The company should start at $8 trillion. But the most interesting thing about it is a million robots. And was the main logo of Apple until 1998.
There's no wish to run.
He's sleeping in Seoul, he's having a night. This is a former owner of the Yandex. OpenAI, really, doesn't have $300 billion. That I started buying them last year, at the end of the year, stock.
Yeah, we've been talking about what we're all old. We've got 17 iPhones.
The Calendar turned literally just now, yeah, from 16 to 17.
Yeah. And Eldar shared that it turns out there were no 17, and I got better.
I'm pretty, I'm pretty clear enough-- dos-- well, I remember so clearly how, uh, iPhone showed up. And I didn't have the first iPhone, but one of the first ones showed up. And when Apple Store came along, because before Apple Store, uh, I had a comrade in, uh, Dubai, and he called me. We had a software company. Says, "We're gonna make mobile applications." What's your mobile applications? I went with Nokia then. Here, and we started making mobile applications later, maybe a year or a half. That's interesting, of course.
Okay, so what? Hello, everyone! Uh, before we go, uh, to Apple, and I really don't know how much he, uh, super-actual, wants to start. I'm, uh, supporting new technologies and interested in testing new things. And, as we know, Ilon Mack released a drone taxi Robotaxi in Austin and Texas, in Austin, Texas. And, uh, I, uh, waited, waited, waited, waited for it to be here in Bay Area, in the Silicon Valley, because it was the second location that showed up. And there's news that we can download the app. I downloaded the app literally the next day and c-- and waited for the group waitlist. And hop, me, I waitlist literally there for one or two days, chick and waitlist approves me. I think so: oh! That was this week, uh, Monday, I think. I was just about to go to Apple Park. Here, and I called...
Taxi.
I called-- well, I should have tested a drone-free cab. So I'm calling a drone taxi called this Robotaxi app. There's nothing there, well, there's no line. Uh, right away, when I started-- the only thing I started building the route, I saw it was very cheap, well, cheaper than usual on the taxi market. And by the way, uh, I think they started it in Austin, it was a flat price, at least, of $4 or seven dollars. Well, that's not a price for the United States, is it? Iia called a cab. So I'm standing, I think I'm gonna be rilling now, so I'm gonna go to a drone taxi. A cab is coming, and there's a man behind the wheel. I'm like, " Uh, my sister and I sat down and drove here, uh, Stanford's right next door, and we went to Stanford to have coffee. And, um, it turns out that, well, he's the only thing he said, "Good day, don't pay attention to me, I'm not here," like. And we're on our way.
Funny.
I said, "When you're-- I'm a ska-- "When you're not really there?" He said, "This is you asking for support." I read that they just don't have a license, uh, here for use, uh, in a cab without a man. And I read, by the way, that it turns out that Waymo started with the cameramen inside the car, which is probably perfectly normal, right? Here. And we went there. He didn't touch any wheels, so he didn't do anything at all. Oh, well, we're here, and the car was totally on its own, probably, um, just as good as the self-driving Tessla itself, drove to the garage, and somehow, by planting us, uh, where the cars are planted. She must have been having a hard time parking, and we're gone. We've had coffee. I should have come home sometime. They called again Robotaxi. The same car came. Here's the same car.
Same, yeah.
Although she was ten minutes away, yes. The driver is like, "Hi." Here, and we're going on, back. Clearly there's no sign of the driver, no driver's rutting, nothing. According to Ilona Mask, they said they were planning, uh, that the drivers would be gone before the end of the year. What's this all about? What's all this about? I'm just getting that riles.
Uh, so, uh, that Ilon Mac, I don't know if you saw or not, who didn't, don't, don't guess, right? And the audience is very interesting. You saw how much Ilon Mack was like, uh, Director General Tesla, who runs Tesla, he's the owner, but he's not the 100 percent owner, and secondly, he's, uh, the CEO. How much did he make a new bonus? Remember that story, yeah, he had a bonus, I think it's fifty or a billion dollars. I've been asking a man recently how many people who don't live in the US, how much Ilona Mask's bonus was. And he said, "Well, $100 million." I really broke it. I realized how much people don't understand America's market. Well, I mean, how much people don't understand. And I'm telling him, "Do you even know he's the richest man in the world?" Did you really, yesterday, there was a dispute that the richest man in the world, uh, the owner of Oracle?
When you buy stock, they fall down.
As Dima Smogen said, "If Volkick Smogen buys, you need to sell. If Volkick Smoken sells, we need to buy. "
No.
How's your idea?
Well, there must be something in billions. From the standpoint.
Fifty billion already.
Well, it was fifty, well, twice, it's doubled, 100.
You, you, you're the same person who, well, as money-smart, even you've had a Bentley car out there recently, so... You know, Tanya, Tanya. Trillion dollars, trillion dollars, he's made a bonus, trillion by 2,000 in the thirty-fifth year. So why am I telling you this with robotaxy? But it's important news, of course. Because it's an indicator that the company owner believes in the company. It's up ahead, right? Because such statements will still be trillion times. The company should start at $8 trillion. She's got to sell, there's twenty million Tessl, and she's got to have ten million signatures in Tesla on different subscriptions. But the most interesting thing about it is a million robots. It's fun. Well, there's a million robotaxys there that's supposed to be the one that's finally here. That's very interesting. My wife was glad to see a robotaxy home in the valley, because Waymo isn't getting us. Waymo, I think Mountain View is covering, we're not getting there. And because she said that our oldest daughter was afraid to drive taxi taxiists forever, and she would have gone unmanned. But I read the rules, it's like it's only been possible since I was 18. So you can't drive a cab if you have a certain age. That's a trillion of dollars. What do you think our audience is on this subject?
Write about trillion dollars, uh, compensation.
Speaking of the driver. I remember the time that Waymo and the driver were driving all the time. That was it. I was living in San Francisco, yeah. And I've seen them in the neighboring cars that they were. Well, there was always someone driving. My son was in a year with something, three years ago, about a year ago. That's why. And then they disappeared sharply. So I think it's a standard scheme.
It was written there, too, to be necessary. Well, maybe because this man, when we were in the second time, what was important was when we first got in, I saw him driving the wheel. Well, he was driving us like a wheel. I mean, the first time I thought the car was here, and the car didn't actually come. Here.
They're reading a little.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Right here, there.
I mean, it's a little bit, it's a little, well, or not a little, it's chiteria, right?
Like Full Self-Driving, too, like not exactly full and not exactly self-driving, but moving in that direction.
Yeah, but we've already told a lot about levels. And just in the past, I said that my friend from the design of AI in San Francisco said that Level Three was in total completely realized. The question is again, you see. So it's a question of laws to even let a car out there without a rudder, no rear-view mirrors, well, side mirrors, and so on. I mean, it's a matter of time. So, Apple?
I mean, it's a matter of time. So, Apple? Apple, by the way, it turns out this logo I have made by Rob Jenoff in, uh, 1977 and was the main logo of Apple until 1998. And he, these stripes are colorful to underline Apple two color dispensers. Here. And, um, a lot of places used, a lot of places. And you're gonna... and you're gonna... and you're gonna... you know what that is? The writing itself, uh, the writing is fun. Well, what do you say about, uh-- I'm thinking, that's last year, uh, speaking, uh, on-- and telling them when they were talking about Apple Intelligence and artificial intelligence, and everything, they're saying, That was the first time that the bet was unprepared for the hip and was not hit, yes, this year--
Mm-hmm.
...not race--- now they're not talking about, in fact, the artificial intelligence they're not talking about.
They sold the presentation last year, uh, iPhone, and they said that there, six months before you, these functions would come. So people there were watching the presentation with the advance, yeah. I mean, you're buying now, but the Apple Intelligence, we're working on it, it's gonna be there for six months, it's gonna be there, it's gonna be like this. But, first of all, nothing came. Second, well, a little weird, yeah, there's definitely a second time that no one would buy, probably. So, here we have already focused on iron, a little different design, new colors, autonomy. Well, as they always do. Just got this six-month advance advance that was last year.
I think they might not have made that advance, and yet people would have bought phones, yes, and they wouldn't. I mean, they were, of course, wrong. Or someone Tim Cook was very much there promised something inside, or they were afraid, maybe, yeah, maybe scared, scared, scared of what was going on in the market. Scared...
Mm-hmm.
...that if it doesn't come out, it's like a total collapse. Although, in fact, people, uh, don't have a super-live yet, well, not yet, a little bit of a super-live on these things.
By the iron itself, iPhone is meant to be interesting. Uh, added a new iPhone Air Seventeen, yes, it hasn't been. A little, a little different, though, it seems, as a matter of fact, that's a pretty good one. Still, they're getting something new, yeah. Before that, they were iPhone mini doing little, now they're iPhone Air. In general, well, the plus-minus on the neumings is no longer confused with MacBook, that's with the iPhone. Looks interesting. Uh, no desire to run, no, like you're not already hiding, like, there's, like, a camera, no autonomy, or, uh, a computer power. Although, I think they said, they've been pumping enough of the fron-flontal camera. That's probably good, because, after all, IPhone's frontal, well, mine, at least, uh, has a n-n-n-n-not enough to, uh, uh, uh, our current videos, have to pee, in the back. I'm writing. What do you think about the new iPhone? Sasha, you didn't buy more? You didn't leave a prediction?
Yeah, weird. It's weird that Sasha's not in line.
I'm a corn--
In the morning.
I bought it.
Five from the tent.
Look, I don't need to stand in line, yeah. Don't stand in line, you're getting everything. And in fact, the first week of sales, there's sales...
That's not interesting.
Starting on September 19th. There's a burnt out of it, so it's better not to go in there.
And they're delivering home. The only thing I ordered right away, I ordered, uh, those, the headphones. Well, considering that I-I'm still using them all the time, there's a improved battery, improved noise-freeing. Uh, I don't care, I don't care, there, uh, what's a translator, I don't know how he works. Maybe he's working, and it's gonna give you some good, uh, but I can still turn the phone on. I don't have one of those, so it's necessary to talk to people all day, I don't know. It might be people's business if he has a nanny, like Spanish only, and a man needs to speak, yes. Or, there, the gardener only talks about something-- or work-- something's going on. That's not clear. Here, uh, that's what the headphones are, uh, heartbeat and heart rhythm, you know, how they do it...
Here's France, Sasha, you're going.
Oh, yeah!
You're going to France, and they're very inclined.
Yeah, by the way.
If not in Paris...
They speak English.
Oh!
Yeah, if you're not in Paris, but there's a little deeper in there, then of course it is.
In France, I worked at a French company in an outfit design company and I went a lot to France. French have a subject that even if they know English, they don't speak English, yes. So they have such a precondition...
Platinums are like that.
They know English a lot, yes. They won't speak English with you, so, well, I'll be in Paris, uh, and I don't really care, yes. But I'm right, by the way. There I can probably use a little more, a little more use-- so, the headphones understand what I ordered, and they're interested in part--- uh, they're just life-saving, like that, yeah. I'm still talking in headphones, especially if it's a quality and a better sound, and less of my health is a factor. With regard to phones, as our phones are in the cell phone signature system and everything, of course, we'll still be updating them automatically. And, uh, there's just a way to do it, they're automatically being updated. I would have updated because I'm taking a lot of content. There's definitely a better camera, plus there's still a better battery, there, less scratches and something. It's a very calm act for me, yes. I mean, it's a simple act. Someone-- some people, maybe there's no point and, um... But Air looks fun. I don't understand why this phone is needed. Look, I don't understand why he needs it.
Yeah, I wonder what his advantage is over the regular phone.
I just wear it without a chick. Yeah, I wear a phone without a hyphen-- but I have, really, these Apple, these are Apple Care Services, which if I broke, I got changed right away, um, screen, and so on. Although, by the way, I broke my back glass almost a month ago. I don't change it because, well, there's a scratch, I don't pay attention to it, do I?
And I think I'm gonna change it as well. Okay. But, uh, Air, he's unaware. I mean, it's definitely a phone without a chick and, uh, it's about a camera and a camera is bad, and the camera's bad.
If you match MacBook Air, yes, that's the point I used to buy it when I used to fly on a plane a long time ago, and it was easy, but it was strong enough to do things there.
Yeah.
That was his advantage over MacBook Pro, although Pro was stronger. I see it, he's been more suited to my programmes. But I'm still a board fan. Here. And if you take the usual iPhone and iPhone Air, I understand how much Elnar explained to me only the appearance, the weight, the size, the size, nothing different.
Well, you have a delicate phone, and it's heavy enough. I mean, it's not much easier, is it? Not like MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, but still he has the upper part, there's a large cell block and, uh, the processor, with the computing capacity, with everything there, right? And that's why he's officially a little bit thin, and somewhere like that, he's getting so fuzzy. But all about these new iPhones, Sasha, is all the simulous stuff. So, they're basically changing the cameras' location and changing this block with cameras for what? To make you visually one of the iPhones of another, so when you don't know, you put a phone down on the table. That's where the cameras are, yes, yes, it was clear. And this one with the last iPhone.
That's what you didn't do.
Where I live, I don't think it matters at all. Yeah?
Yeah. But what would they do? So they make them visually great, just to, uh, understand, that's what--
Just logical.
...a generation, in a rude way, huh? The same colors. They added a very cool red color, but as you have previous iPhones, there's no such red color. Now this is a redhead, and it's clear from far away that either the line was standing or ordered.
You intrigued me, Elnar.
Look at that redhead, cool.
I'll do it.
No, they've actually reduced the number of flowers.
He loves color.
No, they've actually reduced the number of flowers, I mean.
You know what?
It's black, it's black, yeah. They have dark blue and a car salon.
In a few months, they'll release a limite version or just release new colors. There's gonna be another hip.
Yeah, yeah, some color, yeah.
New color Deep Blue Sky, huh?
Deep Blue Sky.
Yeah.
Well, that's the kind. We're just not telling.
Although, Sasha, you're not gonna tell me about your shirt.
About the equipment, the phones. Well, I couldn't sit in another shirt, equipment, phones, and so on, we're not telling. And it's more like you look at it, first, two-- well, it's gonna be interesting, anyway, if you like iPhone and so on. A huge number of people with iPhones. And the other thing I did yesterday was by accident, I accidentally asked a man who had Androids, "How do you feel about the new Apple?" Then I realized he had Androids. And so... "How do you like the new Apple?"
So, like a shit in iPhone-
You went down the edge yesterday, Sasha.
The second, of course, as Sasha Mashrabov says, who-- who is not today, he sleeps in Seoul, he has a night. Oh, c-- we're muslim and we're floating this. How much can you make her feel? There's nothing going to happen anyway. What do you think--
Dead subject, yes.
... about the dead Apple theme? Uh, Apple has artificial intelligence, I think they finally took a strategy to finish and then spill when they work. I think it's another time, huh? Maybe, uh, everyone should do a ha-ha-ha at this point because Apple, by the way, hasn't changed the value of the stock in a year.
Yesterday was a very interesting precedent, and it was an interesting precedent. I shared a sister with me yesterday that there was a company like Nebius. This is a company of former Yandex owner, basically, you know, the Yandex. I wonder if this company came to the $2 billion cost yesterday, and, well, she's got a run-up.
One deal.
The cell was price, yes, yes. For, uh, conditionally, one deal, there, c-- it's like Oracle grew up for a deal, there with OpenAI, right? They're a sc-- you know that OpenAI and Oracle made a deal to buy three hundred billion dollars? Here. OpenAI, really, doesn't have $300 billion, but, well, I see--
No.
...that they'll be attracted, and they'll have them. I don't think the OpenAI has a problem, do I? I think the OpenAI has no problem with trillion now, but just the question of the right thing to do. So, uh, Nebius grew up with one deal. Sixteen, I think, Elnar, billions of deals with Microsoft. Cool guys.
I think so, yes.
What I'm wondering is, at the most fabulous time, Yandex wasn't worth the cost of Nebius. And Nebius is basically a start-up on the securities market and the market at all. They're great, yes. It's GPU, GPU, selling GPU, and I think they're going to be a big success and their shares will grow even more. I have at least 100 percent plus. Aaaa, no financial recommendations again, I remember.
Everything that the Volkick buys, Wolczyk...
More
Yeah, all that Wolf-- but Nebius, Nebius, I think I started buying them last year, at the end of the year, right? And I generally like the shares of technology infrastructure companies. There are different things, there's light, AOI. Uh, well, there are different companies, and there's a whole list of them. And now, of course, with them, by the way, except Elnar, Oracle and their Nebius, there, slide another, at least in my briefcase, there are 15 show companies, exactly which are all CODs, there, the fee, The clouds. Well, a whole spectrum of rocks on the twenty-thirty-forty, probably 40 percent. And at least the market expects to be... logically, I think it makes sense that infrastructure will be invested. I mean, it's from every cheek that says it, and without it, it's impossible to move. And what's in the infrastructure-- you mean something?
Yeah, we talked about nine to ten months ago just like Nebius and said they were very good at it.
I talked about him, didn't I?
Well, we, we talked about this company, and Sasha Mashrabov said that, basically, there's a parole in America, there's a big COD, there's a China-owned, and Europe's kind of a little different. I'm not. Yeah, they do, but they're not very big, not very modern, and so on. And Nebius, they are in Europe building huge centres of their computing centres just to sell those resources. And they are geographically well situated in terms of nearing a large number of consumers, yes, if not the United States. And, uh, as far as infrastructure is concerned, the company's experience also appears to have quite a lot of technical expertise from there, you know, from Yandex, probably very
good ones too.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's what happened. It was there. And I want to be here, so the news is coming. I think it's probably more research, for now, that a group of researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences announced the creation of a new artificial, uh, like that, Spiking Brain model, yeah, working on a principle close to human brain. What are they talking about? Which, unlike the large language models that process all words in the entry text and require a large volume of data, I simply say, uh, computing resources, require large computing resources, their resources. This Spiking Brain is simulating neural brain spikes and activating neurons and focusing on the last fragments. And according to their preliminary experiments, this approach allows a new model to work in the twenty-five tyres, 100 times faster than similar systems like ChatGPT, yes. Moreover, the Chinese model, according to the authors, is not dependent on NVIDIA chips and can operate on alternative apartheid platforms. It's interesting, yes, in fact, that there's still a ero of equipment and that's all very much developing now. But of course, I-- well, there's a feeling, yes, that there will be models that are more energy-efficient, more resource-intensive, there, and so on, yes. And there'll be, though, perhaps, such big resurrections as they're building, they'll make it possible for these models to create something, well, really serious.
There's all that AGI, ASI, there or whatever, uh, these are parameters. Hey, listen, I was watching an interview with Lex Friedman, with, uh, this, with the CEO of Google. I'm, uh, Google's CEO said AGI was a new term, right? I didn't pay attention to that. And I think we Elnar, we've never used this term, right? You're even still working on artificial intelligence training, and we haven't used AGI. And what Carpathians made of him, huh? His Carpathians have come up with it.
I don't know about AGI. Carpathians, of course, inherited a lot of Vip-coding terminology. That's his story. As for AGI, I don't know. Uh, everyone is a common artificial intelligence as if, uh, uh, a-a-a-a-not really--
This is ASI super intelligence, which is a very new story. And as for this AGI, the general artificial intelligence was probably there as if it was before, but it wasn't exactly on the hip. But, uh, the word that we've been using has been the last few years, yes. And ASI is definitely new, yes.
Maybe he was talking about ASI because he mentioned the exact thing Carpathians were driving, Carpathians were driving. I may have just misunderstood, ignored, yes, in terms of terms. But again, there's no point in actually, I guess those terms are kind of over-discuting. It's just some pre-emptive, something's going on. Because even what's called now or was used to be, remember, I was always there, I was such an adversary, and when someone said, "We're teaching artificial intelligence engineers." I always said, "What is the artificial intelligence? Artificial intelligence. Look at the movies. What, what is a real artificial intelligence? Like, it's not a real artificial intelligence. And now, not a real artificial intelligence, yes." And, well, these terms probably allow, that's how the machines have levels, just in the-- the cars, they're more easily used, right? This level one, level two, level three. Although maybe ordinary people don't understand that much.
Yeah, that's right. Well, uh, you just started talking about this Chinese, uh, start-up, the model they did, and that they were inspiring the way the brain works. It's generally interesting that many studies are on this side. Not exactly the brain work. Now, more about the psychology of decision-making, about how people are judged, there, uh, the pros and cons. Well, uh, lately, I've been getting some Tversky-Kahneman networks or Tversky-Kahneman, uh, loss of function. Most people probably heard our viewers about Amos Twerski and Daniel Kaneman. Uh, got the Nobel Economic Prize in due course. Uh, there's a pretty famous book called "Dumi slowly, decide fast." Yeah, and, uh, they had a concept, they were pushing it, that people, uh, don't respond as much as they react to negatives. So the effect of the negative is much more than the positive. The positive is accepted for the plus-minus, which is how it should be. And any negative is being taken very negatively. And this concept is being put on, uh, it's not like it's a big confusing thing. They're putting on neural learning techniques, uh, to make more fines where the model is wrong and slightly less fine, uh, just a little less intimidating, so, say, for the good, right? So we're trying to make the models a little more precise. I'm a little tomatoes in the commentaries now, but somehow, similar things are again and OpenAI in their article, and they're saying why models are hallucinating, right? They're the one who explained that we're kind of encouraging a response, and we don't punish mistakes. So, with the other equal model, it's easier to guess than to say no, right? And they-- people are the ones who are motivated by the pattern of hallucinating. And like one of the decisions they might come to, they could be punished for mistakes, not just for guessing. Yeah, and so, like, on the one hand, there are psychological ends that develop, well, absolutely not in AI, AGI, ASI, and anything, and they--
I'm all I want. And they're moving gradually to, uh, modeling, and some mathematical relays are already in
place.
Yeah, I wonder, of course, how this is gonna be, how it's gonna move. By the way, AGI. Indeed, in 97, the term of Marc Avram Hubert physicist appeared in the text on military technology. Here. And it's become more widely used, there, in two thousand, and so on. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh,
Second arth-
No, no.
The first is Artificial General Intelligence.
And the other is Artificial Superintelligence.
What's their difference? AGI, as I recall, is it a man's mind, right? If it's so on your fingers. What's the second one? I don't understand.
When you stop giving money to AGI and it's getting too much around it, you need to come up with a new term that you can use money.
Yeah, change the flour.
That's how ASI came along.
I get it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I remember that trick.
Let's just do it, honestly. New terms will be guaranteed. Yeah?
Sure.
New terms and hyi would be guaranteed, and new terms would probably relate to technology, as LLM, LRM, and so on. Even everything that's happening now, everyone calls LLM, though it's inside, like, reasoning models, yeah, not language models.
And so on. I want to mention that the other day, uh, interesting, there was a precedent again. Remember, we told the in one of the episodes that Antropic was being very serious about being prosecuted for learning books, uh, books. And, uh, eventually, we have now made a deal to pay the authors at least $1 and a billion in a collective action. All the authors who filed this collective action will be paid a half-billion. And, uh, here, by the way, it was in San Francisco, and there's gonna be $30,000 for each of the 500 thousand books, that's what the Antropics are supposed to be downloaded from the pirate online library.
Well, that's very cool, because first of all, they're gonna close this question, and second of all, they've literally just attracted 13 billion in evaluators, where, how much? They've got about eighty-three, I think.
I don't think that's a problem.
Yeah.
I think they should grow up in the evaluation, because-
Well, they actually had a 60-one in the spring, and they're attracted, and now five to six months before, they've reached 100-eighty-one billion. They are totally uneven, uh, by number of users, active users with the OpenAI, but they are almost halfway there already. It's a pretty exciting fact for me.
Yeah.
I'm sure it's the most important news. Now, really, the other day, but I think there's gonna be an endless, uh, massive story about, uh, going to different companies and laws. And on the one hand, I literally read yesterday that the senator, one senator, uh, Tom Cruise, is Texas, I guess, yes, senator? Governor, I guess.
I think so. I think so.
He, he lobbys, he lobbys a sandbox in America for artificial intelligence, so that companies that new ones come up so that they can do whatever they want for two years in this sandbox, you know, I'm sure they-- there's no regulation, no problem, and everything. On the other hand, it's just now that the new order is in order that, uh, the Federal Trade Commission has filed, uh, this is now, I don't know how much, 11 minutes ago. The Federal Trade Commission filed, uh, an action, an order from OpenAI, Google, Mete, XAI, it's Elon Musk, yes, Snape, et cetera. To understand, how their artificial--- chat-bots work in terms of negative impact on children and teenagers. And I don't even know what the negative impact on children and the tynegers is. Because, obviously, modern chat-bots can, um, well, have a full impact on negative, right? Just as you can fully positively influence. I mean, it's so broad a format, considering you want to get what you want to get, what kind of extras you want, so on. Here.
And the fight will continue, I think, for a very long time.
I'd like to share that news, and I'd like to ask you, uh, in the comments, to tell me a little bit. Anyway, I finally got an invait from Perplexity to plant this new browser. A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a- There, but somehow, yeah, that's a browser that's built into, uh-oh, an agent. And I tried a little bit to play with him. Uh, not so much of a case I've been able to figure out, but I haven't been that long. Literally, I was sitting around for one night, and I was just hanging. But, Tanya, that's what you said that you wanted, for example, to have integration with Google Calendar, to be integrated with the post office.
Mm-hmm.
That's where it's done pretty easily.
Yeah.
So you're asking him, like, "What kind of meetings do I have this week? "I'm free to have Friday night or something." Then you say, "Let me meet someone like that. And send a notice, that's where a man is." And it's all right in general. You can build a dictator of the naa laptop. The only thing that's gonna have to do is send messages. Yeah, so you can press the button, you can tell him to go, then send it. And it's kind of a way to do it. On the one hand, I wonder, on the other hand, you know, like making this a mouse in a calendar looks easier than giving it to an agent. I tried a little different resources to pick up the goods. And this, uh, on the one hand, is interesting, on the other hand, like you can do it without it. So, we're gonna open some Amazon conditionally and say, "I want to be a conditional," and I'm gonna change a hard drive on that computer. Let's pick something up, add some positions to the basket and give me a description that's good, that's not good. And he's intercepting the control, starting to swap, picking up some categories, watching, that equipment, it's not right. Reading the feedback on its own, the evaluation looks, then adds something. The trial is busy. As if it was easier for me to go anyway, there, ChatGPT or Google to search for the right goods, and then, in fact, just go there to some sort of Amazon, Ozon or something and order this product. But there's still some kind of operation. The process itself is a little bit of a slutty.
You sit there, watch something happen, something moves.
Like others.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Like others. But unfortunately, I didn't come up with the casework to actually give him a mission to move on to another deposit. It also works well on non-active deposits. And I wanted to ask, so, say, the commentaries, who suddenly used or had ideas how to use it so that it wouldn't be artificially crafted. Give me a share, please. If there's anything interesting, we'll have to tell them, let's show them. Here. So while I was playing another toy, I had another browser. But there are no living examples yet. Yeah, there's something I was thinking about, but I haven't done anything yet. I understand you can synchronize with social media. Well, conditionally, with LinkedIn, for example, yes? And some of the routines you can get to this agent. But somehow I think they'll be getting used to these things. And I think it's okay, I'd rather be pink to write posts, put some liki on it, like that.
I might have tried, but I haven't decided to do it yet.
Look, this one, I heard about Comet or Comet, I don't know, I don't use it myself, I don't use it. I don't understand why, but I heard that my comrade had a very positive response. And I wonder if you're saying there's a number of restrictions, because I've tried a lot of agents in the GPT chat. From what I'm saying, I've been telling you something, moving between different pages, resources and, uh, waiting for an agent to improve. I think they're inside to make periodic updates that aren't visible. I guess I don't have enough in the OpenAI to sign that there was some update, something improved, and so on. Because I see that, for example, five Pros started working harder. And in general, GPT Five Thinking for me, I see a better way than how it was taken. But I don't understand, however, that they're an agent who's been up or down because the restrictions that the agent was or the way the agent worked were, it was a limitation for me. Plus, they didn't give him a full description. Well, they didn't write, for example, that he had some time-limits, in terms of resource requests, there, I don't know, operational memory. I don't know what. Yeah? That's what the parameters were described. Because I've been facing things that the agent has been very often out of work. It was written that the limit was exceeded at the same time. And you're like, and you've set me a time limit or something? Yeah, they did. I mean, it's weird, it's a little bit.
So it's a little weird, UX/UI. And while this agent story is, of course, it's more like, uh, for, uh, microtests, and probably for some sort of accustomed to new skies. Although, as you said, the audience, write, uh, where you have work things in the field of agents, it's agents, yeah, that do things all the time. Where you see from this... well, that's a very good thing. It's clear that there's a lot of this in corporate business environment. So we-- uh, Cases, that's how we can, you know, come up with a lot of volume. I'm just looking forward to, maybe, less corporate repetition scenarios. Agents are supposed to be, right? So, uh, he's doing some things, uh, more, uh, more ordinary, more life-saving. I'd like to know that at least. What would you be interested in as an audience, what would an agent do? It'll be good. And sign up for our channel, please. Put your hands on the lyrics, write your comments even to us. This very much supports the development of the channel and our movement forward. It's very important to us.
We're not for nothing today, uh, we're taking off the seventy-fifth issue, uh, at least the weekly sub-cadast. We also have extra subcasts, at least a weekly base.
So, Sas, you also put it out, and then I looked, uh, that there was this chat-chat-weight thing. Uh, first, it seemed like, uh, just, like, uh, the trash would be bigger, and then, in fact, tried in practice. Pretty exciting, yeah, especially if you're talking about something big. And there's a lot of points in there. You're kind of gonna keep this conversation, but you have some questions you'd like to discuss, uh, somewhere in the middle of this conversation. And it's quite convenient, so there's three points to press and pick up the vector. The tea is duplicative, yes, it's like a programmer, well knows, the fork is being repository. Here, too, uh, the whole chat story, basically duplicates, well, it's likely to be reused, and you're starting a new branch of discussion. Iia was quite comfortable. Who used it, write it too. Pretty exciting, I think, thing. Have you not been used yet, have you tried?
I'm not here yet.
Try, especially if you have a lot of chat rooms around here, there's some kind of discussion, you want to ask me something side by side, but you don't want to smash the current chat, yes, you can get a branch. You'll have a basic copy of this chat, you'll be in touch, and this one will stay. You have a basic one where you have a theme that's evolving, and you can do some side-response to avoid this context of the current conversation. It seemed pretty busy.
We should try. He's just making new chat, right, more?
Well, it's a new chat, uh, and it says that this is a tale, it's taken from that chat. It's just, he's probably reusing this story from some kind of stitch, so you--
Did you have that button, Ilnar? Did you have that button?
Ah, you probably have one too. Uh, below the chat--
I didn't show her.
At the end of his answer.
I know, I know that function. I know this function, but somehow I don't have that button. I know that function.
Three points, if you press, I'm getting a read out and a branch in a new chat. That's where we regenerate, where the like and the dizzlyc put his answer. And there's...
Ah, everybody! I thought-- no, look. Sam Althman, when he showed this function in X, he showed it, he showed it that she would be in the new menu, and she's all, she's Brain in new chat.
I just found her, too.
Anyway, I-- yeah, I was, I was sure, I was sure she was downstairs in-- in plus, she'd open up. I was waiting for her, Ilnar, and I wanted to tell her when she got here. She didn't, um, and she didn't show up. Here.
Here's the test. We'll talk about it more detail at the next issue.
Yeah, I thought she was right in that left window, there, three points, but there's no such function. All right, I know where she is now. See, I shouldn't have come to the sub-cadast today.
100 percent. 100 percent. 100 percent. Yeah. Because I didn't find this Brain in new. I just wanted to use it a lot, and I just don't know how much he's been uploading this long window. I have some chatty chatty very long, and I have a question, how much of it is over-- well, it's over-wrapping, right? And what he's taking, and what he doesn't really see.
One way, Sas, to make the summit, ask him to say, "Here, do the summit on our dialogue" and see. If you're comfortable with this, you can move this summit to the next door and start again.
Yeah. That's what we're gonna check. Something's not gonna work.
Mm-hmm.
Thank you very much, everybody. I'll see you in a week.