Anthropic said that they were planning to reach $78 billion in proceeds by the twenty-eighth year. What is this proceeds of this? But OpenAI and Anthropic, I guess, yeah, they're going to do AGI. Now, this is a very strong, serious race for how ordinary users are not just attracting, but holding.
These models will know all the trends, they'll be good at generating, there, most people don't have to take pictures, they'll just be able to offer nothing better than the model, right? They'll just be such big media. It's just with a high probability, yeah, there are companies like Adobe, like Meta, that can fall very much or die even.
Hello, everybody! We're on ToTheMoon. Ah, and we have a special prom today. We'll talk a lot about AI video. And first, Sasha, I want to ask you a question. Here's the ChatGPT 5.2 and the posterior. I mean, there was 5.1, then the hop 5.2, and there was Gemini 3 Pro between them, who, of course, hit a, The platform is super cool and so on. And then they come out with 5.2 and show that they're-- in many tests, they're cool, that's supposed to be the coolest platform. So, is this marketing or is it still in 5.2, you feel there's something serious now?
Look, that's a very good question. Clearly, the inter-- opinions were divided on the Internet, right? I mean, I can say an opinion in-- opinion in the Twitter collective. The views differ... about ChatGPT 5.2. Most people say that, uh... Most people say that in Twitter, what is a code Red OpenAI that they announced to catch Gemini 3 was unsuccessful that GPT 5.2, uh, this version was staggered and clearly not finished before. I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I And on the other hand, there's this Arc Prize where Humanity is doing, if I'm not mistaken, then Humanity Last Exam. And it appears that this model is tens, I think 10 or 15 times cheaper than o3 high, with better results. I mean, it's obviously getting cheaper than intelligence.
It's, uh, big-- it's, of course, big hat, but for now, I don't think it's affecting the OpenAI transcript, and it's still like they've been growing up for about two months., from my point of view, it's, in my view, like their Pro regime, it could be better than Gemini. I mean, I've never seen the skirts before when the OpenAI is better than Gemini. I see them now. I think it's really a big deal of progress. Yeah, it really looks like they're really, really, really, really, really getting a lot done. Uh, that's true. But I think that, uh... But I think the skirts, uh-a, but I think the chains are no longer applicable, right? I mean, I think they're already, both companies are out of AI money. So most people who use the OpenAI, 90%, they don't even give themselves a report on the baccalaureate, do they? And they need to have, uh, OpenAI just right now, just a fundamental time, like, doing food and growing up on the product account, not about this, well, whatever this is, there's a Haip about who's in it. What kind of baccalaureate. I mean, I think they should find new growth points and they obviously didn't find them, because they, you know, flat. But I'm not even-- what I think they're still working, they're still working like a pure RD organization. So, like, uh, R constituentD, what does the organization think? We'll do a better model, more people come and good. But I think it's fundamental to most users that doesn't matter anymore, right? I mean, it seems to me that, uh, baccalaureates don't matter to most users. So they need to find new ways, right? So they're gonna have to assume that Google's got the best models. At least, in terms of Google being able to subsidize more than OpenAI, well, with a high probability. Oh, that Google has its own capacity, right? That Google will have its distribution, which is still more than the OpenAI. And I think that in these realities, they need to find new ones, these interesting partnerships, interesting ways to go to market. This is the Disney partnership, which is actually a good example. I think they should do about a dozen partners like Disney a month, and then, well, they have a chance to seriously hit Google. But I think that's what the answer is for OpenAI, how to become a trillion company and be competitive with Google, not to make a model that's better on the baccalaureate.
On the one hand, they're all, well, at least it's not Gemini, but OpenAI and Anthropic, they probably go to do AGI., at the same time, if you look at the facts, it's a very strong, serious race for how ordinary users don't just attract, but keep. And people don't watch the baccalaureate, people want to see the usual boxes, normal, simple scenarios of use, don't-- don't put it in their lives, do they? And then I'm not gonna say no. Here we were discussing the issue, I think, past or later, uh, whether people are willing to move from GPT to Gemini or Gemini, there, Grok or Grok to something else. I said that if the main instrument for me now is GPT chat, mostly I use Gemini, I use Grok, but mostly GPT, it's that, uh-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a full time in Gemini, I'll be back in ChatGPT sometime in a year. You're not gonna get me back before. Now, the fight, the idea, between Gemini and ChatGPT for that. What do you think you're doing here? Or not for that?
Look, the fundamental Google will play all the markets, yes. Well, I mean, that's what Google is one of the world's most expensive companies, yes, that's, like, three points of seven trillion. Uh, if it wasn't for antimonopoly risks that are always there, yes, there, Google Browser and so on, Android, that's all the search, uh, that's the most expensive, yeah. So what do they play against them? Antimonopo-- antimonopoly sues against them are the risk that Google Search Ads, and, uh, 100-- will bring less money because the concept is changing, right? But again, yes, I mean, as it would be, but if we look at it purely in terms of capitalism, not in terms of, like, the one who wants to, uh, stagger, yeah. We're purely capitalist, so, you know, they have the strongest ecosystem. A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a- So they have the strongest and the strongest ecosystem they have, uh, they have a kind of vertical-- completely vertical glare. I mean, they control, that's, uh, where the greatest risk is, I'd say, yes, that fundamentally in the generative AI, we don't know where, where good business is at model level, infrastructure level, yeah, at the level, maybe the application. We don't know today. There's no good business with generative AI, yes. But very-- but when this model, uh-huh, when it gets clear, in a year, in two, Google, by being completely vertically intact, he's definitely gonna bury that value, yeah, he can't not. I'll get you a drink. There's a big risk that Amazon or Anthropic or Microsoft doesn't even bury the value that they'll be sitting there. Each of these companies may be so that they can sit in some low-marginal part of the business, yes, for example. And Google will definitely bury the part that's high-argenic, yes, anyway. So I don't have a case when Google loses. It's hard to draw that case for now. Oh, you can look at Google at the moment like, uh, one of the most expensive companies in the world, yeah.
I mean, maybe it's Apple now, there's four trillion, NVIDIA four trillion, but Google is almost four trillion. And when we think about it, the too is a company like this, you know, the most expensive company in the world, yeah, it has-- it has to play absolutely in all the markets that exist, all the markets. And that's what they're gonna do, of course. So, in all markets where they exist, they will play and they will play both in the consumer market and in the AGI market. Oh, I think it's a b-b-b-b-b-b-b-no-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-no-no-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-no-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-no-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-no-b-b-b-b-b-b-no-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b- And naturally, they have resources and talent to do so., for OpenAI, that's a big question. I mean, they're asking a big question because they have a fundamental, they've got, uh, uh, you know, like go to market. I think they don't have one, uh, that means they don't have a new go to market, well, some new sources of growth, uh, they haven't figured out in the last two years.
I mean, it's a big, big risk to them, of course.
Look, there's a question. That's, uh, interesting comment, of course.
K-- interesting comment, of course. That's a question. Look, Anthropic said they were planning to reach $78 billion in cash by the year of the twenty-eighth. So we understand what, and, uh, OpenAI plans to do, uh, hundreds of billions of dollars of proceeds. And why would this proceeds and where it, how could it come? There's another Gemini. Then Google says, "We want to do more, there, two hundred or three hundred billion." But there's no such proceeds in the market, even a few of them. So, either they should come in and take over a lot of processes and services, and there's a lot of just going away. Or, uh, well, until they don't know, they have to start trading, they have to be integrated into equipment, everything, and they have to, like, do their own services. Or a kind of- or that kind of proceeds should be born somewhere. But I don't know where to come from. How can Anthropic, for example, make $78 billion worth of money? What? Or, like, the OpenAI says, "We're, uh, there's two and-- two and six, I think they said, a billion people." And they're gonna have to grow up, grow up, uh, dozens of times. I mean, they're eight hundred million now, they want, there, four, three, three, actually, yeah? By the number of people. And the money they want to raise a dozen times. How is that possible?
Look, well, I think it's really easy. I think they say, that's where we have CapEx on the verb-- on AI infrastructure, like, three hundred and sixty billion now, four hundred and eighty billion. Like it's growing at 30,3 percent a year. So this is what Gemini gave me this information now. Oh, well, they think that, uh, part of this market, well, ROI should be, yeah, some kind of thing? First year, yes, the first year ROIs, for these infrastructure investments, they must be beaten. I think so. I think they think so. But, uh, bye... Yeah, I think that while I'm actually curious, I don't think anyone's done anything, but I don't think we know the effectiveness. See, it's like a big thing, yeah, what the OpenAI says is they're not building it. So, as efficiency as it is, so there is not so much data as to what the investment efficiency in CapEx is to raise the Concyumeric products, is it? I mean, I think we're seeing the tip of the iceberg, that's, uh, that's, in the view, there's a cloud of providers that build, re-sold, you know, rent a GP, there's a payback, there's a, uh, three-year-old, and They make money for the fourth year, yes, for example. I mean, it's a business model. I think there's some reliable data that this mo-business model is definitely working for the clowns. Oh, but in the concept that, actually, what kind of investment is going on in CapEx to hurt these chat-bots, right? I don't think I've seen any such economic analysis. I mean, actually, this crelation and business understanding, actually, is an interesting question. I mean, I don't know if there's a sense of this kind of economy that you invest in CapEx and grow your tea-- you're growing your chat-bot. It's such an interesting question, but I'm sure they're looking at it, that the fall is getting bigger, so the products will grow.
Well, they probably think they're-- they think that somehow.
Yeah, but now what we're gonna see is what happened? That current models and the current era of artificial intelligence, she brought incredible things to people. I mean, I've given you a lot of opportunities, but it's still very cheap. People are mostly people, people are ordinary... When we say who makes so much money, it's a regular thing. And, well, they're at least interested in that. And ordinary people, they take, uh-- the main audience, so it's just a mobile application. Well, just some kind of mobile application. I can pay ten, twenty, thirty, or $40 for this mobile application. People don't think about the position that it's changing their lives, somehow accelerating, affecting their real income. I'm not talking about business. There's a problem in the business there, too, because when you have a CRM system, like Salesforce, and salesforce, and, uh, introducing something into AI, he's got these costs he pays for OpenAI. But what's the problem? That these costs should be transferred to the ex- enterprise, the company. And companies don't want them to increase the value of the salesforce license. They pay for a license, like $50,000 a month for a safe. They come, they say, "You still owe $30 or $40 a bonus." They say, "We don't have any money for it." This has already been a subject that has already been settled when for a large number of computerized ERP systems, MRP, CRM, XRM, everything, yes, and, uh, came and said, "This is where you pay for a license at CRM $30, And there's five more chat-bots here, and there's ten more for the phone recognition, and there's another 15 for the automatic phone, and there's another $2 for email. And you're finally saying, "I can't buy all of this from you, all of these services." And all those services want to make money. Email guides are theirs, chatbots are theirs, so they're sending them to some, they're on the web interface, theirs, their mobile applications. Everyone wants to make a separate wage.
All these systems want to make money. And I'm just gonna finish, like, I'm just seeing the OpenAI integration with the Photoshop, and I'm gonna have a question, on the one hand, a photoshop like that is a good thing, it's a pier, it's fun to show. On the other hand, if I use different products inside ChatGPT that I can process pictures, including that can make a Photoshop, at some point in time, I'm a Photoshop user, like I am. The user was a Photoshop and added it to the OpenAI. Okay. And at some point in time, I see that OpenAI is starting to offer me something else, and I migrate from the Photoshop to some other environment. It's a very heavy ca-- very heavy case for the Photoshop. And it doesn't understand, and it doesn't even know how to do it.
Do you have any thoughts here in this part?
Yeah, I think that's what Adobe is exactly one-- one of the companies that loses very much in AI, yes, I mean, they, I mean, they're, uh, they're, uh, they're already-- I'm looking at their performance of the run-off, which is, in fact, there, from the second February of the twenty-fourth year to the current, they have lost 40 to 3 per cent, and forty-three per cent of the price of the run-off. Yeah, so we're talking about a lot of money. So if they're worth 100, fifty billion now, well, unhigh math, yeah, we can figure out that they've lost six--and-six billion, right? I mean, well, they could grow up, you know-- and, uh, for them, I think they're for them, that's, uh, they're looking for some new ways, but I think they're having a big problem. I mean, they're looking for new ways, but it's a wrong decision. So the value of Adobe is the Photoshop and that they have a direct relationship with the user. And this integration, she, uh, it's just a empire.
Look, we're so-- we've got a lot of integration that does. Or is it just a cool stack for a lot of people? They don't see it as a empire.
If we look at this more broadly, well, of course, Adobe's got a very bad way to go to AI, it's really bad. And this move from ChatGPT, it's not gonna help. Canva, because it's been integrated, Canva's been integrated-
Yeah.
And they, and they're getting it. But...
Anyway, it looks, uh, very fucking, well, very fucking slack.
Okay, Sasha, let's get to the video generator. Look, it's so small, small for our viewers. Sign the audience, by the way, what do you think about the subject we're talking about? A lot of questions have been raised. It's gonna be very interesting to get your opinion. There were, uh, a lot of different topics. We'll move to the video generator. So you have a start-up, which is six months, and, uh, you've reached $100 million plus, uh, annual purple, planned annual purple and RR, and you're very much headlined, you're more than that. You're all growing up. So, the fast-- not just the fastest growing, but that you're one of the fastest growing, even the fastest growing, there, the start-up in the world. Oh, a lot of clients come, a lot of things. And you're in a zone where, on the one hand, people always had an interest in making fast, there, racels, paintings, some video. On the other hand, I always think there are two and a half billion users, how many of these two and a half billion people use videogeneration? Where is the video-generation market now, so hundreds of millions of people can use it? And do hundreds of millions of people now use or do we even get close?
Hundreds of millions, I think, far enough. I think ten million, ten to twenty million, is close enough. And yes, if we really hold the check, and, uh, the higher check that-
a higher check that people pay, there's $600, a thousand dollars a year. So if there's millions of people paying thousands of dollars a year, it's a very, very solid business, wouldn't it? I mean, it's, uh, it's like there, on Canva or there, on Adobe, on a scale, on coinization. Uh, I think that, again, that's what OpenAI move with Disney, maybe it'll help with adoption in consumers, but it's just gonna have to be a little naughty.
So far, I think the OpenAI has no pre-condition to create its socials, but they'll try.
How can I help you? Well, that's what Disney said to Google that you can't generate their characters, you can only generate them in OpenAI, right? Well, as much as a fan-content base can only be generated, and there's a fan-fiction, that's all that can be generated only in Sora. I mean, it's... That is how a good example of the OpenAI partnership that gives rise to the Guglom. Such partnerships should be more than once.
How does that help develop video-generation?
Well, it can give a big boost to the consumer direction and, in general, to adoption. But Higgsfield is doing a-- it's a professional content, that's a professional advertisement, that's, that's, most people on the platform are already making professional advertising, coinating their content.
Uh, that's the seg-- and that's the segment where OpenAI doesn't play.
Where is Sora now? They let Sora out, and they had a very big pgreade. So they released the first Sora, they're like they're gone.
They're still getting really lazy. Yeah, they're really lagging behind, yeah.
Can you explain why they're doing this? Look, they're gonna release the first Sora at the beginning, there, at the dawn of all the stuff, they're gonna release Sora, all like, "Oh!" and they, and they're right there, they're gonna show that we're gonna have a cool product. Then there are other models, there's Veo, there's Runway, Clarana, yes, or what? Well, short, different things are totally different and sora doesn't even hear, so nobody can hear, use it, nothing works. Then they're screwed, they're out, sora 2, and they start, so something shows it, shows that there's a lot of cabs to do. They even start a social media out there, and then they keep quiet. Why is that strategy? Is it just such microwaves, is there a change of team, or is it technologically not successful in super-modeling, super-competitive?
I mean, the cycle of model renewal
should be once every three months, or you're lagging behind.
Look, you, uh, you said to me one day, "I signed for the upgrade of different systems and I think Higgsfield is the most aptitude." You're just gonna get a little drunk every day, you're gonna make some chips. I think, however, OpenAI within its products, such as Sora, they're starting up, and they also have to keep up with updates. Why don't they do it?
Yes, Sasha, that's a good question. I mean, I see there are different things in there, the point is that you can, from one point of view, win, there, making a unique best model. Oh, yeah, but it's hard to imagine that someone would make it uniquely better. Uh, well, Gu-- yes. I mean, then there's a point of view that whoever has the best model and distribution will win, but it's either-- it's Google first, and secondly, ByteDance, because they're already in the social--- in the social media market. Yes, yes? I mean, where the most important thing is to create videos. Well, the third option will be someone new, young, who moves just fast, friends with everyone. It's Higgsfield.
Mm-hmm.
but how does the OpenAI win? Well, at the expense of these, maybe interesting muwas in the consumer segment, that they're faen-fictions there, that they're enabled for all consumers, that only in OpenAI can be generated, and Disney characters are nowhere else to be created. And maybe they'll do the same thing with the celebrities. I mean, you see, they have a strategy like this, but there's no way they're gonna have a model that's competitive.
There's no way in the pictures or videos that they'll have a competitive long-term model.
Look, in the video-generation market, I see that in the past two years, nobody really understands, and what's really gonna happen. I mean, there's a condition, probably in theory, people who think the entire content will be generosed with AI. Someone says there's only a part of it that's gonna be generated. Will there be something in real time? Now it's more clear what it's gonna be like, a twenty-sixth year, for example, in terms of video-generation? Or is the market still very, very new, very unfamiliar? I don't know where the money is, it doesn't know how to put everything in the company, how it works, what the laws will be. Or is there...
Where the money is clear enough where it is. Where the money is clearer, small and medium-sized agencies that do everything with AI, do it faster and more efficient and rebound to these--stars. It's definitely money, right now, it's a hundred percent. There's a looting in these agencies, like SaaS. And that changes the agent model completely, doesn't it? I mean, it's exactly where the value is created.
Mm-hmm.
Uh, I think, Sasha, it's like... Yeah. I mean, asking a question is a very right question for Higgsfield, but for mankind, it's not a big question, really. I mean, because Google's scanning current models, somewhere in Stoo, like, 30, right? I mean, well, maybe a hundred times. These models will know all the trends, they'll be good at generating, there, most people don't have to take pictures, they'll just be able to offer nothing better than the model, right? Oh, it's gonna be, uh, it's gonna be really hard. So people who can create a unique content that is better than models, these people will be, like, tens, hundreds of millions of dollars, because, well, uh, a unique content, it's always gonna be, It's gonna be fashion, but just most people, there, they're not gonna be able to do it, yes, they're gonna take it off themselves, make it better than AI. That is, most people-- the vast majority of people, and of course, AI will only have to create content. Aaah, here are the remaining, zero point zero per cent of the cryuators that create a unique content, they'll make more money, and because demand for a unique content, some kind of human being. History is, yes, that's quite authentic, of course, always there. Here, that's when we get here. I think it's really not important for most people, it's gonna happen in the twenty-sixth or the twenty-seventh year, but it's definitely gonna happen, yeah, and it's just a high probability, yeah, there, that's a... companies like Adobe, like Meta, can fall very much or die even. I mean, but again, this story is not about-- if you're not a professional cryotor, yeah, right now, becoming a professional cryo, um, the plant isn't gonna be any easier. It'll take a little other skill set, right? You'd better understand trends, you'd better understand the curielles, and less than nav-- less Adobe After Effects, yes, press, there, that's, that's, like, the skills to push buttons in this complex interface, he's, It's gonna be less important.
Yeah.
I mean, they're too much already. Where else? Aaah, that's just gonna be a big, perturbation of the market. A lot of physical sales will be transferred to digital. Again, it's a big help to all the stolitelers. Oh, that's, of course, a very good deal for people who do physically, right? I mean, the cryuators are unique, they'll grow up. But since now there's a lot of simple, uh, sales around the world that physically organizes the films, yes, they're gonna need a little less of them for social media, at least, yeah, just less. And, and there's gonna be a redistribution, like a job and income in the underground, an agent, an agent's niche, of course, that's gonna happen. Well, it's gonna be big, you know, because the market is this digital content, it's gonna be a lot bigger, because the physical sale-- the creation of a content, it's gonna go completely digital. Well, this whole piece of cake, this whole pie will grow up.
But at this point, it looks like we know exactly the losers, it's Adobe and Meta. Oh, we know that Google will be the winner. And then who else is gonna win, we don't know. Maybe there's no one else. Maybe Hexel will be the winner, maybe OpenAI. So far, it's clear that Google is a winner of the-- because they need banana Pro, it's a phenomenal model, yeah, in pictures. And it's known for now that Adobe and Meta are exactly two losers.
Is there anything else that Meta can do? They said, for example, they'd be released in the first quarter, there, Avocada is a new, new model. And I'm also saying, if Meta is a-- Meta Avocada, then Apple might be doing something, too. Is there anything they can do? Or is it just a coffee shop?
That's a very good question. Yeah, thanks for asking him, yeah. I mean, don't have insider information. I can honestly say what I think, yes. I mean, I think we don't have one-- that's, in fact, generative AI is--
Pocaa reminds me, like more technology waves, yes, first of all, but not a business wave, huh? I mean, it's from a business perspective until we can see these agents for a thousand dollars, we can't see anything completely new, there, the economy, right? I can't see that yet. As long as it's a field, a technology that completely changes everything and where growth rates in consumers are in the producer segment, well, unprecedented, never happened at all in history. But I've got to sacrifice the thunders. I think it's a brief description, that's what generative AI is about business-impaque. And from this point of view, if we're looking at this, yes, well, objectively, in my view, what it really looks like, uh, wasn't-- no companies, that, you know, something that was done in a hidden, hidden, something, something. They did it, they locked up and did it. It's not like that, is it? And therefore, there is no premonition that Apple or Meta will be overtaken. So they're gonna have to buy Higgsfields, Black Forest Labs, Luma, Runway. I mean, there are four companies that are more rumoured in the American market.
Well, these companies will be. Some of these four companies will be broken, the rest will be bought.
Sas, listen, you said that comment one that, uh, the whole content would be AI, as a whole, making content more cool than any other creators. And there's a unique content, it's gonna have weight, but it's not gonna be enough. And I thought, at the same time, that there are ordinary people who are just a remarkable number, well, the bulk of people who are not professional creators, how they're gonna create content with. AI or they'll continue to put the content on, Well, how they do some photos, some videos, they're filming. And yet, it's--
I guess, well, it's just not gonna be a engagement, it won't be a engagement, it won't be a engagement, will it? I mean, just like this, just to get a little bit of a scream.
People, people are even less, people will be less involved in ordinary, ordinary people's content.
No, it's gonna be a lot more involved, Sasha. I mean, look, Sydney Sweeney, Taylor Swift. Who's still popular? Who are they talking about? Ah, Nicky Minage. Right there, they're talking about her stubborn Gavin Newsome. Man, they'll be stars, they'll be, they'll have a billion-dollar company, each of them will do their own bottle of water, they'll do their own, there's a brand of toys for kids, chocolates, they'll-- burgers. That's Mr. Bist. Anyway, Mr. Bist, Imagine Mr. Beist's company has a few yards. There will be hundreds of such Mr. Beist. I mean, there's gonna be a lot of centered companies, because they make a unique content. People need to watch people fundamentally, right? But also those who can create an authentic content that will outperform AI in quality and where-- who can give friction, authenticity, uniqueness. Again, these will all be billionaires, all of them. So the same Jake Paul is saying he's not sure he's a dollar billionaire, like he's gonna be a $100 billionaire right now. There's no way. But, here, being some middle level creator, taking off your life, that's gonna be hard, right? I mean, it's clear that AI, because AI will provide an average of higher quality.
Look, this is an interesting aspect. I ran into you yesterday.
Look, Sas, Sas, that's what's happening in the co-piercing, that's what's happening in the co-piercing. Good copyers have made more money.
Yeah.
But, man, this is the messi mudle, there's a fucking tough time, it's really sad. Well, that's really sad. People didn't restructure under AI, and they said AI replaced them. I mean, this is really happening. The video will, like, be tougher, so it'll be harder. But of the good majority of people, but the fundamental difference, yes, from co-piping, that most people, a huge number of writers, tens of thousands of people in Los Angeles are sitting without work and earning less than in the world. McDonalds. It's not a joke we're talking about right now, not a joke. And they can make a living because they have a lot of ideas, but they can't show them, and now they can show them to AI.
It's like you say that a part of the copyrights has become more earning, and a part is still, and if a man doesn't get clients out there somewhere, or he doesn't fit in AI, he'll lose everything. I just wanted to bring you a case of interest. Do I know what happened yesterday? I saw one of my friends in the dentist yesterday, and she put out a town, well, that was the one that hit the city. I'm not gonna be in the middle of any details right now, but the point. And then, like, what this city is now like in time, bombs. And then I click on this post, I go to this post and down there, and it says, "Take a picture and AI, it shows the essence of what's going on." And I realized that picture was untrue. I mean, at first, I didn't realize that the picture was not real. I thought the picture was real at first. I thought the picture was real, totally, right? And it turns out I didn't expect that AI would be used in that case. I mean, I thought you should use AI in that case? You show reality. And that's right, I'm thinking about the dentist now, which is, of course, a little bit of a-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-this is the problem. I mean, if you know it's Taylor Swift, and it's her professional account, and it's a real person, you're watching her, even though you're not gonna understand at some point, it's really her idea. Content or this is AI doing. You're just gonna stop that at some point. It's guaranteed, right? You won't know. And she's probably gonna start putting AI on the profile at some point because a lot of stars won't even make it that long.
And you'll know you have a huge amount of content intact and what's going to happen here?
Andrei Sash, yes, I mean, the pressure will be on the stars more. Oh, they're gonna have to, uh, they're gonna have to fucking learn to do, uh, marketing. I mean, this is the copper empire. So you have the main channel, you have other channels where you have a pure AI-Content, like the k-pop of the band, they do it. And that's what everyone has to do. I mean, uh, different channels, different types of content, that's, uh, different quality. I mean, you're gonna have to, uh, raise your copper empire, right? Because, well, I don't think there's another option. I mean, there's no other option. Again, just the retext will be from, uh, the way to hold the camera and the way to sell the process. The retread will be much more in the direction, there, a creative strategy, like a creative strategy, like, yes, and a shrine. There's gonna be a lot of retext and, well, like having an authentic ass star that's a drag. And again, someone boo-be-- a lot of companies with existing splebs, who will be authentic stars, will be new, naturally, vitubers, i.e., those who don't exist, but they're like authentic stars, Some Masha and Bear, imagine, can build a copper empire, too. Here, hmm.
That's right.
Here, uh, I mean, there's just gonna be such big empire media. So this is what's happening in the mobile applications, right? There's hundreds of apples, they're all over the place, right? Well, you know, Sasha, what I'm talking about. Imperial Media...
Yes
They'll look the same way. I mean, you'll have a flagship, but you'll-- then you'll have a flagship transhipment like this, spraying, then you'll be out there, c-- in every single one of the most paying people, you'll be there for them to pil something, Some extra service. I mean, it's already k-pop, like, what happens. This is the same thing going on here. I mean, it's, uh, it's not possible to prevent it, right? I mean, but in general, the pie was editing crayers, it's gonna be more, but the number of cryuators, I don't think it's gonna grow in principle. Well, that's right, yeah.
Well, thank you very much. Nice meeting, great special. Look at us on Sundays and sometimes the special-produced environment. See you later! Don't forget to write comments and squeeze our videos.