They've released the opgreid, by the way. Now, personal intelligence in Google cards. Whose system will be the original? It's either Codex or it's Google's system, or it's Claude, right? Or-- it's a serious resource. Anthropic has released Dispatch within Claude Copilot. What is this? Is this gonna work fundamentally or not? I'm just wondering if the soft just gets a little bit of a little unnecessary. In the next five years, there will be a very large replacement of softs, just an incredible change in the number of soft applications.
The technological news from the fairy tale Cairo is night, more specifically, not Cairo, but Luxora, Egypt. But technological news, of course, we're not from Egypt. Why would you like to start tonight? So... Oh, well, of course, where I want to start, it's from the fact that OpenAI announced that they were closing the Sora project. And I mean, the closure of the Thora, we were just saying, yes, Elnar, Tanya, that where did our OpenAI last six months release forty-two. They're doing some gunshots like that every six months or there once a year. What can I say? That it's a market indicator. And OpenAI acknowledged the fact that it was obvious that the development was clearly and-- it was unresponsive and unresponsive. It's worth billions of dollars. It was probably someone's toy, someone's project inside and some man who did it inside. But it's obvious that the creation of a video is not right there with economic management, business, politics, armies, people and all the others. That's why they're getting rid of it. But there's a few things going on here. They wrote the report, well, they said that there was a comment that too much resources were spent on Sora, and they wanted to redirect those resources. So on the one hand, as it would be, on the other hand, we understand that there's a billion dollars in it for OpenAI in the video generators that doesn't mean anything. Not enough, they had to close the Disney contract by a billion dollars. I think there's still a whole series of contracts. I mean, it's not a billion dollars. Or they see no economic feasibility in this project. Some of the Inside media have indicated that they have not found, as such, the actual use of these systems and have not seen such a real force in this. So let's see what happens next. And I've been over there on several occasions discussing the subject with people from AI right in the Valley. Why don't these annexes make their own applications like business application? Well, in the example of the CRM system, if I'm just bringing the example of the CRM system. It's not the biggest market there, but it's still there. They say, "What's the point, if it's too little a story in the B2C complex?" And we see here, of course, that video-generation was so narrowly specialized B2B-tom, rather, It's more than a B2C-shoot market. Although Elon Musk, for example, continues to be on the bet. And literally recently, his team leader, like, video and generators or the image of the image--- imagery, they've shown that they're in some kind of specimen, all of them. models, including Google and so on. But I think it's a question where they've been doing the polls, as they always have. But by the way, the question is. You saw, I wrote, so last year's graduation, last Sunday, look who didn't watch. We were talking about what Google did, Anthropic, right?
Anthropic did-
Anthropic did a very serious study, and it's 80,000 people. We asked. I was still laughing that only eighty thousand people, but the quality of their research, well, that was quite fundamental. So they were weighing the parameters, the data, and everything. Literally after the tape, there's two hours or two hours after I open, so ChatGPT says, "You're invited to go through the OpenAI study." I'm clicking on this research, so I'm getting a little weirdo where I'm asked, like always, to put some boxes on. I agree with these glasses, I move on. I'm asking if I'm using a hooppin in GPT chat. Ten choices for answer, and at the end, it says, "I don't use it." Well, I've been screaming, I'm not using it. I think I'll see what further questions are. I'll open it. I have a page on my next page, "Thank you very much for answer," and that's it. And that was one invitation.
You should have said something differently. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He didn't get there.
I don't care what it was. I mean, it was one thing. I think that's where I got it. I think that's what everyone else would be like. Thank you. They're supposed to have answers, you know. The answers were very linear. I mean, it was clear that there was nowhere to turn them around.
I'm just wondering, ten options are like
that?
They're still here. No, well, that's okay.
I'll use it on Mondays only, use it on Sunday at 11:00 A.M.
Well, there were some options. But the point is, they showed me a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little unprofessional at the end, right? Just thanks there and everything. Where did they go? They could've asked me a lot of things. They tell me first that I'm a big user, and then they ask me a question. Not enough, they have seven hundred million users. Can they not have 600,000, 50 million free users or how many, I don't know, or there are 500 million free users who can watch completely? Or anyone with a necklace not turned off, which is almost everything. See if they use shopping or not. Of course they can. I mean, it shows the country-- about non-professionalism. Do you have anything to add to Soru? I want to go to the following themes. We have a lot of interesting topics today.
Yeah, I'd add sora. Fair enough to have them out, OpenAI when they were released, they said it was a pilot project. Yeah, that's what Max was talking about. They first admitted, uh, that we were launching it, taking off, not taking off, not taking off, not taking off. But we're looking at technology, how you're gonna use it, and, indeed, just show your achievements there. Clearly, this OpenAI has some points in the moment, because, well, just lazy about it, Sora didn't say. Uh, we're running some sort of process. Uh, I was, to be honest, Sora opened the example, one or two times, then maybe I was just a little bit more stumbled, too. And for as long as there was, three or four months without opening. But I was watching, uh, the number of Sora users didn't decrease. It's gradually even growing a little. So, some kind of fanbaza that's an app. Uh, it's growing very slowly, the number of users, but at some point, it's just, like, OpenAI decided that, uh, chip shortage, uh, is more important than maintaining this pilot application. Especially since some Haip glasses they made their own money at the time of the launch.
There's no point in keeping it that much longer. They say that OpenAI is about to release the next model. Literally, in a few weeks, maybe it'll work. She even has, uh, some kind of secret name. Stat seems to be called it that way. Here. So maybe they're freeing, uh, so, say, computing power to a new model that we'll all see soon. The only, uh, chips on the market are still pretty small. If they're even a billion-dollar contract with Disney, they're gonna sacrifice their app just to free the power there and not to continue moving in that area. Although they also wrote that perhaps, and mostly, ChatGPT would also be video-generation. Although here, Sasha, I fully support you, as if it wasn't much of a need for ordinary users.
Look, this is a story that, uh, first of all, we all know it's okay to start experimental things and keep them out of the way. Another point is, there are some statements from famous people, the show of this Haip, and then as a cover-up, it's about them, uh, well, very specific, some specific management. Come on, let's just do it, let's just say it, yeah. And plus the question: why are you running along with, uh, this serious system, launching such a resource, uh, pilot project when you're aiming at AGI? Well, then, you better redirect these powers, you'll have to use your interface, yeah. Or, or redirect your powers, and do, uh, good integration with Excel and with Office, in particular, which, uh, well, Google has its own infrastructure, they have their Google Docs, and there's all that. integrated now, and Google Sheets. A Cloud is directly integrated in Microsoft. Very cool, yes, very cool.
Not enough, Cloud has now updated, and they can create complete tables and presentations inside their own interface, with a cool quality. So we're talking about what they're gonna be doing in the first place. But we, as honest as you are, understand that the Office will not exist in the current form. Now this is a separate topic, I'm gonna deal with the previous point, and we're gonna get back to this topic. At least I'll give you some thought, why I think the Office as such makes sense. I'm talking about Excel. Excel. And this is Excel, but it's the number one product of the world. I don't even know what a product was even more than that in the world. Well, if we don't talk about the operating system, yeah, something inside. And ChatGPT didn't fit properly. As far as I know, there are no normal cool flames that are well built. They're kind of in there, uh, this one, through the Copilot from Microsoft, yeah. But there is no such qualitative integration that Cloud has now. And, uh, I'm personally, I'm personally...
So you'd better get over there and do real useful, effective things., in particular, Excel, I'm saying that I just had a discussion with my partners. I'm saying, "Look, why would Excel be if you had, uh, really some kind of in-integration system? If you have so many applications, multi-use applications, very different applications inside. I mean, if I got-- I get some reports, I still see some numbers in the reports with some conclusions or comments. I mean, I don't really need a table, I need to show you the data. Uh, well, just finishing me sometime. And if I want, well, I've got a table in any form, any visa, any kind of board, board, there, or something. I think that Anthropic, uh, now this, uh, the announcement, including the area, uh, this, this, uh, the area, uh, that's, uh, that's not even the competition with Microsoft, that's a--a little comparison with Google. Because still Google what he created, uh, what's the name of this personal, like him?
Intelligence.
Personal intelligence, yes, he created. And interesting...
Yes, personal intelligence.
Yeah. Too is a very important topic. They've released the opgreate, uh, now the personal intelligence on Google cards has been released, and everything. You know, oh, that's cool! I'm a regular user, Google Card, you know, cars, and, generally, if I'm looking for something, restaurants are watching. And having a great interface there, they're still bringing all kinds of kids out there, like they always do, I don't know, there's a restaurant with delicious sausages or something, right? Some abstract. But it's obvious that when we're working, uh, well, a good assistant who's gonna be integrated directly with the administration, well, directly with API Google, not as a separate assistant. Now, there are many systems and users of ours. I wonder if you write where these systems are irritating. I mean, there's a lot of systems in which the assistant is in, but he can't do anything in the system. Like, I have a Whoop bracelet, he has an assistant, but I can't use the assistant sc-- how to influence the recording of different actions in Whoop. I mean, I can ask him, he'll answer me, and I'll get the data back, but he can't pee there. I mean, when in Google Cards, if he can do things different, you'll tell him, "Look, keep me a piece of that map in the offline so I can get a little faster, there. Or come here with this piece of this map, and they're gonna be in my chat room, there, my daughter's a bun." That's it. You-- that's gonna be a whole different level, especially when you get in cars with Androids. Yeah? I mean, given that there's a lot of Androids in automobile, modern cars, just unreal. It's a super move. Here.
Po, uh, Excel, do you want to say something about this part?
Yeah, the only thing I want to add. OpenAI and Anthropic, although the huge difference in B2C, that is, in the number of end-users, is, for example, natural persons, such an enterprise is even moving forward in the Anthropic segment. If I remember correctly, they're 15 billion now, the OpenAI has only 10 billion, right? And in this sense, they are very good at moving to another part of the market than OpenAI. And there are rumors that the closure of Sora is a diversion of resources to prevent, er, Anthropic from seizing the enterprise part of the market, yes, and to channel efforts to that end. So, Sasha, we may soon see the integration of ChatGPT with Excel and with other systems you-- about. That way, maybe the OpenAI will look, too.
But I hope that we'll find out a little more about it in the next two to three weeks.
So, this is an interesting subject, which is, in fact, uh, that can be seen by company estimates. In fact, ChatGPT is so isolated from all users, but from the standpoint of the individual system, because Google does have billions of users and, as much as they have, Seven hundred million people use Gemini, it's not some superwes, is it? But when we're talking about ChatGPT, it's still OpenAI, it's a new company. And after eight hundred million people, it's very serious. And in the valuation, Anthropic almost got them. Well, in the last rounds. It's clear that there's gonna be more than a trillion there and so on. But still. But still! He's got them all very bad. And little, they're in the B2B market, unbelievably well-referred. And again, whose systems will develop something called software modern, right? Uh, that's, uh, who's gonna be such a basicist, a source, right? Whose system will be the starting point? It's either Codex or it's Google, or it's Claude, right? Or, well, there's, like, Microsoft system. I mean, it's-- it's really bad, uh... It's a serious resource, a very serious resource. So I don't know what strategy they're in the OpenAI now. Let's see what happens to him because everyone has different statements. For example, Jensen Huang, head NVIDIA, gave an interview to Lex Friedman, and he, uh, said that AGI was already in the process of being generally achieved. And he said it was clear that it was not possible to create a company like NVIDIA that would cost trillion dollars, but it could be built there like a very serious organization. And that's what we talked about last time, uh, this is from DeepMind, right? DeepMind in Google made this definition AGI. And apparently Jensen Huang is a trundit, yes, tough, because it's an uncomparable story. What is AGI gonna do there at the first two or three parameters that have been determined, uh, DeepMind? There is no such artificial intelligence, even around today. But it's a hip, yeah, names every time-- although I really respect NVIDIA, and I think NVIDIA will probably be together with Tesla-All other world corporations of another class, another level, right? That's how China has Tencent or Aliba, it's corporations, uh-a, a certain class, higher than Google, like, in America, right? I think NVIDIA has such a possibility to be such a company. And DJI, of course, what's their DJI? So it's very interesting where the OpenAI will move. So what's their side now? They're all resources, like you, Ilya, saying they want to invest in DJI. Then what are these microserverts for them, huh? Well, I'm calling them servers. Here's the, uh, thing, with their Stargate projects, right?
Or do they want to, uh, invest in something else? And here, by the way, I'm embarrassed, yes, that is, Elon Musk, who doesn't raise any space money there, they spend their own, their own money. Well, some, I see, they raise, but not volumes... comparable, like, with OpenAI. And they say in terafab that it's just a space project and a crazy volume. And I'll remind you, by the way, that terafab was just interesting, but Tesla had a performance, and they put pictures of their own tramp again, there, well, some interesting things. And there was the point, the terafab. I mean, fab. Fab is a semiconductor factory. And according to Mask, the project will consist of two factories. One will make Tesla chips. We've already spoken last time, yes, they have a great deal of cooperation with NVIDIA, but on the other hand, they want to make their chips. I mean, it's not NVIDIA chips. So some will do Tesla and Optimus chips, respectively, and the other will make chips for AI systems in space. These are more stringent conditions. And they want their scope to be one terawatt of computing power per year. What is this the size of the countries? Here, here's the thing that's interesting-- here's the interesting thing about the division. Look, they're sharing what Tesla and Optimus are. So they show equipment like this on Earth. They don't say that these are X.AI computers, they don't say that these are computing power there to generate pictures or something. They say there are, uh, chips that are used in robots and to make them do something-- something that works. And there are chips that will be for space, right? And it changes the paradigma. Well, the base of space chips to generate, uh, from there, to generate tokens on Earth, right? Well, the idea is to run the Internet, probably about that, right? It's Jensen Huang in an interview with Lex--
Yeah, yeah.
Said they believed that the tokens would be sold in the future. He says we all reorient the fact that someone has more tokens and who sells more tokens, he won. That's a very interesting statement he's got in this interview. I think that for businessmen or who is doing projects now, for entrepreneurs, who have companies that are artificially intellect or not connected. Look-- look at that thicken speech. It's very interesting in terms of management. He says that someone with more tokens is the owner of the world. And that's what we want, so we want to be the owner of the largest number of tokens. And that says NVIDIA isn't a company that-- it's not a TSMC, is it? It's not a company that's a semiconductor company that makes some kind of equipment. So NVIDIA clearly wants to be, it's already been made, too, by a very serious operator.
It makes sense, it's like that. The mask added that if we wanted to have chips, we need to produce them ourselves. Which confirms once again that it's hard to find good chips on the market. They're all fighting, waiting, prices are flying. And in some sense, Mask says it's easier to build his factory than to try to find chips in the market. And so...
Yeah.
The date of the cars, the robots, the number they'll release. But at least they'll build a factory. Uh, he can build plants. He didn't work very well with the semiconductors. Well, in the chips, it means that. Here. But let's see if we can do this, great. The new player will be here.
I want to go to what theme I want to get a little bit of a taste, uh, OpenClou. And Tanya even has, so the OpenClou started to bet. I'm why I want to touch this topic a little bit, and I'm very interested, as we will have it and our discussion will be. I wonder if you-- that people will write down, too, uh, that they'll try what systems they use, how useful they see it. I just want to talk about something Hype. This hat, which is still buying billions of dollars at all. And then thousands or tens of thousands of people start to start businesses to try to create inside. So Claude put it on the base, what do I judge on? Because Anthropic Claude is not the company Anthropic, is it? And it's an independent product that OpenAI bought their team inside if I'm not mistaken.
He hired a manager.
Oh, they hired a manager, hired a man. I don't know what they're asking about their shares, but I think they've got a lot of shares. They've always come out, come in, come in, come in, come in, board of directors and everything. But that's not the point. The point is, Anthropic has released the Dispatch function inside Claude Cowork. What is this? That's the first. They have, they do, a continuous trend that does not deflect and maintain the context between the tasks. That's a big story. In simple things, you can see it in ChatGPT projects. I mean, if you've created a project, he's trying to aggregate all these data from inside. He can even find it easy to find between these tasks. By the way, this is a big function that people don't see again. I'll remind you that ChatGPT doesn't really look between your chat rooms. But if you're in the chat project, you can even ask for a summary of all these chat rooms. He'll do it. So it's easy to focus between them. The second story that's in the world, you can get off the phone, and the performance goes on the desctop. Well, that's a basic functionality that was initially shown in OpenClou, though the point is not that, right? So Cowork this works at, uh, in an isolated virtual car on your computer. And accordingly, this Dispatch is using, well, this local, local, ward, I don't know, a server can call it, right?
And, uh, Well, that doesn't mean it's risk-free. So there's still some risk areas. But what did I want to say? Actually, first of all, if you look at the OpenClou, the OpenClou is presented as some of the two Haip stories, right? Well, hip and not hip at the same time. The first topic is what you can, uh, orchestrate, you know, between different models and, consequently, start different agents. In fact, you can build and say that Agent Aic is buying anthrop, and I'm getting a code from Agent ChatGPT and so on, right? But the question is, what the fuck do you do? But still, yes, you can. And the second story that's, uh, in the big corporations, okay? But what are you talking about? And the second story I'm hearing, I remember someone sent me, says, "Sasha, look, we're doing the project, there, on the investment." And they created an app that's like one entrance to all systems. I say, "He's a dick?" Well, there's, like, ChatGPT, in Gemini, and whatever else. So I can do the iPhone screen, and all these systems will be there. So, but-- and the second function that the Haip has been on, that you can run an agent from a cell phone through a massager. I just want to go back here, this is my very opinion, but maybe someone else will write it off among the audience and show it's a fucking working case. I'm in the Software market as a Service's been working for over 15 years, and I've been watching a lot of companies like you've been using the CRM system. When we got here, we started to show up the massagers, and things started to show up. Your sales manager can work through the massager, or you can get analyst through the massager, or you can run, there, set tasks at the Megaplaner through the Massenger, task management. I mean, do something through the massager inside. But if you're actually looking, business doesn't use it. It's a very narrow thing, little, dumb and small. We had a history, I remember, in the Megaplane in 2010, when I led them, there, 16 years ago, did a function that could be set up in the Megaplan by writing the mail. And at the time you don't have massengers and so on, you're limited, there's like a postal environment, that's like people use mail, right? Until they were banned, they were not banned from doing company. Someone's been banned once, you know, when the mail wasn't allowed inside. People were posted through the mail, but we-- I always said, "Why are you doing this through the mail? You also open the Megaplan and you're making a mission to Megaplan. What's the logic? Why? "You're not putting a pretty good interface." So, people didn't. I've been putting hundreds of thousands of those systems in place. People didn't use this function. And basically, if I have to start an agent or run an agent and set out tasks between them, I'll be in the Claude interface, in the interface, and, uh, inside Gemini, I'll be in the Codex interface or ChatGPT and there. I'm not sure how to be based in their cool function, not in a limited massage, knowing what's going on, knowing what's a isolated, undeveloped environment where I'm leaving my data, how much this swab can do. different mistakes. I had a little fun recently. One of the people wrote to the OpenClou owner, "Get me back the money. Your system has eaten me with a lot of tokens. You have to refund them to me because she's been working illegally." He put this tweet in X and he broke it off. So, that's because people don't even understand, you know, what a system is. Give me the money back, give it back to the OpenClou. Although you have the thuken money, you're going to have to eat more, then inside. Here. Aaa, write our audience again, yes. What do you think? Do you think it's a hip? Because I think it's just some kind of rusty thing, no one's-- no one's-- no one's talking about anything. There are more serious things that can be done in systems like ChatGPT, Gemini et al.
Real serious, really.
If we're talking about OpenClau, I think I've got aaa interviewing the creator's ear. He's the man who came up with this concept. And there was a story like that, he traveled to Africa, or where, uh, communication wasn't good. And he decided how good it would be if he could just drink-- well, and as if the WhatsApp was available, the messages in the massager went away, but that's how access to the systems he used to use, he doesn't. Either the Internet is missing or the locking or something. And on that soil, he had an idea to send out messages that were further performed in the systems he wanted. And here, you know, it's just one specific private case where you're in a place that I don't know is badly connected, yeah, there you are, outside the country where you usually work, And you have some services in there that are inaccessible or something. And on the one hand, it's like a hit man like a badge you're the one who's running the phone and so on. On the other hand, according to this story, she was born very utilitarian. A man traveled, no access. He had a good idea to do. He did. Yeah, so I wouldn't be looking for anything in this story.
But if this is where I support you from our viewers, someone sees it as a very good fit, please write it very interesting in the commentaries.
If you don't have access to the computer all the time, it's also convenient that you sent.
But, Tanya, if you look, and how often does it get to be that you're somewhere, and you need access, I don't know, to the files on the computer, you need to start something from there. I may be too old, yes, and conservative in this regard, but I feel like it's not a frequent use of a case, so that this is all up to be put up.
Tanya, of course. Tanya, look what's going on. If you have complex systems, you don't have access to the computer, you don't use them as a whole. You come back later, you make them later, right? I mean, you don't have the kind of emergency. What if it's urgent, what's this case without access to the computer? So what's that for the cabins? Because the examples that people are giving in OpenClau are examples, mostly, uh, specialized, technological. I mean, it's not... Uh, it's really, sometimes like, fun sending, like, like, like, like, like, like, doing this, and it's supposed to be more convenient. But it's like CRM systems, there's a salesman in the office, and he's got to make 100 calls a day. What's App, huh? What is the point of communication through the CRM system? So he works in this system all the time, it's his professional resource, like some kind of thing. But what did she do? She did, and it led to what, Tanya, Tanya, you sat down and put it up until night, and you set up this system until night. How you're involved. You're ChatGPT Pro. I recommended eight months, didn't I? And then you're the OpenClau, for fuck's sake, decided to put it. I've been down. I mean, there's a lot of hacking systems people talk about in YouTube, a lot of things that don't know about them all the way to the end. Is this gonna be a fundamental job or not? I just see how many people spent on artificial intelligence very much money, not making it... no more effective, because fundamentally doesn't know what to do.
What really needs to be done. I mean, super useful things, and the bulk of people just walk around the layers, without knowing what it is. For example, people didn't read the story Lena was talking about. Well, most people who have integrated it, that it's good to know that when you fucking travel when you didn't have anything in your country, something's been blocked, and that's why you're here to open something. People took the OpenCl, you even knew her, and she hired a separate person at the agency to get her OpenCl to build her. Pay attention.
So people took this story as something, something fundamental, and then they're in some kind of frustration. What disappointment? There was now a report on GDP that artificial intelligence had no impact on the GDP of the American economy. There are some studies that GDP has grown by two points of two per cent and that zero two may have affected. It doesn't mean that artificial intelligence is bad or-
I'm curious.
He's super needed, he's super important. But if we actually see if I'm starting to question people, you've actually started making more money because of the artificial intelligence that's coming? There's a staff member, like a man, who works, and that's where our staff are, in fact, inside. And by fact, people didn't start making more money because of him. In fact, well, really, if you look inside. Or is it effective in companies, is it really different? Well, or everybody just started to start making some kind of stuff. Clearly, someone dies, someone turns up, someone gets super, there, more efficient-- someone in 15 jobs has become a programmer to work and tell him what he's doing this site, there, a month, and he's doing it for two. - Oh, my God. No problem, no problem. But the base, in general, has it made more money? And when they say about GDP, it's actually a measure, it's clear that, among other things, abstract, but at the same time, it has some meaning, yes. And there's a lot of layers here, and my sister and I were talking. She says, "I watch a lot of bloggers, open them, "they say, "We'll tell you five of the coolest fucking nutcases, you're all gonna fall." People say things." She says, "I listen to them and I think, "What are you talking about?" Something, something that doesn't have, uh, some healthy, healthy story to put on with you.
Yeah, I'm gonna put it on my way, really, really, put it in, make it work, and how will it be that it happens in the future, how it will be used in the future, how to use it here, here, "I'm gonna need to take a case again. And it's gonna be fun if people, you write what kind of cabs you have. I have a sensor of this one. He's measuring heart rhythm in a more professional way, and I have a soup, Cubios. It's a professional saft for people who do heart-related scientific work, there's a ta-ta ta-ta-ta. So, of course, I don't do any scientific activity, don't think. I just bought this sophth and sensor to get a little more data, particularly about my health. And this Cubios saft, I thought I was telling you there was MATLAB, you have to put it, there's this huge, loaded system. What's it got to do in these two weeks while I have a sensor? It's just that I'm the MATLAB Wednesday that bought this expensive environment, the sensor is worth only 100 bucks, but it's much more cooler than Whoop or what Oura Ring and so on. I'm using this Wednesday only to keep me the data from cloud-like services that keep the sensors on, to put them on my parole. What's a readable? Technically, whatever, in Excel, on schedule, on something. She's pulling me out this report, which doesn't get shit. Well, he's probably only understood by cardiologists or anyone else. Although I haven't seen any cardiologist who would recommend that someone use such a thing for a long time, at least in Russia, in Belarus, there, I haven't heard such people, and in America. I didn't hear it either. Although this is a very cool topic to diagnose a man for his real life. But the point is what? That I'm getting this system down, and then I always get it in ChatGPT. Already in the formed prompt, in the described prompt, which is forming a report of an unreal format. Well, the quality of the report is such a top pilot. I think it's simple, just a top pilot. And I'm saying, "I'm sure that I'm talking to your partner at IT today, and they're saying, "I mean, it's just that the sophth is getting a little bit of a little bit of a lot of people, I don't think it's feeling. And from the perspective and the softs, it's interesting if someone has these cabs in the softs, and from the company perspective, when we get a lot of money, it's a little bit depressing because it goes to the world... in the world... The world will be growing up in large technology companies, not small ones, yes. On the one hand, yes. On the other hand, we-- I get access to-- I clean up these splinters, and I get more effective, incredibly super cool conclusions, yes, just super quality conclusions of a completely different plan. And for example, I'm Whoop very, well, this bracelet or there's oura Ring, I really like how they make a sophth. I think it's a new class health saft. But now, using ChatGPT with this splinter because I can't unload the data, Whoop cut them off. It gives us the opportunity to export five ovnoparmeters there, yes. And here, the system is exporting you shit how many data are in an expanded format. And I have the opportunity to get conclusions that I would never have thought of in my life, have not seen in terms of my time of provocation in general and influence in different ways, which is very interesting. And I am deeply convinced that in the next five years we will get history, not the question of the dismissal of people, there, something else, all of this I would have made.
The question of what would be a very large replacement of softs is an unbelievable change in the number of soft apps, just unbelievable changes. And the current-- this model that has evolved over the past 15 years, this school of instruction is programming, not programming, but product management, yes, modern manager product in the skirts. She's, uh, not-- w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what-what And it's very interesting to raise and discuss the subject. Maybe we'll call some more interesting people, too. What would it be worth to really study now? I mean, what would be worth drawing attention now, uh, to make it possible for people who would like to be in this real field, I mean, more technologically, yes, that's what we're telling all people, We've got this channel built. Uh, I'd like to discuss it.
So you don't have to teach your children a programming language anymore, because all programming is in human language, right?
No, An, no, I didn't say that. I'm here, I'm here, and I'm here, and I think you're here too.
But that's a question.
You're saying that, you're saying that like a man who's not a programmer, to be honest. And as a few...
Well, I'm not a programmer, no one's arguing with that.
You're saying you're saying, you're just saying that you're just saying that you're gonna be doing some kind of abstraction, because first of all, like you said, your kids are gonna be teaching programming or learning programming, right?
Well, Grisha, I have a propensity.
Well, that's, uh, that slope, look, in nine percent of the children, she's, uh, undetermined and undetectable in the stimulus to programming up to enough, well, a serious child's age, there, closer. 18, over, over, over, huh? Well, or 16. Only if you have a child in ten years of olimpiads, you're gonna win the world math, then you're gonna say he's math. And it's not a fact that he has a tendency to program. What's his tendency to computers there or something? It's so abstract.
There's interest.
Well, that's...
But you don't think that's
gonna happen.
It's a separate subject. It's a separate subject. And I think it's a reason, it's not professional. And that reasoning is built on, built on, um, it's completely abstract. So to answer this question, it makes sense that we will have a broader discussion that is just about to discuss history fundamentally, slightly broader, and that it might be that way. You like your mom would have some base to make you think you're your child and understand how to determine if the baby has some interest. I have four kids, you know, right? I can tell you right away that I can't answer a question in no kid: anyone has an interest in programming or not. Because if I have someone who likes to spend time on a computer and someone doesn't like math, someone doesn't like it, it doesn't talk about anything. Yeah, I got Yolanta, you know her, she's got a math superball, and I don't know, a choir superball, French, English, and chemistry. I mean, um, some-- and she doesn't like computers much, superpowered, like she doesn't say she's gonna be, uh, scientist or crafty or in there. programming or it won't be tomorrow, uh, model, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no Anything could be, right? Either that or he's never gonna work his life at all. It could be, yes, it's easy.
Well, you're saying that w-w-w-w-wrapped this stack in the form of a soft, just like--
I said when I was gonna get the stack out of the soft, I didn't say people would get away. I said there's gonna be a reform--
No, I'm not talking about people, but--
Yeah, I'm sorry, in the opinion of the fact that I'm sorry.
It's going to get more accessible to ordinary people.
Uh, Tanya, the thing is, now, look, every-- I'm in the first computer I got in the ninety-second, there, in ninety-third or some year, yeah, two hundred and eighty-sixth. Someone wrote, I once said four hundred and eighty-sixth. I remember my first computer, believe me, yes. Pentium two hundred and eighty-sixth. The next question is
And a pension at 200. The question is, I'm the first computer I've ever connected to my place. So far, I can say one thing: that until 2,000 twenty-sixth year, it's been a long time, not even to count them. I can say that every year of my life I'm watching accessibility. Every year of my life, I see accessibility. And the accessibility that was twenty years ago and now, it is uncomparable and incomparable at all. And the disappearance of some soft doesn't solve anything at all, compared to the access we have to date. Let's just do it, honestly. The appearance of one smartphone with this screen, it changed what kind of... what kind of access are we talking about? About what we can talk to grandmas on video, grandparents, anyone around the world. Yeah, it's a totally different class of accessibility. So it's, uh, obviously, that there's gonna be an incredible change. Like Elnar said, you should have been driving a hand box, now on the automatic. I'm telling everyone now that my kids, except one, are probably not gonna be able to drive. It's pointless. Why do you do that? Not enough cars, they're not allowed to drive, are they? If everything is going to be okay, they should be banned. But there's no fucking way to say anything. This is a better mode of transport. It's a horse. I'm a phantom-- Tanya, by the way, I've been watching a movie on your recommendation, so "Nile murder" with Hercule Poirot. And there's a movie where they go on horses, so they're in Asuan. I'm coming to Luxor, and there's horses. I think, oh, Tanya should go to the horse. So I'm saying, I'm better off here on horses because cars are so dirty, stinky and dusty and sandy. It's so hard to call them, you're much easier to say, yes. And the way the street looks...
To catch.
Here, the way that this-- it looks like it. The way the street looks here, this is Egypt, which looks like the street, this, this is the real world, this is the real world. And influence the change in real world or not? What's supposed to happen? People need to stop when they eat chips, throw the paper in the air. They're doing this here, right? Then, really, they'll be washing their feet, hands, praying forever, and they're all in the trash, they're all in the trash. And the robots have to show up Tesla, who will clean up the paperwork. So if-- by the idea, this Tesla robot must have a handwriting, because they'll throw it away with themselves, and they'll throw it away, and they'll throw it away, right? And I don't think this service is gonna be here, uh, it's gonna be there or it's gonna be available, right? I mean, it's a completely different plane, a plane of study. I was talking about Cubios, it's more like the story that we're gonna see new sophths and see new business. Business. That's very interesting. And by the way, Tanya, I'm telling you that in your field, this is a very interesting subject, and it's, uh, least affected by changes, on the other hand, it's kind of highly prone to change. So, we'll see a lot of changes in it. Well, someone like you, someone like you, she's not exposed to the lim--- no, well, she's not subject to change. And, for example, a number of businesses that are very superpowerful, they can change dramatically, they may disappear, we can stop seeing it, this kind of business, see, uh, totally total, total. It'll be gone.
Well, as much as the world changed, it disappeared-
I wonder, in this Antropica study, yes, I think, where I showed how much it was affecting, I liked the dispersal. So, my sphere, it's partly related to architecture and construction, right? The architecture is in there to the maximum extent of artificial intelligence affecting it. And construction is at least the minimum, because it's probably physically needed hands, tech.
Although I would say, Tanya, the other way around--
My head is the opposite.
Oh, my-- not even what's wrong with my head, it's gonna migrate and develop because someone said there's no supposedly a plumber or someone else. But you and I understand what happens when AGI-
Robot
...something with AGI will create devices that will work exactly better than any electricity and plumber that is running. Not enough people have regular access. What happened to artificial intelligence now? On the contrary, the number of people who can easily solve home problems with plumbing or electricity has increased. Now, many people will do their own manually. I'm off the toilet now. I have a lot of these toilets in there. I got it, so it's a lid. My wife screams, so the water flows. I'm getting a message that I had a $200-minus yesterday, one toilet.
I had that, by the way. I had this one a week ago. One, one toilet poured two hundred in a few days-- I'm in GPT chat, by the way, asked: Is that possible? He says easy. Three thousand gallons a day can pour the toilet. So I'm raising the cover, taking pictures. Well, I just turned off the crane, and I understand we called the plumber, and he did. But, uh, I just lifted the lid and saw that there was probably a pollo in there. I knew the word. But what's the matter? When you're taking a picture of GPT chat now, he says, "Take this chatter, put it on the left, right. If he doesn't do anything or do anything, you've got a glory on it, you need to replace it." You're getting GPTs now, like, simple things that just tell you, which is basic, he's helping you do. Not much more, and Gemini is there, yes, and Claude is, and Grok is. They help you resolve a simple, simple question. You've got rats swamping your car, you're not gonna fix it now, you're gonna have to call the Evacator and take it to the people who fix it. But very simple things, simple things can be done with hands and more quality than before. I'll give you some attention, by the way, I think that this is a subject that is important, now more qualitative, and now you're gonna get, you know, real, many real work schemes. Yeah, Google let Stitch out. Tell me, Elnar.
Tell me, Elnar, this is actually another subject, by the way, to follow up on what I think we've been discussing, right? Tell me, Elnar, about Stitch.
Yeah, Google actually released a new system. If Carpathians introduced the Vibe codeing a year ago, Google is moving in the same direction, just calling it a Vib design. Yeah, a lot of people probably heard that there's a Figma system. It can be made up of site maquitas, like, yes, there's a lot of presentations to do, some other stuff. I mean, everything that's connected to design. For example, I've been confronted with this when a mobile application is being created in Figma, all the screens, all the buttons, and hence the software moves it to an interface that goes further to the interface. The mobile application will be used. So Google, respectively, released the Stitch system. In fact, some people call Figma's killer, a very similar interface. You have a large polished on which you can accommodate the various design elements, just like Figma, but you also have a built-in from Google AI. You can speak in a voice, you can throw examples and say, "Do the same, but there's an app, make me a presentation on the whole site with, like, this design, and something. So the system is on the hip now, everyone's talking about it, everybody calls it Figma's killer. I think even Figma, if I'm not mistaken, capitalization has become less. They've got their shares on these news. So, AI infiltration not only in programming, but also in design. And considering what Google did, there's a feeling that it's serious for a long time. The product must be quite good. I'm not the target audience for this product, so I didn't pump it, I didn't watch it. But if anyone is-- among our viewers UX designer or this area where this soft is applicable to you, write in the commentaries as interesting as you think it is useful. And there's a point in using this system.
I mean, I want to say it right away. First, she-- that's their lab, laba's project is so laboratory, right? And actually, he looks like a professional right now, like you say, right? But actually, this topic looks, uh, very multifunctional for a large number of people. This is the first project I personally came in, gave him URL his personal website, which I have many pages on, and I said, "Do me the main thing in different interfaces." On URL. Why? Because this system can be URL-based. In this system, it is possible to speak of the creation of a mobile application there for design. I want to show it to something like that, like, like that, to have such fields. I wish he was a stitch like this corporation or this company. And there, to be my uniqueness, he did it. Next you say, "And there's still a missing menu, these are the details." So he can completely translate everything, he keeps little things, he keeps context, he keeps his story, he can turn the screen on, he can create some cliquidity, like it's multi--- Well, when you can put a lot of things on, you can watch it like that. I mean, I'm in person--
He's got an interactive piece of evidence, yes.
Huh?
Interactive elements are produced, yes.
Yeah. I loved the story personally, of course, that you could ask him to design the part of "Go on URL." Why? Why did I even like this story? Because when we connect this system to the design environment, and obviously that it will be able to translate it for code, it will be able to program it further. That's a very important subject. She can program it, she can move it further into the code. It's clear that Figma has a lot of things done right now. I think it's not just a Figma issue, not just a professional designer, because Figma was very badly stunned by her cool UX/UI, plus because they did a multi-user job. work.
Doing, uh, multi-user work on one interface. I remember very clearly how it was, how it migrated from the Photoshop then on Sketch and then migrated to Figma because of this, that at the same time a large number of people can work on it. But I think that's a killer and a Miro in terms of different boards, for example, working with the boards, especially when we're talking about what, uh, the point is not that, uh, still when--- I've never, for example, ever. I never used Miro in my life. I'm saying, "I can unload it?" Because I want to see it in some other system. I mean, I have to go into some kind of technical environment to see the picture. And I'm used to watching pictures, just opening up and watching, there, PDF-something or PNG on top, and seeing her. I mean, I'm not used to having a picture of myself open a separate program. And I understand that I'm inside, like Miro isn't. I usually have hundreds, hundreds, dozens, dozens, or thousands of people, but I'm not the one who's got my hands inside, and I don't want to do it. I mean, I'd like to, like, if I have to put something in that demonstration, I'm gonna go in and ask Sketch to do it. He's gonna do this to me, he's gonna make me do it, draw me these screens. I'm just gonna ask you to put these screens down to PDF and throw it down, uh, and throw it down there, I don't know, my partner, there, or a staff member, or anyone else. I'll say, "I'd like to have that." I mean, this looks like, uh, an incredible cool thing. I hope that soon, uh, this is the easing of the big Corpo-- from the big service providers of the CMS. Well, when you can-- there's no CMS question, it's gonna be something else. Uh, but the environment for the site development, yes, when we're in a simple interface, uh, artificial intelligence chat, in fact, or some project, will be able to keep a separate project in the chat room. GPT on the site and where we're gonna make a website, pages, move it from somewhere, migrate it, update it through it, it's gonna be, uh, a very strong breakthrough. Uh, write down who really, like Aina told me, tried the system how she works. Uh, I, uh, asking for the dextop adaptive interfaces, he did it to me, but it looks like he gave me some kind of template. So he didn't take my website, he didn't copy it, he didn't completely reschedule it, he didn't take my own data, he didn't take all the details that are. I mean, uh, still, as usual, big statements from a big company, and it works like, uh, lab, laboratory. But, uh, still, this is not a Google project, is it? It's like Google, they even have URL like stitch.withgoogle.com, right? So they have, through-- these are their labs different topics, uh, pretty cool, they do different things, uh, well, Google, yeah, and related and connected, together, companies. I'll see you in a week. ToTheMoon is technological news, sites. Skin didn't give up any of them. Bye, everybody.