Do not invent. Observe what is happening
Words, knowledge, and visual sight are not the same thing. In this recording, Alexander asks you not to add your own interpretations or invent what is happening. The meditative process is accompanied by observation of the body, space, and how you yourself perceive what is described.
Am I mistaking an invented explanation for my own perception?
- For those who want to distinguish observation from interpretation in meditation
- For those already familiar with the author's descriptions of spiritual spaces
What you can explore here
In the author's words“Right now, it is very important not to add any interpretations of your own.”
What the conversation covers
- Your own interpretation and observation
- Knowledge and visual sight
- The body and space in meditative description
- Taking note of perception without filling things in
This is a meditation session for you to experience yourself. The text does not replace the recording.
This does not teach the creation of images. On the contrary, an important thread is not replacing what happens with an invented interpretation.
Return to your own experience.
- What did I observe myself, and what did I add through explanation?
- Do I distinguish the word I heard from my own vision?
- Can I leave what is unclear unclear while continuing to observe?
Related recordings and collections
Included in these collections
What to keep in mind
Descriptions of spiritual spaces should not be taken as independently verified knowledge of external events. The recording does not promise mastery of vision or the interpretation of experiences.
Will this recording help me learn to interpret dreams and visions?
No. The comparison with dream interpretation appears as a caution about the difficulty of interpretation, not a promise to teach decoding.
Background: detail of “Untitled,” June 1, 2023 · Alexander Volchek