop, you can compete now with people who have been accidentally given. I'm not a professional. A huge number of people accidentally received jobs, accidentally, got a profession. But I can definitely say that, given that I've hired more than a thousand people in my life. Thousands, no more, thousands of people hired, thousands fired, and hundreds of leadership positions, maybe thousands. A lot. That a lot of people have been given a profession by accident. You have the opportunity and chance to get to their place.
Where will the change be?
Where there are changes and where there is a risk of high health, health, yes, definitely. And the artificial intelligence is making the doctor's assistant. There's, for example, a Google and Stanford case of algorithms outnumbers dermatologists in skin cancer diagnosis, in images, and artificial intelligence of DeepMind, DeepMind, yes, definitely detects the disease. eye-catching. Radiology. Artificial intelligence can analyze the MRI there and so on. I, by the way, had a CSSU this morning, a vessel in the neck, and I was sent with a decoding. I didn't get it. I sent her to artificial intelligence. He wrote it very carefully and told me that, uh, next diagnostic, it's a good idea to do it in three or five years. I didn't get a doctor to write about it. I got a doctor, and, although they're doing quite well, they're doing very well, and he didn't give me a lot of extra details that I could check with. Not much, I can ask for additional diagnostics. How does that not apply to the United States, but to Britain? How does that apply in Japan? How does that feel in South Korea? I mean, ask the most super-cooled countries to do this. Here. Uh, in medicine, health care will certainly change in terms of people, assistants and abilities. What can happen again? M, we can move, move around when people get better help. I believe that we live in a world where, uh, assistance on the one hand turns out, and on the other hand, a large number of people die because of that help, yes. Because of the vast number of recommendations that are false and misleading. I think it's worth a few people to go to jail. There's a very famous California business and Kaif Lee scientist. He said, "We're waiting for an inevitable outcome. A huge number of routines will be eliminated by artificial intelligence." He notes that artificial intelligence is confident not only for physical work but also for white-collar-collar tasks: accounting, marketing, etc. There's a famous Kaif Lee interview for 60 minutes. He predicted that, in the 15-year period, up to 40 per cent of all types of work could be automated or disappearing at all. Well, again, yeah. That means that the professions will change, and you must be on your own development. I have a big channel for my personal development. I don't think I'm ever telling you this here. I'm telling you a lot about being the person who can take the next step right, yeah, and making the right decisions. That's probably all there. Here. However, it is important to understand that automation does not involve the entire profession, but rather separate functions. And this subject, too, will you hear again, yes, if they say, the original staff will disappear, some functions will disappear, but we have them already disappeared in our professions. A huge number of functions just vanished. So there were a lot more couriers who were transporting mail. But I mean, I think the number of couriers just increased, not decreased. And the number of mail messages has risen billions or trillion times. We have a different opportunity at this point. Yeah. There's a big point here that we don't know at all, and that a man really wants to leave, and that he wants to take it away.
Look, the next block I want to devote today is a very important block. So I went from the position of some people, showed, and, uh, a spectrum of negative things where the professions might disappear. Now I want to show you new possibilities for the professions that will stay or come, yes. And in the first place, there is such a statement, of course, that artificial intelligence does not have human qualities, especially emotional intelligence, creativity, and they will remain the prerogative of the human person. There are many people who disagree with this, who, well, are people who live in a very simple material world and believe that the world is completely material. Write what you think on this. I'm sure these are all the thoughts that artificial intelligence will replace a man and can be totally emotional, they surprise you at all. Here. Oh, but the fact is, the modern man is so talking. What's interesting here? What was a recent study confirming that it was a study in Berkeley, that's right here, an hour to get from me, on the other side of the San Francisco Bay. It's a famous Berkeley University, Berkeley City. And the study was that people who use artificial intelligence to provide psychological assistance, and, uh, can receive a large number of answers that increase stigma, which is exacerbating the situation. I mean, if people say you, uh, all the alcoholic Hana, yeah, or there are all the people who drink, they're all alcoholics, and they're all hana, the man is getting worse. There's even a very interesting example of models helping a man make a suicide. So a man comes and says, "I want to do suicide. What bridge do I jump from? And that's not a man, yeah. And once again, whoever believes that everything has been scientifically proven and that everything can be translated into discipline, there are no questions. These are your own thoughts. I'm surprised here, though. They got science-- N-Nobel prizes, 20 years later they proved something new where they were wrong. And here, it means tens of thousands of people or millions of people died because of it. Very strange. I'm a very famous businessman yesterday saying, "Sasha, listen, but that's the essence of science. It's normal, natural." But I'm telling him, "Well, then, you have to go to jail or you know it's not that cool.
And it may be a mistake that will result in hundreds of millions of deaths."
So, the professions that will remain are those that require empathy and social intelligence: nurses, nurses, psychologists, social workers, educators, teachers. By the way, the interesting thing is, one of the studies showed that people don't want to listen to robots who speak or try to cheer the team up. They don't want a robot to replace a teacher or a nurse, yes. And in the end, many routine posts will disappear, but in return, there will be many occupations that require empathy. What do you think about that? That's what they said, including old people's studies. So, they found out that the old people were more valued talking to a man. But I know what I was thinking at this point of time? That they were old people who, in general, are people whose generation is not raised on computers. The new generation of children born with phones in their hands, and the generation is very refreshing, yes. I have four kids. It's already a huge difference between a daughter who was 14 years old and born 14 years ago, and a son who's five years old, right? That is, it is already a huge difference in terms of their inclusion in the development system, perceptions and everything. They live in the same family, though. I think they might be old enough to have a robot, yes, if Tesla Optimus would have lived with us. That's very interesting. So we were walking around here recently, and Tesla Optimus was standing in Tesla. And the friend came to me from Moscow, and I told my wife, "I'll buy you one day." And my wife says, "I don't want to go home like that." And right here in this movie, "Two hundred years not human" shows how they look at it in the first place, yeah, people. And there, by the way, there's a man in the house very optimistic when this robot comes up, and a woman looks very carefully and fearful. One child is very positive, the second child makes everything that this robot dies. Well, look at that, very interesting movie. I'm gonna have to look at him, by the way, because I've been watching him recently, an hour. My friend advised me. It's a very cool, cool movie. Leaders, strategics and creators. So who's staying? These are people who are leaders, strategics and cre-- and creative, yes. These are professions that are connected to the generation of innovative ideas, yes. Obviously, current models, they can't generate new ideas. While you're looking at all the things that are-- trying to make AGI and super intelligence, and in their minds, super intelligence must be able to generate new ideas. But we're talking again, what are we saying, if super-intelligence is capable of generating new ideas, what level? So what's the volume of this going to happen? Therefore, and that the alleged artificial intelligence is not capable of true creativity and image. People, it means that real people have a sense of empathy that robots can't be able to. And here's the question for this Kaiful. That's right with this Kaiful, right? Very funny. There are food managers, analysts, scholars, researchers, scriptors, artists, contusions. The interesting aspect is that again, if these people are tempted to use artificial intelligence to supplement their lives, they will not stop doing so, see how it is. They can get explosive growth if those people who stop do not use new systems and technologies. They'll disappear in the same way, yes, and they'll disappear. And Martin Ford is a foetourologist. He was very interested in writing once that people were making great goals and ideas, and artificial intelligence helped to implement the details and the routines. I want to tell you, I think it's my day, my very basic day, where I'm very much in the field of artificial intelligence and in the formulation of different tasks.
And artificial intelligence helps me.
Intelligt helps me find a way to get it. I can't really, uh, just make some of the actions right now. And I had to do some kind of thing today, do something, uh, schedule meetings in some service, and drive myself. And, well, they're gonna be clearly resolved, yes, I'm not driving myself, that some additional photos will be processed. I have kids surfing these weeks in the surf club and the Pacific. And for example, it might be nice to process pictures or see. Today, my son says, "Dad, I want to go on there. We're planning to go to Orange County in a month, there's a little other place. And, like, I had a doctor's job to get my own self-examinations out of the system, myself uploaded, I got some final answer, and I didn't spend time on this, this search. Or with the car. I knew the service came up, I got myself in there and told me before I could do it. I'm not doing this intermediate thing. The car probably went there, didn't it? Well, I mean, uh, these things, they're very interesting. What else do they say remains what professions remain? By the way, what kind of profession do you think I didn't say that I'd stay? Write it up, support the canal, the like, especially if you've been looking here. It's been almost fifty minutes. These are professions that require physical flexibility and skill outside the standard, right? These are electrical, plumbing, equipment repairs, tablers, mountings, etc. You know, I wonder what I thought, too, that plumber and electrical, they kind of stay. At the same time, I have a friend who does a system there. Well, I-- I'm so different, to be honest, there are start-ups, I see them in the Valley, too. People do some kind of socks or robots to build, for example, to help make decisions. I don't know why the electricians and plumbing should stay. So everyone says it's an old system and an old plumber system. Oh, but if there's Optimus, Optimus doesn't have to. He came up, took a picture of it, looked it up, checked the flow, checked it out. I don't understand why this employee will be needed. It's a big question, yes, it's a big question. And it's like a way to be taken, and it says, "This way you can take out work in the open air, construction, agriculture, repair of roads." At the same time, you and I see a large number of drones, various machines, factories that have no work for nearly one person. That's a lot, yeah. It is interesting that even elite professions, as a doctor and a teacher, once again, which have traditionally been considered protected by automation, may now be partially performed by artificial intelligence. And that's the subject of Bill Gates. I told you from the beginning, he recently said so controversial, yet again, the forecast. In his view, in ten years, artificial intelligence will be so advanced that many doctors and teachers will not be needed, replaced by digital assistants. Gates called it a free-of-charge intelligence. High-quality medical counselling and training will be made available to all. And here's really cool! So look what-- and he says that the human factor will be lost. I think it should improve quality. Today, a lot of people die because there's no doctor. Crimes are being committed because there are no people. Many things don't work out and write because there's a shortage of people. And when simple operations are complemented, people have the opportunity to look a little more at their health, to look more at their health, to get an opportunity to analyse, yes. If a person has the opportunity to make a quick study, for example, blood and findings, and to obtain a recommendation based on where he lives, based on his prices, on the assumption that Sold to meals. Just ninety percent of the people in the world can't do it, they don't, they don't have the chance, yes, it's done. It's very important, yes. Gates claims that a rare talented doctor or teacher will become a common thing, because artificial intelligence will make their level widely available free of charge. But what do you think about this? Will the teacher disappear? The doctor will disappear? What do you think about this?
Bill Gates himself offered an interesting view, pointing out three professions that he believed would remain relatively safe in the foreseeable future. Three professions that will remain safe with a relatively artificial intelligence: programmers, biologists and energy engineers. I think it's a very strange assumption, but Bill Gates is the greatest man. We're not gonna argue with him, but we're gonna look at his opinion as one. Mustafa Suleiman, co-founder DeepMind, is one of the world's leading non-knowers, AI-companies. Well, if you're good at AI, maybe you don't know, then he's the director of artificial intelligence in Inflection Microsoft now. He's more careful. He writes in his book that artificial intelligence will radically transform almost every profession and warn that artificial intelligence is not just an instrument of efficiency but a substitute for work. I agree with that that that there are now a lot of things people are trying to complement. You know, there's a very cool study saying business doesn't get a good effect if they want to add artificial intelligence to their processes. Businesses are getting a lot of effect if they're artificially intellect and they're creating something about artificial intelligence. I've always said that in automation, that if you want to automate, well, I'm a talented man in automating, CRM systems, ERP systems, MRP systems. A large number of projects have been undertaken in these areas. What if you want to automate something, you're not gonna have to automate your current processes. You need to re-engineer processes, given that there is automation. It's very important what to do, yes. And, uh, uh-- here's thesis, uh, Mustafa Suleiman. He says that all people are requalified to high-end professionals, yes. And the scale and speed of development are so artificial intelligence that no one will be fully insured. He writes, he says that even if artificial intelligence helps first, business will start to optimize costs over time. And where the car's running at 90%, the man's gonna be taken away.
Elon Musk, Elon Musk, his office is near me, five minutes to go. Ah, one of the loudest voices of the world. Well, first of all, he's the richest man in the world, at least for now. He has a very cool artificial intelligence from the XAI perspective, which they developed faster than anyone, by the way. He, on several occasions, has stated that in the long run artificial intelligence is capable of automate virtually all types of work, denying people economic need to work. It's time for robots to do better than people. Yeah, and he's suggesting that a universal base income be introduced. What do you think of a universal base income? This is a monthly payment to every citizen to cover basic needs. Write what you think of a universal base income. It's a very interesting thing.
About China. I told you, on the contrary, that China is supposed to have more than nine million, uh, new positions. And in China, unemployment and social discontent. This is a very interesting moment, by the way, that many countries, aware of the effect that artificial intelligence might bring, but, abstractly, look at it. Look at you, actually on your own-- on your countries where you live, whether people look abstractly. Because, of course, I think the government in a large number of countries is looking very abstract. They don't even know what's going on. They don't know how to deal with it. What's China saying? For them, unemployment and social discontent are what China wants to avoid, the government wants to avoid. They are therefore investing actively in the training and retraining of workers, along with the introduction of artificial intelligence. It's very important. So they're very hard on it, they don't need any trouble, so they're getting out and saying we're gonna create new jobs. And by the way, the interesting story that Liu Zinfen is one of the people's congresses, this is a member of Parliament, and he has a very large company of iFlytek. He proposed the establishment of a special system for unemployment insurance. That's very interesting. Establish a fund that will pay benefits to which people have been replaced, encourage private insurance companies, develop, develop such insurance and establish an early warning system for unemployment risks in industrial centres. I think it's really cool. It's not easy for trade unions to say, "You know, there's no way in our country to use some system." In Italy, we saw this case when ChatGPT blocked more than a month, yes. Or Italy has recently fined someone, too, for personal data. But it's a fight, a fight against the air. I think it's very, very hard to move. But we must understand that there are cultural differences in relation to the sca-- artificial intelligence.
For example, if people are traditionally more favourably robotic in Japan and South Korea, in many other countries, uh, people, for example, in Europe, are more likely to be more ethical and humanitarian. What is the point of drawing you up today? Here's the conclusions, please hear them. Here, by giving the outcome, it is very important that you focus. One.
One. Artificial intelligence is a growth drive, not a fall. There's fear, there's a lot of things. The art of intelligence for you is personal growth, especially for years to come. It's not just today's question to solve, but years ahead. Two. Re-creation of training is necessary and artificial intelligence must be used every day. I keep saying, it's not a question to go to class. You go to the courses, it's abstract, you can get out. Start using artificial intelligence every day on domestic matters. At least ten, 20 queries a day, at least! It's better than thirty, fifty requests a day. Different things. You have no idea what you can ask, and it's only gonna be in your process. Three. You have to work with artificial intelligence, not compete with him. It's important not to compete with artificial intelligence. The fourth paragraph, which I think is very important for such strong professionals, entrepreneurs, businessmen. There will be very much change in recruitment and management approaches. Yeah? And employers should be able to shift their focus from formal criteria, there is a diploma or a period of time, and that is, at all, a person is capable of using artificial intelligence in his life or not. That's what everyone's talking about right now. Everybody just started talking about it. Yeah? And remember that in which country you live, there is a role for the State and employment policy. There is a State role in this field, and very much will be related to the country you live in. Remember the words of chapter Anthropic: "In the 10 years of the world, the artificial intelligence of the United States or China will govern the world." See you later. ToTheMoon Canal. Lic, you must put a liquor on our channel so you don't miss our graduations. And please write in the commentaries what you think about this.