Hello, everyone! We're on ToTheMoon. Happy New Year! New Year's mood. We're going out on Sunday. Technological news, Silicon Valley sites and the world.
Yeah, what the technology itself will bring, there's 100 billion.
Or it should be the biggest system in terms of, I don't know, search, operating system, applications of different kinds.
You have some kind of machine, some system that does it almost like any man on the ground. And that's why you start getting profits.
If she had predicted you, she would have created perfect conditions for you, based on some pathetic pathetic life of yours, how your family lives and so on what it needs.
The technological revolution has further deteriorated between countries.
This year, I was really feeling that there is a possibility that we will live in a completely different reality in ten years. She's both scary and inspiring.
Well, before we go to some of the twenty-fourth year sites and so much, uh, strong, so bright, that we have, and that we have to be alerted, I want to be sober. I'm just talking about this news, but I'm curious, I've just been talking to Ilnar about the twenty-fourth year. And when you start watching the whole flow of what happened in the twenty-fourth year, it's just a huge number of events. We've, by the way, dropped thirty-eight episodes in the twenty-fourth year, although we haven't started since the beginning of the year. What month did I start running the channel?
April.
May, huh? April?
April.
In April, yes, the Channel started running in April and, uh, just some crazy number of technological breaks. That's probably one of the brightest years in the world, which is mine, at least I've met myself. I've been attracted to technology for my whole life. Write the comments that were the main for you in the twenty-fourth year. And right at the end of the issue, we'll tell you about some of our findings, some of our sites. It'll be great with you to synchronize and see, and for you in the twenty-fourth year, it was the most important, meaningful or particularly affected, or what you see from the point of view of some kind. I'm sorry. Here. Where do you want to start?
I think it's so interesting at the end of the year that the OpenAI, OpenAI with Microsoft signed, as they called it, signed as some agreements, yes, between themselves, and they--
He was signed earlier. Yes, Sasha, he was signed earlier.
They've identified him. Yeah, they made the finish--
It's now known.
They're, yes, they're famous, and they've shown, and, uh, this is a financial tract. Yes, it's an internal agreement, an internal agreement between Microsoft and Microsoft OpenAI. They made a financial tract, what is AGI, huh? And I'll remember that this is a very important discussion this year. Everyone's talking when AGI is in. Sam Althman has been saying, literally recently, a few months ago, that it is projected that AGI will be next year. Elon Musk says that AGI will be in general next year. It's just super breakthroughs, there, it's gonna be a little late. Uh, a number of people are talking about a new phrasing, but what-- that's what MicrosoftAI signed has very interesting things. First, they said that AGI, we'd think that the artificial intelligence has reached this AGI status when artificial intelligence begins to bring at least 100 billion profits. I mean, basically. Uh, there's a technical definition of what AGI is, but here they've identified, they've determined, Ilnar, 100 billion profits that this is the 100 billion OpenAI profits that will earn?
Yeah.
And, well, Google came up with this printer, right? We don't have a printed machine yet. I mean, it's expensive for now. So, uh, Google, how do you explain that? Google came up with a printer, and they actually optimized all of their glass to be searched, right? So there's a huge amount of optimization. And still, with all this, they don't have a hundred billion prosthetics, as far as I understand.
I'm not sure. I'm not. There's a lot of prosteers in the world, right? If you say...
Yeah, so Meta's got a printed machine, too, but they're checking, and now Meta's writing that they're gonna have 16 billion, so I understand, a block, right? I mean, well--
Is this the whole structure?
I'm just, I'm right now, yeah, I'm trying now. These are the annual net income they have written since-- in the twenty-third year, 40 billion. It's income, so it's a lot less profiling. So, profiling is 100 billion, I think, inexplicable, of course, of the amount.
Yeah, so Google and Meta all think it's like a printed machine, because it's like a software company, right? Well, in fact. Of course, they have hardware initiatives, but in fact, it's software companies that are free, cheap to scale with a very fixed hardware-c, that's simple enough, and that, well, that's easy. Optimize. Well, at least for decades, yeah, they're on the market.
Even so, they were not able to reach such indicators.
And here's a very interesting thing, yes, it appears that they in their agreement indicate that this show will be achieved by two thousand twenty-ninth year. And then Sam Althman says now that it's just been a few days ago that they want to move to another jurisdiction and make the OpenAI company a whole commercial, keep it separate. The non-profit structure and, a, make it commercial, including to attract mass money. Because he's talking about companies that invest hundreds of billions of dollars, right, hundreds of billions of dollars, right? We kind of invest very little and attract little. And the last time they've been there, five or what? Seven billion dollars. Iia needs to attract more money. And accordingly, they clearly state that, uh, the company will not be profitable for at least twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth, well, for the twenty-ninth, twenty-seventh, twenty-seventh, twenty-seventh, twenty-seventh, twenty-seventh, twenty-fifth, Year 8. As a consequence, AGI does not appear there. Or it's some kind of, uh, arrangement between OpenAI and Microsoft, given that there's an explanation that once the company reaches AGI, Microsoft, uh, how would it stop using priority technology? OpenAI, yes, and will use them within the framework, like, standard. Or it's just some corporate arrangement. So if Elon Musk and OpenAI are now suing, Microsoft, on the contrary, how it would have gone into some system of arrangements.
It's very much like protecting Microsoft because the concept of AGI is in itself quite vague. Someone's gonna say we've got AGI, right? Because there are some of our models of olimpiad challenges that can be solved. That's it. We believe that we have AGI, and let's actually, on this ground, our deal is to dissolve, suspend or something. And so that there is no possibility of double tracts or anything, Microsoft has an initiative, I understand, that clearly captures 100 billions of pros. So, we can all assume that you're free from us. Well, because, uh, when you get that volume of Microsoft's profits, it's gonna be a lot of times that invested, it's definitely not gonna be a little offended.
And, accordingly, companies can be quietly separated.
It's very strange why they have been linked to unrelated categories such as AGI and financial returns. Well, I'm trying to find some connection and I can't.
Look, we can get this straight. Oh, one of the definitions of AGI that we've been considering there for many of our episodes, what was it related to? What is a system, it's a model, artificial intelligence, which can be practically all commercially meaningful to meet at level or better than the man does.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah. And, actually, if we're taking all the commercially important tasks, you have some kind of machine, some system that does it practically than any man who's on the ground. And that's why you start getting profits. If you're not even getting so much profit, maybe not so good you're doing these commercially important tasks.
Mm-hmm.
Maybe somehow, you can just be logically tied. Though I may just be on a little snack pigeon.
Look, this is the first. It's the first thing I've ever had in my head that when that figure is indicated, it's more like the story that this AGI is making money. The other moment that's happening again, of course, is changing immediately. We understand what happens for a few years.
There has been, uh, such a major change over the years in terms of reorganization of plans, structures, visions, arrangements. These arrangements may also be modified, six months or a year later, to some other. Yeah? Because when you're defining the structure of 100 billion profits, you're clearly saying that it's still a commercial organization, it's not a commercial organization. Or is it a non-profit organization that makes so much money? It's a very big deal-- it's huge money. Yeah? What's Apple's got? Does anyone know what Apple's profits are for the year? We've been discussing AGI together and, uh, about these hundred billion dollars to the question, uh, what it's gonna be for AGI, which will be capable of generating 100 billion profits. You think, in the view of the view, here are the viewers that look, you have a lot of tests, too, or you use it. What do you see the scenarios are really gonna be doing AGI in the coming years? Yeah? So what would make business? What kind of business is this, or what kind of scenarios there might be?
Please write in the comments here under the video.
My interpretation here is very simple, that I don't understand how they agreed not to the oed-- how they agreed to be 100 billion. I don't know how it's possible to sign. There must be some other document we don't know about again because 100 billions are very favourable. I mean, we're kind of getting some news on the crups. I don't know, maybe I never could have gotten a little bit of a good, but from my point of view, it looks like I'm getting news on kr-- on the crupits. And that's like a pendulum. First, that deal is very cool for OpenAI. They got a billion dollars, you don't have to do anything. That's cool. Then, fuck, Microsoft is a big deal, damn, OpenAI never gets to 100 billion pros. What do you mean? Nobody's done it yet. Yeah? From the company saft. I don't think we have any information. But for Microsoft, I know exactly what they were worried about, it's like making sure that OpenAI won't be a clean reservoir, and there's no way they're just gonna be on Microsoft's money, cash-bearing. Microsoft and be a reserver of labs. And, uh, because it's very difficult to sell, like the board of directors, it's very difficult to explain, there, invest billions of dollars in the lab reservoir. It's very difficult to explain. I'm like a dia with a very unrealistic structure, right? That's how May-- how does that-- because there's no one on the board of directors, there's no way that everyone has time, there, really deep down. And this one... But if the board of directors show this agreement, it's like it shows that, well, the goal of the OpenAI is to become, eventually, like a... for profit organization, right? And, well, it's like OpenAI taking over this hemorrhoid like, like, spylothing out of, like, non profit in profit. I mean, I think it's-- I think that's the point, which he would have done, and he let Satya Nadell explain it very easily to the board of directors, because otherwise I just don't know. I mean, investing billions of dollars in the external, and RND lab is a lot, because it's more advantageous for the board of directors to always wait for some sort of demolition lab to buy it. One dash of $10 billion. What, uh, what, what, what, investing in something that might not yet be fired.
And at that point, it was still unclear that OpenAI would shoot.
But here's an interesting point, Microsoft himself had a profit for the past year of $88 billion and, there, with a $240 billion out. Just when we're talking about, if I'm right now, I'm seeing the data when we're talking about $100 billion in profit, it's clear that it's not a profit earned on the GPT chat users. Yeah? And it's obvious, isn't it? Or if it's a profit earned on use of GPT systems in, uh, API, what do people do in the world to spend so much money? Yeah? It's just another completely paradigma. Yeah? Or it should be the biggest system in terms of, I don't know, searching the operating system, applications of different kinds and everything. I mean, it's like a bet. The idea is, when there's such attention, that bet, well, it's just incredible, incredible. But again, if you look at the statements of strong leaders. This week, the head of Google spoke of whether last week said that their main investment was AI exclusively. Yeah? That's their system that they-- he doesn't talk about searching, there, he doesn't talk about advertising, he doesn't talk about, I don't know, social media out there, about YouTube. He speaks clearly, everything clearly points in that direction. Maybe they're planning something really huge. The numbers are like space. Very interesting, very interesting, huh? Very interesting, especially from such serious people to hear them.
I hate to see the main purpose of AGI, if anyone works it, it's a profit, right? That a system that is very well in the process of doing some sort of thing will be as good as possible for a hundred billion pros. It's like, you know, uh, it was like, uh, impolite, memorial. How do you make as many matches as possible? Yeah? It's to cut all the trees that are on the planet and, in fact, make matches out of them. That's how you get the maximum number of matches. I wish AGI would be incredibly smart if it were ever created there, and so on. It was not intended, it was not his only task only to generate profits, because profits could be obtained in different ways, and it would not be very desirable that she should use all the possibilities to do so.
That's right. I always feel like that, I don't want to.
In keeping with this story, uh, I want to, uh, but I want to highlight the topic that Elon Musk, uh, still continues to sue with OpenAI on the topic of commercialization, yes. What, uh, OpenAI is going to commercialize, but I think that the explanatory statement of this agreement suggests that, well, as it is clear with commercialization, and especially that OpenAI moves part of its own. The structures in Delaware, uh, that's also a sub--- shows that everything is. Well, as everyone understands, they're going in that direction. What happens next year when Ilona Mask, I think he'll have more power with the arrival, with the appointment of the Trumpa, we'll know about it in a couple of weeks, see what decisions are made, I'm sure it's really fast, but it's not.
I think the first quarter of the twenty-fifth year, we'll see, or we'll keep quiet, or there'll be some radical change. And OpenAI, however, it doesn't just show commercialization. There was a statement that the OpenAI was planning to create its own, uh, humanoids, uh, robots, yeah, and humanoid robots. And I think it's a very interesting story in a plan that should be taken into account, too, because again, Ilona Mask has robots that he's making humanoids. OpenAI stated that they were planning, planning to do. We don't know, yes, they'll do it or not. As far as this information is, again, it's reliable as it's not just some kind of micro-cays. And Google is talking about partnership again, and in a, uh, partnership in robots. And Gugla, uh, Gugla has a story? They're 19th December, which means at the end of last year they announced that, uh, there's a company that develops robots, Apptronik, and that Google DeepMind, they've announced, so they're talking about strategic partnership. And here is a very remarkable-- a remarkable fact, as often companies are mistaken, or how often they change directions, or how I-- how they tidy money. They bought Boston Dynamics in the 2,000th to thirteenth year. And, well, we all know what Boston Dynamics is. That, there, their Atlas is a humanoid robot and Spot is such a four-quarter robot. And in the 2 000th year, Google sold Boston Dynamics to SoftBank. SoftBank, by the way, which now, the head of which confirmed that they would give $100 billion to technology development. Uh, he and Trump are doing a thing together. So they said that, uh, they'd focus. Alphabet, so he made this sale, said they'd concentrate, it's Google, it's gonna focus on other directions. And Google was also buying one. She acquired a Japanese company Schaft, which was working on creating humanoid robots. And in the 20,000th year of 18th, they closed the project. They said that we don't have the money to invest in it, and that's not our thing. It's interesting, yeah, to see how changing it is, it doesn't change, some kind of trend, like the story, like the Zuckerberg. They said he would be uninterested with his VR, AR, that's all the glasses, and he won't be in this company so much. Now the AI era and the LLM model era, and what means they're not in the direction like they're going. Now we see how Zuckerberg is very much still investing in this direction. I've been watching, uh, an al- Sam Althman interview together, uh, with Mark Zuckerberg, which I think was done in two thousand trina-- 11 or 13 years, a long time ago. I think it was the thirteenth year.
And there, the Zuckerberg clearly says he sees the future in
He sees the future in, uh, virtual reality. I mean, it's something that keeps. It's always very cool when you come back and you look a little wide range, which people really said. And, as well as they continue this direction, they have continued in this direction. Now, robots and I see the situation that Ilon Mac was walking straight, going to robots. Google's been taking a break here, and the OpenAI's talking about it. I think if it's just that the OpenAI is starting to turn around now, taking into account their statements, that they need more money if they start attracting tens of billions of dollars, maybe there's money from the elevator. The banks will come to them, maybe, or maybe the bank's soft money won't come, we don't know, they're in a completely, well, they can be in a completely different field. And I personally wonder how this will develop and move. What do you think about OpenAI and humanoids?
OpenAI, I hear that in the background they say they lack money, investment to develop something. And it's like a parallel direction that isn't really connected to AGI, yes, it's some mechanics, spatial coordination, and so on. And again, like a different direction than the one we're waiting for, AGI and the other. And it's not clear, either that's a little misinformation so the rest of us spend more money in this direction or actually try to do everything that works out, anything that can reach, I'm sure we don't let them go, let them go. It's not clear, of course, to be honest.
Oh, about companies that, uh, seemed to be profitable first, they were invested, then they became lost, and people recorded losses, and then they started to invest again. Now you've given me some examples, and I remembered, we were discussing Rivian somehow. Remember, we said that Volkswagen, if I'm not mistaken, one of the big condos, recorded five billion dollars in losses, and then another company then put the next in Rivian when it's all there. The five billion burned, new ones are starting. So for this technology market as a whole, the trend is not very rare, because with Rivian, I was surprised at that. Now, I've given you so many examples, and that's how it's all going down and it's going to be around.
Well, basically, there are many examples of company sales and then lots of lots of lots of lots of elbows. It was a very famous story in the Russian market, when Mail.Ru sold HeadHunter in two thousand sixteenth year. She said, Mail.Ru then said that we were not interested in developing this kind of service. They somehow called HeadHunter B2B a service, B2B a service. If it's a job search service, and, well, I think that almost everyone knows who's watching the graduations, what a HeadHunter is. And then when HeadHunter went to the NASDAQ exchange in the USA and cost over a billion dollars, I don't remember how many billions of dollars they were worth there. And he sold Mail.Ru there, I don't know, for a hundred million-- in ten billion roubles, they sold them. I just don't remember what it was like in the 2,000-16 year, what it was, ninety or so, $100 million they sold them. Of course, this story, she, well, they bite right in the elbow. I mean, it's like a re-perfocus. Then they started doing it again, and then they got back on the platform, and they didn't work out. And in the twenty-second year, they sold their platform. I don't remember what she was called, but the platform was searching for human resources, they sold it again. I mean, it's amazing. So they've been investing in it again. They certainly haven't been able to create a serious, sufficient operator. And what they sold was when the CEO was the same CEO when they took it to the IPO. So this same person stayed because I met with the CEO HeadHunter, I remember two thousand tenth or eleventh year. The first time, it was the same person, yes. I'm a Casa-- I think they haven't changed their system for ten years. In general, how she looked in her function, all over. There's a lot of these boxes in the world, right? When someone didn't buy someone. We just don't know what would happen. In particular, yes, whatever would have happened if, from this-- how it would evolve, maybe Boston Dynamics would have been in the robots' perspective just up, from a point of view, not in terms of something. I know, additional funding opportunities. Maybe this company would have died a long time ago because they would have shut her down, too, just like they shut down another project they didn't have, right? That's why it always happens differently. I just don't know how to do anything from scratch. I think the OpenAI will buy some start-ups or some company that already exists. But the subject of different systems, it might be interesting, yes. And as much as it helps AGI create, I don't know, because, in the idea, first, it's gonna be AGI to create when you created AGI, he created everything else.
Oh, well, according to the statement, 100, 100 billion, but maybe to create AGI, you need content and, uh, not content, you need to learn systems, different cabins, and all that. And I'm still a private person, and if I'm taken by a private user, a professional user of such systems, I'd be very excited about the emergence of new systems in the twenty-fifth year of home, home, home-smart, smart home systems. devices, right? And by the way, there were statements that I didn't, I don't remember, we were in the productions, and I don't think we're saying that Apple is planning on this market to make updates and new, but-- yeah, new systems. And, uh, recently, they were planning on making some new control inside the house for, uh, smart house management. And it's clearly a very market, shorter, it's a clear market, which, where we get tremendous progress and change, because it's worth a very old one, yeah, it's very old. Systems are very complex. Something very hard to put in houses. It's Amazon Alexa a little breathing, working. All these systems, there's Apple's a stop-and-design, Gugla, well, some systems, they've been integrating, and they're so much, I think, low-level. Well, it's all low, yeah. I have a lot of different systems in mind from the point of view of a smart home, I'm testing them, using them. I don't have a home that's smart, but I have a lot of different systems, different systems, yes. And like that subject. Any sensors, sensors, videos, audio tapes, some kind of activation. I mean, I like the test, but there's no cool interface where I could communicate with a system of normality or where I could have gotten these systems in some scenarios, like, pretty easy to connect, not. using incomprehensible external sof--
It would be perfect, even if you hadn't spoken to her if she had predicted you and created this--
Yeah.
To be perfectly true, I think it should work, a man was completely out of decision-making, and she created perfect conditions for you, based on some of your pathers. Life, how your family lives and so on, what it needs.
Yeah, but bye-bye.
That would be proportionate to what's going on in AI in the other way, right? And so we're really at the level of a stone age.
Thermostat is a
pain.
Yes, the last generation. He's watching, this is the fourth generation they've released, not the third, yeah. He watches you use the air conditioner and the house heating and builds. There's no need to build anything, no matter how to make a schedule, yeah, he's...
Oh, yeah, that's progress.
You're being built, studying, learning, learning. How is it, how much work it is, how much he's really gonna be, how fit he's gonna be, how much he understands all the scenarios, I'm not sure. Because according to the building inside, he doesn't even have a different detail. He can, for example, determine if there's a building that hits me sometimes. It's him who determines whether you're at home or not. If you're not home, it's turning off. I think I'm not the only one in the family. I have four more kids and a wife, so... And how he'll determine who's home, that's how this definition is just on my phone. And it's like, well, it's kindergarten, well, it's kindergarten. Yeah. It's a mood for-- well, if I'm the one who lives in San Francisco, it's probably gonna be a subject for him, right?
He must have made it for himself.
Yeah, I guess. Yeah, I guess that scenario actually made the programmers he's alone. Maybe he has a girl he sees sometimes, right? Here, well, I don't know who. These are some of these scenarios, they-- I'm just a lot of myself in the process of the boxes, the stories that take into account the programming, architecture and everything. I'm sometimes impressed with some scenarios. They're made, they're very limited. I mean, it feels like a man was doing it just for, like, a group of people did, based on his own understanding, not on everything. Which, by the way, is the hardest thing I have in mind for a smart house, the last one. I've been trying to buy a sensor that works for a movement that works just on Wi-Fi, which records the operation and nothing else. And that it's free of charge from the record. And there's no such sensor, and it's all about the system to be integrated. And that's just, of course, just a little bit of a frustration. I mean, there's a lot of interesting things. The same thing happened in the Gate with the opening-up.
With the opening, the closing of the gate, uh, or the gate, yes, which opens, closes, there's a special system, which is very much-- I thought it was decided. I just lived like this, and I thought the system, all of America, was just an incredible amount, uh, there, an incredible number of garages, houses opening the gate, yeah. And there are, like, very funny technologies, and there are things that haven't been finalized. So, as soon as you're a little more broadly going to some kind of instant-act scenario, it's not working.
Of course, in America, the States have this interesting technology called integration with Amazon and Walmart. Amazon is called Amazon Key, and in Walmart, I don't remember what name. The essence of this technology is, it's interesting for people to know, too. The point of this technology is when I order some food or some delivery in Amazon, which is just infinite, it's a little something that happens every day. If someone orders, I don't know, there, on the Russian-speaking market in Ozon or Wildberries, they're making you deliver, and the courier has the opportunity to open, uh, a closed space, i.e. to open the door or open the garage. And the courier comes in, he has a concept like a one-time, well, a conditional, one-time code for access to your garage. And he opens the garage, puts the food in there. That, uh, that, first of all, he's dehydrated his own service from getting the money back. Because I come, for example, if there's something missing, I say, "This is not there, and you have to give me the money back." They always return money. And, well, it's getting cold-- plus it's there, like, if there's rain somewhere, snow, it's in a closed room. I mean, it's a very good technology, and it's working. On the door garage, but it doesn't work, for example, on the gay, yes, there, or on a certain form of doors, it doesn't work for a certain number. But it's a great development, very, very, well, so alive. I mean, it's a life, good, real case. And I have a friend in San Francisco, and he told me they had a apartment building, and he told me that Amazon had their door codes before, and then they started stealing, and then all of them started stealing. I realized it was just, well, the code was leaking. And when this system came, it was absolutely, completely, completely vanished, yes, in terms of the packages and delivery. I mean, it's a start to work, uh, very hard. These technologies and these, these case scenarios, are very much developed. And of course, it's gonna be interesting to see them coming, like Tana, when the system can be extra, uh, not just the thermostat, but it's gonna be interesting, but I don't know how to do it. music is coming for you.
Yeah, to create a life scenario for you.
Yes, the elder.
Maybe or guess something. That would be the case.
And calmly, and calmly with you-- understand you, yes. Not when you say, "Close the curtains," she says, "I don't see that device in the garage." And you're like, "Hey! Like how much, how much can you do, huh? How much can I have?" You've got it there, I don't know--
How much to be bullied by people.
Yeah, how much you can be fooling around people. Simple, perfectly simple scenarios, yes. I mean, the models are still, by the way, look, it's been a while. Ilnar, don't you remember how we tested or discussed the GPT? Or I said I wanted to put it in Amazon Alec last year. I even did a test. There was a stack of the layout, which was a bit of a stiff. I still don't.
Well, I mean, it's still not a normal model in such an arrangement-- what's amazing, right? Amazing. And, well, it's time for everything. I want to be here today, because we have a new year of mood for everyone, and I think a very interesting subject is to show history, but to remember the subject of autonomous cars that drive without a driver. And that subject, of course, I think we'll get a very serious breakthrough in the twenty-fifth year. I was watching today, uh, this car that CyberCab or what it is called, which is to be released... wants to release Tesla, which has no paediatrics in the front, nothing at all. And the review said it was impossible to get this car out on the market because in-- to get the car out, it needs pedals, mirrors of the rear view, it needs a wheel. It's impossible. And Tesla can put on the ass as we can say, let's get the pedals out. But the number of these things she can put on is limited. And, accordingly, she hasn't filed anything yet, no statements. I think they're waiting for the appointment of Elon Musk, oh, the destination of the Trumpa, and then they're going to have to agree with them inside. But there's still a Waymo company that's actively travelling to the US, in some cities, very active in San Francisco. I was in Austin, Texas. She's going to Austin, and she's already at the airport in Austin, I think. In Phoenix, she's driving, yeah, and in Phoenix, including at the airport, to Arizona. And San Francisco is considered an incredible place to test these machines because the city is very complex, incredibly complex, with the complexity of the streets and everything. And there's an interesting subject on the Internet. There's Jimmy Kimmel like that. It's American, uh, comedian, yeah, or that's been doing show, show, and it's been a long time since 2003. And he called his aunt a cab. I'm offering-- called a cab. I suggest she come to him, yes, on the show. And I suggest we watch all this video now. That's incredible! Look to the end.
I don't think translation is necessary, though we'll see if we can get in there.
What are these phrases great?
Yeah, but it's worth it, I think in English it's all to listen and watch. The way she's acting is what this woman is and what she says.
The woman is a redhead.
Yes, iron extract. Yeah, look at this, and we'll give you some comments together. So, this skate.
Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God!
You stay in the car for your safety.
I will get out of here.
For your safety do not attempt to exit the vehicle at any time.
driver with no driver.
Share your current location with a family or friend. Is there anyone-
Get my daughter. Get Nikki. Get Nikki. Get freaking Nikki.
Connecting you to Nikki.
Oh my God!
Hey, mom, what's up? Mom, I'm in-- I'm on a Zoom. What's going on?
What do you mean, what's going on? I'm in a car with no driver. Are you-- The other thing is killing me. Is that why God made me get to this age so I could drop dead in front of you? You little bastard. Are you guys-
Ma'am, we need a-
Okay, we showed this video here. We just decided to finish this with Ilnar. Because it's a very interesting story, isn't it? From the point of view of that. Well, you look, you know. Tanya, I don't think it's that iron excerpt, all the people I showed this skate, they all said that-- that's not how to do it because the woman had to get an heart attack. And I'd probably not risk it, honestly.
Yeah, I think so.
Not a risk-- would not risk his mother or her mother or her mother, or even an adult. Put them in that car and not report it, huh?
She was very good at her, because, first of all, she kept a sense of humor while she was doing it. If there's any phrases to translate, she didn't, she didn't. Well, I think I'd have a panic attack on her place, at least. She kept her face, she didn't try to get out, joked, there was something else.
I mean, it's a spectacle.
Well, considering this, it must be a remark to the American comic and there's a TV show, a producer, and so on, Kimmel.
He's not, he's mocking people, he's got a lot of people to do.
And how did the relatives get hurt on this bus, huh?
Yeah, yeah.
But the fact is, what's interesting is that technology is generally interesting, of course, we're gonna need an incredible time. It's an indicator of how much people don't fit into it. And yet, what we're talking about here is using, there, one, one, there, a thousand percent of the world's population, right? And I don't know what small microcentre of people is really being implemented, there, in technology, whatever it is, hundreds of million users in OpenAI or, I don't know, the approaching billion users in Meta. But ordinary people, of course, they don't know any of these technologies. If we go all the way around the world, we'll see you there before we start to do things. Well, maybe the $100 million in the OpenAI profits will be able to...
It's a smear.
To develop this sector, develop, develop, develop, develop, develop, develop. Here. Although, maybe everything, maybe everything. The subject of autonomous cars will be of particular importance this year, we will follow and watch. About drones. You're the audience, who's driving this car and who's testing, and what-- what's your feeling and impression? Because I had different guests in a car like that when I was driving them there, and the kids were reacting differently. What were your impressions? And those who didn't ride, and those who didn't roll, you're all right with that? Because I hear that a lot of people I tell, all the first things that they ask, they say, "Well, how?
I wouldn't have gotten into that car like that." Would you get in that car? Write this, please. That's the last thing that's gonna be good.
Okay, good subject. Uh, at the beginning of the meeting, I said that when I was analysing, uh, the news this morning about the twenty-fourth year, I, uh, had an incredible amount of impression on the volume of everything that happened at the end of the day. Twenty-fourth year. I want to hear from everyone who sees what kind of person in the twenty-fourth year, what's the most impression?
I'm more...
It's three of us. I have the most impressions.
Yeah, I think the biggest thing I've ever seen is that I'm the most honestly watching, I guess it's that, uh, that, uh, this technological revolution leads to another. More, as you say, a division between countries. I mean, in Generative AI, well, in Generative AI, it's clear that China is at the same level with America, and all the countries are all the rest hopeless behind. And all attempts to create national AI companies, like Mistral or Cahir, or as Poolside, have not been fully realized. And it seems that, uh, this is the technology revolution that, first, will throw all the countries apart from the United States and China, on the periphery, and that will allow China to compare with America.
Very, very interesting.
Naï naive and optimistic. Here we started our graduations with Devina. Remember that was a start-up with a programmer? He's still alive, by the way. Well, the start-up is meant. And here, yes, yes, yes. I was very impressed by how much progress in programming with neuronets has been achieved this year. Remember, a few episodes ago, I think a month ago, I was talking about trying the Yandex Olympics to do with the O1 Award, and she's basically five out of six tasks. And I have, you know, uh, what's the optimism? A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-the-the-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-the-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-the-the-the-a-the-the-the-the-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-the-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a- And it is largely linked to the fact that good chess moves have emerged, which can be analysed, can be taught to play, and so on. This technology, it's available, it's cheap. A weak computer plays better than any person, and in general, a large number of people have access to this technology. And, uh, so, I'm hoping that access to Gen AI and the results, there, programming and the other, could have a similar effect, right? That all those who do programming, all those who do, uh, want to develop, and so on, get a great tool that we get access to the top of the information, yes, to the tour, to the tigers, to the I'm sure you're the only one who's ever had access to it. Now, access is available to a large number of people, well, tigers in the skirts, but somehow access to information becomes more democratic. A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a- But if from the user ' s point of view, I have some naive optimism in
this direction.
And I have the same idea, Ilinar, in this direction, of which you have optimism, pessimism. Because I think that, well, if you're gonna be abstracted from apocalytic scenarios, yes, which also draws brains, but something more approximate is a man, he's like, well, a social animal, Let's call it a training course when it works, right? I mean, by practice. And even, let's say when you're looking for some information and you're digging a lot of different sources there, you're rereading different, in general, views on, like, the same thing, right? Then you're in the process of learning. Same with the texts when you-- ChatGPT writes you email in English, like, right? Or when you're trying to get a dictionary yourself, well, I'm gonna clean it up, but you're still learning. And that's how people get disintegrated again. Someone who's still working on these skills, working their skills in every field, and someone just relying on assistants loses them. And, as you know, people have stopped focusing on the news, because, there, the Internet, social media, and so on. So many things in human nature, I think they're losing, and that's gonna be such a big trend. Well, in general, I'm probably the man of all of us four who's most impressed by development, because I was a total dilemma, and I guess all of you are still the farthest from development. This is a technology world. But you're always refreshing him. It's interesting every time. And my performance turned over. I mean, I remember when I had a huge skepticalism even to GPT chat, I thought, "Oh, God, Google, GPT, whatever it was, it was all one search engine. But when I see progress in the answers he gives me, that is, I use it every day, and the GPT's ambassador was Sasha, that's 100 percent. When he just came and brushed the poems, using GPT chat, it was kind of cool, but what am I supposed to do and write poems? Now, when I can use it in my work, for example, for some treatment, I'm getting a little more thought, it's really a huge breakthrough. And there's a story that I've always been a little sad, that there was a time when, for example, there was a race between countries, who would fly the moon first, who would launch the satellite. That was the time, yeah, when the world changed, and you felt it right on the tip of your fingers. We live, you know, that there's nothing that changes, right? And this year, I just felt that there was a possibility that we would live in a completely different reality in ten years.
She's both scary and inspiring.
Nice, cool, Tanya, Tanya's insites, yeah.
Tanya, you answered that question best.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I want a sca-- I mean, I think that for me, the main story is, I see an incredible degree of progress, and it has grown dramatically this year, about last year, in a very dramatic way. This is if last year some of the major companies or large statements were, as yet, partially thought of AI, some of which is being channelled into this year by huge resources. Probably not all the resources, but the resources are being diverted. And perhaps just this next year, we will see even greater growth. And here's the story, uh, that shows that whoever's doing it now, and in this case, really, I'm here to say that about the US and about China, I'm incredibly supportive. Although a year ago, I only spoke of the US. I was sure that the United States would be basically one leader unless China made its chips. Given China's current presence, they must have made chips there, we can't see them, but they've certainly been running really hard on the front, right? On the other hand, there's a subject that's probably going on for me, not that it's sad, but it's probably a fact of peace. I did not see any initiative this year by the general public and companies in terms of the implementation of AI and the company. The level that these companies are putting in, the people want to figure it out, he's just a kid. Well, that's kind of a nurse, yeah. People are lagging behind in the understanding of trends, technologies, just stunning, just stunning. And I don't see a lot of cool, good implementation scenarios and strong, strong businessmen, including. I mean, whatever they say about what AI is needed, if you see what they do inside, it's just a very often pyar statement. It's also visible in a big business, in an entrail. So far, it's all, well, it's very partial. Doesn't mean it's not being introduced. Of course, a lot of technology is in place, but you and I have just discussed Alex, there are, yes, some homework. Well, from the point of view of simple rows, many things are still working very, very stunning. We'll probably see a bigger break next year.
If you agree that you're surprised...
I agree with you. What's amazing is that there's still no example of where the company is building, uh, how do the AI first business go? I mean, well, there was no such thing as a successful businessman saying, "This is where we build a company like AI first." I mean, and we're rolling it in every stage, well, like in every business process we're introducing AI.
Yeah.
I'm sorry I don't. So it's all limited, that's the most vivid examples, from Klarna and Sierra. This is the replacement of the Wall Centre operators and, in general, the support services through AI., but that's certainly not very ambitious, considering how both CEOs actually managed or managed before multi-million-dollar companies. They must have ambitions higher, right? Because they're already in some phase, yes, some stage of the skate, and, well, there's no way that someone thinks big enough to put AI into business. Unfortunately, we haven't seen that yet in the twenty-fourth year.
I hope we see it in the twenty-fifth year.
It's like an example. Elnar and I did a year ago for the educational market, uh, like a user--- well, a scenario that would benefit AI from, for example, the educational market. And we were there like a table, and there's every cycle of people looking for what they want to do, the choice of this training, the process of learning, there, the employment, and so on. Where AI is needed. And it's there, I don't know, more, there's a hundred different services to do. I don't see... And it's just a little thinking through AI first, yeah, when you're doing an education company, and you're gradually saying that we're going to have a company to start. I mean, AI first doesn't mean she's AI. It means that this is an educational company that focuses on all the processes, cycles, and introduces AI everywhere, everywhere. From any form of interaction with the client. And we still don't see the services that would be great in AI, there, in education, yes, in a huge field. And, uh, uh, although that's how much fun things could be done. I mean, because, given the current, current breakthrough, what happened this year is the appearance of GPT there, it was 4o, right? And, uh, well, well, as it would be, it's different, well, other possibilities, other, completely different possibilities. And the voice-song is this conversion, yes, speech to text, there, text to speech. Oh, that's where all the interesting, interesting things can be done, yeah, when people get involved, there, voice-speaking, then something writes, something else. And it's all-- but rather what happened, it's more time to watch the flames, yes, or more discussions, uh, I don't know how to get some pictures of some kind of generosity or someone. Some content will generate, and it's just some kind of micro scenario. So, uh, well, yeah, I, I, again, my belief that this, of course, will grow much, given that there will be a bigger game now, especially a 100 billion statement, right? Well, thank you all very much for your graduation. Happy New Year! Merry Christmas! Until the next meeting in exactly a week. Every Sunday channel ToTheMoon. Technological news, Silicon Valley sites, U.S., all over the world. We're always four people. We're waiting for you, you're gonna come because we're gonna show you a list of real trends for the twenty-fourth year and what's waiting for us in the twenty-fifth year. See you again!