We need to read the little print in, uh, the contract that goes with the car.
In design, if you're assessed, it's a very cool car.
Now, in the States, we say we'll fire you if you don't go to the office. Hello, everybody! We're on ToTheMoon Channel and we're on our way to the technology world.
The sign in the Silicon Valley said he updated the tit in Tesla and he was driving completely on the autopilot and drove on the autopilot, there, 15 kilometers of the settlement road to his home, you know, on a parole basis. The settlement road. And he said it was unrealistic. And I think it's not real cool, by the way. And as far as I understand, Tesla's autopilots are far from the world's leaders. It looks really great. He put the camera right, and it looked like it was a mistake. The only thing I thought if Tesla was in an accident, is it his fault, uh, man's fault or not man's fault? I don't quite understand that, I don't know, and I suggest we start today with, uh, a lot of Elon Musk and his company in the week. And I suggest we start with Elon Musk and his company. Uh, and the mentions were about robots and Cybertruck.
Autopilot is the marketing name of the service that Tesla provides. We need to read the little print in, uh, the contract that goes with the car. Because there was a lot of news that, uh, first of all, yeah, when you drive, you turn on the autopilot, as they call it, you have to keep your hands on the wheel, don't take your eyes off, there, the road you drive, and I'm not gonna be able to control the situation. Yeah, that's the first thing. And second, uh, there was news that in a crash in a few seconds, the autopilot is off in a second, and the car goes like it's under human control. Just so there's no situation that the accident occurred under the control of this autopilot, yes, that the liability is entirely transferred to the owner of the vehicle. And here, uh, marketing, advertising, and all these statements say that, yes, there's a autopilot, and on the other hand, well, it's not a autopilot, it's a advanced cruise control. Yeah, he's advanced. He's probably on a good road. There were all these stories that, from one ocean to another across America, the car was driving, there, on the autopilot.
But here, you have to be careful and read the little print in the contract, in my opinion.
No, what's the difference? Or is the autopilot something else?
The autopilot is, well, I think it's a full-time driver who, uh, is doing everything he needs. And this is a advanced cruise control, yes, which tracks the distance to other vehicles, can trace what we have here, speed limits and some other such extra stuff.
The autopilot is like me in San Francisco just drove, and the car was totally running, right? I mean, it's a autopilot.
Did they change something or what happened in Tesla? I had Tesla, uh, I think a year or two ago, and there was a $1 and a thousand-dollar buying this autopilot package, but you should keep your hands on the same side as Elnar says. If you clean your hands, she starts, or even one hand, she starts to fight you like that. But I don't know. So, or did they somehow finish this, it's something new, or is it the same simple? What's the news?
No, there was some
super-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-the-me-the-me-the-me-the-me-the-me-the-me-the-book thing. As for, uh, uh, Cybertruck, yes, or Cybertruck, or, as a result, it was just a little bit of a car, and it was, uh, cars, they were just as revoked. But I think it's just something they're doing there. And I know that Elnar always said he didn't like the car. I like the car outside, it looks just, it looks very serious.
I think there's a lot of jokes about M-Mask taking the best Twitter models and using them at Tesla. And Cybertruck. Well, like, uh, it's kind of a hip, but it doesn't work. I mean, I think that's what a lu-lu-hu-hu-hu-man say. Uh, it's hard to say. I didn't-- I never understood why Cybertruck. What's his advantage? I mean, I think there's a number of others like the kind of cars Tesla doesn't do. I mean, uh, well, now maybe I'm gonna try to find it fast, but I think Rivian is like Livin brand now, I think Ri-Rivian and I think Lucid's second brand, if I'm not mistaken, they're already over, and, uh, Tesla is, in terms of, uh, castom-- well, NPS, right? I mean, in terms of how the castomers are self-evaluating. I'm gonna have to check this out now, but I think I'm--
Look, well, NPS is gonna be a lot more dependent on the number of cars sold. Yet as much as Tesla sells to such a wide audience, it is clear that NPS will be lower. Well, plus Lucid-Aaa, the car is still more than the luxury level. And Rivian, I think, gives an initial impression to all the Californians who buy.
My opinion is that, uh, I think that in design, if you're assessed, it's a very cool car. If you remember, all this super innovative, even iPhone, for example, the most bizarre example, in the time he called for, uh, a lot of human dislocation, because then everyone used BlackBerry or something like that. A plan for the button phones, where there are lots of buttons. But as we see now, everyone ends up using iPhones. But he's kind of won absolute. It's a standard response from a large number of people to all new ones. People love design that they've seen a lot of times. So, basically, I'm kind of interested in designing this car, and I can say I like it. But I'm sure she's gonna have a very strong impact on the market, not only on the automobile, but also on the market as
usual.
I mean, she's kind of scary, to be honest. Yeah, she's totally different and, uh, she might be a little interesting, but in the case of, like, accidents or something, all these sharp straight corners make me much more embarrassed than, uh, those warm-ups of modern-day corners. cars. Although, well, I understand that in the event of an accident, I guess...
It's gonna be a little influence on speed, but in principle, as if there was, uh, the article I sent, where they compare to the traw, there, Ford, yeah, which is super populic, too, in California. And Tesla has a mission like to carry the future and right now, so that this is all like it's been years, and there's a alien ship landing, and we're seeing it. I mean, yeah, they're as good as their own, like, the competitors, uh, well, they're off the table. But I don't know how real competitors are, because it's hard to imagine that some builder will be taking his equipment on Tesla's track or, there, plants, gardener.
And if we talk about their move forward, and yet they have a cool autopilot, okay, leave what the autopilot is now in the car demanding to keep hands there and so on. It's for some legal or security reasons. Why did Tesla make a decision, huh? And it's probably the most lu-- once more in the sense, I know there's an Escalade, like in the States, that Cadillac has a built-in autopilot, but it's 50 times worse in terms of the volume of movements than in the States. Tesla. How did Tesla do that?
Well, I don't know anything about the car at all.
I mean, I'm honest, yeah. I mean, I'm more curious that Mask came back to China again, and I think that, as if Tesla had some clear problems with the exechushen, I think it's been an innovation lately, I think, It seems that there is a most interesting market for them now that China is. It's from the point of view of growth potential, right? I mean, I think for America, all they do is good enough.
It's hard to tell if there's any consequences. He usually has-- usually Mask has no consequences for having contact with representatives of other States. But, yes, I think it was recently, there was news, yes, that, four days, I think, that last weekend, he was in the area of 28 April, he was just moving his self-drive and, yes, I don't think he was in the middle of a few days. The Prime Minister met him. That's what's pretty amazing.
That's amazing. With the US shut down, it closed itself for the Chinese market, right? And given the Chinese cars and the number of cars they produce, he offers self-drive.
Very strange.
As for how they did it. One aspect is, uh, the lack of such a fear of innovation compared to big inert companies, yes, like, there are car manufacturers with a hundred-year history. Even this is a bubble example: uh, Tesla, the first ones put huge screens in the car salon, while all the other companies still put old ones there, ten-and-twenty-year-old screens even in the car salon, Premital cars. If you take Porsche's brands there, and some other stuff like that, there were still screens, well, much worse than iPad, so, yeah. iPad, uh, was much better in the quality of the flower gear and the functioner than, uh, the screen set in other cars. And Tesla here just took a step. One of them is gonna put a huge screen on it. The other thing is to get everything to the electric motors, to the batteries. Of the last, strange, unusual, which I still don't understand, is a rectangular wheel that is set in Tesla Model X. I think it's a totally uncomfortable thing. Well, they're moving it. Maybe that's the future, like in the pain when a man's going. That's why, in my opinion, they're not afraid. Mask's ears may be impossible and there's no fear, um, to do something wrong. And the big companies, the big autoconcerns with a big story, they're still much more inert and they're getting a lot more careful about these things. At least until there was a reason that someone would take their market.
Yeah, 100% agree. I mean, if you look at ID.4, that is, I think, the Volkswagen model that tries to scapegoat Model 3 and Model Y. There, yes, there's a sophth, a soft, the screen quality still looks pretty good, you know, funny enough, if you can say that.
And with regard to car feedback, yes, the article said that there was actually a thing with Tesla, well, at least that the press leaked that the gas pedal had a little gas clipping, and it could be. It happens that when you push the gas pedal, this clip is clinging to the plug, and the pedal, uh, is stuck, yeah. This car starts to get in the way, and there, it's hard to stop. After that, of course, the outside view of Tesla becomes even more frightening, but, like, all 3,787 cars have been revoked and should, like, change the line because they can change things.
The change of the stitch, and here they say, "Go get the car, we'll change the line.
Let's talk about $56 billion. So Elon Musk had to-- had to get a $56 billion bonus. So the shareholders were, they said, "No, no, no, you're not getting that money." We won, I understand, the trial. When was it, early in the year, or when, was it? I think a good bonus, uh, it was appointed, and agreed together, now it's revoked together. I'll be back again, it's about the budget, uh, Republic of Belarus. I'm comparing everything with the budget of the Republic of Belarus as a real Belarusian. It shows a lot of numbers again. Here we are on all, uh, episodes that we call a lot of numbers. The largest number I think was 7 trillion or what, right? What Sam Althman's doing is gathering for production, uh, processors. Is it okay for Elon Musk to take $56 billion or, or is it not normal? How much harm does it hurt or not to harm business development? I think that, in general, the existence of such people, and aaa through them, is creating some innovations, and people who, among other things, make a lot of money. I don't think Ilona Mask needs $56 billion extra to him, the amount of money. But big money is giving way beyond huge opportunities, including the throwing of huge money in the same Tesla. Tesla was originally a super-conventional project.
Yeah, I think that Mask is one of the most effective people in the history of mankind... in how he can transform hundreds of millions of dollars into investments, really cutting edge. food. I think that a elephant-- well, I think no one else has a n-no-no-sex and a close traction. And I'm gonna be... and that's the truth, a lot of people usually have a problem-- people what they're facing? With the, uh, large amounts of money, when it's billions of dollars, they can't figure out how to invest it effectively. It's a chance. So, one hundred-- the starttups often get more smaller, less-- less resourced. But at the same time, I think that Mask, uh, super-efficiency-efficiency-management companies and super-efficiency-administration of the budgets he has. So, if we're talking about this, this is where these 56--- that's, uh, that's a $56 billion, they're supposed to be on someone's account, right? And the question is, who will produce more value to humanity from $56 billion? It's probably gonna be Mashk.
I mean, maybe there's, uh, $5 million in people who can better manage, but when it comes to billions and real, full-scale innovations, Mask is very hard to surpass.
And, most likely, if they don't pay, it's less reputation, all kinds of litigation, weird emotions, and so on. And when this man gets, he gets... You're a good, good thing. I have different attitudes about what he's doing, but in terms of, I guess, the right decision-making. If that's what we agreed, then we'll have to do it.
I'm just wondering about watching the process, at least there, uh, the party that's public. Yeah, well, they tried to start this package, uh, motivation, so, let's say, for Mask through, uh, the company that was in Delaware. But there was a court, and the judge, there, reversed the decision to pay the Mask for this compensation. Now they're, uh, voting and, uh, agitating, so, let's say, their shareholders vote to move the company from this state to Texas. There, respectively, to re-volt, this will be done again. So this is the whole, uh, political game of big companies, it's pretty busy, yeah. It's something else. There's $56 billion, some companies, some states. But the process itself is very busy, yes. And how this is happening within the framework of, uh, U.S. law, and, accordingly, large corporations. That's pretty interesting.
Well, Elon Musk Elon Musk, and Tesla with Tesla. That's what I want to discuss. I was thinking, so...
Information was provided that, uh, 14 per cent of people in the States are now working remotely and planning to grow to 20 per cent if I'm not mistaken. Iia, so we're all here now, judging by your backgrounds, we're all here and working from home. I'm working from home, too, really, not mine, from my partner's house in Rome, and I'm having a huge, crazy discomfort. Ia's just a crazy discomfort, right? I'm glad I have this kind of view on the street in Rome for the shoot, but I'm not inside. First, Internet problems. Second, it means the dog's been walking around at home. Kids do something. My parents warned me, said the kids were in total uncontrollable. They can start singing, yelling and telling poems. Well, what's normal is, anyway. And it's like, uh, the whole opportunity that came out when the world was closed during the cowid increased the number of remote ones. It was such a bad thing for peace. People learned, however, that it turns out that it is possible to work at home, that in general, it is probably great for human development and for more certain freedoms. But I am personally, of course, an oas- and-and judging by the parameter that 14 percent will turn into twenty-in-the-nine-n, I think it's a very large number for the United States. I'd like to go back to my office, even though my office is still in the pre--house. But I would really like to go back to the office, to the living space, wouldn't I? Iia's in there, um, inside.
I--I-I-I-I-I was just wondering if I could ask you a question. I mean, maybe there's really no need for that much commercial real estate, yeah, for the offices, and so on. Maybe there might be more efficiency on the removable for some types of work. But I don't understand what kind of crisis is... what kind of crisis can create. So if, for example, San Francisco vacancy rate is like a record, one of the, uh, record low levels at the offices, is it possible to redo the office or not? That's probably one question. But the second question is, of course, that the boo-more-control of the big-- how big teams will be managed. Now, I think there's an interesting process in Google right now. Oh, he's, first of all, including the fact that everyone is forced to work from the office, but that's when they translate a part of the role of the offshore. I mean, I think the next one, I mean, Sasha, answer-- answer your question. I think that a large percentage of people who work on the removable, especially in the e-gender AI era, will result in more work, more work can be outsourced, and, America for optimization, for the purposes of the work, Optimization of castes.
No, I was just walking around tonight, I was texting you in the morning, and you had a night. And I wrote it when I met you. I'm just coming in in a week, and I know what I don't want to do Zoom-bing. So, audio-mails, there, sleep the quinoons, text, and we need to meet in person, right? I mean, things that we can do, we have enough efficiency from that-- from the point of view of what can and can be done online. But that's a big question, of course. A
But that's a big question, of course. And office, redo the offices. Mmm, I don't know who thinks, but I think it's a real challenge.
I wonder where the world will move with this. From the perspective of all the buildings. I remember something sharp. Last week, he was in Dubai, remembering what was going on in the business of buildings.
What's going on?
Well, that's crazy. The crazy amount of real property built, both office and living, which I think is totally unlived, empty, just unliving, empty, used for, uh, different purposes. I don't think that's a good thing, this empty space will be empty. Here. A lot of empty buildings. I mean, as you say, San Francisco is actually the same as Palo Alto and Mountin-Who. Well, speaking to us, with you, right? A lot of empty spaces, a lot of empty spaces, but it's fun that big companies-- I like it, by the way, because the world often looks at big companies. I remember when everyone in the office started to leave remotely. I'm just saying, "Alexandre, look, there are large companies in America that are getting away." I'm so . So it's been a few years. Now, in the States, they say, "We'll fire you if you don't go to the office." Almost all the big companies, huh? That's-- well, I remembered Elon Musk back. He was a tough guy, yes, all the companies for everyone to be in the office. But I think it's a very good thing to find the right balance in terms of offshore market. Uh, I think it's gonna lead to new management problems because it's hard to run the team, uh, by its own, and managing the offshore team remotely for many people will be even harder. It's a question-- and since we have a very big choice and a big competition, it's gonna be hard for you to pick a good offshore team.
And that news, the Sasha you were throwing, uh, up, that when a experienced employee goes to the distance, that's one story, right? He was probably well-efficiencyd in the workplace, and in general, he would keep the same efficiency there working from his home. And when we take a very young employee who hasn't worked, maybe his first job, maybe he's only come from college, and if he's got a full connection with his colleagues, a Wednesday, um, I'm gonna get some work discipline on the working regime, and he's just at home, and he's got some calls, some tasks, so, uh, start-ups, start-ups, start working out and, uh, starting to work effectively on the remote is very hard, right? And there's gonna be a balance here anyway, because, well, they can't get away at all.
Staff will be very good in some ways.
Elnar, I'm not gonna agree, so I'm not gonna say yes. Just to make another point of view, yes, absolutely. Look, a friend view is that if we take experienced managers, managers, and sales managers, and so on, they most often have, aaaa, they're the most likely to be very good, like-- they have, very, very advanced emotional intelligence, if that's what you're saying. And they can, whatever the results of their work, they can give them what-- they can explain them. And checking what they did or didn't, it's impossible. While people may have one, two, three, four years of work, they have the most measured tasks. Yeah, agree that it's likely that a person will be ineffective-- that an inexperienced person will be ineffective in the remote very, very high, but it's likely to be easily measured because the challenges are More atomar, less dependency, aaa, to measure it bye. And with more experienced people, it might be difficult to identify a problem, it might be difficult to measure, it's hard to understand what happened. It's a problem with a man or something. I think that there is, uh, aah, I think there's still, that is, the first question of efficiency, and the second thing that can be measured. And, yeah, usually with experienced professionals, it's hard to do that.
Hana's doing it, Sasha, if you put one on another, then the p-cut. It's a problem.
Yeah. Well, in corporations, it's known, as in-- well, I've seen a lot of people, like seniors, over a decade of experience, who-- who have been in all situations more sub-work--- well, A slave, huh? And they have a kind of skilled connection to all life cases, they can get out of any situation, more less. I mean, I've seen enough of this. And I think that, yes, in America, uh, top-- often, it's the emotional intelligence that's the ability to get out of any situation, and explaining any
situation.
Well, Tanya, for example. Look, by the way, about the remote office. Tanya couldn't work so remotely from the house that she built a separate building next to her house, a separate office to work in a separate office, built a building near the house, set herself up. Well, Tanya just wants to do something around her all the time, develop.
No, well, I've worked in the office for a year and I'm so tired that, although I had a very nice office, a very nice team, but still here, you know, even more motivation was still closer to that. The kids, because they're still small. I don't know what I'm doing with them all day, but at least I'm here and I can influence something. Here. And apart from home, it's perfect, because it's, uh, quiet, isolated, nobody's worried, but it's probably 70% of my time I'm doing a personal contact with clients like that. And I noticed that you could send-- do as the same presentation, and that outcome would depend on her personal presentation or did you just send her by mail? Man like that: no...
Personally, do you mean, in a personal meeting or in Zuma?
In a private meeting. I don't know how we'd even have, like, the office I worked in, right in the office, we had a facial ban on presenting in Zuma, unless the client insists on it. We should have invited you to a private meeting. Well, that's a very high level, uh, designer bureau. Here, I understand why. Because it's a perfectly different level of client service when you meet and discuss it as and, uh, level, uh, phony, client's profile is increasing, too. I mean, I have a very, very, very, very remote job.
Yeah, of course, I was just kidding about your separate, small-scale building.
I mean, you're like a man with four kids, I think I
understand why I have a home.
Well, I ran out, too. There are three kids in my partner's house.
So, Sasha, by the way, I wonder if you had a choice right now, and you have an office where I've been in Moscow, right? If he were to take it right now and move it here, to the States--
The office.
Where would you like to be?
The office.
Home or office?
The office.
In the office?
The choice would not be. The office is guaranteed, the office is guaranteed. And I think I'm just having a lot of different projects and different projects with different people, and they're not focused in the same place. Once I have a concentration, and once I have a concentration of a little closer to people, I hope that the office will come. Because, of course, personal meetings, some connection, a trip to the office and a walk to the office, well, a little other space, time is a good time. It doesn't mean I'm having a bad time, but it's another-- another, of course, atmosphere, other turnover. And still depends on the kind, to be honest, of the business you're doing. I mean, there are kinds of businesses that make it very good for the manager or maybe the staff member to work from the house. There are business and management that can't be done. And you mentioned Moscow there. If I have seven hundred people working there and, uh, hundreds of thousands of clients, well, you're not-- you're-- your office's efficiency, it's 100 times more. You're not even in the number of tasks you're doing, you're not gonna solve a lot of questions, you're just not gonna solve them. Because you're up, you go, you meet some other people, you start talking to them about some things, you get differently when you've got your whole day full, it's different. And yet, some things, I'm going to the Stresses in a few days in Turkey, and this is one educational business, and, uh, there's a team coming in, and I haven't had the opportunity. We'll work together and online. Well, online is a little different. And when you're dating them in the offline, that's the opportunity to deal with other episodes and start other systems of the future. Well, other things are totally-- you can talk about some other stuff because I don't know what to do with Zoom for four hours. I mean, I'm supposed to be on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, where I'm gonna be on the team for four hours with-- I'm running like my part of the stratsy. And even though I'm not involved in that O.R.
project, a mini-partner, but it's me, it's not-- I'm not--
It's me, it's not-- I can't do it on the Zoom in all my, uh, skills.
I'm curious, yes. Last time we were just talking, so short, yeah, asked Tanya, wanted her to have a human robot at her house. And Boston Dynamics was just saying that, well, it was a while ago that they did a robot that moves like a human. But it's very strange, really, it's getting up. Look at the video that you didn't see. It looks pretty scary again. I have a scary graduation today. Well, that's what I'm interested in, isn't it? The news was well described that, first, it was all in the collaboration with Hyundai auto-producer that these robots would be used in the workplace. That's the first. And the second thing they're in there is, the most important thing is, is it human-like, right? They can manipulate two hands at the same time. So if before, for example, robots manipulators, they're bigger, there, grab some sort of device, grab some objects, that's what they can transfer, then there's just two hands that can have some objects. Take, move, like, like, like, like, like, like, like, "Chuck," right? So some synchronization is in the mood. And I'm a little bit curious. I've been digging up Boston Dynamics, and what robots they still have, which is already used in the production. But besides this dog that is often shown, they have a robot that can move with a manipulator's hand either in warehouses or in production and, accordingly, in some kind of way. objects to move. And when that robot humanoid showed up, uh, I got, uh, curious, and it's just a pyar-hode, right? Show me how this robot can get out of the floor, turn around and, there, change direction. Or is there a real need for human-like robots? Because on the one hand, when we talk about production, well, the eye-to-eye manipulators are coming up with the welds that are standing on the car assembly line, and there's one or two of them. They do, and there's no need for humans. And here, uh, the company says that this is the form-based de facto that will greatly expand the scope of these robots, right? Because they're released into a world that's created for people, right? Because this robot's shape, the way it moves, it's just, uh, the most suited to the world, which is a lot more, uh, action that can be done with this de facto form. What do you think?
What thoughts do you have on this?
Like when it comes to making a task, from and to. Even Tesla has failed, yes, in conditions, yes, er, well, traffic rules, they are very clear, more or less regulated, and the navigationer, they are very clear about what should be done and more than less, I'm not sure how it should be done. And so far, this task has not been accomplished. Robots who have many more degrees of freedom and, in the idea, many tasks they can do, I have no idea how they can do things from beginning to end. I am, yes, and I am, so in this plan... for me in this plan, Waymo and Tesla are like a lacmus paper, I guess, right? So until they can make a cool, cool decision from and to, uh, rudely, for drones, for drones, until Amazon can make a decision with drones, uh, I'm gonna be It's a little hard to imagine that someone else can do it in the Concuemer Seg-- that someone can make a decision in the Consymer segment. Still, the dron is also delivered, well, the task is quite understandable, regulated. And Amazon is also testing the delivery of drones. The drones are used in their warehouses successfully, but they have not been able to scan for the time being in the pla-- for the Consymer delivery plan. Another example. There are just a lot of examples where much simpler robot versions have been used. For example, robots tried to use to deliver food through student campus. And these little robots still go to Santa Monica, uh, like, instead of a courier. I mean, but I, I just saw how such robots even act. It's just a lot in America, where these trottoires are, they're not very flat, there's a different kind of crash, there's a robot that can just get confused and not get out. I mean, I think that if even with navigation, there are problems with, like, the most-- even if there are problems with navigation in the most populated and most studied areas, like robots, like, Humano-humanish robots can do a wide range of tasks, I can't even imagine. I think it's more like, as the aspi-- it's more aspirational, which is why the future is clear, but we're far enough, I think.
It's like we said, the sor has post-sale and the robot video has post-sale, too.
When I first moved here, I remember my shock of, uh, not being a cultural shock at all, but when I'm still walking down the street and driving this very nice robot, uh, with food, and on it. It says it's a delivery of food. Uh, they were, but then they-- they got somewhere. And I was just asking, and it turns out they were taken out of San José because there were a lot of situations where they were taken, those robots, opened, took food and whatever. But I remember, as Sasha says, they were often on the sidewalk and, like, they were spinning around, didn't know where to go, because I don't know if they could get into that hole or, uh, they had a program. I'm not a stud.
And there's a city of Innopolis under Kazan, where the same kind robots ride with delivery.
And there was some news that this poor thing was stuck in the snow, and the others helped dig it out of the snow just because, well, the clots here sometimes cover the snow.
I want to discuss this last topic today, remember LLM and OpenAI. What-- now has OpenAI episodes with European legislation with GDPR. What they need, uh, at the request of European users, uh, they need to change their data. I've got an example, uh, that LLM's chorus has been learning about some data, learning, for example, and remembering the wrong date of birth there. How do you change that date of birth? I was thinking. Uh, so my sister runs the requisition unit for a big company. She's got, like, a ten or a dozen countries. I'm talking about a lot of things. She's been so consulting on automation and CRM systems. She says to me, "Sash, do you know how many people in Europe agree with a bunch? That's when there's a type of accept cook coming up or down there. She says, " You press the box, accept the dolls or not? " I'm asking. I say, " I always press accept ". She says to me: " 90 per cent of Europeans are pressuring decline ". I say, "Why are they doing this? She said, "Well, they have a habit." I say, "I press the cuisine to keep me on this site, keeping some of the data I've made, uh, offered a personalized conclusion, a choice, and so on. A bunch of details. And there is a very complicated rule in the GDPR that I think very much slows Europe into development, and it's incredibly slowing Europe into technological development. I mean, on the one hand, we all are dehydrated, uh, controlled or uncontrollable. On the other hand, if we start-- we want to control everything completely and thereby slow down progress. In Europe, I think it's just a slowdown of progress, but at least I'm under Rome, and I'm underneath Rome. You're talking about some robot delivery guy telling the little ones that went to San José and they went to Moscow. There's no delivery here, is there? There's probably a little in Rome, and a little under Rome, a little under Rome, a little under Rome, a-e-e, one or two companies bring something there.
If we go back to OpenAI, LLM, uh, to GDPR, uh, how will this problem be when it comes to, like, the US, Europe or China, or something?
When it comes to the way the State, uh, looks at LLM development, it's very hard to understand, I'm very hard to understand. The only thing I can say is that France has taken the most serious step in this. They, they made a big AI-stratape ecosystem. Mistral, Hugging Face, probably the most famous. Ah, they have their optimization companies. Well, I think they have their own companies that are working to optimize the chips. And most importantly, yes, whato Mistral, well, as if Mistral is well-positioned to be, uh, the people's LLM for the European Union. It's amazing to me that other States don't... don't incubate the same production starts as national LLM inside. I mean, I think it's a... quite obvious action-- it's a buying GP-- I think, yeah, for every country, it must be obvious that we should invest, there's hundreds of millions a year to make sure that we have a million dollars. To develop a national LLM and to have thousands of H100, in blatant words, to be competitive.
To be competitive if, for example, well, know-- if, for example, the development of open source, uh, stops, right?
You can explain a little more simple, because I think that H100 is more competitive, makes its LLM, it's very difficult.
Uh, well, not too hard. This is a very interesting subject, by the way. And just a little, uh, explaining the issue to people.
So the models that train, there, Google and OpenAI, they practice at tens of thousands, uh, GPU, if not hundreds of thousands. And the most popular video map is H100, NVIDIA H100. And now, uh, NVIDIA will release, well, a new generation of video cards, I think, B200, if I'm not mistaken, by the end of the year. Ah, and access to this video-- well, uh, these video cards are in the z-- they're all almost in the shorter. I mean, it's actually a very interesting situation that most of the video cards that are produced-- produced by NVIDIA do not have a shorter. So, in principle, they can be bought in almost unlimited quantities. There are tens of thousands of other videocarts that can be easily bought, and H100 is difficult. But they have-- but they're the most effective because they're the most effective to practice big models. Uh, for us, uh, for me, it looks like a cho, uh, a-a-m, there's now a few open source LLM that's getting quality like ChatGPT. So, ChatGPT, which was wrapped more than two years ago, right? I think it's important for every, uh, government-- for each State to have a competitive, competitive LLM. Well, in particular, because LLM can be used as, you know, like LLM always has two sides, like every technology, two sides of the medal. And that could be used as, uh... It will be understandable that LLM, she can be very convincing, convincingly express ideas, ideas, rudely, and that can also be used for fraud, for example, right? And so it's a staging- and it's clear that LLM can be developed to help prevent fraud. I think it is important for States to invest in this regard.
An interesting view of the whole proo is that the LLM of its own is necessary within the State.
There was a-- there was a study interesting from MIT. They have drawn up a list of episodes and tried, you know, on questions that might guide the model ' s policy. Policy, right? So, uh, and, uh-- and at MIT, we had a resurrection question, actually, here in mankind, well, there's standard questions from a series of things that if there's a man driving a high speed car, he's got to get hit. or, there, younger people or older people. How do you-- what do you do? And there are many questions like that, actually, they're like, like, 100 if they're not more. And the question, and the fact that people at MIT wanted to understand, the MIT resurrections: is there a right answer? Well, it can be seen that the answers vary greatly across countries and each country will need to put in a policy for its LLM. That's very logical.
Anyway, it's really hard, just like a robot. So, Tanya, you're not gonna have a robot home anytime soon. Stop! Two dogs, cat. Buy another cat or tiger, but robot, we're not waiting. We use a robot piping and a window robot, windows. Thank you, everyone. We're at ToTheMoon graduation every Friday night on YouTube. We also launched a channel in Instagram with, uh, the best, interesting moments. You write your comments and it's important to sign on the channel. That's a strong support, and we're on our way. Before we meet!