Hello, everyone! We're on ToTheMoon. Technology news and sites from the Silicon Valley. We're going out every Sunday. We're always four people. We're taking the sub-cadast.
It would be very useful to find it in some strange forums where it's not clear who writes. I want to try it.
It's time to see real examples of how this affects how it improves people's lives.
And the judge said, "No shit, we're not gonna pay."
To make a lot of money, it must either be the specific pain of the organization or be accessible to all conscripts.
Elon Musk, he had a very strong authority, but it was the manipulation of the board of directors. The court cancelled this-- this payment. The United States once again shows the very strong independence of the legal system.
It's actually a matter of admiration for the American judicial system.
The title of Elon Musk leaves Tesla. Trump said the war would stop in 24 hours.
Well, I guess I want to start with-- we were out here with Sasha a few days ago and we were going out tonight, and the yar was talking about the OpenAI and her weird peddits. And when she released Sora, we were just sharing the impression of Sora's first day test. Me and Sasha. And, uh, but then they let me out, I want to start, just put some down, let's just say about the update in Sora, I'm about the video-generation update, and I'm gonna start with a pretty serious skies, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, but I'm not the one who let them out. It's an opportunity, uh, to do, uh, to use chat through video, yeah. And how did you test, what do you have the impression of chating through video? Because I've always been screaming through audio and, accordingly, what skies? So you open AI in the video, you give him the video, he looks like your video, and he can look at you, he can watch what you show, you can hit him with your screen, and you start with him. I mean, not just a voice, but he still sees what you want to show him. Which one of you tested? Did anyone test or did I?
I looked at the dumps, but I didn't come up with a skirt, except for some funny, like my hair or what you see in front of me. I didn't do anything. I mean, I couldn't figure out a normal yuzkeis. It must have been possible, you know, like, I'm gathering a bike, I don't know where to put it. I'm showing him, he's telling me, I guess. I mean, I didn't have enough fantasy. If something interesting-- oh, sorry, if something interesting could find, think or in principle, something like that, it would be really interesting to hear.
I think today is two questions of such importance. On the one hand, it's a skies, on the other hand, the question of technology. Yeah, Sasha, I guess you can talk about technology. From the point of view of technology, from the point of view of the skies, I really, I, uh, I always do that like I do? I'm just saying we don't know how to use it. I mean, we never had that opportunity. And accordingly, I try to, uh, try to put it in practice, even if I think it's not too reasonable.
I can think of 100 yuzkeis.
Yeah, you seem to have it. They showed it. Did you test it, did you test it yet?
No, I haven't tested yet, but I've had a thousand ways in my head to use
it.
Because you're still moving, you had to take a picture before, especially if you had a plane, you had to take a picture of four, like five different pictures or places. And, well, there's a simple skirt, like I'd be putting a lot of plants in the garden, and I often, for example, take one plant and take a picture of the other. So I can come up and say, and this, and this, this is a plant, and this, this, this. And I can tell you he's gonna find out pretty good. So he recognized the good pions, the colored ones, the nails, the way it's gonna be, there. I mean, he's pretty good. He was hard to recognize things when I opened the fridge and said that this refrigerator could be eaten by a protocol. I mean, I told him, he, it was clear that there was no instant evaluation, yeah. However, for example, in terms of fruit, when 10 fruits were lying and he was given a difficult, well, quite specific assignment, again, with protocols, by some world, he was I really did. I mean, I told him that foodMap could be eaten. He says there's only food in here, I don't know, banana or anything. Well, that's it. There was a lot of micro-sized positions there. They've shown an example. They have strange videos, of course, but they've shown an example of how they make coffee, they make a purple, right? And that's how it talked and looked good.
Coffee or how?
No, like the model was talking. I'm telling you, I'm honestly impressed by what hit me - very good, good-- well, not really, really, enough for me, I didn't expect. Well, I mean, we're here right now, I'm saying, a couple of days ago, we were just snooping around, snooping about some things. I was snooping from the audio. It was working well. Well, that's what it was working in real time. There's no such delay, you know, there's such a delay. Yes, Ilnar.
I'm just saying that the technology was showing her. I mean, I had no vocal effect in person because they showed this story about six months ago, I think, when a man was in the back, there was something else, and the system noticed, it was a reminder. But what I really like is that the system is very broad in terms of use. I mean, I don't use it like that. And you have a lot of skies that are useful. I'm sure our viewers can write in the comments, but how would you use or possibly use this technology?
Yeah, cool! Write in the comments.
I'm not using these technologies like that in my own use.
Well, that's really something to add. I mean, it's like me, this story, like you've given the right example of a bike. I mean, that's something to add. I don't know how much she can help on a bike, but I guess we just have to try, right? To beg, add, add, like the usual GPT chat. So you try different use of the case. Tanie, I think there's a lot of use of the case.
I have a lot of things. I even imagine if I come to the construction site, I have very often questions of a construction nature. And the builders are of different quality that they can't answer to me by some. And if GPT's video chatting could offer me, like this knot to let it go or how this stove is better to put it, there, well, some kind of stuff that's been banal, which would be great, it would be really good, I don't know what to look for in some strange forums where it's not clear who writes.
I mean, yeah, I want to try it straight.
Sasha, what do you say about the quality of technology?
I think it's a... well, I mean, it's a dump. I mean, I haven't seen any examples of use yet in real life, unfortunately.
You mean a democrat from the point of view, huh, a technological opportunity?
Yeah. I mean, um, I mean, how to say, and basically, how progress is moving, yeah, here's human. I mean, there's a scientific article first, then someone makes a scientific article and some visualization of the process, that's some use. Then it's a company that's picking up, saying they have a product, and then people use it, right? And there are four stages. And, roughly, that the system can help train scientists, that a good video industry system can help cook food, for example, right? Or, like, uh, toss nails, to pick chairs, and so on. About this... the use of a case of science comedian was doing a dump there five years ago. I mean, I know OpenAI's talking about it, he says, But it's time to see real examples of how this affects how it improves people's lives.
Well, it's like you, you, Sasha, the idea you're saying that while it's still some kind of dump, that's not--
I'm waiting, I mean, I can't judge, I just didn't see a success story. I mean, you're a category of Tutorians on YouTube, it's big. So there are very bad Tutorials, very bad Tutorians with millions of viewings, how to change the castle, how to change the battery in their bay. Well, I mean...
Yeah, yeah, yeah. As long as you look, you'll leave that idea.
Question, the question is, what's gonna be real, well, real, is how we chat GPT started to use as a tool that's real, right? Or how you use it, there, Gemini or there, I don't know, Grok.
Well, Sasha says, in principle, I also had a very sceptical attitude to GPT chat, and now that he's been doing differently for my inquiries at a completely different level.
I hope it's also going to get clean.
Shipmass they call it.
How?
Shipmass.
Shipmass?
Like Christmas, yeah.
Yeah. Just Shipmass. Because they're all schippers.
Yeah, they definitely had Shipmass, I think so. That's what they showed up.
The weather-- how much they showed up there. Many things seem very specific. I'm gonna have to discuss the same question. It's like an example. There's a video-generation, they let Sora out. Uh, she can be tested in a simple version, well, there, on the plus of $20,000. Well, I understand we tested her there and watched her, there, two hundred proversion dollars. And, uh, what's the point? That a man can write a supposedly some scruple, do a script for ten, five, ten, twenty seconds, and create videos. Sasha and I met together and said, "What is this?" Well, Sasha is professional, I'm a user. What is this? Because Sora doesn't look at your script at all. I mean, you're doing something. The picture looks a little bit, but there's no scenario. And I was just-- we were talking, and what to do with it. I mean, I have the first scenario I wanted to do, we were just discussing, in one of the projects, I have a real estate project with ours, with our partners, with the team, uh, an announcement in the field. marketing. And, uh, my partner says, "Let's get some AI-video. I think, "I'm in Sora, I'm sgenerating." She just got out. So he put in a cool promp that needs to be generating AI-video. She's been generating a poop, yes, I mean, that's absolutely nothing. Well, because it was more or less skies to me than to use. I mean, I'm producing a little commercial video that can, uh, one of them, I don't know, get 50 or 100 advertisements, put in Instagram, Facebook for advertising. And, of course, that's, uh, nothing. I mean, I realized that this skirt doesn't exist. And we were just discussing what kind of skies are there. And basically, it's like there's a lot of people in the skies. Very complex inquiries, very exclusive, so beautiful, cat, not for masses, yes. And we said, "Why would it even be for a mass, if it wasn't for a mass?" It would be great to do something for a large number of people, not, uh, for some exclusive or, uh, for some scientific research. Sasha's just made a conclusion.
Sasha, you can be more detailed about why this is not some strong move from the Sora perspective, it looks very strange even from the point of view of science.
Yeah. So any task, any project might have a, uh, uh, or a task of collecting data from some unique, yes. So from a scientific perspective, technically, move forward, or make a lot of money. To make a lot of money, it must either be the specific pain of the organization or be accessible to all conscripts. Consymers are very hard to understand how to use Sor, yes. A-a-m, and there's the most successful applications, they require remix and blenders, that is, like a pre-complementary service that ordinary concuits cannot possess. A-a-m, what needs the organization can decide, as yet unclear, because it's not good, it's not good for a case with pictures. And that's what I was saying, that the whole picture-bearing thing, in the sense of the video-modeling, is interesting to provide AI with a video-based huup. So the video understanding model has a large number of applications in the world, and the video-generation models can provide a bulb that one model would be competing with another. And this is the idea of addressing the lack of data, which is a lack of quality data. But for this model that generates videos, it should be quality in itself. What does it mean, she's good? That means she's good at prom., i.e., it shows that Open IM is a model of image, image to video, it's very bad listening to prom, but it has a style that is so special that-- that is so abstract. The art they always put out everywhere.
And that, and that's not clear, because they don't do business assignments or scientific work.
What if? When you say the model doesn't listen to prom, I have the idea, not if I'm being greedy? Is there a thing they have pre-generated, 100,000 morons? They're just watching which one of them is closest to prompot and, in fact, a little pushing it, maybe using this little prick and, uh, your picture, they're doing some work. So it's not a complete video show from scratch, as you want when you're just prompt giving it, but, well, it's a cheap way of video-generation just to get there, or, uh, to New Year's, to show it or, uh, You can't let it go to mass without using the enormous computing powers that I think you need to generate from scratch. But I'm just sharing my thoughts when I hear what you say you don't listen to prom and I think, "Oh, man, that's how you do it.
Well, there's more interest-- well, yeah, yeah. Well, there's some more interesting examples of-- So she's good at extenuating the video. I mean, there's a 10-second video of 20-second video. I mean, this capability probably doesn't have anyone, but it seems because they can really renew it. On the other hand, it's not clear because, you know, in-- it's like marketing, I think it's necessary where in the internal marketing, where the corporate- internal corporate ties are, where the stage is. Long, music video, entertainment, ads, all the scenes-- all the shorts, they are, and they're not more than five seconds, even three seconds. So I don't know what use, to be honest.
What use is Sora's? I mean, they have some unique technical stance-- possibilities, but what value they have, what use the case they don't
understand.
Uh, before I think I want to address this interesting topic today about analysis, uh, satellite imagery with AI, right? And what Microsoft and NASA do. Still, the OpenAI has released additional peddata there. And cool, we're three days ago, so we're going with Sasha. I say, "Well, at least they would have taken, scattered all these chat and made it easy to look at chat." I say, "Well, the twenty-first century, the twenty-fourth year in the yard, and the search, just some cheap search, you can't find what it is, you can't find it inside?" And then they're just making you out of the way. Two days later, they'll lick these files of Projects. And I think we'll still see that use, yes, and how convenient or uncomfortable it is. Because there are many files in the modern world, they, they are in some places convenient, in some places, uncomfortable. Not much of a "single" thing, but it's a little embarrassing, I don't know, in notes. Not much, I think that with LLM, they were supposed to do, you know, not the folders, right? They say, "Well, here's your project. But if you don't want to use projects as projects, use them as folders." But I think the most important part that history is is some kind of smart, you know, smart-ass service that analyses your chat, somehow connects them, gives you a really cool search. And just what am I doing now? I'm launching one dialogue window. If I'm going inside the gluc, I'm starting a new one on the same subject. There's a gluc that you're launching a new one on the same subject. I mean, there's a problem right now, you know, another one, I think, of a nature. This case is not solved. Yeah, you're always infinitely in these new dialogue windows, not like you're going to some story. I mean, this fundamental theme is how to make a real good work story. Because they've got, like, a memory or a personalized staff. These two fields of staff are in their possession. It was dead a year ago. That's what it was. Then they took out the memory. This memory is also unfamiliar with how it works, and it doesn't seem to be clear how it's delivered. I'm not gonna get a chance. They're putting a lot of things out there, I think the number of very different use of the case. Maybe it's their right testing strategy. And maybe they have some kind of move ahead, but it looks a little weird.
By the way, one of the videos is really weird, the guy who pulled the folder out, so there was a front-engineer, and he says, "I'm the front line engineer, and I work for three months." I thought, well, he was, uh, coming in and doing these files, which, in three months, and he pulled those files out.
Yeah, like, a probationary period, and I was sitting there, doing this... Well, it's a very important use of ca-- well, that's a very important task, to structure information that, you know, is that important, essential action, yes, in which, the main service in which it is located.
Yeah. About projects that actually, I really think, are more folders, because, you know, like a chat aggregator, it might be something useful. And if you're talking about how they showed how to use the projects, I feel they're a little out of it. I'll explain. Is that why ChatGPT is so popular? And, well, this format, why is it so popular? Not only ChatGPT, Anthropic has the same thing, there, Claude, others. Just because they're very easy to use. You give some grandma a conditional, say, you're on the phone, you're on the chat room with your grandson and you're actually writing it down.
With my grandson. And you're gonna write a question, right? And, like, and that's it. And you don't have to learn anything, you don't have to remember where to push, that's all. A very simple interface, the lowest entrance threshold. If we're talking about projects, how they show them, you're immediately disconnecting the percentage of the seventy, probably the auditor who's not--
Ninety-nine
...to use it. And-- and even ninety-nine, really. So it looks so little, you know, artificially.
They did, did, but there's no feeling that they're gonna use it.
But here comes a very interesting moment, that they've created a completely new interface for Sora. I mean, there's a new interface, like you're opening. Not much of a slave--- well, there's a lot of things that don't work, really, really, really not working right now. So they've been paying attention there. In parallel, they made a statement, well, my favorite, so integration, integration with Apple, so that I can use everything in Apple. Again, the last time I had a very strange feeling, how Apple let that cheese product go out. I mean, they're showing--- well, like, in terms of the working product, the probability of the work product is not even that. So it still works very strange, very stunning. And little is, it's not operational, in fact, until it's been realized. Maybe it's all going on and going on, we're talking early, and everybody doesn't care, and they're gonna get there. It's like they let it out, there, iPhone, and there wasn't a MMS. All: "Oh, no MMS, so you can't send a picture." What a picture, huh? There, we live in another world now. And...
MMS is the word that once was
What kind of text? That, by the way, might be, yeah, maybe it's like doing these tests to get integrated, run the carbon volume, see how it works. Apple learns it somehow. And Apple already promised, there's a way to turn around by March. And now, it might turn around by March, but it looks really weird. I mean, it's uncomfortable. I mean, even the same video, the video, the chat, it looks, well, I don't know, it seemed to me, the working technologies, at least I'm ready to test, but I'm still in Apple while, uh, I'm in... It's hard work. I mean, you need to open a dialogue window, uh, you open a picture, you do like, uh, a picture, and then you have to ask what's next. Well, that looks like a case. That video looks like a-- shorter, a video from OpenAI, uh, video-cock-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a That's what surprises me. That's kind of weird, right? I think that's the same thing in Apple, and it's supposed to open a video-cock-cata. Maybe it will, right?
Then the question is, uh, that with the GPT chat and whether it will be replaced by some domestic Apple tools and so on. I want to touch today, uh, yeah, and I'll get through and get through. Here, the graduation was so interesting, I think it's a very interesting move in the world. What NASA does to Microsoft on analysis, uh, there's a Web site of information that, uh, NASA satellites, they collect very much information. This information is understandable that it is difficult to analyse and they want it to be made publicly accessible. So they're making it available to NASA researchers, they want to do it, there, accessible to politicians, for, uh, some economic discourse, and probably for ordinary people, too, so that people are human. You know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, like, really cool, right? I mean, it's cooler. I think it's a very strong move in terms of development, analysis of everything that's going on. Because the oceans aren't even much of a scientist, I'm not talking about the rest. And in real time, it's more cool to see, in the view of the weather, moving objects differently, yes, there's some kind of change, uh, movement, people, there, electricity, that's how it is. There's a change of light, it burns. I think it's just huge, just huge possibilities. I mean, uh, all the traffic, well, very, very much, very much, yes. I mean, I think we can build a lot of predictive models, uh, presence, where people are, and-and-analysis of these people. Here. I'm in the choro-- I'm now, someone's theory of conspiracy is gonna start yelling, which is something that can be used in negative things. I guess it was gonna be.
It's quite likely that it's already used in negative.
Guaranteed, yes. I think the first thing they've done, yeah, that's what they've been watching. But in terms of positive, I think that the positive effect of such a deep-seated, real analysis is very useful. It's not a homemade picture, yes, it's not a picture to add, and that's, uh, that's a big volume.
And, uh, good, good story. Good story. And it's parallel, again, about the analysis. Here, I don't know, Ilnar, you can, you can add Sasha. Google, Google had, there, again, pop--catch computers, there, cvantage, a little more, yeah. They've released a new chip. And, of course, those things that describe what you can do there seem to be a kind of space-like, uh, in the future, uh, what's on this side. A-A-M, is this a real future breakthrough in terms of artificial intelligence? Or is this still a very complex subject in quantum calculations, quantum computer?
Quantum calculations are a very narrowly special story, and it's there for science. So we're just a little bit of a custom here that says something.
Yeah, sure.
Well, at least I am, yes. Here, and the only thing I know about them is that very tasks are being handled by specific. So we're looking for a task that we can solve, and hence the algorithm, uh, is building equipment. On one particular task, we are deeply overtaking classical approaches to this task. It's great they could do that story, they could show you. But again, there are a lot of teamwork that runs cvantage. And in Russia, and China, and in America, there are many teams--
And the chips are new, and the new chips and the , the computer itself, there, that's still a unique subject. A lot of teamwork. It's a very complicated story, I think.
Yeah, look here until there's a ready product that's doing everything we want. Uh, all the teams will say that our chips are our best approach, because even physically they work differently. And Google says, "Yeah, we're in less, but they're better." Others say, "Well, we've got more to do, so we'll have other tasks to do." That's why it's like, you know, science plus marketing. Uh, Gugla's shares grew six percent after that. Although I do not deny that it is good that this is a forward movement, technology is developing and so on.
Google, Google with his new chip said it was a multi-settled one.
Multi-persons. That's what I think Hype is like, you know, to get a lot of people to know, and the stock's even bigger.
Yes, yes, absolutely! You're responding to this headline. So if they said they'd let out a new chip, you're like, what chip? And when the new Go-- with the new Gugla chip, they found that there was a multi-haul, that's all, at this point... That, by the way, grew up on this subject, and the shares really cost you, yeah.
Still, six percent for Google is a serious figure.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's hundreds of billions, right? Hundreds of billions of dollars. We'll go back to Elon Musk. So I think that's a good point, because first of all, Ilona Mask, um, they've attracted quite a lot of investment, yes, from the perspective of XAI development. And in the XAI, they released the image generator. I just think that now we're looking at Elon Musk, considering he and Trump are all over the place. And then I got a friend from another state yesterday, adults, saying, "Sasha, and you think Ilon Mace will be long gone or what? That's how long he's gonna be there?" And I don't know exactly what that is. And, um, I think he's got a trick going on. Uh, and I'm curious, but I think there's still an interesting subject. First, you and I discussed the graduations so twenty ago that he eventually agreed to a $5 billion shares. I'll remind the audience. So, yes, I-Elon Musk, because he's done well, the best scores that Tesla has made in recent years, he was supposed to pay $56 billion, yes, billion?
Yeah, fifty-six billion.
Fifty-six billion dollars bonus, bonus! Just someone thinks Tesla's actually 100 percent Elon Musk-- is that right? That 100 percent of the man belongs to one man. It's not. There are shareholders, and, uh, he's, like, there, like, them? And they're sort of running them, like he's running them. And then there's $56 billion that he was first canceled by that bonus, said he was illegal. Then he came and said that if I didn't pay him, I wouldn't work at Tesla and I won't do Tesla. I'll leave. He was paid fifty-six, said he'd pay $56 billion. And the judge in Texas said, "No shit! So we've already canceled and said that this payment was illegal, and so your new decision that it should be paid is illegal, and we're not paying. You know, yeah, how it works in America--
We're not paying,
yes.
Yeah, we're not paying. It's a very unique, unique case. Again. He, he agreed to the board of directors that he would be paid a bonus. Uh, next, uh, one of Tesla's shareholders, he's a lawyer. It's not a man from the board of directors, it's just a man of the outside who owned Tesla's shares. Any man, including, you know, who owns shares, as far as I understand, if I have Tesla stockings, I probably have them, right? I can turn. So any person has the right to apply to the courts. This man who went to court, he was a lawyer, so he found this loop there. He wrote that Ilon Mack had prompted the board of directors to appoint such a bonus because it was he had a very strong authority.
He had a very strong authority, and in the board of directors, he had been... as agreed upon, but it was a manipulation of the board of directors. Oh, uh, the court canceled this... this payment. Elon Musk said, "You have to agree." The board of directors voted again to agree. The court came and said, "Wait a second." There's a judge, Judge Texas, yes, as I recall, yes, Elnar, there's a judge in Texas. She said, "Wait a second, we've already canceled, and your new re-conscious, they're illegal, and you have nothing to pay for. Actually, it's a wonderful practice for me.
Mm-hmm.
And the U.S., uh, shows once more, of course, uh, very strong independence of the legal system.
Yeah, yeah.
And there are different aspects, but it's just a little bit of a problem. So everyone was sure he'd be paid. So, I'm curious, Ilon Mac, he's gonna leave Tesla now or what? He's not paid. He said he wouldn't be there. It's a hip, I think there should be a title: "Elon Musk leaves Tesla," because he promised. Well, look, he promised.
Promises are not bad.
We live in the modern world, yes. Trump said the war would stop in 24 hours. He recently declared, uh, the war of Russia and Ukraine. He recently stated that, uh-
It'll do,
yes.
...what, walking, not the fact that it's gonna be so easy. Well, uh, people make different statements, and I'm showing it as an example of a statement, yeah. Let's see what Ilon Mac is gonna do. In parallel, Elon Musk has another story. I think he's just in the epistor of different topics, yeah. It's a story of what, uh-oh, well, their-- his forensics, uh, with OpenAI. And, of course, well, such serious speeches in terms of, uh, Sam Althman said that, uh, Ilona Mask was committed, a series of actions were not American, and it's not right to do that. And it's not right to move. That actually looks weird, by the way, yeah. In business, I think these attacks, especially in companies like this, are weird. I'm guessing that's what it's like to show again, since Ilon Mack is advancing his interests, not interests, a-a-m, people and society, yes. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm kind of my kind, maybe some kind of speech, but it's probably something in this design that's a way, uh, so to speak.
He can afford everything he wants. I mean, conditionally, with the same Aurororo, with the image generator, they just let pictures of people. Yeah, if it's, uh, real, that's, like, there, Trampa, at least as long as we could get a generosity, yeah, something else.
Yeah, but you mean, there's Midjourney that wouldn't let it do it, and they--
Yeah. And then ChatGPT won't let you do it either. But, uh, it's just, again, some kind of hip. This will increase the number of users, increase the number of generated images that will be posted somewhere. So other companies can't afford it. He's doing it quietly. There's some extra glasses on it. That's a little remark, Judge Delaware. It's just you--
Yeah, yeah.
...we've got someone in the commentaries.
No, Judge Delaware.
Oh, all, all, all, all. I have because somehow it's a little bit of a delay. I'm surprised.
I haven't figured out why. They're just moving in after that. All right, all right, all right.
It's weird, actually, some justification. It's very interesting to read, uh-oh, than the judge justified, because that's the decision of the board of directors. Why?
103 pages, Tanya, 103 pages of judicial detention.
In fact, there's a fundamental, fundamental, key story, which, as it may be, cannot be overturned by the court decision that was adopted, and that decision, which has been adopted, has a specific weight. You can't take and--
No, that's amazing, that's what makes me admirable for the American judicial system.
I don't know if they can re--- as logical as that is, there's a logic of what? What even then... Oh, and I'm also wondering, lawyers asked me to pay six yards, right? Or how much? Six billion dollars for fighting them, not lawyers, these people. The judge thought that $6 billion was a sort of overtake, yes, well, that's a lot. And I decided to pay, uh, some small $345 million, like exquisites, a fine for... $345 million, you think? Why did they make six billion? They've made it 10 percent. I mean, it's a American rate, like 10 percent, like a courthouse. That's a separate subject, of course, yes. I imagine if this shareholder were paid, then it would have been $5.6 billion, you know, for what, well, that's how it worked, yeah. How do they justify it? They say lawyers work without a gonorrara, they work for a commission. Well, that's who won, that's what he got. I mean, basically if, uh, Ilona Mask had 56 billion, he'd give 10 percent to lawyers, as far as I understand, in such a structure, in such a logic, yes. And of course, numbers are striking, yes, the numbers are actually striking and the designs are different, some crazy, some crazy structures. And by the way, it happened when Elon Musk got a very strong political weight. Well, that's a good point, yes, a man has a very strong political weight. And again, by the way, shows, uh, uniqueness, yes, opinions and-
Mm-hmm.
...the things that come. Uh, just unique. I don't know, it's kind of... That, by the way, was a very strong trigger, too, and, uh, that, uh, Trump, now, that Trampa's got a mask standing around, and that means, uh, the judge says things like that. So it's very difficult, in terms of political weight: who decides who's doing what and who's doing. I wonder if Trump will speak on this subject, by the way. Well, would he, uh, say, would it be a word of a word from the Trump on the subject, uh, probably not, but would he have a comment on that? Oh, well, that's still a lot of numbers, right? Here. Big numbers. And given that the Vice President, uh, the new US Vice President, he's from the smoking area, uh, IT and the technology market, there, from Peter Til, et cetera, then, um, actually, uh, we're going to a new, too, New time, new times of different events.
We'll take a separate edition to this, and we'll take a separate edition. Uh, please write in the comments, uh, that's a very good, very good subject, that's the update of OpenAI, and which, uh, you're using skies. That's not a fact. We're doing this on the example of OpenAI. It's clear that there are many other systems, and you describe them, describe even different payroll signatures of systems. Even me, I don't know the name. That's what you're writing. Write down what you're skies where you use what you're doing, what you've been doing from the new one, and, uh, you've tried where you are. That's very, very interesting. Including the Auroro image generator from Elon Musk. Here. Uh, who did what, what sort of things were used? Uh, we're on ToTheMoon channel, coming out every Sunday. Technological news, sites from the Silicon Valley, the USA and the world. Uh, sign up on our channel to keep our videos off. Bet your liquor, put your support.
See you again!