I don't know. I'll look into it
A retelling can preserve the words and change the meaning. A ready-made explanation can sound convincing while saying nothing about what happened to a particular person. Here, Alexander returns to the starting position: I do not know, and I will try to understand.
How can I avoid mistaking an explanation, a retelling, or an external indicator for knowledge of what is happening?
- For those who want to distinguish description from their own lived experience more precisely
- For those who notice a habit of immediately explaining another person's behavior
What you can explore here
In the author's words“I definitely do not know, but I will try to understand it.”
What the conversation covers
- Retelling and a change in meaning
- Verbal description and the source of a question
- A family example: a ready-made model and a specific event
- External indicators, your own perception, and the position of “I do not know”
This is a recording of a live meeting with participants' questions and examples. The topics describe its contents; they are not an outline for a separate course.
The family story is one example, not the whole subject. The meeting's central question is where our knowledge of what is happening comes from.
Return to your own experience.
- What do I actually know about what is happening?
- Have I replaced a particular person with a general explanation?
- Can I refrain from insisting on a conclusion for now and keep looking into it?
Related recordings and collections
Included in these collections
What to keep in mind
Criticism of ready-made explanations does not remove the need for professional assessment of health and safety when it is needed.
Does this continue the subject of parenting?
The meeting is broader: a family incident serves as an example of not insisting on a ready-made explanation. The central subject is the distinction between knowledge, retelling, observation, and external assessment.
Background: detail of “No. 3. Whispering,” October 30, 2025 · Alexander Volchek