What are you doing?
We're waiting for four hours.
Yes, sir, we have today, and we are now with Guglom to be integrated on a daily basis. They're, they're the ones who have the capacity of the most in the market. They sold mete for ten billion, didn't they? They've got a nano banana model, the best picture model. So, in general terms, she might be a little more than 100 percent of the best in the social media, but that's how the foundational model is better. Well, there's a VEO3 in there. We have plenty of opportunities with them. Sori, I'm late today.
What's 10 billion? Tell people to figure out what it means to ten billions they sold mete and what does that mean? What's that on the market?
Yeah. I mean, I can't call the names of other companies there, can I? But other companies, they don't close big deals now, let's just say. Other companies have capacity problems, if you can say so, right? Aaaa's in the hands of Google, GPU capacity. Of course they use it.
Well, power. You mean the power that works on.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And they sold a $10 billion contract. That's a lot. Of course, the six-year contract with the meth, but ten billion is a huge amount.
They have a system that's serious, one of the real leaders, right? I mean, it's definitely a leader, you know, one of them. And they sell power. So they have so many powers. Or is it a big story to have good partners strategically?
Oh, I don't know what strategy they're doing, but they're all good with models. Gemini is very competitive. VEO3 is the best. Exactly, yeah. They're still the only ones who can make audio videos. And the picture model is the best in the market. I mean, I think they're doing the right thing. I don't have a signal that Google is doing something wrong. Meta is doing something wrong. That's 100 percent. They're four reorgas, right? And the news just came out, that three of the directors went away.
Now?
That three directors who came from the OpenAI left.
That's a strange name. I thought someone was joking when I got this nano banana. I haven't tried yet. We should try.
I don't think she's really good for professional skies, but she's good for a big, wide range of skies. But she still lacks realism, she still lacks.
I was gonna make a joke when you said that the people in the OpenAI left that Sam Altman had last week handed over to all the employees who worked for over two years, $1 and a million bonus to all, Whatever position. They also wrote that in OpenAI, all became millionaires. And I thought the staff probably gave something to them, too. Look, there's, like, a few days ago, there was information that Apple was discussing with Google the use of their model for Siri. So we started with Google getting his position on the market very tight. How real is Apple... It's a little bit for me. I was the first time, I still believed that Apple would do his model. And seeing that information, I've been thinking for the first time. They have such a serious problem, and because it's a very big problem. So if they start, they won't go into the race with their models, then all, well, they're probably gonna lose leadership in terms of the most expensive companies in the world. I'm thinking, no?
But I think that every technology wave would be like losers in big companies, right? And a lot of accent on the start-ups, there's a bad Marge, there's something else. But I think we should understand that there will be large companies that are going to lose. And now that we're looking at this top of the list, well, meta, I think it's gonna work out somehow. I mean, it's not like they're gonna win, but they're not gonna lose. Well, Apple is probably gonna lose. I mean, I just can't choose. And that's the big company, which is more than two hundred billion, billions of capitalization, who's probably gonna lose, I don't know. Except Apple.
Yeah. And, accordingly, yes. But with time, of course, it will affect their capitalization to fall. Well, that's, like, time, right? I mean, they're not gonna disappear. So we shouldn't say there's a huge balance sheet and so on, revenue, but it's just that, of course, they're gonna lose in terms of capitalization, equity prices. So someone's gonna lose some kind of thing. There can't be one winner, can't there? Unless it's a negative rate, unless Trump has made a negative bid, and then the whole market will grow indefinitely.
And if there are losers, it's probably Apple.
Look, how come Apple, uh, with all the resources that are so serious, couldn't-- okay, we could see some kind of super exclusiveness in modeling, models. But still, there's a lot of money, uh, a lot of Apple's equipment, and Apple's got no problem with that, right? Uh, and they lost their chance. They're not on those people on the team? Well, that's how you're giving the example that Meta was hired, again, people are gone. So they're somewhere, maybe they didn't form a team. Is this the same story here or what is it?
Fundal, yeah. Meta and Apple, of course, are organizational matters first. And the problem is, well, Apple could, under any circumstances, be doing a model on, uh, one, three, seven, thirty billion parameters, right? Like, well, a big company can do it, and they can buy Mistral, license Mistral. So many options, so they can. And that's the problem with organizational, right? Because Google has a good thing they have DeepMind as a strong foundational model, very strong. That the food teams can build something up, yes, integrate it, and so on. I'm surprised that Google is slow, in a place that is not well coordinated, that departments don't talk to each other, that this is a different business, that it's a young man, right? So all the G-Google criticisms are known, but they still have this technology transfer and deployment process, right? I mean, he's not as effective, maybe as some TikTok, but he's definitely there. At least there's a very strong partnership between DeepMind and Google Cloud. They're working like one team, actually. And Facebook and Apple just didn't figure it out. And maybe the problem is, when I thought about it myself, yeah, why did it happen, I realized that Google probably had a big advantage in that Google Cloud has a leader who's purely selling oriented, right?
And it's a fundamental difference from all these giants, because in the consumer, everyone in there is making up, some kind of a lot of melting. Well, more like consumer companies, PNL's management is all over, like, lucky. Google Cloud, well, anyway, in SaaS, any B2B launch, yeah, there's no fucking startup, any company you have a very strict PNL management, you have ranges at the safe, every man has a quota, you, you, You can't sell, can you? And maybe this-- that's why they just let them lock this cycle between DeepMind doing something, and then get it out of the market. Maybe. Maybe it is. It's some kind of, uh, base hypothesis on the surface. But the first thing that comes to mind.
Facebook and Apple don't have that.
Well, I'm personally wondering if Google can correctly resolve the question, first of all, the introduction of artificial intelligence in advertising. And the second time of implementation, uh, this is the transformation of the search that will be happening. I still have two, two points. They haven't decided. And while they're in the process of introducing, how they're making a search, I'm asking a question. Oh, again, maybe it's such a complicated, big task. They're market leaders, they're waiting. You know, I always think that, well, they're market leaders, and they have a traffic, and they have the opportunity to wait, see and then choose something. But they've put this AI Mode deposit on, it looks very strange, but it's actually very strange, though they've actually been scattered literally, I think, yesterday or when. They said they'd be rolling around the world now, not just random, in the test--
It's everywhere, not just random, in the test countries. But it looks weird. Although some of their products, once more, look like you're saying they're putting things in. That's interesting. What they've put in, there, there's a lot of new phones, that they've been doing a lot of Google Meet there, even in Google Translate, they've made foreign language training, yeah. So much started going to the food, introducing artificial intelligence. How bad are these products going to be? We'll see.
And I would say that. Well, I'm here, actually... There are a few, yes, I guess, such comments. The first point is, AI Mode, it's not much worse than GPT 5, normal, not worse. Now, the GPT 5 is not thinking, I think he's not... he's worse, but he's gonna do it. I think most people might be coming, I think. And as for me, there is, of course, a great value in deep research that no one takes. But most people, remember, Sasha, you said yourself, yes, you always say that most people don't need to. Perhaps AI Mode good enough for most people. And the fact that they've rented it is a big loan. I don't have hallucinations, yes, the model is stupid, yes, it's where it's lucky, it's answering, but there's no hard hallucinations, I'd say. Oh, in my opinion, it's quite convenient, and I've been using it enough often. I mean, I don't have any cabs when I need-- i mean, cabs, when I need a quick answer, I'm gonna go to Google. And when I need a good answer, I'll go to all the systems, Grok, in, of course, Gemini and OpenAI. Deep research, I'll turn it on there and so on.
I'm having a patter right now.
Our audience, please write, what do you do with the permission, uh, here are the cabs, like Sasha said, would you go to Google in the simple cabs? Because I'm not, I'm not going. I'm opening automobile-- automatic, like ChatGPT or someone opens up, so I may have opened some sort of time to Grok. Oh, you're just looking for a search and looking, like a search summary, right? Many countries, among others, are working. Well, there's a lot of Russian-speaking audiences, like Yandex, working or someone-- who has access to Google and AI Mode, write as you can see. And, uh, roll up our graduation. And if you don't sign up on the canal yet and if you don't miss our graduations, sign up for us. Don't forget to say that. Always. It's very important. Ah...
Yeah.
Why?
The swords. Well, because English is easier, it's more about it. Knowledge graph is. Oh, I mean, you can--
To create, you mean to create bahgs, bahgs and other languages.
Yeah. And you can deal with the coincidence, yes, with the youth economy.
I mean, I think everything's doing well.
That, that-- that's not a question. It's more like this AI Mode, because he's really a little bit, uh, like, one GPT 3.5, I don't know, I think it looks like that. Yeah, well, some kind of, uh, simple. Another point, which may not be the focus of the majority of people. And the question is, those in Google are looking for how they see this deposit, it's not the main one, it's the one that needs to be switched. People don't know what it is to switch. And actually, I think the majority of people in the world today in search systems is using a summary from above. And the summary that's on top of it, I think that the main theme people use is actually. At least I can hear from people who don't have a separate app because there are still fans or people who use Gemini constantly, there, Grok, ChatGPT, DeepSeek and everything, It's still a l-- or Anthropic there, but it's people who understand more or less what models are and why ask such questions. Uh, well, uh... Tanya, do you open Google often?
Yeah, I open up a lot. Until agents learned to find certain things with certain parameters. And, there, let's say if a hundred-- someday they start for me, well, a rough example, looking for furniture, I guess I'm gonna be out of Google. And I'm just saying I want to support you, Sasha, your, your, your thesis that people don't notice. I'm having a blind spot on this AI Mode in Google. I'm in the process, you know, looking for something, I'm getting things open, and that's what I get, I'm kind of annoying when he's trying to open this deposit right up, and it's the other way, It's like it's distracting. Although the summary is in some search, yes, it's very helpful, but I'm still on the machine gun as a loyal man, I'm always the first thing in ChatGPT. I'm used to it, and that's all.
Well, there are standards, see. There are standards that have made some-- just an incredible number of years ago. Like, there's a deposit of a separate picture or a video feed. Although, in fact, in the modern world, it's very strange, yes, to come to this separate piece of picture that's made in a very old, just dumb way. There's so much going on, it seems like so much, so much to use the case to be really solved. But companies don't want to do it because they're trying to make money in context advertising.
What kind of deal is this and what's going on in this part?
I really didn't hear it. Wow.
Man, I can't say anything. It's a little too sad. We're too involved in all these processes.
All right, I get it. Too much, uh, more information. Then don't tell her.
Yeah, there's something...
You'll tell us
later.
I'm sorry, I'm in. I'm saying a few comments before we go to a very important topic, big, I think for the general public, what happens to artificial intelligence in the future. There's a story like you said that, in the spot of many countries, whatever I'd do, I'd agree now, while it's still possible to agree with OpenAI on the introduction of the trial-- I'm actually saying it in the final report, ChatGPT implementation for the whole country. Because if you're actually looking, there's a way in the country to build a certain infrastructure, you can do some business and company. And if you can't do this, the only thing you can do is put all citizens on artificial intelligence. And it's like teaching all the blind press. As I was at my parenting school yesterday, the teacher says, "The kids are very important in the fourth grade to learn to print peacefully, remove the psychological barrier they think when they write a essay, not a essay. "With the name of the X." I've said that too often, to develop access in the country so that people have freedom to access IT, you have to put a blind seal on it, and now you need to get everyone to pay--- free, you know, or give free access to it. systems. And then Sam Althman was in Britain and it was known that the British Government had been considering the idea of ensuring that every resident of the country had access to the version of the Prize. It's very interesting news, because I'll remember the same exact same subject as I did, a, United Arab Emirates. I don't know if it's finally turned up on all citizens or not, because it's not much, strong-- until it's clearly super detailed. I don't have a friend who's a citizen of the UAE, and I haven't heard that from the residents. But I'll notice that at the British level, the government has discussed it. I think it's a very interesting move. And, by the way, Governments would like to be added. This week, South Korea, the South Korean Government, has, inter alia, strongly stated that they should not be left behind in AI. And there's a $77 billion or $810 billion at the government level that's also being allocated. To simply all those who live in different countries, to understand what they can do, to what extent a country can or will not succeed in artificial intelligence. That's a little preamble. I will still continue to talk about the fact that, for now, of course, within the United States and China, they will no longer be defeated. Yeah, at least two of these lines won't win. Well, our audience will write what you think. I've been filming a recent edition on Russia and the United States. That in Russia is possible for artificial intelligence. So write what's going on there and if there's anything else that's good.
What do I want to translate the topic? So, look, there's a volume like that--
There's a lot of weekly statements. One survey revealed that 80 per cent of Americans have strict control over artificial intelligence. Then head Anthropic. Uh, Ilnara's not here today, but he's having his birthday today, and he's got a flight. So, Ilnar, happy birthday! Congratulations to Ilnar on your birthday, by the way. There's always a lot of people fighting for Illnar. Uh, here's how we congratulate Ilnar on his birthday, and he'll be very pleased. Aaah, chapter Anthropic said that artificial intelligence threatened half of the jobs in the next five years. And he said, uh, what did he say? He said that, uh, enough to talk about this.
It's a fact. So anyway, it's gonna be fine. Then look, there's another study this week, 70% of Americans are afraid that artificial intelligence will lead to unemployment. There's another story, uh, that someone said it, I'll tell you right now, I'll just say it on her subject, wait. There's a known name in my mind, there was known name in this story, uh, that... Oh, here! What do you mean? We were just thinking today. Mustafa Suleiman is a co-founder of DeepMind, so is the director of I.M. Microsoft. He said that, uh, he introduced the term AI psychosis and psychosis. And the story-- described cases that over-reacting with chatbots leads people to laundering the real boundaries, right? What happened this week? I'm the first, uh, on a number of my teams, especially those that create content and are connected to content, and, uh, put a tight block and told people that any information you're sending me, and, uh, you should notice. Look, do you know where I'm at? Uh, I think that China has been entering a new law on the marking of artificial intelligence content since September 1st. I've made a mandatory marking. I mean, I said that any content you've created is obligated to say how you used artificial intelligence. And I've been going for a few days, uh, I've been getting my internal marking. I mean, I'm told that in artificial intelligence, what they used it, what they created. Because I'm honest, and there's a problem. The problem is that part of the content is coming, and, uh, bad. And not because artificial intelligence is bad, but because of what went, the content went very well, that it was dispersed and distracted from what it really had to create. If I see that a man is going through the phase of a scam-- the use of artificial intelligence so deep, then in this case, uh, let this man do something different, and artificial intelligence goes on, well, these people. Processes are transferable. What do you think of this subject, all these statements? What do you think-- what do you look like-- what do you feel?
I think Sas is, since you use ChatGPT, there's not enough people to use. You don't have a psychosis. You can be considered as-- there's no loss of the real boundaries. That, uh, same thing, that-- that was the same subject in that edition. If a man is predisposed to losing the real boundaries, it's ChatGPT, it's an Internet, it's some Facebook fraudster writing something, and, uh, it's gonna happen. Question: What's going to happen here? My opinion.
What do you think about, uh, the influence of artificial intelligence in a part of the profession, on, uh, how much-- well, here's a really good story, I think, about, uh, chapter Anthropic, that, uh, that's enough on that, uh, I'm gonna talk about it. Uh, influence is coming, uh, very big, yeah. Here.
Of course.
How do you feel about-- what do you think?
What can we do? Do you know how when the electricity was used to drive that process to stop and keep roasting meat on the cat? Or when the Internet was running, I should have said, "No Internet, we're only gonna be on the phone with the wire." Well, it's a thought, I think, you know, very abstract. I don't even know what their end-state target is. It's inevitable, all of it. Uh, what, yeah, I'm, like, troubled all the time. I'm afraid to miss it. Maybe there's something in there, uh, that's what I'm doing in my professional life. I'll see this nanobanana. All right, we gotta run and watch what's in there. Okay, what's he suggesting? I mean, the nerve is certain, but I think it's okay. It's just a hypertrophic wish to be, uh, as long as it's so time-consuming, not to lose opportunities and to use them for good, right? Well, everyone probably has a different feeling about losing my profession, but I really want to be, uh, you know, on the island, that's, like, know, all my legs, trends, and so on. It is clear that we all change and the world is changing, but the world always changes as long as it exists.
That's right. 100%! You said very well here. It's a question right for yourself to decide what's done isn't. I remembered right now, Sasha, and that part, I think he'll tell me. This week, one-- news says Adobe released Acrobat Studio with artificial intelligence, and it said, "Rovolius to PDF with artificial intelligence." So I was thinking, at this point, what kind of revolution could be in PDF? Even, well, the headline is not that yellow, is it? What Adobe Acrobat is that, huh? You're sitting, you think what Adobe is, what's the revolution in the PDF? If you look at the facts, well, obviously, the question of formats is not worth the time, um, well, it's gonna disappear. The formats will be questioned. Clearly, all models can, can trans-trans-- translate from format to format easily. It's just a matter of time. I even buryed a book with an electronic one recently. I had to put her in Amazon's regime. I thought maybe ChatGPT could make me comfortable translation from the format, because that's what, from the format, it's gonna be translated. When you write that news, you sit, you think it's just a headline or Adobe really makes a stake on this product that Acrobat Studio will exist. Sas, from a professional perspective, do you even believe that this might exist in the horizon, there, two or three years? I understand that this product is in many corporations, but still.
Yeah, they're used. It's a standard. And Adobe is very good at introducing some of his standards, even if they're not really cool. They have a lot of marketing decisions. I mean, I think Adobe and Salesforce are one of the few companies that might sell a lot of very strange sophth.
But he will, Sasha--
Yeah. But there must be a flagman, yes, there must be a flagman. It's a Photoshop. And a bunch of things are parked in some way.
But he's got a normal-
Bandla, et cetera.
Yeah.
And at least what I heard from the mounters and so on. Yeah. Okay, okay, okay. Although I also think it's a big question, how much of the market they'll really be on. But okay, okay. I think they lost the market very much in terms of a bunch of new fashion soft that came out. I have a question for softballs like Acrobat Studio. I mean, how much is that--
He's a banal, Sasha. He goes by the banal when the enterprise buys, he buys all the sh-- all they have. It's standard--
All right, he was just bought by a banel. Well, that's a useless thing that just got bought and won't be used. I just don't understand the meaning of this use. Or it's a short-term initiative.
No, why? He's helping. Why? I mean, if you want to make redline, that's redline on PDF, then Adobe Acrobat is one of the solutions that's the simplest, I guess. Or you got a PDF, you need it to work at DOCX. So these skies are in, people are still sharing PDF and DOCX and often--
Exchange.
- They're going to be there.
She's still unavailable in public, but yes.
Yeah.
Everybody does and Bynd will.
Yeah. What they described, what you can create 3D--
The potential that you can create, uh, 3D world in real time, in real time add different chips. You're gonna do this, this way? Or is that your track?
No, I guess not yet.
Not your track, is it?
Not our track. Because, uh, games, look, that is, 3D peace 3D worlds, they're needed to be beautiful or to be interactive? Oh, well, like games and so on. I think you-- you're not--not yet, not there. Anyway, we're not there yet. So, 3D worlds, who needs them, 3D worlds for 3D worlds? Nobody needs it. They should be either very beautiful on schedule, such a wool, just like that. And, there, for the VR, it's good, and so on. Either it's an interactivist, that's a-a-l-a game.
Well, it's supposed to be a super-working VR. I just, uh, lived this story, when, for example, in the education market, I wanted to do different education products in metavol, and it all seemed like a parphos absolute. But what they showed is that this opportunity in real time to choose different trajectories, assuming there's some very cool VR, you know, in terms of, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, here's the question, Of course, technologically, it looks very fun, but it takes some space power, yes, crazy investment. And it's far from reality. It looks very far from reality. But it looked like, look, we're gonna show, uh, try to put in, uh, videos now and show us what it looks like. I personally had an effect even from the point of view of the skies. I saw a lot of normal life skies there, how that could be used in this 3D world. I mean that. Not even in terms of the glasses of some helmet or not of games, but in terms of base, how a person can, for example, create a commercial. Yeah? And, um, well, somehow it was alive, yes, what you've got left, there's still a lot of space that's been created, that they don't disappear. It looked like it looked pretty good. It looked pretty good.
If they can do it and can put it on and on, see what happens. Sas, from the point of view of the phrase I said, that's what Tanya and I were discussing about, uh, all the intellectual debates, control, for example, eighty percent or disappear. half the professions. How do you feel, uh, the influence of artificial intelligence in terms of what Americans are worried about, there, or someone says professions will disappear. How important is this for society? Or it's for now for the highly specialized people, and for a billion companies or, there, hundreds of millions of companies in the world--
For the identity of the people.
For billions of sites, yes. How does that affect people at all, so does the individual have any influence on how important it is?
Well, according to how people use Meta AI and don't understand what's going on, like the fact that there's a public leak, that the growth of correspondence is leaking in public, I think people don't understand that It's like this in general. That's the first thing to do. And the misunderstanding is that this neurosis is, uh, about how the technology-- how it affects them. I'd say that, wouldn't I? I mean, I think it's just that while we talk about someone being replaced, I think it's still super premature. So you're connecting to privacy? Well, privacy is a big problem, yeah. So that's what we said on the last issue of, uh, legal medical, that's the attorney privilege, that's all super important in the way that if people start to understand... I mean, yes, often they say that AI will replace u-laws, lawyers are not needed, but now as if there's actually a partner in charge there who works with a client, and an associate who helps him, Yeah? And I mean, maybe the States are going to be ripped off, as much as I'm not arguing, but the concept isn't changing, is it? Because partner, he's kind of in charge of attorney-client privilege, what questions are right to ask what wrong to ask. So many of them are nuances. And as an associate should give bulletproof as a data. Of course, it's more efficient, but the concept isn't changing. Well, efficiency will grow, but so far, some professions are completely out there, until it's a little hard to say. Yeah, maybe some people might need less, but it's hard to say. I mean, if one way to say, there are fewer lawyers, and on the other hand, if you think that each and many sites will need to create their own AI policies, yes, as well as, They're working at all, or, on the contrary, they'll create a new, new type of work. Yeah, he's there, but it's not a new type of work, and leagues are going to be over there. So that's why every profession can watch it, and of course there will be changes. Well, here we live in a world where changes occur. It's hard to get back. For example, this was a recent interview with a partner from Andreessen Horowitz, a top fund like Martin Casada. He says that programming, yes, now, many as programmed, they still don't understand how they work inside. They just know all the Freime-- Python Freamworths, they're connected to each other, and they're fine.
And how much of the programming is so simple and Python has gone. And it has increased people ' s productivity, but it may have been more accessible to the wider community, and the overall level may have been so much down in the last ten years by programmers. Maybe, because you don't have to figure out how much it works inside, right? For example, there is a position, and, uh, it's clear that if this position is taken as a basic one, there's a lot of people who agree with it, yes, we're, well, generative AI now, making it easier to program, not to learn at all. Python, and there's just a normal-- B-- well, in the usual, there, language. I mean, uh, how it's going on. But that doesn't mean that everyone can go and do, uh, theirs, their quality, the website, I don't know, the store, whatever it is, to be there, the affiliate program to be a mediople. Well, that's not-- that's not-- that's not-- that's not-- that's-- that's not-- that's-- that's-- that's-- that's--that's not--that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's not-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's-that's- So some baseline gets easier and easier. But getting better than competitors is still hard, right? I mean, because the general, the average is growing.
The overall level is rising. And as you can see from the same sites that there was little website, the software was little that they did. I remember very clearly this time when they were very little. It's in '90s, '96. Micro, you bought a magazine to see what sites are. There are billions of websites now. They're all supposed to be supported, so they're easier to do, right? A bunch of CMS systems that do. But they need to be supported. It's all gonna have to be rewritten, and the general level will grow. And, accordingly, there's always gonna be things where you want to be cooler, just some things will be easier. That's a very healthy thought, a very healthy thought. But there's another opinion.
Again, in the comments from the audience, what do you think from a professional perspective? What professions do you see, disappear or not? For example, it is clear that programming is a very important issue. In particular, Elon Musk registered the Macrohard company. It's really fun. I didn't even get that stub first. So there's Microsoft, and he made Macrohard. Yeah? And I really don't get it at first. I mean, I read, I think, what, why are everyone laughing? And he said that, so Grok agents, Grok's junior will rewrite all Microsoft saft and Microsoft Han. So he's gonna die, and we're gonna have to write the whole sof. I mean, it's clear that there's a feeling that all the softs are supposed to be able to rewrite. Although I always say that if they create agents that can rewrite everything, then all the hauns are in fact. Here. Because, by the idea, if there is--
We're still very far from that.
But I think so.
We're still very far from that.
I think from the way things are going, we're very far away from it. And there are always people, there's always politics.
There's no case-stady, there's no case-sat-sash, Sas, just no case-stead. About getting some old-fashioned site, complicated, confused, with the Lego system, rewriting with the C.I.'s generator, and it's getting good. There's no case in the top.
Well, look, let's do it. I see it on the websites. Look, I'm on the websites, but again, there's a brain connection. I mean, even if you, uh, don't be a programmer, you use some resources, you still need to connect your brains. And to get your brains on, you have to put a good seat, maybe not programmers, but brains. And these brains are often more expensive than those same programists. And that's why it's very specific. As I said, please write again about the profession, because this is a big deal. We, including a number of in-depth professions, for example, er, can study and remove or make additional materials, or, uh, I'll be doing a similar issue soon, perhaps even in the near future. Wednesday after this release, it'll be seen. Watch the news channel and write how interesting this is to you, because it must be fundamental, well, it really matters. What do you do personally with regard to the use of artificial intelligence? And I'll see you in a week.