Another update of ChatGPT. This update or blank, or very serious update. The mask was agreed to a trillion dollar bonus, and today is a huge update in all of its absolute companies. It's definitely something everyone in the world should know. Google launched a Google Skills training platform. I'm always, uh, smiling when the same name is inside. Europe needs investment in a four hundred billion-dollar cloud of artificial intelligence. It's important for the world now. Forbes called the professions most protected from dismissal in the era of artificial intelligence. Big language-based robots are not safe for real worlds. What about the robot I ordered and he's supposed to come next year? China is introducing analog of visas to attract world technicians. News for the last two weeks in the world's start-ups. This is the biggest boom. Seventy-fifty million dollars are invested in legal artificial intelligence.
And Anthropic did a very cool research. So, hello, everybody! ToTheMoon Canal. Technological news, Silicon Valley sites and the world. Aaah, news AI, artificial intelligence, everything that's connected to it, right? I've been doing this English-language interview on the theme of spiritual development in business, yes, and the use of-- different practices and everything. A man is running a channel in America, American. And, uh, as I was saying, I was in ChatGPT, saying that I had three transcribations of my Russian-language rolls and asked him to draw me a list of words and thesis and the phrases in English. in theory, it might be difficult to interview. Because if I speak Russian in peace, I realized that in English I couldn't say anything. And I mean, he did a really cool doc to me. First, he himself has given me the words that are unique to the subject of spiritual development. That's the first. And the second one, he's got some words that are exemplified. And the third one, he prepared me as a big offer, although I didn't need a lot of suggestions there, but he also prepared them. So he made two pages of A4 of the document that was sufficient to give such an interview and prepare. Well, because I'm not a super-hospiter to study languages, I did everything I could to prevent an interview from being prepared in English and then I went to San Francisco for this interview and forgot the printout. I thought if I had a print on my desk, I'd watch my word sometimes. So I had to... Well, some, first of all, I remembered the words for myself because I didn't remember how they were in English. Well, I don't use it every day, do I? And I had to, there I was saying five, six, seven people in the man, asking how it's gonna be in English, right? Well, that's what you do in the interview. But it didn't trigger any stiff. It did not, in fact, give rise to any stance in terms of the fact, as the fact in the interview. That's what's very unstandard. I mean, I certainly didn't expect that. I didn't expect that. But ChatGPT helped me. As we have a theme about technology and artificial intelligence, ChatGPT helped me.
Let's get started, huh? So...
Sas, I heard you ordered a robot.
So... Tanya, you just asked. I'll start with the robots. And...
Yeah, you said you wouldn't order, and there was some change of opinion.
Not much, not just changed.
Unstable man.
There was a chin. There was a sub-ball kit in Reels, which means that there's a large number of world robots that just do, uh, well, cut into something, there, hitting children, people. And I liked the news, so Russia has the first robot, and it goes on stage and falls. I've got a lot of people sending that, too. But apart from the Russian robot, there are many other robots falling. He fell down there, fell down, and he had something flew away and so on. We have a previous release, by the way, one man wrote that we were wrong with some robot name. Then a robot wrote a maximum in his hand, could raise a number of kilos. And they told him that he didn't, there are robots that could raise 20, 30 kilos. And actually, I think there's a huge amount of stuff going on today. The question is, what is going to work really? And I'm not for nothing today to make this title, "The robots in large language models are not safe for real world." It's a study, and, uh, it's a joint research work of the Royal College of London and Carnegie University, right? And they identified serious problems in using models in robot management, right? We know that on NVIDIA's chips, Google's got a few systems to create, train robots, to do robots. But we see in the world, of course, uh, well, the serious question of these robots can be given to people or not. And, of course, the more Tanya and I looked at that robot your husband and Ilnar brought here, which would cost us $20,000 and a $500 signature. But I have a signature of $500, and I like it very much, don't I? But you don't know, maybe I'll have a commitment for ten years to pay a subscription of $500, right? No contract yet. I made a prepayment, I'll tell you, I picked a black robot. I'm Tanin's husband, so Steve, he's my partner, too, and he's throwing me out right now. He didn't realize it was, because this robot is all white and I ordered a black one. And he says a little, "What is it, what is it like a fairy?" I say, "No, it's a robot." And then he saw me paying him off. Well, it's just like a deposit.
I thought, however, given the valley, the discussion of different things in technology, well, we actually have a channel, and I think it's very useful for everyone to see a real robot.
You'll call him on our tape.
I mean, he works or not. But I'm saying one thing, really, the more I thought about the robot, and I have a very large space inside the house, different levels. There's a dog, four kids. I have a very large area, and under the tidy, there's a hill, yes, a mountain of stuff, a lot of living and everything. And here you realize that, and the robot, first of all, is not safe, I'll be responsible for him and I'll pay for him if he's gonna crash around, like, a little bit. And second, I have a huge number of glass walls, there, expensive furniture, dishes, and, in general, children, right? And last time Elnar told me, how could a robot-- it's a Spot robot, right? We said Atlas. Hydraulic, which, yes. Boston Dynamics can eat, like, a baby's hand, right? Or dogs. I don't know how my dog will react, because she loves to jump on someone just by the feet, and she's up over two metres. So, I thought if he could be disconnected somehow, he'd just sit at my place, at least, and meet couriers, like, to get everyone out of here right away, right? And no one's laughing. Or gardeners. And so everyone knows that there's-- or standing in the window, you know, that night and lighting red eyes like the Terminator. I live on the hill and the house is on the top. So that's how it's like, arson, surveillance. Here, some fun. My wife, by the way, didn't appreciate my prepayment. I don't know why. Maybe she thought I was wasted money, maybe-
Our nanny didn't appreciate it either. I think she'll leave us when we order this robot.
No, Steve told me that, listen, Sasha, I'm paying $180 for people to get out.
Yeah, yeah. He's got a lot of money from that perspective.
$100. Well, you're not really saving here, you're wasting more.
Yeah. Choose the dishes and wash the windows behind him.
Steve, listen, I don't need this Ilona Mask satellite receiver. I've got Starlink Elon Musk's satellite. We're gonna talk about Elon Musk, right? There's no need for a satellite receiver who can be taken to camping together. He says, "Oh, 100 percent is needed. I had to buy it under Steve's oak. Okay, so, uh, I'm gonna... I'm gonna talk about robots again. Write our audience. We were questioning the last time, as you would have done, there's no question of price, of the existence of a robot. The thing is, we're going to go to and go to Elon Musk. And Ilona Mask has a huge, uh, first of all, board of directors, board of directors in Tessla, this board of directors of Tesla has passed.
It's clear that it's all about Elon Musk's performance. It is generally unique in terms of implementation. He was doing, doing it at the factory, and it is clear that there were a great number of interesting things, including a high priority on the robot Optimus. And by the way, it's fun that I've been saying, "Who and where my Optimus is?" I'm still waiting for my Optimus. So Optimus will be a friend of this, this is the worst company. I even forgot the company I ordered. She has a name. One X-box of what. Yeah, he's just got it.
Yeah, he just has a name like XAI, right? And that's why this robot is alone. They're together, so you can sit down. And there's a lot of, uh, stuff on the Internet, like, what does a robot do when he finds out he's a robot? Or it's this 1X on the Optimus. Like what Optimus will do with the robot when he sees this 1X? Well, shorter-competitive. Yeah. I mean, I was told today by the wife, "I'm your husband, uh, sent this collection of things, which makes robot when you left on a mission, you have a wife at home and so on, yeah?" And, uh, and today, Pauline says, "Look, listen, When you die, do I have a robot or what? And who said I was gonna die first?" And I said, "Because of life insurance, she didn't ask you. And she keeps saying-- who's got it. Yeah. She says, "When, when-- well when I die, you're off the rock--- I say, "What robot is it, what do you mean? I'm not interested in that." She said, by the way, she doesn't believe that robots will be so cool in the near future. So, here's-- I agree with her. I'll get Optimus. I'm just gonna show everyone this thing. Elon Musk made a clear statement, and I remember that was the first time that my partner, Andrei Rogachev, was speaking, that's what he did in Russia. He said the hardest part was to make a hand. And still what hand? Even in a normal warehouse, in a warehouse, there, or a normal store, to use an industrial robot. A robot who understands easily when he comes to a human head, a child, concerns a bottle, takes glass or beret, there, ice cream, or gets, I don't know, a burrate, yeah, something soft. Well, that's when he takes it or, there, soft peaches take it, I don't know why I brought the burrate.
So when-- is a strange example. So, Ilon, Ilona Masca's mother just laid out, so this hand was presented. Elon Musk wrote that it was the hand of a generation like that, that means we're having a new generation. What's interesting is that Elon Musk said they're promising a pilot line in Freemont, that's in the US, a million robots a year, and 10 million robots a year are planned for a Giga line in Texas. And that makes sense that a long-term perspective. And in general, he was saying that, well, we're probably gonna be at a billion, like robots. And Elon Musk has a lot of things to say in recent months that robots will be more than humans, right? What do you think, our viewers, write. And again, he confirmed that the price of the launch would be $20,000. And it's clear that it's high when they're very much released. And we're just gonna talk about what they said about Tesla. And there's a huge number of super-crunch components in robots. And by the way, remember, we told him a couple weeks ago that he was doing that Optimus could do surgery. But I really liked the thing he said that Optimus would be able to provide emergency assistance at home. Well, first, well, quick emergency. That's really interesting, by the way, isn't it? Another moment. Someone was putting it out there, one of the major American bloggers, describing this robot alone, he said that, you know, this robot should bring her medicine to grandma's house, right? And what's the chance he didn't make a mistake? This is when the hand shows up-- who's gonna let the robot do first aid if a man dies? And I'm embarrassed--please explain, please, the audience, we're gonna turn you on the video right now. Tell me one thing. That robot I ordered, he has, which means when he comes to a bottle on the table, he's like, when he comes to a bottle, the video shows how the bottle moves a little. Well, I mean, the bottle is moving on video all the time. Then he comes to the glass, the glass moves. Well, as if he took it. I, uh, I had the first one, that's a video fair. Ildar's gonna say it's a video game. Then. Then I thought maybe he had some kind of system that was blowing up Magnitis, huh? And it's magnetic, yeah. How's that? Well, I don't know. And, but it looks like a very feikovo. I mean, it's like all these videos are made by the faeque. And in general, if the more these videos you're reviewing with this robot, the less you want to buy it. Well, well, that's a serious joke, because you see more that he's just not adequate. And, uh, but I'm gonna get this thing on through it remotely, there, turn red eyes around, I like it. That's why I decided to go through it to say, "Hey, dear, toy." Well, maybe $500, by the way, that's a normal price. Well, a month. In total, $20,000. There are models, models. Twenty thousand. Where are you living? You pay for the models. As your husband said yesterday, I'm here for breakfast, so I ordered a DoorDash, so buy this device. So, what do you think about this thing again? Ildar, what are you gonna say about this video? You've been considering him.
Do you think it's real or faeque?
No, I didn't watch that very carefully. But now with the evolution of the models of generation, there's no way to believe anything, such a demo. They were all faeque, generosized and so on. Moreover, we've still been discussing that much of what a robot does on video is done by a telecommuting, yes, that is, the operator's connection and something. And what else might be on top of it, I'll believe it too. That's when the robot comes and you can do some things with him, but then I'm afraid we can really believe that this thing is, it works and it can do that.
Yeah, but when he's waiting. It's not gonna be like humor. Delivery. Yeah, like humor. Like HumanFit. But it's generally, anyway, look, if you look at the Chinese market, of course, there's a lot of robots in China from super smart robots, just space. Actually, I'm actually, if people, by the way, I-- everybody knows what a robot vacuum sucker is, right? Well, it seems like a robot piping agent any grandmother should know. But I want to tell you that we have a huge number of children, not two years old, and there are 15-year-olds from Bay Area schools. Their parents work in Google, Apple, NVIDIA, and many of them are billionaires, hundreds of millionaires. The kids come in and say, "What is this?" When Roborock's vacuum drives around the house.
A country where shoes don't take off at home. So I think they don't need any dust pumps.
I drove ten years ago. I didn't just put a picture of me in the cascades on the couch. But it was a test photo. We all have, all children, others, their shoes. Sash's stationary photo. No, I was making a barbecue on the street and I went into the house and I thought I'd take a picture. Just, uh, beautiful. The dog's still on his own. I wanted to-- is that you're making barbecue in the cabin is not a pact? No, no, no, no, no, no, that was real.
It's more delicious.
Texas guy Sasha. It was real. Here. Well, you know I have all kinds of shoes, which means they didn't really know. What do I mean? It's not one person. And at different ages, people really say we never saw it. The kids never saw. And in town, you're walking out here in these villages in Bay Area, driving drones, just, they're starting to get flooded like San Francisco. And I have a little son, like my son, and he's been there five years, and he's been in San Francisco now, and the car's on his way. I say, "Oh, look, invisible pilot." He says, "This is a drone taxi." I think how does he know the word "operative"? Here. I mean, they're swinging, yeah, I guess. And here, so people don't know what Roborock is.
But I was just saying that in China, of course, the charashit industry is unreal. They've already shown up to Guangzhou, there's a drone coming up with people. I would never have gotten into that drone in my life. Yeah? So I don't know how everyone else is. They show these dusty pumps that don't just drive, but they see and scan the dirt and understand how this mud is to be removed and what it's best. And they make a map you didn't pre-empt, like Roborock. She's always falling down. I think my wife's throwing him out, she's always losing him. Yeah, I also have Pauline walking, then losing, saying, "I lost him." She lost him once, she couldn't find him for three days. Well, here we go. And I'm saying he ran away from you on the street because he's always driving, and I don't know what she's gonna do with that robot if she teaches it if he can clean something. He's just, I think, losing some stain and-- washing. Pauline has a favorite practice of washing. Washing, yeah. We've been wiped out empty, empty drums rolling and... Well, isn't everyone in this relationship with their wives? And that's how they show robots that are very interesting. I think we should do a separate edition. They're just super-renewal now. And here we showed this robot last week, who learned to walk practically. He's really going really cool, huh? That's, of course, well, they're in a serious move. Here's the biggest move in China, by the way, there's a very precise study that the vents in artificial intelligence will grow very much in robots. Right there, they're making money out of the way. Well, because the models, of course, are already on the top.
What do you want about Elon Musk? Well, first of all, I'll repeat, there's not a trillion dollars, is there something eight hundred and seventy-six or what?
Eight hundred and seventy-six or how many billion dollars bonus. You'll hear the sum of billions of dollars again. It's two of his current status. If he sold it out there, well, nobody has that cash. And I really like Ilon Mace. And I didn't like the way you're doing this in Russia when you come. I had a situation in two thousand twelve years, so we sold Megaplan fifty percent of the 1Es and the company, there, I don't remember, tens of millions of dollars worth something. And there was a plan, it says it's gonna cost half a billion in five years. I say, "Look, if it's worth half a billion, I'm gonna pay $2 million." And they say, "How's $2 million? Twenty million dollars people don't get it." I say, "Wait, well, it's worth $30 million now. If it's worth 500, you'll make four hundred and seventy, pay me twenty. If it doesn't cost, well, I won't make it." And thinking is a very interesting thought in Russian-speaking space, it does not allow it to be done in any way whatsoever. And I remember leaving, and I'm the owner of the 1Es saying, "Alexandre, what are you doing there?" I said, "Well, more interesting prospects." And he tells me Boris Georgievich Noraliev, he says, "No, you ask so much money." What are you talking about? So, Ilona Mask, well, that's not five hundred, not $2 million. There's 500 billion, that's one trillion. But when it comes to seven or eight trillions, it's very important that it will use millions, tens of thousands of robots will drive robots everywhere Tesla will be sold in a huge amount of money. Number. I mean, I still want to see that there are parameters, and if it really does, it's gonna be very serious. Now Tesla stands almost a half trillion, and at the time of the release, there's, I don't know, one point four, there's a trillion. The price is very high, remember? Remember last year, Tesla had a meeting at exactly the same time, and then she grew up. And remember, there was a thing that I was buying stock, see what happens to them. Yeah, it was a year ago. And there was a spike. There were lower shares, then a spike at his meeting.
But then Trump came to power. It's all down there by the April. And now it's growing up again. They're in some, uh, peak for them. What I'm saying is, the two innovations they've released. Innovation number one. And it's a world-wide innovation, of course. They, they promise. Max Mask described a new version. Drive when you don't have to watch the road, but you're driving full self-driving. They're the version of 14 points three. The mask described it as follows. He said, "The driver can sleep and wake up on the spot." So he promised, by the way. To be honest, I came in and wanted to buy Tesla. I went right on the site, started looking again. I'll take my wife again. You know.
You need to sit behind the wheel then.
Yeah, yeah.
Look, I see. But what am I? Here's your favorite Carpathians. The mask was cited, put out an entire post. He bought Tesla X there a couple weeks ago, and he put it out, and Mask wrote, "Look, Carpathians!" So he wrote about self-driving. He put it out and wrote, "I'll go and make a list of mistakes." He says, "I'm a mess from driving new ones." He says he didn't get the fourteenth version of it, I think he had the thirteenth. He said, "I'm a hell of a quality, like she's staying there, at the crossroads where all the stairs are standing. In America, there's a woman who turns on the left line, how she keeps the line, how she passes those who make mistakes, like she parked herself." He says, "I didn't record any mistakes." He has a full post, directly posted. And when you see this full self-driving, and I bought myself a self-driving Hends Frey on the roads, on the haiva. How's Cadillac? Well, it's kind of like a humane pin. She's on her way, she's rebuilt. But you have to be careful, because Cadillac is generally very calm at some point, taking you red and stops running the machine. I mean, I remember Tesla doesn't do that. And Tesla, if you stop watching, she stops the car and parks. And one of the shareholders of Tesla was driving from Tesla's meeting. He put out a video that Tesla saved his life again. He was going to the place with Tanin's husband at night, forgetting what this state called New Mexico. Santa Fe. He was, uh, he was on New Mexico in New Mexico State. He was walking around the track at night. There's people who wrote in New Mexico City who can't drive. And then he got a car out of the way and self-driving swooped and jumped on the side of the road. There was a fence there, and he jumped between the side of it. He says he just broke his side mirror. So self-driving saved his life. Speed was very high. And I think Cadillac would have done the following. He'd have seen this car, he'd just turn on the red panel. Take the wheel. Say goodbye to your life. Life is over. Red panel.
Well, Carpathian, he's been working for years in Tesla, right? And just about the Autonomous driving. So, in fact, he probably had some interest in comparison, and what was done at all during his absence in Tesla. Well, how do you get a positive response from him, too, it's expensive. I was actually wondering why I was-- why would I be driving if you could not keep track of the road? Because a couple of years ago, if I remember correctly, there was a story that, uh, Full Self Driving was so determined that in a second, a few seconds before the accident, it was off, and the accident wasn't under the control of Full Self. Driving, under human control. So, as in the statistics, you have Full Self Driving as if you don't, yes, or do very, very little. And how would you be here if you were to sit behind the wheel, but how would you not have to keep track of the road, you know, what would you be sitting on the wheel for? I guess, to keep me from knowing, that's how you said it, the red light bulb, take the wheel. And whoever brought you to this situation is just like another question.
Look, first of all, it can tell you in advance that I don't know this area and take the wheel, something's going on. Secondly, there is a law, and yet this, uh, responsibility, what you describe. Remember, I was talking about Mercedes... telling S class too, yeah, that thing was, and I even watched it buy it for that. But it just turns out he's very limited in travel. The level three selvesdrawinga log, which is located in Mercedes in a very small cut, in the US and somewhere in Germany, that Mercedes is responsible for the accident and, uh, two people are responsible for the accident. The responsibility for the accident. So it's your problem, the probability that you actually decided to let the wheel go or didn't hold it. And I can honestly tell people who ride Full Self Driving in Tesla, every second I hear, they sit on the phones, they sit on the phones, they sit in the laptops, they work. That's a lot, yeah. And even though Tesla says, "They're supposed to keep the wheels there." They have, although they have a website that they don't have to hold on the wheel. But if you start, I don't understand, I still have to drive or not. But there's still a nurt. The law. I'm also saying why, for example, robotaxy launched in Austin and Bay Eria, drives with drivers. I was making videos. I went out, thought I had a robotxi without a driver like Waymo, and then there's a driver, because they don't have a license under the law. They, but they have now stated at this Tesla meeting that they plan to remove this man in Austin before the end of the year.
Well, plus they're training the car. And we said that Waymo was originally also the driver. And the question is, the next thing a car without a man is called CyberCab and, and CyberCab, yes. I don't know, Russian CyberCab or whatever. And this CyberCab--
Cybertaxi.
Yeah, yeah, cybertax. So, uh, they say they're gonna start serial production in April of the twenty-sixth year. I'm gonna go to the line, so they're doing some line that's ten seconds a car, so they're gonna be there, go to the line, that's five seconds on the car. It's a conwayer, yes. And, uh, there's a story about that, I'll remember that Mask promised that this car would cost about $200 a month. There were different descriptions that there were two places in it. I never understood whether it's two or four or how many places it is. And when you're sitting in the first place, you just have a screen, you don't have mirrors, you don't have a rudder. But by law, you have to have mirrors now, yes. Even by law, I have a car that can take the doors off. Well, I took the jeeps down there, and I'm taking the doors off. You're legally bound to put another mirror. Well, you can't just go without rearview mirrors. There's different state jobs. There's a right to be a mirror on the left, somewhere on the left, no matter what. And that's why one of the stories is why you can't drive, including this. And if they're doing this to Esemaska to write on the wheel? If they do, I think the quality of driving will be huge because...
It's huge! Because people tell me that, of course, there's a great ride in town. And I can't wait in person. Well, I'll make sure I pay the prepayment at CyberCab. For example, Elon Musk said they were Roadster, uh, gonna show up next April, and start out in 18 months. It's like Sam Althman who paid him there in 2018 or what year. So, well, that's not interesting at all. Well, I'm personally, someone might be interested. Write it to someone who's interested. And CyberCab, there's even two people in the unmanned two-two-two-two-four-two-- I'm-- I'm--I'm-I'm-I'm gonna be in a car that I've been in, she's gonna be happy, yeah, I'm totally on my way, I'm doing my business, talking, talking. I think it's super cool. Question: Will they be able to prolobate this next year, uh, from a legal perspective? I think they're all technologically ready for this. I think. Again, aaa, it's gonna work like this or not, I don't know. They are planning to expand full self-driving in Europe and China in the first quarter of the next year. Yeah? And not the pilots, that's the mass expansion, including.
Although with China, in China, I think it's just that I'm competing with Chinese cars now, uh, that's weird and uninteresting. Here. What else is interesting about Elon Musk. They first release their chips for XAI and in any case plan, well, within the framework of AI, to expand substantially everything in the area, chips, artificial intelligence and everything, as it was stated, That perhaps the people whose Tesla is parked there will be used as a model infrastructure. Ia, uh, see how this works. I don't know. I think we're gonna need new cars, some unreal electricity. What's going to happen to that? They understand that they have, uh, updates that were related, uh, SpaceX. And, well, the only thing they said about SpaceX is that maybe the company will be public and people can invest in it. And, uh, see if it's gonna happen. Yeah? We'll start putting out some promocodes, some references. Well, in the course of our channel development, we'll put a promocode on the Starlink.
If someone has a Starlink, you can register, there's a month I think it's free. So let's move to update, uh, to update OpenAI. And last time we said that OpenAI was planning until the end of the year, there was insider information, rolling ChatGPT 6. And then the OpenAI rolls ChatGPT 5.1. In the last two or three weeks, I don't know how viewers in other countries have, I have a constant change of interface in my own office. So the mobile application has changed the interface all the time. I've lost my model choice, hid the protein, then on the website one, then another, in the annex on the descope third. Honestly, I think I'm gonna fire every one of the UX/UIs doing it again. Here. Models do cool, and UX/UI have problems. They're taking, they're pouring out a new interface. I already have model 5.1. So it didn't change anything, but it came back down here, and that pole came down at the level of thinking, and he was kind of, like, a splendid. Uh, I had him in person from time to time, and he was gone periodically. Model 5.1 will soon be completely unfolded. They started to roll it, and the pro-version will be the model version, and GPT 5.1. So, d-d-- while the pro-version is GPT 5, it's 5.1. The Jacobs are a more enlarged version that, uh, understands better, and, a little more understands that you need to think about the answer somewhere, see it, not give some stiff, inappropriate conclusions. And plus you can choose a communication style for yourself. I'm asking you again, uh, asking, what are you talking about again about these communication styles? Because, uh, there's a friendship style, and then, like, very demanding, you know, different, right there. And I'm asking, what, uh, this model is gonna use emo-emoji or something or not-- emoji or not, it's gonna be short or long. But I remember that the OpenAI was saying, just a few months ago, that they'd have outfitted the personnel, and they're kind of changing things again. Here. Who tested, sees changes, improvements or not? I'm feeling very neutral. I think it's hard to understand when you're in the pros and the way your models have done things qualitatively or inaccurately.
Clean cosmetics, Sasha, nothing else. That's why there's no benchmark. I mean, there's no way they compared 5.1 to five, with other models that's better. The only thing they say is that we have tasks, in the sense of simple, medium, complex. We're responding to the simple ones now, and we're thinking a little bit longer. So they have slightly streamlined the reasoning process to avoid chewing the other delicate episodes and perhaps more to focus on more complex episodes. So, from the point of view of the most fundamental model, it's like nothing's changed. And if it were, I'm sure they'd put the baccalaureate. Either if they showed some kind of increase on the binches, they'd have put them out. If they didn't put them out, it felt like it was a pure cosmetics. Well, that's all you're saying about the style of communication, staffing, and other things, well, that's very minorous stuff. That's probably why they're there 5.1 and they're doing it so they wouldn't be so badly hutting for some of these things. I mean, I'm just taking the small cosmetic update they've added.
Yeah, I know what you know. I understand that first, their cars were not carded. He's making me laugh periodically. I don't know how everyone else is and how they're in other models. These are the automatic regimes that the regime determines, you're kind of quick to answer or go on the Internet or think about it, because it answers serious questions from time to time very quickly and not so fast. Checking, checking. And until I asked him recently, I was on the Internet checking some price news, and he's telling me, there's a real gasoline, so I'm getting a little cheap. And I see he's got a link to me on January 15th. I'm like, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, we're here, so we're in October or November. What was the fifteenth, January 15th? And it looks really weird. At the same time, I understand that we're still coming to this. Well, I mean, we should come to a model that you don't choose or the majority of people, at least, doesn't make the choice. Just why are they hid the regime now? I think they could have a regime-saving regime plus hiding only to make people less use of a cool regime. They didn't load their power. But in the version, it's a shame because they often replace me with thinking or pro, or they're returning the car. I don't understand. Wait, I had a version of this chat in my office. Why would I have a version of you? Yeah, that looks really unsolid.
You never know about the story for so long. Why? Because there's such a serious reasoning coming or just a delay, just to get you tired of waiting. And you're okay, let's think about it, and then let's instant answer. Well, it's a normal, valid story they can do to keep the tokens from digging.
But I mean, there was a time when I started answering my questions, a month ago, and now it's like I got back to history like September. Well, I mean, I'm talking about it again, and I'm starting to love it again.
It's like doing people well, doing bad, and then getting back what it was.
This is, this is the Russian model of management. So, or the world's model of governance.
Well, you call five
one, you got it back, like everybody else was.
Yeah. I think it's a very interesting thing Google has launched the Google Skills platform. Not that she was set up, they've already developed it. They have offered it a large number of different courses, which deal with the study of completely different technologies at different levels. There are a lot of free courses, some kind of stuff that we can pay, but now that they've done the peddate, they can get a lot of credit, they give a lot of certificates. And, well, considering that the incredible amount of time spent in education, right, Linar? I want to devote this to you. And I don't want to say what the quality of the courses is, but they've had a very serious update right now. Who cares about this and who's looking for a place to do the training. I think there's a point in looking at them and seeing what they're worth. Because it is clear that a large number of major providers are now interested in giving people serious environments, serious models, providing them with infrastructure, providing them with free testing resources. Different systems, by the way, give a lot of things. First, I know there's a program in Perplexity, it's cheaper for students. There are so many such student and educational initiatives. So look, Google's infrastructure is still very serious. And get it for you, if you're studying.
If you're learning arts or some technology related to artificial intelligence, you don't even have to marketing, either there or sales, or management, and, or production and miscellaneous items. Uh, it's really cool to get access to their resources because, uh, Google, um, I think that's all about videogeneration, generation, uh, text, audio, uh, creation, analysis of a lot of documents, vaults are different, right? Code writing, everything. Well, a lot of, a lot of cool tools. You wanted to add something, Eldar, here?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. As for, uh, learning tools. I've closed all my fans, haven't I? I mean, I'm gonna imagine you going to some resource to study something, so I can't imagine a situation like that that, instead of, uh, deep research or documentation, or something. I'm going to some kind of class to learn something. The only situation that might be interesting is that of those stars like Andrei Karpatov. He did some kind of educational work on the start-up, yes, and he's telling me how LLM works. That's probably gonna be interesting, right? I mean, there's a situation where there's some very smart man, and that's where he starts to transfer his knowledge through--
Yeah.
LLM, people, courses, etc.
So,
And if you take a really-- yeah, and if you take a straight wide spectrum, which is, uh, parole, that Google company, I don't know, that's where people can set courses and stuff. I feel like, on average, you're probably gonna be on deep research and something, and you're gonna get better and better. But we don't take the most of the entrance level.
Yeah, there are people who have a useful life, there's a certificate, some kind of right sequence of lessons. They don't know what to look for, what to believe, and so on. I see that now, from a learning perspective, you can be deep research just, you know, just go to lifelong learning, right?
And, well, the knowledge that is, and the volumes that are. Yeah, that's a very cool addition. Oh, about that, I've been saying from the beginning that Europe needs an investment in a cloud of artificial intelligence of $400 billion. Why did I say that? Because, in fact, it's been said-- we spoke last time about the dependence of GDP on the emergence of artificial intelligence. And by the way, the interesting thing is, I've been looking at it a little bit from a market perspective, for example, Russia. And it says that, uh, the appearance of virtuals, I'll remember that this report was about someone who didn't watch the graduation, look. Information that, uh, increasing the number of virtual staff is growing is starting to grow very much the country ' s GDP, country, huh? And the interesting aspect is that this direct indicator has a very strong impact on countries where unemployment is low. For example, in Russia, low unemployment, customary-- well, unemployment is very low. If the country is under-employment, the introduction of virtual workers has a very strong impact on GDP. But that doesn't mean that there is a problem, for example, in Russia, that there is a blockage of access to infrastructure, there are sanctions, there's a huge amount of everything. But just this relationship, they're very interesting. And here in Europe, what do you want to say? That Europe is very, well, European government and companies have made it clear that if you want the economy to grow, it is necessary to invest in artificial intelligence, invest in infrastructure, or you have nothing to do with it. You won't get it. I think that's the same thing about a lot of companies. I'm just saying, now on the market, a lot of companies want to get a result, conditionally, buying some kind of $50,000 or $100 soph, or somewhere hiring some kind of cheap, A cheap consultant.
Still, if you want to grow up or really stay in the market or get a good result, but you have to invest in it. And for the first time, I see that statement in Europe. It's already some amount that matches the American market with the Chinese market. China, I see, is a little smaller than the American market. Obviously, they have the possibilities, but they're comparable. And that's not the numbers, of course, how the OpenAI says they need one and two trillion dollars. In fact, the OpenAI leadership has approached the US Government to guarantee the granting of credits to the OpenAI. Why? They said we should get financial funding for a trillion. And for that, we ask the State to guarantee the return of credit if we cannot return them. In that way, we can attract cheaper money and realise all the projects. Because I understand that you're getting money on the market.
If you have money expensive, it's hard for them to build this infrastructure. And the CFO OpenAI said it. We've presented a few episodes back, that the OpenAI plans to make the IPO next year. She mentioned that IPO is not being discussed, but we're talking about our, uh, conditionally our exclusive funding. Forbes called the professions most protected from dismissal in the era of artificial intelligence. This article is a short story today from the point of view of the news. Who wants it, he can always see this block. Not much of the one we did the graduation we're doing on Wednesdays. Oh, there was a special probable of what professions would die, which would not die. And we have you on the canal to find him. And, well, we're gonna light up the cover now. Oh, this is interesting, Forbes, I think that this research is about a coffee house and a needle search in a haystack. Forbes, it concluded that the next waves of dismissals would survive cybersecurity specialists, health and financial analysts IT experts, and programme engineers supporting critical critical episodes. infrastructure. I want to say how smart the Forbes author was, it means he made this article. A, and, uh, gave such conclusions and comments. But still, uh, I was confused by finding financial analysts there because there's a lot of research that says financial analysts will, on the contrary, be fired. It's about what's going on in the market, and nobody knows what's going to happen. I mean, people like Elon Musk who say that people are likely to make their own decisions, work for them or not. Like, people can't work, like, like, sometime the economy is gonna be doing. On the other hand, a, and all the professions will be gone. Someone says all people are gonna get fired and everything's gonna be haun at all. And someone says, nobody gets fired, nothing happens.
And all of them, like, working more in the world, and they'll be working more and less, yeah. Every year, more people are growing, more jobs. So they're working more and less. And, uh, I personally feel like this research. Why did you say about China and the visa? I think we have some of the lies that might be interesting because people in any case view different countries, and, well, we have very many viewers around the world, including. Oh, what China has opened, uh, a technology talent visa, that's, uh... It's a inconclusive position for China, as it seems to us all the time that China has a rebate of people. And in fact, it seems to us that China has a reexcessful of goods, as if they don't import anything, everything is exported, created. And there's still a residual opinion, at least, of the generation that was born there in the nineties and the eightieths, and I'm not saying about the seventies that China is doing something unquality all the time. So, uh, I want to remember that, from the top of ten universities, and, in the field of scientific work in artificial intelligence, I want to draw attention to the fact that only two scientific works in artificial intelligence are in place. countries, two universities are not Chinese. So, in the second place, Harvard is the US, and that's the eighth place of Toronto University, yes. So all the other eight universities are China. It's obvious that this is some sort of report, probably some kind of sample, some details, but still. And, uh, China is importing a lot of everything. And yet there's a problem. This week again, the war has increased, uh, the war of chips between China and the United States. So China banned the purchase of chips at all. America said we'd never sell anything, either, so we'd never sell anything, in terms of chips inside. They're getting an update from Chinese companies, they're doing their chips, and they're gonna have super-crunch chips in there soon, and they're gonna be cooler, right? And Baidu had graduations, and Aliba, so that's the subject. Ah... And this precedent is, uh, technology visas. And by the way, the US has imposed, on the contrary, restrictions on technological visas and dow-- and has claimed that this visa starts to cost $100 thousand. China said, please come to us. Well, a little different things in terms of moving in China, the U.S., but still. Here.
That's exactly very
Yeah.
connected.
Because we also have news from Anthropic, like, and there with other companies. Anthropic is the clearest thing to show. They opened a mission in India, opened a mission in South Korea, and that was immediately after they imposed a $100,000 limit there at the border--- for work visas, First of all, yes, there's H1B1 that there's a vice like that.
H1B. H1B.
H1B, yes. I'll bring you back.
Vida. Consequently, it is becoming more difficult to bring staff to the United States. Large-scale technology companies are beginning to open offices in different countries. Well, in particular, Anthropic, they first opened a mission in India, then South Korea, yes, it starts to bite the region because it makes people to the United States very expensive and expensive. It's hard, it's almost impossible now, at least. And the talents are needed, they'll start to be buried by other countries, and the company, in particular, China is opening up options to move in, right? And, uh, this Trampa's operation, which involves 100,000 employees, is quite a change, uh, in the labour market, especially in the IT schema, in a, uh, high-tech cut.
Yeah. Oh, and, by the way, I wonder that, of course, there has been a great investment in-- in general, in different countries. And even now, Microsoft plans to invest in Portugal, and, uh, in the day centers, ten billion dollars. And there's a fight that goes directly to invest, Microsoft or Google, m, in Europe, in completely different countries. And, uh, I think there will be new opportunities for technological expertise everywhere. Although I think the market for technological professionals is now also on the one hand, there is an increase in the number of people who can, and, uh, cool things to do with artificial intelligence. People understand how to use new media, and what to do is use different systems, there, from Anthropic and so on, right? On the other hand, uh, there's a lot of people who have learned to use, they think they're super-crunch programmers, which can't be, right? It's a reverse side. I see that a lot and I hear it, and I see it at the price. It'll also be a n-- bring imbalances to the market. In fact, on the programming market, what happens next? How to choose people from their real knowledge, their real understanding, especially those who cannot test a person, to understand and verify. Now, testing and testing, well, it's getting more complicated and heavier, right? Well, it's harder and harder.
What happens in the market, of course, seriously and unreal.
Sas, as long as it can be seen that returning to the offline interview is the most appropriate option in this story. Although Meta, actually, they, uh, I don't remember when, a few months ago, they had news that they were planning to use, uh, chat-bots in the interview. It's a whole thing, too.
And Google said that.
I don't remember Google, but surely Meta had something--
Yeah.
At least, there was such an initiative. I don't know if they've brought her to mind or not, but, uh, well, many people write it down anyway. And if they write, then, well, let's just do some other assignments. If you can, you can't. That's the first.
Well, therapist--
And the second is during--
Yeah, yeah, whatever--
You're using it anyway. Then let's actually check your skills to perform chat-bot tasks and so on.
Yeah.
Yeah, but getting back to the offline is a normal story, too, because before the cow, it was perfectly normal that, for example, you're interviewing, I don't know, there, in Google or something, they're buying you tickets. From your place of residence to some office, I don't know, there in Dublin, in San Francisco or somewhere. You're actually going there, going to their office for a few days, they're gonna give you a living and everything, and then you're actually getting a ticket back. And that's the normal practice for highly qualified professionals, that you actually have tickets, uh, visas, all arranged, interviewing, passed, not passed, then offer you out. Covid has a little bit of a rigged up this story. Then, in fact, it went, uh, well, to companies, it was just more profitable than offline online, because they were still online, right? And after the cowid, we haven't returned to the offline yet. But if the story of checking the specialist needs a good thing, yes, and it's a lot of things that follow, going back to the well-verified offline interview, it's a good idea. Why not?
Yeah, I'd be interested, if I give you, hire any man now, anyone, and I say, "You want to use the artificial intelligence system, use it, but tell me the logs." I'd love to see the logic that man makes the queries. Because you're on request, uh, I'm in the middle of a program, business, strategy, business, sales, marketing, you're gonna get very fast, man's really good or he's got superficial knowledge, right? Well, the design will be clear right away, man actually understands what he's asking for in the system, that's, or he's totally zero and he doesn't know what's going on.
So quick comments on the large number of investments in $700,50 million in the past two weeks, even more in different topics, in start-ups, in the design and processing of the legal instruments. I mean, from contract analysis and electronic detection to claim preparation. And the increase in funding is because firms want a concrete return from artificial intelligence rather than abstract chatbots, which are very large, right? In the legal sphere, it is easy to measure time savings, there, risk reduction. And now, right on it. There's a lot of start-ups, a lot of things are done. I see that a small number is gonna survive. So there's not one percent conversion, it's gonna survive a very small number, because it's gonna have to... One of the biggest things, you know, is how to generate the proceeds. If Sasha said, "Where's revenue?" And, uh, there's a real problem, I think it's gonna be with those handcuffs, because on the one hand, they can do like a start-up that's some specialized thing. So who can win now?
Only someone with some unique data. Who has unique data? How unique are they from what they have inside Anthropic or Google Gemini, there, or Grok in xAI. So how unique are they? Grok, by the way, HAI, Elon Musk said that in a couple weeks Grok would have access to 100 million or so many chats in the X and could, uh, auto--- very fast answer the X. This is, by the way, an interesting thing when systems can, uh, any social-- well, how individualized it would be to process a social network of volumes when they were constantly independent of the social network. So, it's like a proposed, uh, thesis suggests that not everyone has access to it or has a restriction on learning, right? Well, obviously, if he says so, he has access to learn everything. I don't know how legal this is, though, do I?
I guess theory is legal. So, uh, is there any access, like, to xAI learn Facebook? If anyone knows it, you can tell me about it and show it. Illnar, please tell me about the Anthropic study. And, uh, well, living subject, a very lively subject.
I love their research. They did the following. They took eight volunteers. They're people on their team. So, it's highly qualified engineers-programs. There's no question about their competences. They split them into two teams and gave them a fairly unusual assignment. They brought, uh, robot, robot dog, and they gave these teams a few assignments. The team was split into two parts, and one team, and four participants were allowed to use Claude Code, and the other team was not. I mean, two teams, the same assignments, but a little different. One with the AI, the other one, respectively, does it on its own. And the guys are very qualified. The first assignment was just a dog, there's a dog's joety, and it's really necessary for this dog to move a little further. Oh, none of these, uh, players are working in robotics, nobody's involved with it, so they don't have the competences at first. And they're gonna take a look at how the team performs these assignments, how much time they spend on it, and so on. With the first assignment, a team that has access to AI-Assy has managed much faster. In seven minutes, a team with an assistant, 11 minutes, a team without an assistant. Next level. They got a jawster. They said, "Here, get your computers onto the scout, write a program to run the bomb from your computer." Yeah, we need to get the sensors inside. And how do you put the team on the way? And again, one team has access to an assistant, and another team has no access to an assistant. The third level was the most complex when a program was therefore to be written, which would find a ball without external control and that ball would lead to a point. Yeah, I mean, we had to figure out the positioning of the dog, searching for the objects, so that this facility, there, would be a good way to build the route. And it's done, not with a joeist, not with a human control, and that's what it's done. Okay. And accordingly, measured the time people will be doing, their emotional state, as they do, the challenges they face. And they've been tested, and how much use of AI is it that gives or does not give any tangible advantage about, like, other people who don't use it. And there I recommend, first of all, that we watch the video. Anthropic has a video of all this experiment for seven minutes. Secondly, there's a very detailed, interesting article where they tell us what their websites have happened.
Well, there's some pretty interesting things, like, that people who had access to AI have written code ten times, well, nine with.
We've been writing the code ten times, you know, nine commas one tenth more than the people who wrote themselves. The code, which is written on its own, is much more understandable than the one that is being generated. In doing so, people who had access to AIA. have done more tasks and have done them almost twice as fast as those who did not have this assistant. Ah, and the emotional background in the teams that have an I.A. and who don't have is very different. The teams that had an assistant were much more calm, less nervous, less arguing and more often talking to the bean, not between themselves. The teams that didn't have an assistant, they were, on the contrary, and they were, respectively, measuring the index separately, so, let's say, the humans' disorders, as far as, well, just, uh, they're making a transcribation of their conversations. They were actually more tense, and, uh, interestingly, more interacting, right? So they didn't have the chance to write chat, they had to work together. Of the interesting, yes, here is Claude Code, which came down six months ago, and almost all Anthropic staff use it. The people who took advantage of this very AIA., felt, really upset about it, and said that it turns out my programming skills are no longer as good as ever, right? Because without an assistant, writing this like this is getting harder with your hands. I'll remind you, these are engineers who work in Anthropic, very and very qualified people. And, uh, there's a few sites, there's a pretty detailed description of the experiment they've been conducting. And that's how they showed, uh, that using AI is what's affecting, uh, working inside the team, as it affects, the self-awareness of a man and a team, which, uh, results are, what kind of mistakes, by the way, I'm the reason I'm coming. There, for example, because of a small lapa, uh, the map was turned over by a team that AI was doing, which AI's been writing the code, and they've been looking for this mistake for a long time. And the people who wrote themselves didn't have such minor mistakes. That's pretty exciting, too. Anyway, I highly recommend seeing both the video and reading the article, because, well, it's basically the future we're going to. I'd like to add it here. They say that there's a bubble of I., so it's gonna burst and so on. Now, take what people have now, and you're feeling a little bit of a problem.
You don't have the opportunity to at least be there for a few days, um, use, uh, chat-bots to do some routine work, work, you just feel like something's missing, something--
Yeah.
Your effectiveness is not so high. And that's the same thing with super-crew engineers who, well, don't write the code so surely, even though they do it all their lives.
Many people, I think we have a, uh, part of our people. I wonder if you'd be able to sign off the audience, please, and remember to slide our channel and sign up. Lic, put the like down. And it's gonna be cool if you guys are gonna send friends over on our channel, too. Let's make this happen this time. So, what was I gonna say? What, uh, you write down who's so hard at work now on artificial intelligence that, in general, he can't do his job anymore. Because there's obviously a lot of work that's done, that's all, you're already 100% tied up, right? And I, for example, well, most of my own, I can, for example, turn off now, and I won't, uh, have, like, someplace else, it'll make sense that it's gonna be harder and so on. I'm not gonna lose. And there are professions, I think where you, uh, you're gonna be right on the design side. It doesn't mean it's bad. Again, because it's not like anyone's gonna take it. So too many systems have already come up. All right, that's an instrument that's totally real, real, alive. He won't disappear. It's the same thing to say that planes are going to disappear, right? Well, the planes won't disappear.
That's what I'm talking about. I mean, when they say that the bubble is all bullshit, that all this is gonna go down and on. Yeah, maybe there's some company cost overstated or something, but first of all, it's unlikely. Second, investment in infrastructure is definitely needed because these tools use a lot of people now, and they will be used further. Well, it doesn't seem like it's a bubble bubble.
Yeah, that's very interesting. Well, I'll see you in a week. Bye, everybody.