Hello, everyone! You're on ToTheMoon. Technology news and sites from the Silicon Valley all over the world. So it's anon. First, OpenAI prepares IPO. The world has the most expensive company with a new maximum assessment in history. Prohibition of social networks for children up to the age of 16. The leak to Amazon that they'll fire 600,000 employees. Fake checks and data in the world. What about Elon Musk? Where'd he go? When will Cybertruck be? What's Optimus doing? And a new robot that can be bought for $20,000 or only $500 signatures. Will super intelligence be banned in the world? And a huge number of others.
Well, I think we're starting with a very interesting subject that, well, we don't have an open-AI. But today we have Elon Musk with a lot. Given what it means, here, a few hours ago, information was available, like the official thing that OpenAI is making IPO, and they're planning to do the IPO when it's worth a trillion. All people who have spoken about expensive grades are reminded, half a billion, two, three. So I want to see it. There's such an interesting thing. Microsoft invested less than $15 billion in OpenAI, and now they have restructured. They have a current restructuring in Microsoft, which is 27 per cent, which is their current, current-- when they evaluate trillion, more than two hundred and fifty billion. And they also have two hundred and fifty billion, like, an Azure-of-OAI-proof contract, which means they also make profits. Of course, it was for the reason of OpenAI that he allowed his employees to sell half a trillion stock a few months ago. That's a trillion of dollars. That's a very serious estimate. Again, it's a trillion dollars, right? That, well, that's totally incredible. So...
One fifth India.
Yeah. But when you read, you know, it says, it means, on 27 October, Japanese, so the start-up attracts... Sakana AI attracts funding for the OpenAI competition. So according to media reports, the Tokyo launch, an ambitious response from Japan OpenAI, is negotiating to raise $100 million. And then, means, next time you see $100 million, you're like, "What's your answer? I wonder where? And once again, this story, it's, uh, first of all, people, people who invest and make money, how the real money works, see. Real money, huh? In general, companies in the world and countries understand that, well, there are now two world-wide elites in terms of artificial intelligence, the US and China.
After IPO, when the stock goes out and trades, so many people will have the opportunity to buy a part of OpenAI. Yeah, if you're saying that, at first, people have been wondering that a billion is a lot, there, 500 billions, there, or some million, that's a lot. Then it was all suspicious because there was no way to come and buy the OpenAI shares. If you're not in the rounds, are you? After IPO, it's gonna be a reality. If they're there, I don't know, Nasdaq will be out or somewhere, there's a way to buy these shares in reality, to add to his briefcase.
Yeah.
You're the man who was making the company to go to the IPO, and you're very close to this story. Here. What's going on? What's changed inside OpenAI when they get out on IPO, huh? There, I don't know, public records will be available, and now they can't publish, and then they'll have to, yeah, there, through the auditorium, some other stuff. So what's changing?
First, I want to say one thing here that-- remember Ilona Mask. Ilona Mask is gonna say differently about his projects today, but I want to remember that Elon Musk was one of the first investors in OpenAI, right? And in 2018, he seemed to me at 2018 or where he started protesting that he was for the company to make profits. There, he wanted to be integrated with his companies, there, Tesla, and so on. He was kind of out there and then he was committed to being like you were here, and now profit. What is this? History, I think that for OpenAI, it's not a problem with governance. IPO is not a problem. I think that in general what OpenAI does is a problem for regulators of endless ships, checks and everything. I think the company that develops the volume of artificial intelligence, like OpenAI or Google Gemini, is there, or Anthropic, yes, Claude or xAI and all the others, they're the first. There are endless collars, multiple claims, where people do, I don't know, suicides, psychological problems, theft of information, etc. Yeah? And we'll talk about the story I've been talking about super intelligence today. They're not gonna ban super intelligence, are they? But it is clear that IPO will add a large number of, yes, additional information in terms of reporting, details. We'll start seeing all the information straight. I mean, if it's sounding like this, we'll start seeing the truth. But it will open up a huge amount of opportunities for the company, yes, in terms of money. The IPO thing they're explaining is that she's-- by open sources now OpenAI Financial Obligations...
You'll hear it again. We've been doing a lot of graduations, right? Uh-oh, and, uh, not that long ago, yeah, and a year and a half. And before we spoke about the commitment of $10, $2 billion, it was like, "Well, it's all fucked up!" When I remember, in September, Trump came to power, then it started to sound... half-trillion. Half-trillion is $500 billion, right? It's ten or more of Belarus's budgets, I think so. Look at the numbers again. So it seemed a lot. Now, one point of commitment is openAI's four trillion. They might have given up some of the obligations, but they're planning to build an endless number of centers with some, you know, these numbers, there's, like, 30 guigawatts, 40, 20, I don't know how many. They're talking to all people, right? Or there's a gigawattt a week. What's the cost? It's like $50,000 for a hygawatt, right? That's why, uh, one of the main stories, of course, is that, uh, uh, money is needed. And look, I have a logic. If they plan one of the four trillion to spend and they'll be in one trillion, they'll probably cost more than ten trillion. Because, for Apple's information, this week showed the biggest quarterly extract. She's about $100 billion. Well, there, a little more. Twenty-five percent of the profits. So the company costs four trillion dollars. A year's worth of money if you multiply four, four hundred billion, four hundred billion. Here's the profit of 25%. So when you see one of four trillion costs, it's clear that it's not a year or so, you know, it's gonna be a change. Here. I want to add it here. You said the competition NVIDIA. It's really... well, I'll remind you again that OpenAI is the most expensive start-up in the world today, right? And, uh, this week, there's still another event that goes on, including ToTheMoon, I think.
Because in ToTheMoon we were covering how-when NVIDIA started worth three trillion, right? Three! I said, "Serious, three trillion! NVIDIA passed the threshold of five trillions this week, five trillions of the threshold, yes, it's over. And, uh, we're in the world of new money. That's clear. From the perspective of new costs and estimates, it will be very much a change. I was just wondering, we were talking about the education market and why there are no companies in the world that cost a lot. I mean, look, one of the biggest players in the world is the coursera company. Coursera is one point of $8 billion. Udemy is worth $900,50 million. And there are education companies. I mean, that's what develops a man. It would seem that the three most important spheres of life of any, you know, company spheres, three of the most important, right? Food, health, education. So, in food, in there, or in food supplies, we see at least Amazon, right? Well, health is probably not a starting-up or some self-assessment company. And there's a coursera in education, like Udemy. Coursera is eight. Well, someone can lead, there, the example of Duolingo and so on. But I wouldn't call Duolingo a superbly exploratory education company in terms of mass volume. But the company is not worth it. I'm a lot like this-- I'm a lot in it, and I'm very much in touch with investors, with different people here. Where's EdTech? Where's education, then? Why doesn't he have money? Answer one. And if he got in...
One. And if you go deep, see something that the education market is still considering that giants like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, including now OpenAI, they'll, uh, market, education market can be To manage modern consolidated companies. So who can do so now, well, who can get and invest $100 billion in education? Well, Coursera is one and eight. Well, what can you do, huh? When Sam Altman is here, who says, "I don't care how much we're gonna spend on the op-- building artificial intelligence. Fifty billion, 500 million. There's no difference." Yeah, and you have a question. I thought I was joking. So Sam Althman put his post in his X, we'll talk about it tonight. He made $45,000 in advance payments for Tesla Roadster in 2018. Seven and a half years ago, and Rodster's gone. And he's writing a letter back there, "Get the money back." And he's in a reply, a letter of reply. It says, "There's no such box." Here. And Sam's brother Althman comes out and says, "Look, I don't understand what's bothering you with $45,000?" And he's putting his post in which he says, "I don't care how much we're gonna spend on artificial art. "Intellect, fifty billion or more." He says there's nothing worse than a little brother. Here. Uh, five trillions. Five trillions. Very serious. And at this point, it is again a reminder of the news that the chapter has recently been written, and AMD is Jason Huang's kin. So, uh, here you are, uh, you're like, uh, five trillions? Keep going, huh? So, uh, about, uh, social media. I think this is a very interesting subject.
We'll be a little distracted from artificial intelligence, but I still want to see, again, what happens in the world in terms of various limitations. All countries are in their own way living in terms of restrictions. One of the most serious, one of the most serious episodes that, of course, everyone is discussing in the arts, how children and, uh, what are the artificial intelligence that they use? The viewpoint in the artificial intelligence of data preservation, in particular, here Douras, said that we live in the world, so I created, like, Telegram, so that we have the protection of information. I really don't know what protection is if the chat is not encrypted, but yet. So we have information protection, and we're gonna create a distributed artificial intelligence where the mayors are generated, so a lot of things. Oh, uh, your D-- your data is not available. And it's clear that today, if you use Guglom or you use GPT chat or Gemini or DeepSeek, your data is pretty much under control, right? And then there's a law in Australia. The law, to be honest, I was a little bit so impressed that it was possible. Australia prohibits social networks until the age of 16. I mean, the law will come into force on December 10. And to date Meta, Facebook and TikTok, and Snap, they agreed to enforce the law. I like "sentence." They didn't have any options. So they don't know how to do it technically. They're afraid it's gonna be a problem because teenagers are going to go to illegal networks or, uh, again, how they're gonna start deactivation, like, from-- short, I don't know what's going to happen, because I've got four. Kids, I understand that, for example, if one of them goes into a social network, well, they can be quietly clicking and telling us we're 100 years old, right? How's that? Well, social networks don't check the papers to date. Sam Althman said they'd be in charge of the identity check, there, adulthood, and so on. Okay, but social media don't think they do it anywhere, right? You can register and tell me you've been in years. By the way, why don't social networks do that? Of course, because they don't need it. If they start asking for the full paperwork, they'll lose a huge crazy market, and they'll be very easily touched by regulators, right? Well, that's the subject in Australia. And the law is interesting, by the way, that it's a v-bank from the country. In fact, if Facebook is allowed to have a 16-year-old child now, then, in the idea, then when they find out, they can suggest that this is your problem, that you didn't check the documents. Check the documents at the entrance. I don't know how they'll regulate it. What do our viewers think about this subject from the perspective of social media? I don't know if everyone has kids. Who thinks? Would it be good or bad to prohibit social networks for children up to a certain age? I think it might be in theory if all social media were, right? Well, the world would be all schools there, that's all. Well, maybe in one country, that's a working story.
Well, you're right to say that the demand is not going anywhere. So, a lot of children who used to use social media are now being cut off once. Well, that means the analogs will be found, there will be some way around, how to use these networks. I don't understand. I mean, there's no demand.
Yeah. Or imagine if children, for example, from Australia, have big scouts, like, or they've become blogers at 12 or 10 years. They come and say, "Your scouts will be blocked." I'm not really the one behind the crazy use of social media. Just curious. I wonder when such cardinal things are being delivered so late. Where were you 15 years ago, huh? Or 20? Twenty. Well, at least ten years ago, when these kids were born, yeah, so you'd tell them at birth that you can't do it until you're 16. Well, like a man in the country, something was born. He's been told that alcohol can't drink until he's 18, so you can't drink here until 20 years. Well, at least he does. You can't drive here until 18, and you can't drive here till 16.
And that's the kind of thing you can't tell everyone.
Sas, you're not letting your kids use social media until a certain age. Right?
I-- well, I have a clear regime of this kind of control over the approach in terms of the overall use of everything. I mean, on the one hand, I'm not leaning on them, and they kind of have access to anything. Yeah, you want to come up with your family outside, you want a computer, take anything. On the other hand, I really don't. Well, I mean, I have kids, they'll be asking if they can do something. Yeah, I don't play with them. And I only have a big girl who's 15 years old, has a phone. The other kids have no phone, even a phone, but they still have a computer. They have computers in schools to date, they are being issued in the fourth grade and in the sixth grade they already have computers and televisions, and there are huge numbers of tablets. They come in, they play, they watch. I'm here in social media, I kind of have the opportunity to regulate, although I've seen a great deal of things and I see my oldest daughter, who's been using social media, like how she could have been in them and what different things were. precedents. There was a moment when she told me, "Dad, can I just... I found a device special to put the phone and it doesn't open there for an hour." I said, "Why control yourself?" She said, "I've noticed something in recent months that I can't control myself." Then when I came to her, in a couple months, said, "What do you want a device?" said, "Look, Dad, take it, don't pay attention to me for the next six months, it's gonna be fine. I need to do this. Well, it'll pass, don't pay attention to me." I said, "Okay. " I see she's been more calm in six months. Yeah, a little. But I know that for a huge, but it's for Yolanta, but for a huge amount of family, communication, contact, and all that, it's the only life that's probably just in Snapchat, in TikTok, The only life. Here we are, you know, beautiful, and your life was yours. Can social media, can the face be published? She started publishing her face for a while, by the way. Yeah, I'm back, because she's got a huge amount of scans, she's got millions of riels in the hall, yeah, in Inste, it's a flash, and, uh, fashion, it's got a little, you know, in some way, you know, in some way, in some way. She said, "Dad, can I open my face?" She just wanted to keep the account in one place. And I understand that there must be some kind of message that can come in and out. And these systems that have parental control are very uncomfortable. I can tell you, as the father of four kids, I don't know, Tanya, you use it or not, you're such systems, but it's not real. Well, from the series, add kids everywhere, do parental control, come in, these passwords.
Where in the modern world, when you have 100 different systems.
They find it very fast, yes, where you put it, they find where you didn't.
Yeah, but how does it all control this huge amount of passwords? You come back, they say, Dad, take control of me for ten minutes, and I don't know what password is, because you can't know the password everywhere. Or a man's computer, I don't know, math or something else in parallel, like a lime, and it's not a lime, is it? And that's all it is. And with a girlfriend, one-lit, two-not-lit-- or what? I'm doing a homework. I'm watching something else. And how do you-- and Grandma call that limit or not a limit, yeah, everywhere. I mean, kids, I guess.
Everywhere. I mean, like, ten years ago, I think that's a little more Windows, uh, Windows was-- there was a first parenting in there and, uh, well, the one in the ear. And I didn't have any kids then, but at least I knew he was. Well, c-- now from the perspective of different applications and everything. And many systems, they're very strange about accessing content. I mean, there's a content that's blocked, I'm allowed, and vice versa. I mean, you don't even know how these systems work. I mean, there are systems where content is allowed, and I don't want to do that, do I? And now Halloween, well, we're shooting you the day Halloween, right? And America is here, of course, a nutcase, yes, from the perspective of Halloween. And as much as it's perfectly normal in many places if the baby is bleeding. Well, I'm not talking about that. It's clear that technical, it's technical, but it does. And they're not gonna let a cartoon in there, yes, in which I don't know, there's a bunny in it. Well, that's it.
Smoking
.
Yeah, the bunny smokes. We've got a little, uh, we've got a little, uh, a little, uh, a little, uh, a little, uh, a little, uh, a little bit of a cartoon, right? Here. Okay. And not enough, he didn't just smoke-
We had a wolf smoking, I don't think, a rabbit.
Oh, the wolf smoked. Oh, no, there was a series of rabbits that means.
There you go.
I don't remember, and the bunny was totally screwed, yeah, and he was yelling everywhere. That's why I was just kidding.
It's a genre classic, Tom and Jerry.
Yeah, he didn't. I'll remind you, he didn't escape, he was also being bullied. It's like Tom and Jerry, right? Here. And that's why there's no one else to know who's in.
Who?
The whole thing with the kids is, of course, popular for the last few months. So there are stories with the limitations of the OpenAI. I saw the news the other day from Character.ai, yes, when you're at the service where the avatars are being created, it's being interacted with by the avatar, and there's access for the children to 16 years. Again, because of all these stories of bad things.
How are they? They're in Character. They're in the middle of a check, uh-uh. Who, by the way, was used by the audience, write it, right? They, they, they, they... how did they do that technically?
How technically implemented, I don't know. But the news is they're planning on doing it, yes. But somehow...
Well, like, or just, they wrote on the website, that program can't be used by kids, so it's until 16 years.
By continuing to use this app, you confirm that you are over 16 years old, yes, and you have entered your data.
Yeah.
But they're taking responsibility, yes. But, on the other hand, as in the alcoholic, if he was allowed, maybe the kids would have had a lot of drinks, but as it does, it might have cut down a number of precedents.
So the documents are being checked. Look, Tanya, at least in the alcohol.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Still, I'm being tested.
Yeah. And in the States, they're checking the papers. It says that--
Up to eighty years.
Yeah, everywhere, everyone, huh? And they say we check the documents from every man, even if you're 100 years old. It says we don't check the papers if you're the year of birth of some other. And it's often there, if you're older, over 40 years and so on, yeah. Here. Because, um, they, uh, they're, uh, because it's a real problem. If they sell alcohol at the store without checking the document, and it turns out it wasn't Grandma, it was a 13-year-old girl who drinks a lot, they'll-- they'll be in jail, yeah, they'll be in jail or they'll be in jail. There's gonna be just crazy fines. Liability.
And therefore, the question is, what responsibility is -- and how, how does that responsibility work, how can it be preserved in the current world? Let's get to the next information. There was a leak in Amazon that there was a lot of information on the Internet that Amazon was planning to fire 600,000 people. They did not confirm this information, but the number itself raised a question of course. Six hundred thousand is serious, right? But Amazon confirmed that he was planning to fire 14 grand officially right now. And, of course, everything is related to the fact that a large number of people are replaced in terms of robot processes. And there's not only a question of artificial intelligence as a system, but where the replacement--- can put, I don't know, some analyst or anyone else. The question is, of course, robots, because we were showing up in one of the skates like the warehouse, I don't remember what the video was, maybe, which I was in special release on Wednesday, like, a top of ten applications. artificial intelligence in life. You should write, by the way, you've seen it, you haven't. I remind you, we have special subjects on Wednesdays, and you can offer topics. Don't forget the liquor to put it on and sign tonight, yes. This canal is very much helping and writing how our canal likes which one of us likes.
So I was just telling you, I was just saying that there's something-- I'm telling you, I didn't believe it at all. There was a video of the container trucks driving. It was just like a whole city showing where the container loaders drive, restructure, transport these containers. I remember the first time I hit a robot factory in two thousand seventh years, two thousand six, maybe a year, on Taiwan, and it was all down the ceiling, on the floor, on the walls, there's a lot of things. But one thing you have is technical robots at the factory. You're carrying containers. And these loads do, in terms of how open it looks so serious. You know, of course, Amazon's test. Have you seen the tests? That's nice. A man comes up, he runs a robot out of the car, takes a box, runs a box forward, reports, carries that box. Well, it's not like a... a robot like Optimus, and a dog like her, she's got a lot of credit, she's got a report. She's moving in all the barriers, brodures, coming in, dumping this box. Well, I understand that they might be the one that's been regulating this man, who's standing by the car, and they're back in the middle. It's funny that a man is testing his dismissal, is it? Because a drone car came with a dog like that or a robot with one of those, right? And he, he did it. I was coming back from Europe yesterday, and I was flying back to America and thought that, by the way, the plane would be short and unmanned. If we're talking, and it's probably not the first class, it's the zero class when you sit and you have the first row--
In the pilot's cab.
Yeah, there's a pilot, and you have a seat. The ticket will be worth not $15,000 one side, it's fifty or a hundred. Yeah, and you're sitting, so you're flying in the cockpit and you're gonna
see the first thing if something's wrong.
Yeah, and you're gonna be swinging.
Yeah, and you're gonna be swinging. We saw the theme with the faecal checks that people saw, yeah, that people were scanning the faeque checks and bringing them to work. And there's been a whole trial. And it was found there in some volume of 12 per cent of the checks, which was faeque. And we talked yesterday about when people are coming to customs and they're wearing, I don't know, clocks, they say, "Hey, show me the picture..." Tanya, Tanya says, Tanya, it was just yesterday that we had our birthday here, my baby, and Just say, show me the watch, you wore it? The man says, "Of course, I have. There's a view." And there's a...
Yeah, yeah, ten years ago.
Yeah, I was joking, and I said, "Yeah, of course, that was my grandfather Stalin's personal gift, which means the watch, and then, or the roast, yeah, I'm glad. There's a video, so it's going out with hours...
Some customs officers are gonna believe this, I think.
Huh?
Some customs officers can still believe in some countries. It's probably not the U.S. or China.
Well, you know, look, there's checks, and there's a story on the checks? What if you made a check and just kicked it stupidly, that's, like, a bunch of tiles that, you know, software or tools that would allow some identification, right? But if you're a little bit of a brain, there's people, like, making the cheques, washing the metadata completely, then you don't know-- they're saying, "We're gonna check the menu. Well, you can write a check, take a check that you've ever been given in this restaurant. You know how he beats up there and give them a full copy. Plus, you can't all restaurants fully check, menu, positions, prices, dates, etc. Well, people, I think the softs are gonna be so big, they're gonna be making, including checks, checks and press checks. They already are. Look, they've been there. It's not an artificial intelligence issue, it's been. It's just that you can say it in a restaurant like this, and the artificial intelligence in this restaurant will check the menu, check your value, check out the bills... and then the people are checking the checks. You know, like Google Maps are doing Google, they're making checks. Yeah, in the feedback.
Well, six months ago, I think you've given an example that this insurance company is fighting too much because the generators, I don't know where the car was scratched, and you're putting a picture, and, uh, Reimbursement, then put a normal picture of us fixing it.
You'll get so much insurance that you'd better not do these scratches. Or else they won't want you.
It's cheaper anyway. If you've scratched already, it's cheaper than that, well, if it's not worth $200.
Yeah. Well, that's what it is. Artificial intelligence can be used in very different places. And if we did six months ago for insurance, now, in fact, the epidemic.
It's now, in fact, the epidemic has gone to report in-- somewhere on the job, on the mission, some more extra checks are being made. There's more to start generating.
More.
More? In the commentaries, have you encountered a story that you personally generated? Well, someone who can tell. I know that not everyone will tell. Who can tell--
Tell me about your friend. My friend's asking.
Yeah, I guess someone has a friend.
Tell me about that.
A friend was
generating.
Yeah. And who, then, did it completely. And we'll go to Ilona Mask. And, Ilnar, of course, you've been very interesting about the robot. You'll tell me. I mean, Ilona Mask has two such an anonna. First, there's anon, which is still planned by Cybercab. And I'll remember that this is a very interesting car because she doesn't have, uh, a rudder, and no rear-view mirror. And you're basically sitting in the front seat, and you're just having a screen, right? And I think that in the future you'll-- you can even, like, be there, like a TV, on the idea, you're gonna have to be, right? Well, like, I mean, without glass, you can cheat, change the ton, there, change the visa on the street. And, uh, they're planning on starting the car, doing it in the second quarter of the twenty-sixth year. I don't really understand how they're gonna pass the law because they still can't get the driver out of the car out of the cab sometimes. I was putting it here at Tuzmun, like I went to robotaxy. And as long as there's a driver, right? Although, by the way, Waymo is at our place, Tanya, and it's Waymo to come to Los Altos. I got news, yes, they expanded to Los Altos, yes. And I don't know, in Los Altos Hills. But by the way, I-- we all thought it was cool for the kids to call that Iolant is afraid of drivers, there, well, with other people to drive. And-- but there's a rule that you can't drive alone to a certain age. I mean, I can't, as far as I'm concerned, legally call my daughter Waymo for 15 years. It's illegal.
Mm-hmm.
I can only call you from some age. But I didn't see it in the annex as such. I didn't ask for an app, "You don't call your child?" It was somewhere I read about robotaxy, yeah, which--that is, it's a new time for the audience to remember, uh, Tesla, you started a cab of robotaxy, it's Ilona Mask's project. It was originally in Austin, Texas, the U.S. We're here now, California. It's a drone taxi, but I've been here with a pilot for a reason. So Cybercab doesn't have mirrors. Very interesting car. And Elon Musk denounced that she should be worth two hundred and three dollars a month. Well, from a purchase point of view, there's a leasing or a credit card. Look, two hundred or three hundred dollars, that's very interesting, right? If that's allowed, it's certainly gonna change the market enormously. I think there's a lot of cars that can produce. The question of laws, yes, how they're in line with the laws and how it's gonna happen. But I want it to happen because I'm in Europe now, I've had two Uber problems, twice, and Uber hasn't solved them. Drivers just come in, they're on the counter, they say they're here, they're gone or they're leaving and they're off your trip in 20 minutes. You write to Uber, and Uber says, "I'm sorry, but we're not counting anything." Yeah? Here.
And that situation leads to you thinking, "Okay, don't count, I'll just drive without a pilot." There's no way Waymo's interested in coming and pushing the button that he came in advance or the tariff you might want to raise or fool you, right? And it's getting better. And Elon Musk said Tesla Optimus, I think they're just talking about Optimus. That's something they do. He made a statement that Optimus would be able to do, uh, surgery. Now, one second, I'll find a precise phrase. Now, now, we'll cut it out. Here.
Is that the same one that's washing dishes? He's already doing surgery.
He promises he'll learn to do surgery there. And there was a conference, and he said he could do surgery with an accuracy that didn't fall into the hands of a man. But here again, I want to say, "and where a robot who at least has a vacuum or security at my house walks and scares my dog, and then keeps watching-- what kids do, so, or my snake is taking away from my smear. In the yard. Now, Ilnar, tell me about this new robot. To be honest, I'd like to buy that thing. At least the way she looks.
I'm almost ready.
And when I saw the ad, I had the first thought: if you hadn't had time to predict it, did you? There's a company 1X Tech that has open predictions for home assistants, robots. He looks funny enough. He's got eyes like that, like, a little bit of a 7-foot. I mean, he looks so anthropomorphic, funny, cute robot. There's a video of him doing some homework. Simply put, if you socked around your house, he knows they're gonna be packed and where they need to be put. If you need to load it up, unload the washing machine, he can do it, too, some dust pump, or blow it up, there, throw it out, something like that. I mean, it's like a homeworker. The prices are so stated that I think $20,000. If you pay immediately and get priority delivery in this case, you'll be the first to bring him when he's available, yes, as long as you can only predict, but you can't get it. Either take a subscription of $500 a month, then the standard delivery will be, respectively. Well, he looks really cool, like he's got some good stuff, yeah, some routine stuff can be done on him. But, uh, there's a problem, so, let's say, there's a nuance. The nuance is that most of what the teleoperator did at the demonstrations. So the VR operator with, uh, the command joe, he was driving the robot movement, in--
Is he running a jawstick? There he is, he's making coffee. I mean, I could say, "Take me some water, I've got a podcast." Yeah? Or not?
Look, it showed that there was a number of operations he's doing autonomously. One of them was you sitting on a sofa with a glass of water, uh, a glass, not glass, apparently, just to keep it from breaking. Oh, and you say, like, "Get the dishes off." He's right there, taking a glass from your hands and taking it there, and as if this part was made autonomously. But when he, uh, loads or unloads a dishwasher or does some other thing, it shows how the teleoperator controls it. So, to the credit of this company, they, uh, they didn't show up in the main commercial, but they don't hide it at all. They say that there's a very special case in the first time, some complex operation that will be made by a teleoperator that will be connected. And, uh, you can limit the robot to some location. Well, conditionally, you don't want him, I don't know, to shower, you don't want him to go in the bedroom, do you? It's like it's possible to limit it in a software way so that the operator can't get it in that room, even if he wants.
The operator is from outside. Right, Ilnar?
Yeah, I kind of...
A stranger?
Yeah.
Aah.
Well, it says he's...
That's not interesting at
all.
Look, it says he knows what to do, but there's some kind of extra regime, which if a robot doesn't know what to do, he's talking to, uh, soupport, as far as I understand, and soupport helps him do what. So he goes into the room tonight in your bedroom and says, "What am I supposed to do here?" Here.
What can I do?
What can I do?
But, but for the moment, the number of actions he can do on his own is very small. The vast majority of the actions are done by teleoperator. The company promises that there, as the data are collected, as their models are taught, as systems improve, they will be reducing the number of calls to the teleoperator, but somehow, yeah? I mean, here's the...
Well, privacy's on zero.
The future is moving. - Bye. You'll have some kind of machine at home run by a man from outside, cameras, microphones, full access to all your--
Take all the data on the full program.
Personal life. If the paranoia is on, they can hack it, they can get a control--
Yeah.
Outside, other people are robots inside your--
It's like when those smart houses were being introduced a hundred years ago, uh, with cameras, by the way. Well, I know that we haven't spoken in a while, but there was a case where the baby was stolen in France because they had full access to all cameras, all of them, microphones. I mean, I think it's from the same series that history makes things easier than I don't know.
Probably. But here, you know, we're just here with Tesla. It's a similar story on Tesla's autopilot. I mean, first there was a level one, two, three. And as data are collected, as a lot of cars drive around, there, different roads, uh, cameras work, data are collected, modeling is being developed. And there's the autonomy of this Full Self-Driving mechanism, which is, therefore, growing. Same thing, probably--
It's growing. The same thing is likely to happen to these robots. It's just there for a while, uh, people will have a lot of data. Ah, it's got to be enthusiasts who are willing to turn this all on. But in a few years, it's likely that autonomy will increase. Maybe then we can completely shut down, but yes, he can't go to the teleoperator if he can't do it himself.
Yeah, that's a question of interesting case files. For example, $500 a month is even reasonable, there's a story, for example, for a decision-making-
For California.
Well, to solve a whole spectrum of questions. You're in the plan, like, to be a robot that you don't know about water and water, or, uh, plays a
How much is this robot worth?
role--
...for example, guarding a certain, just security, right? And you're shutting down the cost, right? Or it's-- it's switching off some extra devices, right? Or control and watch, I don't know, let-- let him out of the house, I don't know, the dog is just you, right? People come for it, there, they pay a lot of money. Well, I mean, there's a whole spectrum of basic things that he might be able to do. All these robots, what's their problem? There, I don't understand why they're showing the dishwasher. Uh, it smells like GPT chat.
Sushi
It's, it's really lonely programmers who, I don't think, are never home at all, right? Because it's like a GPT chat, that's their case with a sue-- yes, instacart sushi. Tad, you know, because why the dishwasher? The thing is, the dishwasher case is the hardest one because the dishwasher is a huge amount, glass of different thickness and complexity. And put, for example, a glass--
Not everyone can wash it.
Of course! And the pan, and not all can be washed. And that's what you're gonna load. You're fucking loaded up often, you don't know where, like, what's gonna happen. Why do they show that case? Why can't you show the boxes real, human, that you need every day? Or they show you the case, you have a robot, they show, it's a vacuum cleaner like that, and it's a dirty carpet. I represent the people who bought it, so the robot is $20,000. They have such a stinking, dirty carpet lying in the middle of the bed, and they're-- oh, in the middle, uh, rooms.
And they're like, "There's someone who's gonna take my carpet out of here." Well, obviously, the viro-- well, people, uh-oh, uh-oh, now you can buy a regular pulmonary pill, which is expensive, which is exactly the same trash you're gonna have. And they would have, they would have done that case, and they said, for example, that this robot would help pills with it, help some other element to work. Because...
The wires are going anywhere.
Nah, you have a pill that's super cool with space, and she, today's pills, they're going through such barriers now, right? They're smashing themselves, they're cleaning themselves, they're lifting themselves, uh, on the carpet, there. Well, shorter, it's very cool vacuum cleaners. Look at the latest Roborock versions. And I'm not talking about Roborock's version, where he's got a, uh, hand coming out, and like a beer bottle takes a sock or something. That, that looks really weird, doesn't it? But it's okay. And here they'd say, like, that this robot in the case would stop the steps, right? Or this robot in the case, uh, if there's a problem, he's gonna get the san--- see how those vacuum cleaners work, and that's gonna solve the problem. He'll take him to the station if he's decorated, he'll clean up. I mean, they would, uh, situ-- or whatever I said, the dog would open, close it. Or if you're there, I don't know, some keys have been forgotten, or there's security, all sorts of alarms. Well, I'm sure these boxes are still-- forgot to turn the light off in the apartment, the cliffs there. Well, uh, live, real stories, right? Not like a robot is worth something. Come on, man!
Is that interesting for a robot to cook?
Ten, maybe.
No, later. Later, yes. The audience, by the way, write what you think of this video we showed. Did you buy a robot like that because--
Write what you wish he would do the most.
Here!
What real needs are.
Yeah, just real scenarios, please. Not a scenario from "We'd like him to fly around the house," right?
Well, that's the real scenarios you know, he would help, uh, uh, help. It's a strange scenario, you know. So I sit down, drink water, say robot, "Get a glass." And he turns like that and puts it on that one, on the next shelf, right? Well, I could put it on the next shelf myself.
Going to the dishwasher and said goodbye to the glass.
Or you come home, he means he, he means, "Packets." Yeah, he put a bag in the kitchen before the kitchen. I'm representing this programmer who went, bought myself, so I got six years ahead, so that means, uh, the basement was to fill out. And he's picking up his bags. Well.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
What progress has been made.
Not if he can bring things up on the sixth floor, but he's not gonna bring a piano. You know, like in the usual, in the usual-- I've got history telling you how someone's in there--
I found a place to put it easier.
Twenty dollars and a piano should be off the tenth floor, right? I'm okay. I'm still, so they'll show them that. And they show a very modern house, ultras are so cool houses, right, Ilnar? And then you still have, uh, uh, remotely, remotely, someone watching.
But with a dirty carpet.
Yeah. Not if he washing if he was washing it completely. It's just that kind of a towel, and it's in the laundry. How will he know it's a towel, not a ball?
Sasha, is that what you're talking about? You know how hard it is to teach a farm assistant, yes, a man, a reasonable man, not some kind of, uh, less educated. Tell him how to treat the marble like different metals, different means cannot be used. There's a park, like washing. It's one, aaaa, another carpet. So people don't want it at all, like they don't. And the robot gets to that, well, it's a lot of work, but it's not that the first delivery, that's gonna
be.
Look, Case, Case, Cloth, and robot parks will be a lot better than humans, right? Because a man says, "I'm smarter than here." But to tell a robot, for example, that this is not a towel, but the salad of a wife that was bought for $5,000, so it doesn't have to be laundry and washed at a high temperature. That's what I think he's not gonna do, right?
Yeah, a story with the chippings that washed the shoe in the washing machines. It'll be from the same series.
That, that's a lot, yeah, that-- with anything. But he's probably gonna be sent. Again. People have a lot of cabs, yes, they have, like, a washing, a toilet, a bath, some kind of design. There must be such briefcases in theory. But again, how is he really capable of washing the toilet for real? Is that what I'm gonna do with trained robots that specialize in this? There's a company in Australia, that's a company, that's where robots are, I think it's the same, I don't remember the name, Inar, you don't remember? Which is the top-down robot in the world, I think it's Australian. Yeah. They show, and there are some robots in China, which, for example, we showed, yes, which come to the bathroom, like, in the bathtub, super all the sweats. But these are robots adapted to this decision, yes. What, like, washing, collecting moisture, water, that's it. And this robot, he looks like I think he's not allowed to lick water on. I mean, if you pour water on it, it's like my kids are gonna ask him to buy it from them in the pool, you know. Is that gonna end or what? Or when my dog jumps on it...
He'll contact the operator. Can I swim?
No, he'll decide, and he'll decide. And my dog will always play, and she'll be so good at it. That's how it's upside down. He's what he's gonna do, right? S-- what's going to happen? But in any case, look at this robot. That's an interesting contender, I think. I don't know. Plans for delivery in the twenty-sixth year. I don't even know if I'm ready to make this prediction today. I just found out about it. Well, that makes me embarrassed. According to the cases described, everything is embarrassing.
I'd wait for a few irrational things to pass.
Well, at least one thing--
Be the first tester to be.
Let someone else's glasses hit, not ours.
Yeah. Otherwise, it'll be like Sam Altman with, uh, the stunner he ordered in Tesla and seven and a half years $45,000 made a prepayment, yeah. And that, of course, looks very strange. Yeah, I mean, that's the stuff... Or how I ordered this pendant, yes, eventually, who just stopped working and died, and that's it. Maybe they're doing something super right now, although I can't hear a lot of descriptions about
this pulon and how successful they are, although the team was very cool with the staff, super cool.
This robot is about the domestic responsibilities in the plan, the cleaning or something. I'd probably start paying more attention to him if some big hotel network bought itself a big part of these robots and, accordingly, pre-regulation numbers or I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Yeah, and then it would make sense that, okay. In fact, a large number of jobs are performed, carried out at a good level, and-
At a good level. And, in fact, this is the issue closed, right? Then he's treated like something like that. So far, it looks more like--
How good is that?
...a interesting sample.
Test them and train them in commercial spaces. It's not that kind of privacy idea that's-- that's a big deal. Uh, yeah, that's probably a way to develop.
Well, the way forward is always if they're, of course, some hotel does. Oh, although it can be seen that now, many companies are moving this way. I came in yesterday, there, at the airport laundz, and they're having a quiet drive with these robots that carry the trays or you can put the trash out there, or they're cleaning, carpeting and carpeting. It's just something else, right? But they're high. So the same systems are coming. And, of course, in commercial, commercial, it begins to matter, directly important. I mean, you have, uh, cleanness, especially in these big areas where people stop running or don't see the details. Because this robot has them showing that he has sensors standing, and he's, for example, more diagnosing dirt or diagnosing bacteria. That's great, of course. Or a robot like that is very useful to adults. What's a $500 signature? Imagine if there's an old man at home or a b-- well, grandma or there, Grandpa, and they like you-- I would buy a robot like that even if he was watching their health. I mean, he's connected to their sensors all the time, uh, constantly, like, watching their health, bringing them some basic stuff, even water somewhere, or helping them get up, or just leaning in. Even. And this case is alive. And you're like, $500, uh, that's actually... I have a mom, like, living alone. She's not an old grandmother, of course, but she doesn't care, does she? She's been there for almost seventy years, and I'd have asked her a robot like that. Well, I'm not gonna put him in Minsk, in Belarus, am I? But in general.
And here's a remote connection, it looks like a fuse, so you can, for example, get involved and somewhere, I don't know, in there, control this robot remotely, there, I don't know, to your parents, there, Something to show, help somewhere, something else. So it's a different presence, but it's just a call, there, on some Zoom.
So I'm saying why companies don't make real briefcases. Sometimes you're impressed with this story, like the OpenAI wrote, "We have an achievement and a pulse-- pulse now you can use on the web, not just in your mobile version." Well, fix your notifications, right? You're having a really cool subject. You started to do notifi-- well, that's the infor--- time task. And by the way, we have people asking how to do this when you can do the ChatGPT task, for example, tomorrow morning, do a certain act, right? Or send me some news every day. I've given you an example, Case. He was checking me on the-- on-- in Opera, right? Every day-- every hour, check if the tickets are on the secondary market, for example. He was always checking me out, and, um, it's a fun thing, like, a subject. They don't develop it. I mean, she's gluing, she's been working a lot of times wrong. You can't turn it off from the chat. They-- but they're pulses, like they've made new ones, right? They say they do some unique research in the code, there, or something. To develop...
So you finally got to Opera?
I'm on the other side--
Got a ticket?
...the opera never showed up on the tickets, listen. He-- I hit another one. I hit Opera, I didn't get to the ballet. I was looking at Giselle and I was just in the main opera building. And there were no tickets at all. I mean, I never got it. And then just to stop this task, you say, "Take the ChatGPT task." He says, "Okay, I stopped." In an hour, you're being sent again. You say, "Take it off."
Oh, I had the same thing.
"Do you want me to turn the job off?"
I was so annoying.
Yeah, I want you to turn the target off.
Yeah. And he's sending you back.
And on the mobile rig-- and, and there's no menu on the mobile device to turn off, we need to open a desktop--
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
...we.
Aah!
And on the web-based
...self in the construction, in the construction, they are, uh, these planning tasks. You open these planning tasks, and you're turning it off completely. And you're like, guys, look, this is a cool case, really good for everyone. I understand that he must be a tough guy and eats power, and that's why you don't get it all out. But I'm about the user or, uh, the pros, but turn people out to who he is, who's in the versions. Do it, do it. It's a very useful case. I was watching it, by the way, the release is about the use of GPT, and there were some people writing in the notes, you know, straight-out, and let's just tell me how to do it. People don't even know how to do it. There are some additional parameters that can be done. Well, it's a very high-end-- it's, Ilnar, by the way, he found all the sites I could buy, and then he said that there was, uh, only one site, official, where you could buy a first-- well, secondary tickets. market, otherwise you may not be allowed. And he's just scanning this page and checking out the presence. He first glued me, like, s-- like, today on October 31, yeah? Well, or there's a graduation on 2 November. And he says, "I found you tickets on October 29th." I said, "If you found me tickets, you know... How, first of all, could tickets show up on October 29, if today is, like, 2 November or 31 October, yes?" Here, but then I told him to, uh, watch it. He calmed down and started doing fine. But there are tasks he's doing to me periodically. For example, I have one investment portfolio, one that is directly counted, with certain parameters. Like, there are six companies at a certain cost when I bought them. And I'm telling him, look, I bought them. You're supposed to send me once a week, sco-- what's my plus or less revolving now? And he sends me straight, separate notes and writes it, your PNL. He's writing me professionally. I don't understand. I didn't ask him to write, by the way. I know what PNL is. Normal people are unlikely. And he's writing straight: your PNL, there, plus, there, I don't know, there's a thousand three hundred and seventy four dollars. And he's starting it once a week. And I can still go into this task separately, and I have a certain project, and I can go into this task and just write it, check it out right now. And you have a regime of moods, and he does. Who, by the way, does this story ever use in nap-- in reminders? Give me some examples because I think that a huge number of people is incredibly interesting, right? Let's see, uh, show people an extra case. Well, I'll see you back in the middle of a week. Bye, everybody. Don't forget to label this video and sign it for us.