Hello, everyone! We're on ToTheMoon. So, technological news, the Silicon Valley sites. We're leaving every Saturday. Plus, we have technology episodes on Wednesdays. Here comes a big issue on Wednesday about mass different requests. Look. So in Arizona, artificial intelligence revived the victim of the crime in the courtroom. Well, that's unprecedented. Look, this is a real case.
Three hours of triumph.
They made it the biggest network. There will be companies that feed, print cash, burning billions of dollars for employees' salaries. People get millions of dollars, and nothing happens stupid, right?
The function of the funnel that came on my channel in the States is personal, it's a double in all languages, short. YouTube's setting up a double test function. So, it appears that it is supposed to be automatically transferred, including our, for example, the release is on this channel. I had no other function of having a graduation, and it was supposed to be automatically translated into, in, all languages immediately in real time. And there was even a tie to do a test in difficult languages. So, there was a tie, like, in which languages to do the test, like, everyone, for example. I was in a difficult place. Languages that require adjustments there. Let's see what this is gonna be. I'm through, well, I don't know how much it's gonna work, how it's gonna be, like, the thing, and so on. And, of course, very, very interesting at all, what happens. I'm very curious that...
About, Sas, the inclusion of this box is to allow modeling on, uh, our videos. Elijah Yudkovsky has a concept of Vasilisk Rock. It means that if you know about development, there's artificial intelligence, neuronets, and so, say, you don't make it development, when super intelligence comes up, it's like everybody else. Such unnecessary waste will be removed. And the people who help him develop, they do everything they can to get him to grow up, become powerful and all, they're actually gonna get some profiling. We therefore believe that the inclusion of this box will also be achievable to our future prosperity.
I always say thank you.
Look, this is a very interesting subject.
So I met a friend of Americans here. A known businessman in general in the technology market makes several systems. That's what makes personal AI. So he started telling me about what I said, "What the hell is your system? I'm having a ChatGPT now, I'm feeding him data on myself and everything." He's like, "Well, you're at ChatGPT, you're giving me your own data. I said, "What am I supposed to hide?" Well, I mean, I don't give you any data. What does it matter? I'll put them on Google mail, keep them on, and I'll put them on Telegram, send them to Watsap, Google Docs, or I'll get this system. He says, "No, it's not safe. "We're making a safe system." I'm telling him, "What's your system safer than the OpenAI system? Your system is hacked in two minutes, if they want. At least they have, at least, some chance that data don't break in." This is the subject of dissemination and closing data, yes, so someone doesn't know, it seems to me to be unbelievable.
And it's a story. Now, it was reported last week that the United Arab Emirates had said that all citizens of the country would receive ChatGPT Plus, a pay-as-you-go.
And the residents, too.
Yeah, a pay-off. And residents, yes, they're also paying. Well, that's a genius move! I thought you'd imagine in Belarus, so they'd take every resident. Next on TV, on public news, on radio, on the ramp, all people are being distributed, every grandmother, all models. Everyone starts to wonder what models are. People want to use these models. That's how I got the graduation. Who didn't see, by the way, Wednesday about a lot of different requests, we were telling them, and there was a man... And, by the way, write off your own writing, write down how you're doing this type of thing. And there were people who write, "I mean, sixty-six years, I teach young people at work, how to do the schemes, there are protocols and so on at work." Someone else says, "I'm using, I've learned a lot of things to do." That's great! Well, it's just a way to get in. And someone's sitting there saying, "No, ChatGPT can't be used." And in Italy, five million euros have been fined again. By the way, one of the first fines was made by companies for allegedly not telling users that we might have an adult content that there was something in the data personnel system. Different worlds, huh? From a learning perspective, I've opened everything on YouTube, and at least I've discovered that we're learning about, because, well, that's a really cool thing. And by the way, those who don't know, all the models now... That's a good subject, Sasha.
So I'm talking to people about searching just like this, and the models are looking for something, and why they're putting something in search. And I mean, someone says, "Well, if there's no Google search for it, ChatGPT won't give it away." I'm telling them, "Is there something that won't give? He's got his index, he's looking for his own, he's going through, he can go through all the X posts, there, LinkedIn, looking for the whole thing, and he's taking the information you've put on some website and telling her as relevant to-- Makes the conclusion that you, based on that information you've put on some site somewhere. I mean, if there's little information about you, like in Yandex, in Google looking for your website, maybe you won't be able to find it now, but search, search, and index, they'll find it. They, Sasha, write their indexes right on the search? They're doing their search systems.
Yeah, yeah. I mean, yes, of course, yes. I mean, for all of these Perplexity start-ups, OpenAI, Anthropic, that is, for everyone, you know, that two hundred billion is Google Search's revenue, which is very, very profitable.
As much as the profitability of the AI startups doesn't have to be said, so we don't talk about that AI, it's a profitable or not. We're only talking about revenue now, yes, two hundred billion. And it's clear that, as the Perplexity, OpenAI, Aic in this part is very simple that, uh, they're, like, a percentage of Google's leaving
easy.
Look, Google, Google plays another game, too. He's got the AI Mode deposit, said he can book a ticket through this AI Mode. So I was here yesterday, telling or the other day, talking to one of my partners, and I think I'll show him, so, super-innovation is new. I came in, tried to book through this AI Mode ticket. I saw it was scattered, it felt like the GPT chat three and a half went out there. Well, the quality of the model was nothing. Some stupid answers to me. I went out there, opened up an O3 model and showed at least how he compares prices perfectly.
Google's working too, coming, leaving a standard search. And this commercial thing, how long before it even lasts? So, Sasha, you say two hundred billion because two hundred billion is a context, right?
Yeah.
Well, if we leave the context advertising now and we start getting another type of extradition, then this other type of extradition will build a new commercial model.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. But here we must understand, too, yes, that advertisers are as good as I think advertising is not so flexible in the overlapping of budgets, right? I mean, if people are looking for information in another way, they'll start to overwhelming these budgets. I think so.
Why haven't they started yet? Look, there's an OpenAI. They say they have $800 million. Okay, let 100 million people use some kind of search. Why else did they not start to get the budget here? Well, because Google is clear. Google's got his search, they don't need it. But I think the OpenAI is a very good example with the GPT chat in search.
Well, look, that's the problem, that's the problem, that's, like, all companies like Perplexity. So why am I so pessimistic about Perplexity? Because they do browser, they make finances, finance agents, they make browser, agents in the browser, they make a commercial. I mean, as it would be, these are all clear directions for improvement. But there's no company that understands this space, which can explain how they're beingt. The same OpenAI does everything. They have a fucking agent and no one uses a cop. They say something about advertising, and nobody uses it either. Well, I guess I do, right? I mean, it's like everyone's in the air, but nobody can even say, that's what the future looks like.
Guglom is clear. You have Google AdWords, and you realize you're there through the bet system, you go out to some kind of positions, you get clients, you take the money, and you've got your clients. Well, that's a simplicity. With OpenAI, it doesn't know where to put money to get clients from. At least for now.
We have a 60th issue today.
And I'm actually suggesting that for the first time in my life, all the subscribers have to say our canal back, the liquor, the comment, the friends send. We gotta get out of here, right? Here we are getting some kind of video. The last videos are going to be there for 10,000 views, and we need to get more of this. I therefore propose that this issue be supported, especially in view of the number of sixty. Why not sixty, huh? Why not a 60th issue? It's been so bad today. It would be fifty-ninth, I'd probably suggest, too, but I'm offering it for the first time. That's why we need to be backed up. We're here.
That's why we need to be backed up. We're going out very stable every Sunday. Never missed a spot in the sixty-week, sixty-week.
All the people on the track will be 10,000 plus the liquors.
On the line, on the phone, on the subscription, and send five friends.
That's how it's gonna be great! Yeah? But watch SEO Google Sundar Pitchai. He was talking about this IMode deposit, and he said that AI responses to the search increased the number of requests and reassignments that they did not take site transhipments. So, what logic was that? That the models are supposed to take down the website traffic, which, to be honest, I agree with that. And they take it, they take a hundred percent mobile application transcript. You just think at some point of time why would you open your mobile application? He says he's not, no, no, no, no. They don't take it, they're increasing it. The Jacobs were there, so they directly released the data, which means he refuted the fear that this search, it increases the traffic on different sites. Although, of course, I think that a large number of sites will lose information. And as Sasha said from the beginning, I think the record hasn't started yet with The Moon that there will be a huge number of new companies that will win this new search. And little, this search engine optimization in AI, he hasn't even woke up in models yet. I mean, it's some kind of place, I don't know, ninety-fourth, ninety-fifth year of the Internet, I don't think it's even ninety-eighth. I was there in '96 or '97, and I was on the Internet and I remember the first ones there, so, Astalavista, Rambler, you open them, looking for something in magazines, reading what kind of sytics are interesting. I'm not. There, Haker.ru, I don't think, or I don't remember. The hackers are such magazines, I don't remember what he was called. Sasha, you, you, you, you're younger, right? You're younger.
I was. I had one graduation.
I had, uh, I had a lot of things. I was just young when it was fashionable, yeah, more. And...
It was worth a lot.
Well, because U.S. Robotics Modem called 30,600, right? Robotics 30,600. And then there was a time when the housers were supposed to buy the right kind of thing. Now, what's the difference, conditionally, you have a dome called it if you have a search system. Well, the next question is, she's showing what she's writing and how she's handling the data. Just if you look at the way people get it, why she-- here I showed people about human data analysis yesterday and started a model of rapid human data analysis, not deep research, but I did. Just about three, about myself. And she took it for some reason. I have, I've been in some different ratings, you know, a decent number of ratings. And in one of the ratings, I was there in a hundred people on the Russian-France ratings and a few years in a row. It's somehow only taken this rating and wrote, "And Alexander Volchek, which means he's in this rating." So it puts a weight on this subject and says, "And then Alexander Volchek is published there on Hacker News." I think what the hell is Hacker News? Some kind of five-hundredth article, you know, nothing, right? So he chooses his information, and it's the basis for it. These weights will change sometime. There are people, of course, gonna be this, well, this, this is, this is a serious future. I want to start with what news I'm gonna get.
I think this is a very awesome subject. There's a super-presidant at all. So in Arizona, artificial intelligence revived the victim of the crime in the courtroom.
He's been revitalizing the victim of the crime. You think you've done it?
A very yellow headline.
Well, that's unprecedented. Look, this is a real case. In the trial of the case
Christ!
Remember, we were telling in one issue that in Combo-- in Thailand or where, or in Cambodia, I've forgotten, in which country, the real temple has set a virtual, virtual divine.
Cambodia.
I mean, it's real.
You mean Malaysia.
Malaysia, yes.
There's a place in Kuala Lumpur.
So, at the trial on the murder case, the family of the deceased showed a video of the victim himself handling his killer. The video was created, I understand, with the use of genetic technologies. Old voice and victim videos were processed with artificial intelligence. And then there was a skate. And he's, uh, erroneously erroneously erroneously abused the victim's impact on the defendant. And that was at the sentencing stage. And according to the experts, for the first time in the history of the United States, the image was made. Well, protection, protection of convicted...
It was with the jury, wasn't it?
Well, I guess. The defense of the convict filed an appeal, which means that we-- they've filed. Why did they appeal? Because they said how much the judge could be exposed to the influence of this video in determining the punishment. Well, there's a lot of people trying to reconstruct a man. And there's a lot of discussion about this, and it looks like it, right? And a lot of it is everywhere. And that's, of course, unreal simple, right?
Hello. Just to be clear for everyone seeing this, I am a version of Chris Pelkey recreated through AI that uses my picture and my voice profile.
Well, the headline is very clickbeit. I was waiting.
If the jury, it could have a big effect. Interesting case.
Yeah. But, as a matter of fact, it's a very specific subject, because it can lead to deepfake, but to the present, we understand, yes, deepfake. You can manipulate.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
What's really...
That's what deepfake is.
What's-- look, well, Elnar, first of all, it's--
No, they warned me.
I mean, there's deepfake when you can still change the kind of person. Elnar, this deepfake is a fact.
I'm Chris Pelkey. I served with the United States Army in the infantry. I'm from Upstate New York. And what else?
Uh, the news under discussion. We've been talking about her for months four or five years. She's like nobody noticed. Uh, media didn't spread out why. The entire Internet has now exploded about the Grok being introduced into Telegram. So, seg-- but I'm sitting here, so I'm reading last night. What am I reading? I read how Douras writes about what we're doing, so we're putting Grok in Telegram, how does Elon Mask write to him, uh, "We're still...
Not right now.
Not right now.
Three hours later.
He's-- three hours.
Three hours of triumph.
In fact, you're gonna notice that Elon Musk, actually Elon Musk's reaction, he's got a press service, or does he work for 48 hours a day? He says, "No, go-- go-- go-- That, by the way, you know how, uh, to execute, pardon, execute, pardon, comma. It's about here in English, no commas, no commas on the deal has been signed - it's No, it's comma. No, the deal was signed. No, the deal wasn't signed. Anyway, you can watch. What the Duras answer is that Dorov answers to Elon Musk, "Yes, really, we agreed, we agreed."
I'm worried.
Well, clearly disturbed. Well, he's worried. Wait, you mean it's not an alarming answer?
Well, the same place, there...
It's an alarming answer. Yeah, he didn't write to him, "Ilon, what are you doing? We agreed on everything there." Here. He's-
I'm all day long, I'm very much in the case, there, in some projects, discussions, some investment, something to do new, a lot of things. Explain to me, uh, what's the uniqueness of this?
What's the point of this case anyway? Well, in the mass, that thing is in place in WhatsApp. That's what I'm doing. And I don't know who's using it. What's the point of this case? It's kind of a little bit of a pre--- it's for the subscriptions, as I recall, it's gonna be good to work out of the last of the statements four months ago.
They were talking about the award, and now I think they said that everyone could get rid of it and his--
A free version of the story, or a-- or a free-of-charge version.
Well, that's not a detail yet, is it? But, of course, it's not the most advanced.
What's the so-- what's the problem? Well, type--
Well, there's no logic. So all the pay-- you have to pay for the good LLM, how does he pay for it? What's so stupid?
No, can you explain what the use case is? If people want to use the model, they don't even have the money, but they'd better open a separate model free of charge and use it separately. DeepSeek, who can't open the East-- open the ChatGPT or can't open Gemini, there, or can't open Grok, well, open this model and use it separately.
Well, they're in general, they're in the middle of a xAI development path, they're starting with Twitter, right? So, it's all on Twitter, and now, actually, it's gone on other social media.
Uh-uh, hung up, huh? We should have been here.
I don't know, it's gonna be a good look.
No, that's why I asked.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, Logic is not clear yet.
I think it's a very specific project.
Well, as you can see, there's no deal yet.
Yeah.
As it turns out. So...
Yeah, I think that's what the OAE announced about ChatGPT Plus, there's a different discussion on this subject, because there's a possibility that they're turning inside their absolute, impossible, Stargate, right? And the disconnect and the OpenAI are involved, and they're turning their infrastructure.
And they're turning their infrastructure, I understand that the UAE is likely to turn its GPT chat inside for everyone present and give them a plus. That's how they get, first of all, data, they'll probably be able to learn it in the model, I don't know. I mean, I think the UAE is probably gonna be on some of its infrastructure for these people. But this is the case, right? That sounds like an unprecedented, awesome, just unrealistic. And I was thinking about this, by the way, what's the U.S. with all the plus-not? Although it's probably a free version, it's a quality-smart.
Still, the current free version...
She's getting tight.
The current free version is like six months ago, I think the $22-paying version. Well, maybe not like six months ago, maybe nine months ago, right? Like a feeble version. That's why she's really getting a little tight. I mean, it's all very relative. What do you think about the case, not all over the country?
I'd add that it's not just for internal use, it's just, you know, you're gonna have infrastructure all over the world. And if a man, there, I don't know, from Europe, will be contacting GPT chat, his signal will go no longer to America, not to the OpenAI servers that are in the States or somewhere, but to the nearest server. You're running out of time, you're processing, you're sharing your infrastructure. And in general, they would want to close the whole planet, so you'll always have a pretty close distance. It's like youTube, there's video clashing into different regions, and you don't need to go to some remote server at the expense of this, it's all working much faster. Therefore, the OpenAI is still in the process of developing this infrastructure throughout the country. And about the Emir, well, a rich country can afford. That's awesome if everyone has the opportunity to use this tool. They don't have to, but the opportunity is all coming. That's great, of course.
Look, normally, when you have a mass service like that, it's like public servants in Russia, for example. I didn't say it in Belarus when you were telling it on TV to the ordinary people. The most awesome introduction, the mass introduction. I remember Belarus, for example, faster than Russia and Ukraine, introduced a system of food delivery home. They made it the biggest network. I remember when I came to my grandmother for eighty-seven years, and she said, "Well, you should order food online. Why go to the store? There's the same price as in the offline." And when that man tells you eighty-seven years, it's really, well, how do you get it, you're kind of like that? I mean, a man has heard about it. When you're spreading information, well, a wide range, you're all starting to use it. You have a little different population, yes, inside. Once again, I don't-- I don't understand who's in the race where and how to win. There are huge questions about education. We were, by the way, filming who didn't see the Ilnar education show together a few weeks ago, look.
We've told you what's going on in different countries. Illar, we'll have to go over there in a couple months, because I don't think progress is going well, it's moving very fast, right? And there's an example. Look, I want to talk about agents. We were talking to a comrade about what, uh, the system is about. And he said there was very little business, real business-kacy and business-to-doing, and that people, that means there's no agent there that calls anyone and so on. And I gave him an example in the dialogue process. I'm saying, when you want to book a restaurant, like in the States, and if this restaurant doesn't have any connection to any system, there's always a "Gogle reservation" on the map. Google calls the robot himself. It's free service. Google calls himself to the restaurant, tries to call there. First, the restaurant may be closed, he's trying to reach you as soon as he reaches, he's blinking, he's sending you. The armor confirmed you. So, basically, what's he doing? He calls the restaurant and says, "Hello." I didn't hear the conversation, but I'm gonna assume that I'm calling from Google cards. You have a bromine and so on. He's recording, and people get used to it, they're normal, they're totally confirming. I've been seeing these armored armored people a lot. I thought I was open AI, and I'm saying now, for example, OpenAI, that I should study all dentals that are near my house, in a radius, I don't know, hours of driving, and tell me their prices. He's just running websites, studying sites, watching feedback. Well, like everything on the Internet, but he can't call. If he could call me every dental facility, tell me who I am from the standpoint of the data and come to me with answers. That would be a real agent, not an agent who puts me on a schedule, not an agent who sells. He doesn't have to talk so hard, he can be totally debilitating. Well, he might be my voice. He can call and say I'm a robot. I'm the boss here who asked me to call, right? Well, or I'm in the computer system, I'm the master.
Chief.
Master.
Master.
The master is right here. So, by the way, as our viewers think, they should be called master, boss or who? Or a friend, a staff member, a assistant, a assistant. I'm the master, the master asked me to call. And I like the master. I don't know. My master asked me.
I'm sure you're in your way, Sasha.
The owner asked me to call and get information. Now, many companies are blocked, well, as they say, some robot is ununderstood, but he'll bring them a fox, and it'll be a
case.
There's a robot on the other side.
Imagine how many leathers are being sent to publicity campaigns. Fuck you. Just some phone numbers and everything. And this is a complete design. And I'm sure the fuck is gonna be a system that's gonna start calling, so do the world. And then it's real to re-examine it. I mean, yes, Ilnar, they'll have a robot on the other side, and they'll have a robot that will answer and communicate the necessary, absolutely necessary information. Just like there are robots now. We're calling the bank now. There's a robot. No problem. If he's not stupid, there's no problem. He's drowning, but he's connecting you with someone else.
Then look.
If two robots were choking.
Yeah, you have a voice generator on the one hand, recognizing the part, on the other hand, and then she generates, it'll recognize it. They'll be easier to finally start talking about some routine computer protocol, and everything will come back.
Yeah, but there's a subject here.
I'm often asking my husband to call, and it's very uncomfortable because he has a man's voice, he can't say it's me. I have to confirm.
California can't, yeah.
I'm Tatiana, I'm in a bad English, well, I'm saying that, so they don't have questions about why my husband's doing these things. Here. And my friend, she told me she had a situation, too, but she's got a situation on the other hand, and she's calling for her husband. And she says, "Yeah, my name is Pavel."
Yeah, she says California has no right.
In California, yes, they have no right to say, "Why do you have a woman's voice, Pavel?" So that's a little trik.
Well, Elinara, by the way, on the subject, everyone thinks they're gonna get on the record. But if you really see it, then there's gonna be a huge layer of protocol. Well, you can't get on protocol, you're gonna have a simple channel because someone's on the SMS, someone on the spot, someone on the online chat, someone needs to come live, someone on the regular mail, Someone's on emails, well, someone's on physical mail, someone needs a letter to get. So everyone has their ways of communicating. Peace, peace, the world is very big, and where there's a central protocol, we were clearing the case yesterday with your buddy that you were coming to the airport, I thought I was telling him last time. I came to the airport and asked the GPT chate what kind of ladder my baggage was going on. In fact, I said that the volume of applications is missing because GPT chatting will know exactly who the source is.
And there's one centralized data system that's reporting luggage data. Well, there's a source, and he's gonna connect to this source, and he's not gonna be asking any intermediate systems at all. That's what's gonna happen, yeah, on the idea. And in these boxes... Sasha, there are people on the start-ups now. Do you see any of the starters around here? You're very much in the Valley at a hundred-- company. People create, people create agents not these. I'm just nine hundred ninety nine failures from thousands of agents, like the safe agents. Does anyone do such real examples of the future?
No, well, it means that the fanning is like a new one, you know, like, that kind of a fanding on the left is not the same, right? So, how do we say that? I think we're in a phase where, again, these top AI companies are already being evaluated by multipliers 30 to the ribs. The only exception is Perplexity. And in fact, we are now in the value of fashion creation. I think the change of fashion is over. Here.
Explain, Sas, to the people, or I'll be texting.
Look, yeah, I mean, you can, like, standard, yeah, you can, you can invest forever. So you can look at everything-- you can always look at, you know, the way new opportunities are and fan it forever. Somethin' crazy, there's a Poolside up over a billion, there's no product, nothing, nothing's happening. It's like watching it all look like business, right? As long as Open, well, OpenAI, Anthropic, of course, investors close--
Ah, of course, investors are closing their eyes on crazy losses, aren't they? But if you take them, there, growth rate, growth rate, too c-- it's a multiplier 30, it's kind of a fair-- it's justifiable. It happens to be like... like, like, like, in life. And if it's like just to close your eyes on, there's something they lose a lot of money. I think we're in fact, well, at the stage of what is, what is the number of companies that create value, and they have to transform into real business during, Uh, the next two to three years. Well, real business is business that isn't counting revenue, but poo profiling is usually. Yeah? I mean, what's, uh, company should be break even at least and should grow fast. I mean, I understand that OpenAI, Anthropic, many others, they're on this path. Everybody's talking about it, everybody thinks about it, right? And then someone says, "I did some unreal agents on some new, there, infrastructure, some unreal new." Well, no one has talent, no one has a talent start-up, even close to the OpenAI or Anthropic. So, like the start-up now, it could be a little bit of a hundred million to do something in principle when they have a talent worse than Anthropic, and Anthropic is still measured by revenue and future. I'm here. Well, there's no such thing-- no.
Or you should be named Mira Murati or Asus Kever.
What are they really doing? They do something...
Well, we don't know.
Ang said, "Nobody knows, just the money's coming."
No, just go-- hypothetically they're doing the same thing, right? But more and more, except her, so much to do something in principle, nobody can. I mean, I kind of think we're at a stage when, uh, some money came into the market, so much. No matter how much, you know, there was no beta that people are like, "Yeah, we do something differently." And it was fired. No such company, no one. Someone who said, "Shit the rules, we need a lot of money, it's gonna work." There's no such company. I mean, it's true that investors close the eyes to the fact that this is a lost story, but it is still measured by revenue and revenue growth rates. That's what I'm trying to say, we're in this market stage. In three years, everything will be measured at speed, because companies have to break even at least fast. It'll be three years, and we're in this economic cycle.
Sasha, listen,
I'll just go over the subject, yeah.
And, and in fact, it's really super important, this is the news about Stargate, that they're building this infrastructure project, which is really super important. Now, this new generation of chips is coming out of Blackwall, and they have four years of cycle. And as it is to build, it's like the companies that all build business in the twenty-seventh, twenty-eighth year. So there's gonna be a safe-- there's gonna be companies that typ-- typ-slashes like HubSpot, salesforce, all those SaaS, right, they're gonna-- they're gonna be such companies, they're gonna need power, right? And these power will be in the States, and they will be on Blackwall architecture, because now is like a new beginning of this cycle. I mean, because, well, how does it make sense to build something at the beginning of the cycle, like, a little, uh, a little bit of a way, huh? Because the cycles are not, not long, there are four years.
Explain a little more to people.
Look, first Ampere, there was a GPU, they lived there from the 17th to the 21st year, and they lived-- no, you know, from the twenty-first to the twenty-fifth, you know, from the twenty-sixth or from the twenty-second to twenty-sixth. The twenty-first to twenty-fifth live Hopper. And now Blackwall. And Blackwall is like the twenty-sixth to thirty years. I mean, like this, this real AI impapt in GDP, well, people are estimating interest, maybe there's something like that. Ah, well, he's gonna be in the twenty-seventh to twenty-eighth year, and he's gonna be on this Blackwall architecture. And, well, they're gonna be real, it's a bo-- and the Stargate project will support it. I think we're definitely in this cycle now. Now, I can't hear any crazy rounds. And more...
How does that affect the creation of solutions for, for users, business? Blackwall architecture.
They're faster, they're faster, they're 20 to 30 percent cost efficient, but twenty--- but the most important thing is, they're twice as fast. So latency is still better, right? I mean, how can we assume that... Yeah. So, as a matter of fact, we can assume that in the twenty-seventh year of the O3 level model will be real time, O3 quality will be real time. And the question is, who's just gonna build a business. It'll be real time by software optimization, by hardware optimization. So he's not gonna wait ninety seconds, but there's three seconds.
Here. I'm, uh, I'm, uh, I don't think there's any, uh, new story that's actually possible.
Look, I was gonna ask you something. Netflix provided information on their plans to install personalized advertising based on video, you know, on a film. I mean, it's a movie, and they want to put in, put in a commercial that's similar to that movie, that's, like, integrated into the movie, and that it's gonna be, that's, uh, dynamically, rolling, there, thematically. The film or the TV show that the audience watches, respectively, by being more relevant, attracted to the audience. And this is AI commercials, these are the tagged. Well, Netflix has
I think it's, I think, it's a hip, I think it's a bullshit. They have nothing completely. I mean, I understand that-- that's what I think, that's a very interesting news. Like what we're working on in Fixveld, huh? I mean, it's really cool.
Yeah.
Noo and kind of super respect, what are they doing marketing for us, huh? But I think it's like a complete bullshit right now. I mean, it's kind of true, that social media every week has two and 150 videos that will always be AI generated, that's true. It's true that you can get a video generated to make thousands of dollars a month. And it's like a good business. And, of course, just the-- the level of technology generation, just so it's on the TV, like, a fucking hypothetical look. Well, as much as Google and Clink do. No one else can. No one else in the world can generate that kind of thing. Google, oh--Goo-Goo-- and Google's got that video on the video, like you're playing the wheel, you're getting something on the text, right? I mean, it's a wheel. How do they automate this skate? They won't work with the Chinese. So there's a technology out there, then there's still an economy to go down, which will take as long as it takes. So we haven't seen any predefined content on the TV, no personalized-- just no AI advertisements, no one, no one, no one, no one, no one. So this personalized commercial is more, in my opinion, if Google's involved in it, it's very interesting, right? So if Google is trying to smash Netflix to himself instead of Microsoft, that's like a smart move on the Gug's side, right? I mean, I wonder how they would even make this anonym. I mean, if Google's involved, then Google's young enough to use the right moment to scream this news. But if Gugly's not in the news, it's a full profanation. It's like a Google-- the only one who can get to this technology in a year, no one else, well, in the west world is close.
Yeah. And the question is, how will this work really, huh?
Yeah, we, we just haven't seen a single-- that's social media again, there's, like, a-- we're gonna be 10 percent of the content we consume, AI, medium-generated, yeah, there by the end of this year. Right.
But on the TV we didn't see anything AI generated, it doesn't exist.
A huge number of people, you're on this subject, let's help people, too. A huge number of people constantly indicate that it is not necessary to remove content to date, so that AI generated avatars can be removed, that can be translated, lip synchronized and so on. And I have a question all the time, and I don't-- I know a lot of different bloggers, details, I hardly see the applicants, so people can fly in other languages with a change in the person being motorized, Well, the faces, well, the autogenerated people, all the way up, they're all very strong. As far as it is... and I feel like all social networks, systems will be as secure and blocking as possible, or it will cause chaos within systems. Well, it's a huge number of cabs, known as the porn industry, yes, or the string services. There's a straight, well, there's a case, yeah, when the guys are making avatars and reals and making millions of dollars, they're gonna be opened up, and they're kind of bluffing. How is it really going to fly with a type of content? How much do social media have the ability to detach a type of content?
Of course they can. And of course, it's gonna happen. So no socialist has clearly said about his policy on AI generated content. I mean, you should guess. And it's very wrong. I mean, there must be a policy, a recommendation that we consider as correct, what we consider to be a ep-
What we think is right, what we think is wrong and so on, right? We recommend that we do this, but we think we don't recommend it because of it. And I think I hope that competition among social media will increase dramatically, because, well, it's really just like, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really Well, just burning billions of dollars for employees' salaries. People get millions of dollars, and nothing happens stupid, right? I mean, searching is a very delicate structure, but the same thing in social media is not happening.
And of course, they will have to differentiate to how they relate to AI generate content and ranking it.
With the lips, the translation into other languages, that's what it doesn't fly, I'd have seen it from the inside. Because if we're talking about some kind of entertainment, it's always in the context of the audience. And what might be interesting, fascinating, funny in one country, in another language group, might not be completely in. Like, here, uh, there's videos that, with a conditional English version, are fun videos, but with a Russian sound, and they're totally well in. If the content is interesting, it's fascinating, if it's called in this market, instead of watching it with the subtitles, you'll look it in the sound. If it's been made with the help, there's the voices of the participants, I'm sorry I haven't seen it yet, but I think I'd love to see it. But some entertainment content is much easier to look at, like, the mother tongue of the creators who are in this context. I mean, I wouldn't forget that side either.
Yeah. Do you have to replace your face? I mean, if we've been watching movies all our lives that just got filmed, I don't know, in America and translated into Russian, and you're just looking, like, yeah, I know, it would be cool if a man would sound like a voice, but in a Russian language. We're watching the movies, and it's always been great. How do you really need to change your face? Because when you replace your face, a man becomes not himself, he becomes another person. It's not his mimika, not his gesture, not his details. I have a little fun, for example. I see the cover on YouTube periodically, I have another channel and cover on YouTube with my pictures. I'm getting closer. And it was, like, a joke. I've got a shirt open here, so that's it. And I have hair here, my chest is hairy. I'm like, "So, wait." So I open it, it's a real shot. Well, that's how it might be open. Well, that's it, yeah, that's it. So the chest is hairy. Like, "What is that?" I'm getting it. And I realized that they were using some sort of treatment and using this processing, it was changing, you know, changing, like, lips were pumping me. There was a picture of me like I had lips pumped, so my chest was hairy. You're like, wait--
This model was in hairy people, wasn't it?
Well, that, it looks, it looks, to be honest, weird. You're becoming... you're becoming completely unlived, another man. If the people of the filters are putting up, there's a makeup to change the girl or something. Well, what's supposed to happen next? Like I'm walking down the street, and I have a special bag in my hand, coming with me, right? Either a dog special or I show myself in certain places in terms of, like, the intrinsic nature of the situation. I have, look, in the dock, so a friend of the day before yesterday sends a picture, says, "Sash, so, like, Openai Sam Altman and Joe-- with Ive are videotapes filming in the café, and John Ive took a picture across the building. San Francisco." It's sending. He's standing across this building, and I'm standing with the baby. I thought it was AI generated, and then I got hit. So we were there last week, well, about the same days. That was very funny.
I actually thought it was AI generated content already, because you, you just don't understand, you think, "Well, and maybe it's all, so it's fake." Just, by the way, they're flying again. That's the subject that was raised, so I'm interested in social media. Look, there's Instagram, he says officially that you don't need to put on the tapes that have the logo of my competitors. Well, if there's YouTube, TikTok, and so on, they're downgrading. That's it. If I put a camera in Instagram for a minute, ten-second generosed video in Higgsfield or Veo 3, there, no matter what, is it? Am I gonna get a little skate or something?
No, we were really jealous in Tictoca, and we had 20 times more traffic. I mean, Tictoku's fine.
Tick's okay, right?
I don't know. I, I honestly don't know now, and it's very hard to say. It's a shorts, not shorts. I think it's still changing. It's very bad that it's very slowing adoption AI, short, that there's no one here that can't answer these questions, that's a very big problem.
Well, that's what people don't say right away, like, what you can do.
Well, yeah. Well, yeah. I mean, you can use AI and don't say it's AI.
Or you, you, if you use AI, you have to say it's AI. Or there's a right AI and there's an incorrect AI. Well, I mean...
At this point of time, I'm saying that Europe, uh, European technology has died because they have GDPR, and there's nothing to do. That's the idea, nothing at all.
Yeah, it's hard. Europe is hard. And here, I guess, in America, this is where very rigid capitalism is going. So there are no rules in AI, in fact, now, in fact, there is no normal rule. At least there's no example that the rules are actually enthusiastic, right? And we are just as we are in the new technological revolution that will be a revolution that will be vein, you know, capitalism rules. Just, well, who's more tense, who's gonna deal with business there, he won. There's no rules, shorter, probably. I mean, I'm saying that I'm sad that I don't have the rules, but they're probably not gonna be. Where capitalism will lead us, it will be taken.
I mean, I was gonna say that he'd be in computer games first, not in video, probably. Because it's there, and it's a painted character. And the fact that his lips are rewritten differently and that the mimika is a little different will not affect, but the localization will be very much raised. You're not gonna feel it, that's what it is, a dead valley, I think, right? Or a malicious valley when, well, it looks like a man, but it's not human. I mean, the transformation is, it's in the video sometimes. And with computer games, it's probably not gonna happen. Well, or less likely.
I think it's working out that there are some cabins where it just doesn't have to be. So we're making ourselves up like, for example, idealizing voices in the vobot's call. What do you really care about, how does a robot say what a voice? The most important thing is that he's gonna decide. Or maybe he won't talk at all. It doesn't matter at all, does it? He's gonna be in there some-- some other system of some kind of relationship. I think a huge number of boxes in the world are being made, where it's not clear why, even how they're gonna work. And they do, and they're not doing the application. Simple, normal, applied tasks. Well, there's, like, a sgenerate--
So there's no profitable company.
That's why there's no profitable. Thank you very much, everybody. I'll see you in a week. Don't forget to watch the release we had on Wednesday about technology at AI.