Hello, everyone! Technology news and sites from the Silicon Valley. We're on ToTheMoon. Uh, we're going out on Sunday.
It's like, you know, the red line of our subcaste that I'm even a few people writing periodically.
Not everyone. Google and Apple are not suffering, but XAI and OpenAI suffer. Grok-4 grabbed the planet. You know, these kind of requests a couple years ago, you're making some 500 pages of inquiries. Couple years ago, it's space! I think there's more UX episodes, to be honest. Spoyers. I think it's a dead end.
We've been running the canal for over a year and we've got 60, six, uh, we've been discussing, discussing, and we're probably gonna talk about it. It's important for ordinary custom, though it seems that she's so much of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a company... Although we have a very, very interesting topic today, by the way, especially with regard to Grok, Ilona Mask and the new topics on OpenAI. What news? NVIDIA last week, he was moving four trillion dollars. And remember, there was a moment when NVIDIA became the most expensive company, and she was out there, I think three trillions were there. They always said it was some kind of unconscious grade. Then, in January, with the arrival of the Trump, all the companies fell. Everyone says, "Well, look at the pill. So the company will have problems." But still we see the result of the current, as they say, look at the pill. The technological world, especially the company in AI, which produces equipment, infrastructure, is the world ' s most expensive company. Four trillion. There's also, really, an interesting aspect that Microsoft has been pulled up, yes, and now he's worth three and seven trillion dollars. It seems to me that it is also a very interesting, interesting fact. And, uh, four trillion, four trillion, that's very serious, very serious. And again, especially in terms of where people invest money in AI. Well, before we go to Grok. So we'll have the next issue Wednesday, about the next question. Oh, a lot of people, we still have a Russian-speaking audience. It is clear that a large number of people from Russia, many of them from Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and the world.
Oh, for all eternity, people write that I am in contact with different businessmen from Russia, that Russia is generally in artificial intelligence, too, on the front lines. That's a very, very interesting knowledge, by the way, that's what it is. And we're gonna have a U.S. and Russia on Wednesday in terms of artificial intelligence where anyone is to-- not to dispel myths, but rather to give people the opportunity to see, and to look where they are and what they are. They're using them themselves. Well, by the way, write it. You watched our extras, they walk out Wednesdays. There were future skills in artificial intelligence. There were releases on the use of artificial intelligence in terms of the creation of agents. Yes, Ilnar, is that correct? There was--
New technologies in this direction.
Yeah, it was a mass-load of requests. What are the requests used in daily life? The different editions were Wednesday. Tell me what you were looking at. And in general, propose topics all the time, we'll put them in a basket and we'll have to tell them. Well, keep the channel up.
Bet, put the liquor, write the comments. We're very much helping to develop. All right, let's go to Grok. Grok-4, so he left at the end of last week. We were watching the presentations and the broadcasts before the night. I personally purchased Grok-4 Heavy and parallel to the day I'm open in parallel, I think five to seven deep research in OpenAI, O3 Pro. I've, uh, been doing a special, straight-up, uh, call on Grok-4 Heavy to see what kind of system it is, uh, cool. Well, let's start with your feelings. Of those who used, who used Grok-4 at all. What are the impressions of Grok and the presentation Ilon Mack made with the technical team last Thursday? What's your feeling? It's been ten days, the system has adapted something, something's been set up, and it's possible to draw conclusions. Alexander?
I don't know. I tried Grok-4 and until I can't say I was impressed. Oh, maybe it's at the speed of work, but I'm basically O3 right now. I mean, for my job, I can't say that I've noticed a large difference yet, yes. But I haven't had intellectual tasks lately.
Yeah. What do you think from the point of view of their presentation, how much did they do what they wanted? That's how it looked. So that's why they had to do it right now? From the valley perspective, why was it important for them to do it now? Why would it be important to be with him now?
Well, now is like a moment when Google's been through a series of releases, yes, Meta has absolutely nothing but news that they pay people hundreds of millions of dollars. Iia, Grok 4, how to get to the first place is good. OpenAI is also under attack. I mean, O3 Pro is no longer the best market model. And that they and the open source of the OpenAI model are also in a big question. Aah, because Kimi K2 came out, which tears them apart. So I think that we're in this interesting situation now, yes, I think, like the OpenAI has enemies from Meta and from the xAI, and the OpenAI has now been dominated, yes. So they have no model at this point that-- whatever the leader of the market is, I would say that in no house, that's not the type of model in either of the
OpenAI cuts.
That's right, of course, 100 percent. S-- I've been in English automatically, and I've been going to change to say that the o3 level has long exceeded, um, expectations, and, uh, the middle user, yes. The same thing is actually in pictures and the video happened, yes. I mean, I'm just saying now that I'm drinking a company, that point is a point of fact, too, that it's not exactly the question... In fact, we've been a little bit of a time when the baccalaureate reflected the adoption of models. We've been through this moment for a while, and I've got a straight, I've got a hot--- I'm ready for it. Well, as a normal person, it's like a professional business no matter what O3 or Grok 4 is, it's not gonna be the same.
Look, Tanya, the chat room was asked again, "Isn't Tony set up an o3 Pro or not?" Because it's like Tanya's still fixing an o3 Pro for two hundred dollars, her 20-dollar version is the same, I'm just saying, like I used to be, like, like, like, four months ago, two hundred dollars. Here. That's why there was a comment again. Dancing?
By the way, it's as much as, you know, the red line of our sub-caste as I'm even a few people writing periodically and everyone mentions, "Oh, yeah, I'm not leaning on my own dressing version. I think it's a kind of a waste of money. I haven't set it up yet, but I plan to keep the story intreed."
Tanya, I'll give you a yearly signature card with an annual subscription.
Yeah, it's still...
It's gonna be a stupid present. It'll be, yeah. Tanya, Tanya's birthday is in two weeks. Yeah, Tanya's birthday in two weeks. I imagine Pauline will come to me and say, "We're going to Tana for our birthday. What gift?" I'll say, "What gift? What's the best gift that's ever been, is O3 Pro model or Grok 4 Heavy signature. By the way, Ilon Mack-
I really liked it.
Elon Musk did very, very-
I'm waiting for something else in the surprise.
Elon Musk, by the way, did a very interesting thing. Gemini's made a two hundred-50-dollar model a big signature. OpenAI released two hundred. I had an OpenAI for two hundred. I'm gonna buy Gemini in two hundred and fifty more Gemini and Veo a model for video creation. I think I'll see if I can see the video. I couldn't buy them, and I hit them. Grok's out. Ilon Musk during the presentation... The presentation, of course, well, is suffering from the presentations, is it? Well, not everyone. Google and Apple are not suffering, but xAI and OpenAI suffer.
I and OpenAI suffer. So, uh, they say, "We're having a signature now. Maybe it'll be glowing within an hour, but you can buy it all." I came in perfectly easy, bought Grok four Heavy for three hundred dollars. Thought I'd buy it. Given what they say, she's on the front lines and she's in business. It's important! Look what they did. They called a team that specializes, a separate, separate start-up that specializes in using artificial intelligence in business, and said Grok four makes more money. Money, more than all the other models that there is a man who earns $800, OpenAI, I don't know, $15,000, Gemini two and a half thousand dollars, and the Grok four, it means three and a half thousand. I mean, the level is higher, I think, well, since... And by the way, Grok four, they said he could predict the stakes almost by the Polymarket, maybe predict the stakes. I wonder what they showed Polymarket, though Polymarket is prohibited in the US. Yeah? But they took a logo, they put the Polymarket and Grok directly, and, uh, they said they could, like, predict the bets. I bought Grok four and, of course, I want to tell you, so there are two kinds of comments on Grok four on the Internet. Some people say, "All, OpenAI, dead. So Grok four has taken the planet." I think he's dead? He's got $800 million of users on a monthly basis. Oh, um, others say, "Grok four is the worst thing I've ever used in my life." I'll be honest with you if it wasn't for $300, that would be my experiment with Grok four and ended on the same-- on the same day. But I'm responsible, first of all, man, because we have a subcategory ToTheMoon, it's important. And secondly, I'm still in the Valley. I want to, like, test models, watch. I left Grok four and spent a week every day, all of them all copying and doing everything. Although on the first day, he gave me the impression of absolute idiotism. I'll tell you honestly. I guess some kind of baccoon... Well, I saw the O.R.O.O.O.I. video yesterday, and he was talking about agents, and he said he was-- he was telling the boxes of the agents. And the world, when they talk about agents, they usually say what? These are agents that program, agents that collect some analyst, are agents that sell. There are 100,000 lids, saying you have five salesmen, they'll sell you. I think you know, if everyone has 100,000 lids and all have agents, so I'm gonna have a phone call forever, and I'm gonna be trying to sell it forever, and I'm gonna be writing all these agents forever that Is it going to happen? Everybody sees the cabs very complicated, all the complicated business case files. What did OpenAI do? Sasha said that. OpenAI, in fact, has received almost a billion users who use their system in daily case files. And it's important to build a system so that it's simple and work for, uh, normal questions of different kinds. And it says Grok four, he works badly for everyday different tasks. So he can win math, he can outperform some kind of decisions, some kind of complicated, some fundamental tasks. But everyone says programming. Well, whatever, go use Anthropic.
But it's a specialized solution.
And before the quality of the answers to these questions.
Of course! Well, listen, when I gave Grok four, guys, look, just a simple subject. First, I'm a file to his friend, he's-- he's saying, "Please, give me five hundred pages, analyze my statements and give me an answer." He's a gift-- a pre--- starting to write from my remarks completely left-handed information from Kazakhstan. I'm telling him, "Where did you get it?" He writes to me, "I'm your phase-- you didn't file, so I decided to simulate the information." I'm telling him, "You're a fool, aren't you? I've got you a file." He's coming to me, writing, simulating the information again. Then I ask him, "Where I want to leave here for a week. Find me a hotel of a certain level between Aman and Four Seasons. So give me priorities. I want to go." You know I'm Grok four, where can I go? Look, Grok has four hanging in my own right in the building, in the construction, look, in the building, it's like I live in Los Altos Hills. Grok four says I have four kids, a dog and a wife, and we live in California. He's got everything written where I lived. He has a treasury. You know where he offered me to go? Like, well, suppose, the city where he offered me to go first. Aman and Four Seasons. Sochi! I told him I didn't want to leave the US, and it's supposed to be three or four hours from my house. He offered me a trip to Sochi, and then he offered me a third trip to Minsk.
I'm just curious to introduce such requests a couple years ago, as it would be weird to have a case-- looking. The answers are hats, no questions, but you're asking about the questions yourself, and you're asking about 500 pages and you're asking about that five hundred pages. Couple years ago, it's space.
Yeah. And level, level... I'm with you, I'm with you. I actually at Grok Four asked, "Do you think you can analyze the papers?" He said, "I can do the best of the fifty-page two. And then three of Pro said that there might be two hundred fifty pages, but three Pros when I said, "Can I throw you a thousand pages and a half, and you'll analyze them?" He says, "Maybe.
I'll put them on the batches, and I'll put them on the separate, set them up, there, the cluster, and I'll fully analyze it, I'll do it." By the way, Sasha and I were discussing three Pros. Sas, I don't know how you got, I've got three Pros stopped being very slow, like the first two weeks. And I've been using two or three of these days, mostly three Pros. I've been migrating from three to more or less, well, speed, speed has become very good, at least in all deep research, it's three Pros, and even in basic questions, I'm using a lot of three Pros. You didn't go completely to three Pros?
It's a lazy one.
I mean, I'm waiting for--
It's a lazy one.
Grok Voice interface in Tesla can be really good.
Oh, by the way, this is awesome! So, three hours before Elon Musk was released, and two hours before Elon Musk was released, we were just talking about what Sasha was gonna do, like Grok in Tesla. Well, we've been discussing things differently. Which means that's what I like about Ilon Mac, which is, of course, phenomenal. They've already been set up in Tesla Grok, right? The test's already on. The news came up, I think, yesterday or the day before yesterday, that the Grok was already on. And that's right, I'll see. Yes! Here. It was July 15th, it's Monday this week, and Tuesday this week, it's got Grok on Tesla, probably gonna be on some apdite for some people, maybe randomly. And of course it shows... That's why Tesla's a lot of sales. Please describe what you have to say about Grok who used it. I have an interesting thing, by the way, that I have an editor in one project saying she's using, she has an o3-pay version, but she's using Grok to analyze the text free of charge and says Grok, for example, For YouTube, some text-working stuff makes her more comfortable than a pay-off o3. Very interesting, by the way, was the statement, and it was very interesting to have a statement. Is that how you use Grok? It's gonna be very interesting, especially if one of you used Grok 4, Grok 4, Heavy. It's gonna be really cool-- it's really cool.
And of course, the ability of Ilona Mask is that it syncs up everything and does that stuff, it's phenomenal. And, by the way, of course, that I liked the same thing at the xAI, that's their promise that they'll release a lot of peddies this year, with regard to the inside of agents, about the different kind of search there, about the different kind of search. video generators are there, well, shorter, there's a lot of them... As Elon Musk said, there will be no question of the human being who can't solve the model. And don't even talk about it. And by the way, his good speech. That you're always disconscious that some model doesn't solve any kind of problem? All tasks will be accomplished. That's it. Well, obviously, huh? All the tasks that a man is doing now, well, obviously, the model will be 100 percent better and better. But in terms of, of course, the daily use of OpenAI is still a number one. They're growing. And of course, it doesn't make sense how other companies can win. I mean, if there's... They're also learning their own systems on these data. There are restrictions. What kind of data do you learn? And it is that if, for example, Anthropic and the majority of users use Anthropic for programming, it is that, well, or there, to deal with complex scientific or mathematical tasks, They're not using the daily case files of people, and that limits their training to the model to create AGI, AGI+ and everything. No?
it makes money on Claude's subscription.
Well, that's a friend-- that's the other side. OpenAI wrote again that they're planning on letting out the browser. I--I think again, it seems that a new generation browser is not what people represent now as a browser. Because if ChatGPT took ninety percent of Google search, so he took ninety percent more time, personally, at least ninety-five, to visit different sites. I mean, I used to visit sites, now I'm using ChatGPT, you know, Grok, or someone using Gemini, or DeepSeek, or something. And browser, I think it's something else that's gonna happen. Maybe that's why the OpenAI doesn't pour. While, given how the OpenAI usually vents products, it can be expected that, uh, there may be nothing special, or something special.
We'll see. Sasha, look, you mentioned today about what you're saying, "The Chinese Moonshot has started Kimi K2," right? You said. And he said they went to the OpenAI a few at ChatGPT, there, baccalaureate. Well, they're at a few, they're over there at Gemini.
But they have, you mean, they have a major topic now, or do they have a major topic to launch GPT 5?
I don't know. In the sense they said they were GPT 4.5 discontinue. Right? Come on.
Mm-hmm.
That's right.
They turned it off even by API.
No, 4.5, yes. A 5.0, yes. But now you-- now there's a story that they wanted to launch 5.0. Yeah, they're 5.0, which they wanted to start now. And now there's a whole thing they're putting their launches down there, and they have a lot of different questions inside.
I'm not sure how much I can say. I mean, you see, I've got a GPT chat problem, they're so pure skirt, right? He can be there, throwing some kind of heat, some terms, something that doesn't get it. And, well, in a way, basically, in the browser, yes, there's a button "open in the new window," right? That you're looking for something like that. Yeah, that's the information I don't understand. I'll open in the new window, see, I'll be back. And you, uh, you have a tree like that, actually, right? Now, the GPT chat contact is so linear.
And, well, I just think there's more UX episodes, to be honest.
Well, this decision now appears that in the browser you have the opportunity to separate a piece, a fragment of GPT chat and press, uh, reply. I don't know if anyone's seen it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, but then these chat rooms, they're all alone.
It's actually a very convenient thing. It's made of a cow, it's made very nice, yes. That button, it's not visible. What you're saying now is that if GPT chats a good UX, it's not a question of the browser, is it? And the question is, they will solve this linearity problem when different tasks can be separated and a common tree can be built. Not with the folders the project they've done. I don't know who's using these files. Here. The folder is still limited to the models, but the folders are limited. Dani! And there, there was. There was a subject like that that wasn't supposed to be on file o3. I think we can do this now, right? Ta--- or you, and you, Tanya, you use the paycheck?
You say you use four or three on a payroll? I see fouro at my wife, I say, "I don't believe this chat, don't show me it."
No, I'm using O3 but 4o, you know, if I'm just saying that, uh, that's a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-
You can salucate the same.
You know, from the grad, what's the depth of any standard size? I don't think he's hallucinating, especially I remember her, but I need her inches.
That's one of the interesting things that they write about a 3 model at all, a model like that they're even the easyest question to go, like, recheck themselves, right? They're going online, usually do a lot of inquiries, check a lot of resources. And it's true, you're waiting for that, you think it's easy. I was asking you about how much I need to buy square feet, uh, one-on-one in the garage. And, uh, I have all these models. I asked Grok 4 Heavy, I asked in o3, and they went to think. I'm like, "Can I give you a quick one? It's a simple task." Yeah. And, uh...
Yeah, I have a lot of questions.
Yeah, you probably have a lot of questions like that, so you use them. But going back on the topic--
We need to count the vows.
Back on the simple interface. That's interesting, of course, that Grok 4, no Grok 4, no Gemini gave a new type of interface at all. Well, nobody gives such, I think, simple stories in terms of interface. Maybe it doesn't matter. I'm actually thinking, is that important? OpenAI has a growing number of subscribers. And they can wait now, not release anything three months, and in three months, they'll release something cool and beat again. Everyone in the baccalaureate beats someone every month in the baccalaureate, they'll release something, but they'll have it again, they'll be in front of all the others again. It says they've delayed the release, uh, the models from the open source because Meta and Google have a huge number of people. Again. Here. That it's supposed to increase the pressure on the management there. I don't know how much it works and how much it really works. Maybe it's working.
Eldar, listen, do you have an Anthropic version like, a scock-- which is the most expensive or not?
Look, there's, uh, standard base, there's the same $20,000 in buying for a year, there's something 17, and $16 a month. So there's something like that. There are, uh, versions, there's a hundred, my, dollars or more, but they're just a few requests. I mean, there's nothing super serious about it. I mean, well, if you don't get a lot of requests, there's no point in taking something more expensive.
Look, Ilon Mac, I think I did a really great job. He offered to buy a subscription for a year. Elon Musk offered to buy a subscription for a year.
Yeah, we got a signature right here with you, uh, before this Pro came in for two hundred dollars. I don't remember what she was called. Uh, she was just a year too.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. We had an OpenAI Team for a year, too. It's quite convenient, actually. I paid Anthropic once too, and I forgot. Anthropic is about to say, uh, that's what others have. Well, I'm not exactly looking for anthrop, but for the programming of Aic Claude Code, it's connected to the same conditional basic subscription. What is it? It's Well, experience is pretty interesting. There's no need to copy anything. That's how people use the IDE. Here's Cursor, Windsurf, yes, which we might talk about today, too. But just like the salty Claude, it's on the subscription. It's very fun to use. So if you're interested in programming, uh, then Anthropic has a history that's not obvious. Yeah, it's not just a chat room, but also a software that can be put on a computer localized and used. It's like the Codex at OpenAI, but, uh, it's a spread like Claude Code didn't get it, as far as I understand.
Well, that's interesting, by the way, from the point of view of the subscription model. If you look at the market like this when you're offered this annual subscription, what the xAI offered, on the one hand, is like a fun decision for the company that the company is planting a man. On the other hand, you're responsible for her, and you have to be sure about your product line.
That's a problem. Did you see? There is, uh, in the new season of Black mirror, not this season of Black mirror. There's, uh, a thing where they tell you. It's a very interesting series. I recommend that we look at how a woman has brain cancer and is being re-entered by a part of the brain of a new technology that is signed-in-signed with servers. And to live, she needs to be in a certain zone, sign up with servers. And it's all going to work. And she's told, "This operation is free, it's cheap, you're only gonna have to pay two hundred dollars a month." And that means she pays $200 a month and, but she sleeps. And she's told, "The only thing that you'll have more sleep time." And the amount of sleep time gradually increases from eight hours to nine hours, to ten hours. And then one day she talks to the kid, she sells out commercials and advertises chocolate for the baby. And then she's advertising chocolate to a kid. And she's told about it, and she doesn't know it, she doesn't know it. And they tell her she's starting to talk through herself. They come in, they say, "What the fuck?" They say, "You've got a commercial on your side." Oh, uh, so she starts talking commercials everywhere. Well, we're talking, you're automatically getting a commercial. I saw something, like, automatic advertising to a man. It doesn't matter when it's sexy. In this sex scene, it means advertising is giving some kind of lubricant or something. Well, all the time, all the advertising, so it's a valiant. They're taking, buying a bigger subscription, so they use that expanded signature. And then this expanded subscription loses the function of certain perceptions. They come in, they say, "What the hell?" They say, "No, you're just a professional version, but there's a more cool version." They say, "Wait, we had a maximum version." They say, "No, your man.
Ping. They say, "Not your version of professional." And we, uh, they've released another subscription, and in that subscription, there's a lot to pay for, like, $1,500, I don't know, $1,500, I don't remember what the amounts were. And there's more stuff in it. Well, that woman ended up shooting. So, but, uh, the point--
Spoyers.
You can't watch.
Spoyers. The point is, I don't recommend seeing, by the way, uh, anyway, see what--
You just told me
everything.
There's a lot of episodes. Look, there's a lot of things inside each other. I didn't say much. Here. The point is, uh, this subscription story, it's very complicated. And I was at this point when they were Grok Heavy showing this thing for an hour-- in three hundred dummy-dollars, to be honest, I thought they were very risky. Well, I mean, when you go to the annual subscription, you're very much at risk as a company. I've been doing a different service on my life, and it's a very hard story when you give people this commitment ahead, and you have to say that I'll be there, and I'll be there, like, to respect, to be some kind of thing. You're making it out and you're limiting yourself to value. So how is it? So you let him go heavy and you get... and they have a little easier signatures, and you're getting what you're supposed to do? I think it's a marketing risk. Sasha, what do you think, in terms of subscription models? Is that the right story that they've released a year or is that a risky version?
It's, uh, it's really hard to say. Uh, I think they're all competing in there now, like, two hundred, three hundred dollars, and they're all competing for models, right? I mean, not at the interface, skirts, and so on. I think it's, of course, Grandpa's end. I mean, it's like the molestrapers, like for the coding, there's a cadet lavable and so on. Application layer also adds a lot value. And while the foundational model of the company that's building models, the crowd hasn't started irrationing over it, has it, like, an interface, right? And that, well, that's amazing. I think that the big one...
What's a good decision? What good solution can be?
Well, uh, how can you do the tariffs? Tariffs can be done, here. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I just want to add that compute always makes it cheap. So they're selling, there, and, uh, the subscription is for a sum, it's just that they're probably hoping that the base will grow up, and secondly, the number, there, the number, there, the capacity will be. More and more cheaper. The model itself will be more effective and, therefore, just over time, m, the cost will be reduced. Maybe a kind of stake, maybe just grab some of the market. And that's how you paid $300 a month and still you use it, even though you don't like it. I just paid a year ahead, but I'm gonna have to use a year now.
I just wonder what happens, uh, who-- who wins? The winner is who puts a product and power on the subscription, like you've given the example of Anthropic or what Grok is doing now. The one who makes the bandages like Google, but the OpenAI type is a band, but it's actually more like the first part. Or wins who, uh, adds all the chips from the perspective of the interface, and the different possibilities, well, the real possibilities.
And for example, I would pay for the parallel work of agents. In fact, ChatGPT didn't work in parallel before. I don't know, it's not about the story, or not. In the story, I can run a lot of dialogue windows in parallel. I just don't know if you can do that in the 20-dollar version. Start a lot of parallel dialogue windows.
I never had that kind of need.
A lot, a lot of requests.
You need to, I think.
Not if you do, if you use it all the time in different topics, different topics, you, for example, sit in some history, and I start out all the different agents. I mean, I've got some deep research going, and I'm just, like, a complicated request that's just started in the same subject. Well, imagine we're preparing for this issue, and we're looking to analyze the comments on Grok, Grok, on the Chinese market. And I want to know what Grok says in X. And I want to see the Grok and OpenAI comparisons in parallel. And I want to see what's going on in the OpenAI now with the releases. And I want to get an opinion on Sam Altman in parallel. Well, I've started parallel to the sit-in and I'm aggregating all this information. I agree that maybe we should be ready to analyze it. But I can still do some more of the stuff. I'll have a thought, some hotel picking up. I'm still parallel to the ditch, something parallel to the dagger. I have these systems, so everything, everything, everything, all right.
Don't forget to try it all.
That's a fun thing, Tanya, by the way.
I'll start in two days.
Yea
h.
Tanya, this is a fun subject, by the way. It's U-- it's-- but it's UX. How convenient they'll make you look at your subjects. They got hit in Grok the other day, like, at least. By the way, that's what I like about the interface, you see at least a date, right? Because in the GPT chat, this tape and there's no signature, you don't see what date your request was made. The search is a cow. Only such refinements can be very strengthened. Yes, yes, yes. Yeah, especially when you're having a combination of topics, right? Because you often don't need to ask this dialogue window for a simple, separate request or something to put it in that window, I don't know. Well, I understand these interfaces are not easy, but I want to be different, so some things look like you do in parallel. This is the subject, by the way, which I'm giving an example of the parallels of the different requests, I think she, she's not really understood by people because people, you know, the cabins don't know. Well, what can you do? Well, like Elinar said at the beginning, Sasha, who the hell would have used to analyze a thousand pages, right? So the people of the cabs don't understand what they can.
You, Sasha, just need another chat-bot, which is, like, five or six of your parallel requests, summarizing and just gonna let something read. I'm serious reading deep research slower than he's making it.
Look, I don't need to.
If it's parallel to three or four deep research, I'll, uh, I'll just not
get through with it.
Yeah? But look, I don't need the man who's doing the summit because it's the question of correctly making requests and giving you some kind of information. It's just a different type, different kind of like a withdrawal, right? And it happens when I just start some research on the sidelines, and I have one project that can go out at all, I don't know how to do another business there or then cross. I've been analysing, for example, Grok-4 and OpenAI, marketing requests from a different business perspective from a commercial perspective. One of the advertisements was related to, and, uh, to, the effective promotion of real property, and one was linked to such a ledogeneration in education. And he started them in parallel. But then, these, the same kind of answers, they had intersections. And I'd like to go there sometime, like, to put them down, to put them down in the plan, to get a job started. You can't combine chat or cut off chat. And plus you don't know what he's looking for. It's a condition when I'm looking for information that should not touch, I don't know, my personal business, but it's about other people's business, which is how it, for example, understands or does not concern my personal life, and I'm, like, her. I'm asking for someone else. Remember, I told you I didn't want GPT chatting to think I had winter. When I asked my mom about the plant, I wrote that it wasn't my plants, my mom's plants. Well, to keep him from releasing it, or he'll remember that resource, and he can't remember it. Well, even once again, Grok hit me with a response. I don't think he's gonna take it. He's getting it. He's taking free. Dani! My projects are all confusing. Part. Free version. No, you have a pay-as-you-go. Tanya, you have $20,000. Tanya, you have $25 or $20,000 for your money. We found a reason to buy, yes. Tanya, you have a pay-as-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you-you- Well, $20,000, yes. But it's not free. You're just saying free all the time. Tanya, this is not a free version. I'm telling users that GPT chatting your story even in free versions now. He's analysing free, he's analysing cheap signatures, he's analysing expensive subscriptions. I think it's just a level of information analysis, information preservation, it's different from a volume point of view, but it's analysing both. Yeah. Yeah, he's doing a little research. I've got him confused. That's why. Is that a question of how to do that? I mean, I'm saying how to make him so you can rule something out, and you know what's on the basis of what he's being oriented, you know, what's inside he has, what kind of data he's got inside, so he can give you. You know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, where you live, and sometimes he doesn't have to rely on them. Because we have a lot of kays in our lives.
We don't have to rely on them because we have a lot of cases in our lives. Again, this is all UX, UI, and it must be worth the money. It must be worth the money. But the Grok about Sochi and Minsk, I'm not gonna forgive, because it's, of course, very funny. Especially giving me a hotel from Minsk compared to Amman. It was, uh, it was very funny. That's what happened in Sochi, there's--
We've got you, brother.
Sochi, there's a Sberbank hotel, former St.
What's interesting?
Yeah. But there's at least something there. There's still a way to bring some... attach some.
Not so far from Four Seasons.
I'll tie it up, yeah.
Something I think even better than Four Seasons.
Yeah. But I asked him to be between Four Seasons. I said Amman is tier one, and Four Seasons tier two, and Ritz Carlton is tier three. I need to get between one and two. Now, please, let me have an analysis. But he's doing a very cool analysis, by the way. And I mean, it's not a year ago when I was watching some routes or trips or something, it was one--- one quality of analysis. Now, of course, the level of analysis, search, search, data, the details are just striking. I mean, a man so informative-- that's what I'm gonna give you. No one can think of it. Well, I mean, I don't know who would.
Of course not. I worked with him later. I did, and he was there, and I did some 15 deep research on this subject. I had to do it. So it wasn't one to understand, it might have been 40 queries, of which there were 15 deep research inside, but it took a little time.
I wonder where you're going.
I'm interested, too. Here. Aah, the more he offered me... No, I'll remember that I went to Jackson Hawl a month and a half ago, and I didn't have a plane, really, and I finally got Yellowstone Park going, right? I went to Jackson Hawl on the recommendation of the GPT. So... But I'm here to get a new level of hotel analysis. Here, he, uh, just gave me, uh, a very good decision. I mean, I'm a little bit of a psychic in the US hotels because I--
Wait.
But I need to, I need to go there once a month, once every two months, for a week, I usually go alone. And that's why, uh, or just, we're traveling somewhere, right? And I had to understand, uh, different states or their different stories. Here, write off, please, in the chat room.
No, Amanwillo, Amanwillo I--
The most beautiful hotel.
Too expensive, too expensive. Five days, $30,000.
Oh, uh, too expensive to travel.
Here. Aaah, would you please write off the question you're dealing with? Well, relatively complicated. It's no longer difficult for me, but, in general, it's probably difficult for people, such a massive search and analysis. And what have you done lately, huh? Interesting lately what you've been doing.
I think we should add a new black mirror to a brief description from Sasha. Write in the commentaries if you want to add a shirt like that.
No, I didn't mean to go paw, but it's just, I saw the ad, yeah, my wife somehow, Pauline didn't pay attention to it, but I just thought, of course, it's fucking awesome. Well, that's what they showed this subscription and that deception, you know, this technological deception in subscriptions is a real trick, like everybody's being scattered with signatures, with all of them. And it shows this straight, straight-up point. Here. Well, Illnar, there's only six episodes, so there's not enough shirt. In the new season, only six episodes came out. Is that who watched the Black mirror, by the way? Who watched Black mirror, season seven, show up. No, there was one movie, my wife left. She likes to watch me, watch the Black mirror. I don't even watch TV shows. And here, "The Black mirror," I think we should watch. And there was a series, she left because she said, "I can't watch it anymore." There was a fantastic game, there was a game fiction. Just, just shit. Who, by the way, saw it, write it off, but I'm not gonna go pinginging. There you go.
Next.
All right, the shirt's off.
Next.
No, look.
The arm's gone, yes.
Look, there, uh, this movie, "Peter Player Prepare." He's resting.
You won't.
You know, I'm always here, I'm making a movie "Peter Player Prepare" that's a real VR, yeah, that's it. And that the real virtual reality is watching the First Player of the Pitch--, uh, the Last Player or what's it called? That's the player to get ready, right?
First, first.
"Peter Player ready."
"People."
And the Black mirror in one of the episodes, I think it just turned everyone around. They just showed, uh, class, what's really gonna be in virtual reality. Ia is cool. I'm suggesting, by the way, that we discuss this. I'm suggesting we discuss it. There were two, two series. I think people will be very interested. Look, Wednesday, don't miss the Russian and USA edition. Once again, this issue is primarily aimed at making it easier for you to be more comfortable and correctly directed in the future in terms of technology. Well, we're waiting for the OpenAI editions and pedits and we'll tell a lot of info on this subject. Bye, everybody. See you later. I'll see you in a week.